58
Getting applicant selection right by Toronto Training and HR March 2012

Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Half day open training event held in Guelph, Canada.

Citation preview

Page 1: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Getting applicant selection right

by Toronto Training and HR

March 2012

Page 2: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 2

Contents3-4 Introduction to Toronto Training and HR5-6 Main processes7-8 Key attributes of effective selection9-10 Measures11-12 Decode the jagged resume13-18 Application forms19-22 Decision-making23-30 Assessment centres31-33 Role of selection interviews34-35 Structured interviews36-37 Criticisms of interviews38-43 Psychological testing44-45 Ability testing46-47 Personality testing48-49 Biodata50-52 References53-54 Tools and techniques for screening and

selection55-56 Case study57-58 Conclusion and questions

Page 3: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 3

Introduction

Page 4: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 4

Introduction to Toronto Training and HR

• Toronto Training and HR is a specialist training and human resources consultancy headed by Timothy Holden

• 10 years in banking• 10 years in training and human resources• Freelance practitioner since 2006• The core services provided by Toronto Training and HR

are:- Training event design- Training event delivery- Reducing costs- Saving time- Improving employee engagement &

morale- Services for job seekers

Page 5: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 5

Main processes

Page 6: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 6

Main processes

ShortlistingAssessing applicants

Page 7: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 7

Key attributes of effective selection

Page 8: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 8

Key attributes of effective selection

A clear and precise specificationEffective use of multiple techniquesElimination of redundant processesMeasurementEvaluation and continuous improvement

Page 9: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 9

Measures

Page 10: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 10

Measures

ProductivityPerformance against quality criteria such as error rates, level of competency, length of service in the organization, speed of promotion or levels of absenceQuality measures such as error rates, downtime, absence rates, motivation & morale levels and labour turnover

Page 11: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 11

Decode the jagged resume

Page 12: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 12

Decode the jagged resume

Compromise on experience, not on characterBe alert to hidden virtues such as resilienceKnow when to read a resume upside-down

Page 13: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 13

Application forms

Page 14: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 14

Application forms 1 of 5

FUNCTIONS OF AN APPLICATION FORMTo enable a shortlist of candidates for interview to be drawn upTo provide information that can be drawn on during the interviewAs a means by which information about good but unsuccessful candidates can be filed away for future reference

Page 15: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 15

Application forms 2 of 5

FUNCTIONS OF AN APPLICATION FORMAs a means of analysing the effectiveness of the various recruitment methods usedAs a public relations tool enhancing the employer’s image Capture sensitive information in a non-intimidating manner

Page 16: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 16

Application forms 3 of 5

TYPICAL HEADINGSPersonal detailsEducationWork experienceGeographical locationPersonal interests/achievementsEvidence A-planning, implementation and achieving results

Page 17: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 17

Application forms 4 of 5

TYPICAL HEADINGSEvidence B-influencing, communication and teamworkEvidence C-analysis, problem solving and creative thinkingAdditional informationSpecific skillsCareer choiceHealth declaration

Page 18: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 18

Application forms 5 of 5

TYPICAL HEADINGSRefereesAvailability for interviewDiversity and equal opportunities monitoring form

Page 19: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 19

Decision-making

Page 20: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 20

Decision-making 1 of 3

Whole picture approachHurdle approach

Page 21: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 21

Decision-making 2 of 3

Actuarial approachInterpretative approach

Page 22: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 22

Decision-making 3 of 3

MISTAKESIgnoring the specificationOver-reliance on a single elementHalo effectStereotypingMirroring or similarity-identity biasNon-involvement of clients

Page 23: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 23

Assessment centres

Page 24: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 24

Assessment centres 1 of 7

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INCLUDEDAnalysis of the key competencies required to perform the job in questionDevelopment of appropriate exercises to measure or permit observation of the competenciesPurchase of psychometric tests to use at the assessment centreShort-listing of applicants to be invited

Page 25: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 25

Assessment centres 2 of 7

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INCLUDEDTraining of assessors and other employees involved in conducting the exercisesFood and accommodation at the centre for applicants and assessorsPresence of senior managers to act as observers and interviewersGiving of meaningful feedback to successful and unsuccessful applicants

Page 26: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 26

Assessment centres 3 of 7

TYPES OF DRILLIn-tray exercisesGroup exercisesPresentationsRole plays

Page 27: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 27

Assessment centres 4 of 7

RETURN ON INVESTMENT-SALESPEOPLEImproved levels of new business, such as $400000 per year rather than $3000000 which occurred before assessment centresImproved levels of repeat salesEnhanced customer satisfaction ratingsLower attrition rates among new hires, down from 50% over two years to 25%Higher levels of employee satisfaction

Page 28: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 28

Assessment centres 5 of 7

RETURN ON INVESTMENT-SALESPEOPLETotal program costs of $250000Estimated total benefits of $750000ROI=200%

Page 29: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 29

Assessment centres 6 of 7ADVANTAGESFocus on key elements of the role and are therefore very specific in measuring suitabilityThey are thorough, avoiding over reliance on a single techniqueInteresting for candidates since they provide a variety of activities and opportunity to meet othersExercises provide a useful glimpse into and the flavour of the workResearch shows centres are very effective at selecting candidates

Page 30: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 30

Assessment centres 7 of 7

DISADVANTAGESProcess can feel uncomfortable with some candidates, particularly where abstract drills occurCentres are sometimes transparent and it is too easy for candidates to ‘act’ in group exercises and other aspects which may not be sustainedCentres can be extremely time-consumingDrills should be appropriate to the general level of intellect and the experience of the candidates

Page 31: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 31

Role of selection interviewing

Page 32: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 32

Role of selection interviewing

1 of 2 CANDIDATEAsk questions about the job and the organizationDecide if they’d like to take the job

Page 33: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 33

Role of selection interviewing

2 of 2 ORGANIZATIONDescribe the job and the responsibilities the job holder would need to take on in more detailAssess candidates’ ability to perform in the roleDiscuss with the candidate details such as start dates, training provisions and terms and conditions Give a positive impression to the candidate of the company as a ‘good employer’ (who they'd like to work for should they be offered the position)

Page 34: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 34

Structured interviews

Page 35: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 35

Structured interviews

Questions are planned carefully before the interviewAll candidates are asked the same questionsAnswers are scored using a rating systemQuestions focus on the attributes and behaviours needed in the job

Page 36: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 36

Criticisms of interviews

Page 37: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 37

Criticisms of interviews

The self-fulfilling prophecy effectThe stereotyping effectThe halo and horns effectThe contrast effectThe similar-to-me effectThe personal liking effect

Page 38: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 38

Psychological testing

Page 39: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 39

Psychological testing 1 of 5

BEFORE USING A TEST USERS MUST CONSIDERWhether it is appropriate to use a test at all and Whether it will provide any additional relevant informationWhether there are sufficient resources in place to carry out testing effectivelyWhen used for selection purposes, that tests are relevant to the job/person specification

Page 40: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 40

Psychological testing 2 of 5

BEFORE USING A TEST USERS MUST CONSIDERWho will choose, recommend and demonstrate the value of testsAt what stage tests should be incorporated into the decision-making processEqual opportunities issuesHow the results will be used and what weight will be given to them for decision-making purposesWhat their policy will be on confidentiality

Page 41: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 41

Psychological testing 3 of 5

BEFORE USING A TEST USERS MUST CONSIDERWho will have access to the resultsHow test results will be storedThe law regarding the copyright of testsThe policy and provisions for giving feedback

Page 42: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 42

Psychological testing 4 of 5

TEST ADMINISTRATORS SHOULD ENSURE INDIVIDUALS RECEIVEAdvance notice that they will be required to take testsNotice of the duration of tests and whether this is significant in interpreting resultsAdequate time to allow them to make any practical arrangements to enable them to take the tests

Page 43: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 43

Psychological testing 5 of 5

TEST ADMINISTRATORS SHOULD ENSURE INDIVIDUALS RECEIVEAccess to an appropriate environment free from interference in which to take the testsAdequate information about the requirements of each test they will be asked to complete, and the opportunity to raise any queries they have before taking the testsInformation on the arrangements for feedback

Page 44: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 44

Ability testing

Page 45: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 45

Ability testing

Verbal reasoningNumerical reasoningAnalytical ability

Crystallized intelligenceFluid intelligence

Page 46: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 46

Personality testing

Page 47: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 47

Personality testing

Basic assumptions around validityBasic psychological constructs or traitsInferences made by selectorsTypes of question

Page 48: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 48

Biodata

Page 49: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 49

Biodata

DefinitionHard and soft questionsCriticisms of biodataCircumstances where biodata is particularly suited

Page 50: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 50

References

Page 51: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 51

References 1 of 2

SPECIFIC QUESTIONSPeriod of employmentWork performance based on a scaleTime lost due to sickness or other absenceReason for leavingQuestion of whether the employer would re-employA catch-all question seeking any other relevant information and reasons to be employed

Page 52: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 52

References 2 of 2

A tendency to give individuals a similar rating when asked about different aspects of their work and personalityA tendency to give good ratingsA tendency, when given a five-point scale, to rank individuals in the centre

Page 53: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 53

Tools and techniques for screening and

selection

Page 54: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 54

Tools and techniques for screening and selection

SuitabilityResource and cost constraintsEffectivenessAcceptability

Page 55: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 55

Case study

Page 56: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 56

Case study

Page 57: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 57

Conclusion and questions

Page 58: Getting applicant selection right March 2012

Page 58

Conclusion and questions

SummaryVideosQuestions