Upload
shahir20
View
357
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation Date: 17th July, 2012.Venue: Electropolymers (Pvt.) Ltd.Presenter: Shaheer HassanFinal Presentation regarding the Project carried out with the assistance of JICA expert Mr. Yoshida San.Team Members: Shaheer Hassan, Muhammad Danish Kazmi, Saleem Sharif, Faizan Arshad and Mr. Adnan Islam.SMEDA team members: Syed Babar Umar and Muhammad Naeem Ansari.
Citation preview
OEM’s Vendor Development ProjectOEM’s Vendor Development Project
Final Presentation
Electropolymers Pvt. Ltd.17th July 2012
SMEDA-JICA Industry Support ProgramSMEDA-JICA Industry Support Program
Kiyoshi Yoshida JICA ExpertSyed Babar Umar SMEDA Counter PartMuhammad Naeem Ansari SMEDA Counter Part
Name DesignationShaheer Hassan Assistant Manager, QualityFaizan Arshad Executive Quality AssuranceSaleem Sharif Production SupervisorAdnan Islam. Manager Quality Control.
Members from SMEDA-JICA
Total number of Visits: 11 Evaluation Date: 25th May.
Duration of Activity: 2 months.
Introduction of Company. Company Mission and Vision. Main Products. Client Area. Organogram.
Electropolymers and SMEDA. Product Selection for Working (Rear Combination) and Reasons for
selection. Supply and forecast Graph.
Productivity Improvement. Status before improvement. Target setting. Problem defining. Old Layout of Assembly line. Cycle time study. Takt Time study. Line Balancing graph with Efficiency. ECRS Implementation.
Line Balance graph with Efficiency after Improvements. New Layout of Assembly line after Improvements. Results of Improvements (Summary). Work Content Analysis Chart.
Quality Improvement. Suggestions from SMEDA and JICA expert. KAIZEN Implemented KAIZEN. Un Implemented KAIZEN.
Summary of KAIZEN. Cost Savings by KAIZEN. FINAL RESULTS.
Product Selection for Working (Cultus). New Line Layout and Proposal.
Takt time and Work content Analysis. Proposal of new line from JICA/ SMEDA. Future Plans.
Welcome At Electropolymers Pvt. Ltd.
In a world where quality increasingly touches every aspect of our daily lives, we will be leading quality provider in the automotive lamp manufacturing industry to become the most admired company in our industry as seen by our OEMS.
Our mission is to retain our position as a leading Pakistani manufacturer of automotive lamps, our prime priority will be ZERO DEFECT supplies backed by responsive service and empowered employees. The quality of products further been upgraded and our thrust is to achieve optimum level.
Atlas Honda
Honda Atlas Car Pakistan Limited
Suzuki Motor Cycle
Pak Suzuki Motor Company Limited
Dawood Yamaha Limited
Millat Tractors Limited
Dewan Farooque Limited
To synchronize the processes.
To Increase the productivity
To reduce system wastages
To improve product quality & reduce the rejections.
To seek guidance from program regarding layout for new products.
1. Rear Combination Lamp SB-308
Areas of Intervention: a) Productivity Improvement b) Quality Improvement
2. New Lamps Layout
Because of the High Lead Time. Because of the large number of manpower engaged. Because of High wastage. Since the volume of Rear combination is increasing,
a consistency was required in the production for meeting
the schedule dates.
SB-308 Rear Combination Lamp
Lens
Reflector
Bulb & HarnessGasket
Rear Combination
Screw
MODEL / (Selected Product) Rear CombinationCurrent Production Volume: 3600NO. Of Operators: 8Bottleneck Process Cycle Time: 149.9Production Lot Size: 200 setsTransportation Lot Size: 10 pieces /cartonProcessing Time: 612.4 secNo. Of Deliveries / Month 4Total Working Hours: 184 hrs/monthOvertime 0Productivity 100%Line Balancing Efficiency 51%
Cost reduction by 30%.
Reduction of Work space by 30-40%
Processing time reduction by 30-40%.
Wastage reduction by 70-80%.
High Process time. (612.4 sec)Excessive workers (8 workers engaged)Process redundancy. (Non Value added
processes)Wastages. (Wastage of Time, Material, Man hours
and Material)Efficiency was around 51%
1
2 3 4
7
5
6
8
Before KAIZEN
8 workers were involved in the production of Rear Combination Light.
Tact time is the exact time required to process one product
Tact Time = Monthly Operating Time
Monthly Production Quantity
Old Takt time= 184/3600 hours/piece
Old Takt time= (184/3600)x3600= 184 sec/piece
New Takt time= 184/5108 hours/piece
New Takt time= (184/5108)x3600= 130 sec/piece
=51%
Balance Ef f ic iencysum of working hour s of each proces s
maximum time of proce s s x the number of proces s e s
= x100
The graph is showing the Adhesive cleaning as a bottleneck process.
The Idle time was very high for several processes for example Idle time for Taping process was up to 89.33%.
The efficiency of the processes was 51%.
ECRS study was carried out in order to reduce the nonvalue added processes and to eliminate the redundancy.
E- EliminateC-CombineR-Re arrangeS-Simplify
Previously a non value added process Taping was followed which had no impact on the Product.
The taping was done to prevent the flowing of adhesive from the back of reflector. After bonding, It was removed.
Taping applied
Bulbs were verified at Final Inspection after complete assembly. The process is now eliminated and the bulbs are verified at the time of fitment.
Bulb verification
Previously two different workers were performing the processes of Inspection and Packing.
The packing of parts is done by the inspector at Final Check point.
Previously two different workers were performing the operations of Bulb, harness and screw fitment.
The processes of Bulb, harness and screw fitment are now combined in a single process.
The process of Taping was removed by Gasket fitment. Formerly, taping was applied which was then removed having no impact on the product.
The processes are now re arranged by putting the process of Gasket fitment at the first place instead of taping.
Previously the testing unit for Rear combination had two different units for Left and Right hand lights.
The testing unit is now simplified and is made common for both the lights.
Previously the worker had to put the light in press fitment and then had to locate the upper jig.
Now a jig is developed for Press fitment.
Upper part
Lower part
New Jig
Screw gun was previously placed on the table and hence every time the worker had to take the gun and fit the screws.
The Screw gun is hanged near the screw fitment and hence the worker is facilitated.
The Gasket fitment process is eased by making a jig for applying adhesive on the Gasket and pasting the Gasket on the Reflector.
1
2
Balance Ef f i c i encysum of work ing hour s o f each proce s s
max imum t ime o f p ro ce s s x t he number o f p roc e s s e s
= x100
=85.87%=51%
Balance Ef f i c i encysum o f work ing hour s o f each proce s s
max imum t ime o f p ro ce s s x th e number o f p roc e s s e s
= x100
1
23
4
7
5
6
8
Before
KA
IZE
N
1 23
4
6
5
After
KA
IZE
N
Parameters Before AfterImprovement
%
Total Cycle Time 612.4 sec 474 sec22.6%
reduction
Line Balance efficiency 51% 85.87%34.87% increase
No. of Workers 8 6 25% reduction
Cost reduction in terms of workers’ time
81.6 min/total workers
47.4 min/total workers
41.9% reduction
Space saving 264 ft² 216ft² 18.2% saving
Work Content analysis was done for two different processes in Leakage testing.
2)1) Leakage testing without Air
3)2) Leakage testing with Air.
The reflector was cut in order to see the gap between the Lens and the Reflector.
The Lens has a window which is shown in the picture.
It was recommended to make a inner wall in the Lens to avoid Leakage
The time of Press fitment was changed from 45 seconds to 6 seconds in order to ensure that the
locks are properly seated.
Previous time
New time
The flashes inside the channel along the leaked area were removed and then adhesive was applied.
The purpose was to check whether the flashes were the root cause for leakage or not.
After Press fitment, the pieces are placed upside down on the table to ensure proper adhesion of Lens and Reflector.
The purpose was to retain the adhesive along the channel and impart a pressure so as to confirm the proper adhesion.
Process:
After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other_PM (machine protect)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
Sealing
1. Possible damage of Hot Melt Nozzle Because it was installed on the
passage
2. Possible part defect caused by collision
(other worker)
Move the Hot Melt Nozzle to inside the process
Productivity Result
Reduced time : 0 hrs./month
Team: Suggest:Leader: SMEDA-JICA
2012-5-29
1
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Before (Problem)
Process: Pressing
Before (Problem) After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
It takes long time to use the press machine.
1. The worker has to hold the upper base plate in one hand and put the part from second hand.
2. Possibility of damaging the part and also it take long time to perform the operation.
Change the upper and lower die and upper die fix to the moving plate so that worker can
use Both hands for loading and unloading of the
parts.
*Shorten the operation time.*Makes worker task easier.
Productivity Result
Reduced time : 17 hrs./month
Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-6-5
2
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Mr. Salim / Mr. Adnan
(37-20)sec/pcs x 3600pcs/month= 61200 sec/month
Process:Before (Problem) After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(____Space_________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : 16 hrs./month
Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-6-5
3
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Sealing performed after application of masking tape on every part
*Take much time to masking & remove it “Waste of process itself”
*Waste of masking tape
Rearrange the process and eliminate “Waste of process itself”
*Eliminate Waste process (application of masking tap)
*Reduce working time*No masking tape required (cost reduction)
1.Gasket fitment2.Bonding/Press fitment3.Adhesive cleaning4.Leakage test5.Screw/ Bulb & Harness fitment6.Final testing + Packing
1.Sealing2.Bonding/Press fitment 3.Adhesive cleaning Remove Tape4.Leakage test5.Tightening6.Gasket fitment 7.Assemble harness8.Final testing9.Packing
Before After
Mr. Salim
(16-0)sec/pcs x 3600pcs/month= 57600sec/month
Masking tape
Process: Leakage Testing
Before (Problem)After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : hrs./month
Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-6-10
4
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
1.It takes long time to check the leakage2. Possible overlook the water leak
Dip into water and check if water goes into the part
Use low pressure air for check.Check by bubble
*Shorten the checking time.*Ensure the leakage inspection.
*No water goes into the part (therefore shorten the cleaning time)
Low Pressure Air
Mr. Salim
Process: Gasket Fitment
Before (Problem) After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
Location Pins
1-It took long time to perform the operation Because the glue stick with the workers hand
and also the gasket stick with card board.2. Make Operator task more difficult.
1. The idea is to develop a jig with embossed same Profile as of gasket and it has little higher with base
so that Glue does not stick with base.
2. There will also be location pins as there are holes Available in the gasket.
It will make the operator work more easy and lesser time is required.
Productivity Result
Reduced time : 21.57 hrs./month
Team: Suggest:Leader: SMEDA-JICA
2012-5-29
5
Jig base
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
(100.57-79)sec/pcs x 3600pcs/month= 77652 sec/month
Before (Problem)After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : 0 hrs./month
Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-6-10
6
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
SMEDA-JICAProcess: Final Testing
There was no proper place for putting the markers used in
marking the parts and there fore the worker took time in marking.
A holder is attached to save the time.
Process: Final Testing
Before (Problem)After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : 0 hrs./month
Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-6-10
7
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Coupler was fixed in the Jig which was previously not attached
SMEDA-JICA
NO. OF
IDEAS
Total
BEFORE
SMEDA
AFTER
SMEDA IMPLEMENTEDTARGET OF
IMPLEMENTATION Time saved
12 0 12 7 1st week of August88.2
hours/month
Before (Problem) After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)
DoneProgressing
FutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : hrs./month
Process: Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-5-29
0
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Excessive length of bolts
*It take long time to tighten nuts
Before (Problem) After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)
DoneProgressing
FutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : hrs./month
Process: Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-5-29
0
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Before (Problem) After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)
DoneProgressing
FutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : hrs./month
Process: Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-5-29
0
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Inadequate lightening for Test
*Possible overlook the defects
Dedicate Lightening for Test
Example of lightening at Auto
Assembly Line
Before (Problem) After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)
Picture or figure
Date
NO.
Status (round mark)
DoneProgressing
FutureReject
Productivity Result
Reduced time : hrs./month
Process: Team: Suggest:Leader:
2012-5-29
0
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
This worker is just holding Jig (waste of time)
Unload lamps one by one (take a long time)
Hold the Jig by Clamp or something
Remove the springs one side all then after remove the other side of spring so that
unloading time will be shortened
After (Improvement)
ProductivityQuality, Cost, 5S,
Safety, Other(_____________)
Target (round mark)Date
NO.
Status (round mark)Done
ProgressingFutureReject
Productivity Result
Team: Suggest:Leader: SMEDA-JICA
2012-5-29
5 Reduced time : hrs./month
[Before – After (sec/pcs)] x Production Vol. (pcs/mth)
Before (Problem)
Process:
Material handling should be improved by making the trolleys in order to reduce the risk of damaging.
Time saving on Rear comb. Line =(41.9/100)x184Time saving on Rear comb. Line =77.096 Hrs/month
Time saving on Rear comb. Line=925.152 Hrs/year
Cost saving on Rear comb. Line by saving time =77.096x43.47
Cost saving on Rear comb. Line by saving time =3352 Rs./month
Cost saving on Rear comb. Line by saving time =40224 Rs./year
Cost saving by worker reduction =2x8000
Cost saving by worker reduction =16000 Rs/ month.
Cost saving by worker reduction =192000 Rs/ year.
Total saving = 1,92,000+40,224 Rs./yearTotal saving per year
= 2,32,224 Rs./year
Description Before Target AchievedImprovement
in %Improvement in
Times
Total Cycle Time 612.4 secReduce to
1/3 474 sec
22.6% 1.29
Line Balance efficiency 51% Around 80% 85.87% 34.87% 1.68
No. of Workers 8 4-5 6 25% reduction 1.33Cost reduction in terms of workers’
time
81.6 min/total workers
min/total workers47.4 min/total
workers 41.9 % 1.72
Space saving 264 ft² - 216ft² 18.18% 1.22
Total Saving 0 -
2,32,224 Rs./year - -
Y9f Cultus Head Lamp.
Takt time and Work Content Analysis of Y9f Cultus Tail Lamp.
Takt time and Work Content Analysis of Y9f Cultus Head Lamp.
Y9f Cultus Tail Lamp.
CNC Spot Gluing Machine 3 Axis
2.1 x 1.27
Table-10.75 x 0.9
Press1.0 x 0.7
Control P. Adh.
Applicator0.85 x 0.5
Leak Tester0.9 x 0.7
Light Tester0.9 x 0.85
Tab
le-30.75 x 0.9 Table-4
0.75 x 0.9
3.6 m
4.0
m
Tab
le-20.75 x 0.9
Implementation of KAIZEN.Time study on other Assembly lines.