Whats the row?Ms Eweida works for British AirwaysThey had a
policy No religious symbols to be worn visibly unless it was a
mandatory religious requirementMs Eweida wanted to wear a
crossUnpopular with: vampires and BA
The uk courtsNot Direct discriminationPolicy applies to members
of all religionsNot indirect discriminationMs Eweida couldnt show
others shared her beliefThat meant no group disadvantageFAIL
European courtof human rightsThe convention protects freedom of
religionWearing a cross was a manifestation of religionUK had
allowed concerns about corporate image to trump the freedomThat was
bad should have done more to protect Ms Eweidas rightsWIN
Take away menuFreedom of religion is not protected just by
saying you are free to go get another job.Corporate image may not
trump freedom of religion but other things might including health
and safety (see chaplin)No right to wear a cross at workWhere does
this leave indirect discrimination?
