6

Click here to load reader

EU Onshore Insurance Protected Cells - Captives on a Budget

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The use of EU onshore Protected Cells as a capital efficient, cost-effective, flexible and secure alternative to owning a standalone insurer or captive, together with the benefits PCCs offer under Solvency II. Presentation by Ian-Edward Stafrace to the Financial Services In Malta conference in Stockholm Oct 2011 on Insurance Protected Cell Companies (PCC)

Citation preview

Page 1: EU Onshore Insurance Protected Cells - Captives on a Budget

Ian-Edward StafraceMIRM FCII PIOR Chartered Insurer

Risk Analyst & International Business [email protected]

Atlas Insurance PCC Ltd

Financial Services In MaltaStockholm Grand Hotel, 5 Oct 2011

EU InsuranceProtected CellsCaptives on a budget

www.atlaspcc.eu

Page 2: EU Onshore Insurance Protected Cells - Captives on a Budget

PCC

Cell

Cell

Cell Cell

Core

Insurance PCC Purpose

Segregate cellular assets & liabilities

Allow different owners with varying interests to participate in 1 company

Cells set up with less capital as min requirements apply to PCC as a whole

Owning a Cell in aProtected Cell Company (PCC)

www.atlaspcc.eu

Page 3: EU Onshore Insurance Protected Cells - Captives on a Budget

Only EU State ToHave PCC Legislation

Approachable Regulator

EU Single PassportEnglish, Time Zone, Flight Connections

EU Compliant Regulations

Tax Efficient

Why Malta

www.atlaspcc.eu

Page 4: EU Onshore Insurance Protected Cells - Captives on a Budget

No Minimum Guarantee Fund (MGF) Required

No Fronting Required for EU/EEA Risks

Reinsurance access for smaller investors

Lower Running Costs vs. Stand-Alone companies

EU Standalone Insurer EU Protected Cell

€2.3

Million €180,00

0

Protected Cells: “Low-cost” AlternativeTo Owning A Stand Alone Insurance Company Or Captive

• Complying with EU directives through PCC core capital• E.g. Typical minimum

capital needed for general insurer with €1m annual premium:

www.atlaspcc.eu

Page 5: EU Onshore Insurance Protected Cells - Captives on a Budget

Maltese PCC = Cost sharing of SII requirements & Capital for cells

Benefits of PCC under Solvency IICell

Cell

Cell Cell

Core

Pillar IQuantitative Requirements

• Core puts up Minimum Capital Required (MCR)

• No MCR absolute floor applies to cells (unlike standalones which require min €2.3m/3.5m as per Solvency 1)

• Cells only need to put up own Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR), typically lower than MCR for small undertakings

• PCCs with active cores lend diversification benefits to cells where secondary recourse is allowed, further lowering SCR

Pillar IIGovernance, Risks

Management & Internal Control Requirements

All already catered for by PCC under its

regulated license

Pillar IIIDisclosure

Requirements

All procedural structures & resources in place to report & publish results as one single legal entity

Page 6: EU Onshore Insurance Protected Cells - Captives on a Budget

Atlas Insurance PCC Ltd

•Leading Maltese Insurer since 1920s

•First EU PCC after converting in 2006

•Active non-cellular core in which local business is written

History

•Less capital required whilst protecting the policy holder as Atlas can allow cells to have secondary recourse to its active core

•Less costs thanks to shared governance, risk management & reporting

Benefits Under

Solvency II

•Enable subcontracting of cell management to authorised insurance managers

Independent PCC

RegulatorySolvency

Required (SCR)

ActualPosition

SolvencyRatio

At End 2010 (Solvency I) €3.5m €14.5m 414%At End 2009 (Solvency I) €3.2m €13.6m 425%At End 2009 (QISV Solvency II) €7.1m €16.9m 237%

Strong CoreSolvency Position