41
Employee engagement – fad or performance factor (see also notes pages) John Smythe 11 11 13 Welsh Government

Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

John Smythe's slides from a talk delivered to the Welsh Government, November 2013. For attached notes: http://www.engageforchange.com/fad-or-performance-factor/

Citation preview

Page 1: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

Employee engagement – fad or performance factor (see also notes pages)

John Smythe 11 11 13 Welsh Government

Page 2: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Which workers are most engaged and productive?

Page 3: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

3

Your menu

What is employee engagement?What engages you/your people?Problems with the conceptBe the ‘go to’ resource on employee engagement

Page 4: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

4

Think of a project/period where you were really engaged, fired up, productive and enjoying it

What brought about your engagement?

What engages you?

Page 5: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

5

How would you recognise an engaged person/group? ……………………………………….

Page 6: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

6

What do engaged people do?

Enjoy their work whatever they do Make it their job to do it better Risk speaking upwards to challenge and innovate Make it safe for people to challenge up Self organise – less need for costly supervision Take responsibility Collaborate within & beyond their ‘border’ Resolve difficulties locally Demonstrate awareness of personal limits Are generous

Page 7: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

7

“I decide when to engage myself, not you boss”!

We engage ourselves when we are invited to challenge in safety, and to contribute to every day operational decisions and big ticket strategy and change that affects us, which we can improve

Page 8: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Benefits of engagement are not enablers/drivers

IP Engage for Change 2013

8

Benefits eg:

• Discretionary effort

• Better decisions

• Better strategy, change

• Better operational processes

• Compelling place to work

• Customers enjoying better

service (from engaged

employees)

Enablers (EfS)

• Strong strategic narrative

• Engaging managers• Employee voice• Integrity

• = + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Page 9: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

9

“A culture of distributed leadership enables people to liberate their creativity to deliver great results for their institution and themselves”

What engages us?

BY: Inviting employees who deliver the

end result to contribute to day to day decisions, strategy and change in a well governed way.

Leaders at every level who have the self knowledge, discipline, appetite & capability to engage people in in decision making

Page 10: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

10

Tellingthe many what has been decided by the few

OUTCOMEHooligans orspectators

Sellingto the many what has been decided by the few

OUTCOMECompliant collaborators

InclusionDriving accountability down by implicating people as individuals in execution

OUTCOMEWilling collaborators

Co-creationJudging who will add value if included in front end decision forming for change & strategy

OUTCOMEPersonally committed reformers

From command and control to a more mutual culture

Page 11: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

11

Choices of approach open to leaders

“There is a 5th way -they decide but don’t

even bother telling us”

Page 12: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Overwhelming business case (Engage for success data)

CBI: engaged employees take 2.9 sick days/disengaged 6.19 days Towers Perrin: operating margins 3x higher in engaged workforces M&S: stores with improving engagement delivered £62m more sales Kenexa: In the US companies with engaged staff have highest customer sat BAE: engaged staff reduced plane construction time 25% BAE: same staff found £26m in savings in two sites Gallup: disengaged organizations have 62% more accidents Gallup: engaged staff say that work brings their creative ideas – 59% vs 3% Aon Hewitt: engaged organizations give 22% higher returns to shareholders Total UK: double digit £ms in efficiency savings + new revenue lines (EFC) Kenexa – increased engagement could add £26B to UK GDP

Page 13: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

13

Mercenaries

3%Disconnected

20%

Hostages

28%Fence-sitters

16%

Apostles

33%

Business case? – UK 25,000 workers YouGov/EfC

Page 14: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

14

Why now for employee engagement?

Loyalty for security Transactional relationship Velvet revolutions Democratic capitalism

Power over knowledge Digital flattens hierarchy

Page 15: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Velvet revolutions

Lech Walesa at Gdansk Shipyard addressing workers

Page 16: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

16

Coincidental social upheavals?

Protestors gathering in Tahrir Square,

Cairo, Egypt

Demonstrators marching through Habib Bourquiba Avenue, Tunis

Political dissidents in Sana’a, Yemen demanding the resignation of the president

Protests in Duma, Syria

The Arab Spring

Page 17: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

17

Problems with employee engagement

Definitions & enablers/drivers – more to do locally/internationallyC suite full of boomers and Xers bought up on C&C and ‘lovin it’Command and control, hierarchical leadership sugared by

employee engagement ‘magic spray’:Turbo charged top down communication masquerading Learnt behavioural performances which don’t lastPresentational concessions to mutuality:

Dress codesFirst namesOpen doors/walking floorsCharm offensives by leaders

Page 18: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

18

Be the ‘go to’ resource on employee engagement

1. The behaviour/role model of leaders, managers & supervisors – Generous Leadership; ‘guides not gods’

2. Engaging widely and deeply to drive transformation, change, strategy & operational improvement via disruptive interventions

3. Internal communication that enables engagement 4. Engaging widely to deliver inside-out customer/brand promise5. Helping a new C Suite members to engage with the organization in

his/her first 300 days 6. Helping functional teams (Comms/HR/L&D/Mkt/Finance etc) to be role

models

Page 19: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

The shifting nature of leadership

Complexity requires new capabilities beyond the individual

Page 20: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Leadership & culture - gods to guides

Capabilities to create context

Page 21: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Leadership & culture - gods to guides1

Capabilities to manage participation

Page 22: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Management drivers of engagement and performanceCreates space for teams and individuals to test and explore whilst ensuring short

term demands are met (0.13)

Accepts challenge and addresses questions (0.11)

Provides insight and explanation to help create a clear context for the work we do (0.10)

Identifies the right people to contribute given the demands of different situations (0.10)

Creates value by engaging others (0.09)

Communicates clear messages about what

needs to be done

Has the knowledge needed to lead our team

in the work we doIs adept at dealing with different personalities

Helps members of the team overcome

resistance to change

Invites people who can make a difference to be involved, irrespective of

level of seniority

Helps groups integrate different perspectives to

create sustainable solutions

Page 23: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

23

Be the ‘go to’ resource on employee engagement

1. The behaviour/role model of leaders, managers & supervisors – Generous Leadership; ‘guides not gods’

2. Engaging widely and deeply to drive transformation, change, strategy & operational improvement via disruptive interventions

3. Internal communication that enables engagement 4. Engaging widely to deliver inside-out customer/brand promise5. Helping a new C Suite members to engage with the organization in

his/her first 300 days 6. Helping functional teams (Comms/HR/L&D/Mkt/Finance etc) to be role

models

Page 24: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 24

How would you recognise it - Ruby & Geraldine’s contrasting experiences

Page 25: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Total UK: “We had to disrupt the ‘dirigiste’ top down norm”

Action for recovery:

Survive, Recover, Thrive

Top down….

…Or bottom up….Double digit millions in savings bottom up and “twice the speed of top down”; Paris 25

Page 26: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 26

1. Elites decide; often secretly2. Messages formed3. Messages delivered 4. Messages impact checked5. Messages reinforced

= Command, control, align & coerce

Geraldine suffered this familiar pattern of command & control communication:

Page 27: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Whose shoes would you rather be in?

27

Ruby’s Geraldine’s

Page 28: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 28

Generalists solve complex problems

Page 29: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Employees need the same view / data / experience as decision makers at the front of the train

Better still let them collect it

Complete transparency of data

Page 30: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 30

Getting people into the breakthrough zone

Daily operations, transactional responses

Good for surviving

Bad for breakthrough

Flight, Fight BREAKTHROUGH ZONE

Hear what I thinkSolo & pairs Borrow B

uild Breakthrough

Group size escalation

1 hour recovery Needs dynamic experiences over

some hours

Enough!

Page 31: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Strategy – ‘Need to Want’

31

Page 32: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 32

Vision

To be the most relevant F&P practice we can be to our clients, our people and our firm

This means being The number one choice for our clients An employer of choice Vital to the achievement of our firm's vision and respected by

everyone in DLA Piper

Page 33: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Our vision and strategy

33

Vision

CommunicationF&P offerings & knowledge

I to We Leadership capability Employer of choice

Page 34: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Page 35: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

Visible progress

35

… plus a detailed reporting of savings within each business unit

Additional revenues plus cost savings

…..plus detailed programme impact reporting by Business Unit

Department

Page 36: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 36

Page 37: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

37

Get the ‘how to’ & receive discount via: www.gowerpublishing.com/isbn/9781409443247

Page 38: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 38

The Engage for Change model for inclusive strategy, change etc

1. The vision/’where we need to be’ – simply stated2. Your default approach to engagement – enabler or

disabler?3. Negotiating who should be engaged – the power of

the peach4. A creative intervention to engage your leaders and

people5. Integrating the intervention as a part of business

strategy

Page 39: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement

IP Engage for Change 2013

39

Be the ‘go to’ resource on employee engagement

1. The behaviour/role model of leaders, managers & supervisors – Generous Leadership; ‘guides not gods’

2. Engaging widely and deeply to drive transformation, change, strategy & operational improvement via disruptive interventions

3. Internal communication that enables engagement 4. Engaging widely to deliver inside-out customer/brand promise5. Helping a new C Suite members to engage with the organization in

his/her first 300 days 6. Helping functional teams (Comms/HR/L&D/Mkt/Finance etc) to be role

models

Page 40: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 40

To be relevant in future…..

1. ‘In the tent’ advisor - challenging the pattern of top down, elite based decision making.

2. Negotiating with elites where others can contribute to add value and accelerate change & strategy - understand the demographics of the workforce.

3. Knowing how to create open source engagement experiences/interventions F2F & digitally…vs cascades.

4. Building the ‘engagement challenge’ into change & operational improvement processes.

5. Grafting engagement capability into training, development, performance management & recognition.

Page 41: Employee Engagement - Fad or Performance factor?

© Engage for Change 2011 This is the IP of Engage for Change and can only be reproduced in whole or in part with acknowledgement 41

And finallySir Wim Bischoff (chair Lloyds Banking Group) as a senior sponsor of Engage for Success

“employee engagement will become be one of the key health factors to be considered by shareholders” – the velvet revolution at work is becoming main stream