10
Demonstration Thermography report Company Device Customer E-Mail: info @testo.co.uk Phone: 01420 544433 A McGrath - Testo Tester: 32 degree Wide Angle Lens Lens: 01799300 / 01906938 Serial No.: Testo 881-3 & Testo 882 Alton Newman Lane Testo Ltd 15th November 2010 Measuring Date: 320 x 240 pixels v 160 x120 pixels Comparison of Quality of Images Demonstration Report Measuring Site: Demonstration Thermography Report to highlight the Differences in Resolution between 320 x 240 pixels Testo 882 & 160 x 120 pixels Testo 881. Task Alton, Hampshire, GU34 2QJ Newman Lane Testo Ltd 1/10 Page

Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

Company

Device

Customer

E-Mail: info @testo.co.uk

Phone: 01420 544433

A McGrath - Testo

Tester:

32 degree Wide Angle LensLens:

01799300 / 01906938Serial No.:Testo 881-3 & Testo 882

Alton

Newman Lane

Testo Ltd

15th November 2010Measuring Date:

320 x 240 pixels v 160 x120 pixels

Comparison of Quality of Images

Demonstration Report

Measuring Site:

Demonstration Thermography Report to highlight the Differences inResolution between 320 x 240 pixels Testo 882 & 160 x 120 pixels Testo881.

Task

Alton, Hampshire, GU34 2QJ

Newman Lane

Testo Ltd

1/10Page

Page 2: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_00040.BMT 20/10/2010

Measuring Time:

07:48:15

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 882 Thermal Imaging camera a 320 x 240 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 160 x 120 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

2/10Page

Page 3: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_01185.BMT 15/11/2010

Measuring Time:

07:15:27

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 881 Thermal Imaging camera a 160 x 120 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 320 x 240 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

3/10Page

Page 4: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_00089.BMT 21/10/2010

Measuring Time:

07:24:20

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 882 Thermal Imaging camera a 320 x 240 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 160 x 120 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

4/10Page

Page 5: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_01190.BMT 15/11/2010

Measuring Time:

07:16:42

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 881 Thermal Imaging camera a 160 x 120 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 320 x 240 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

5/10Page

Page 6: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_00091.BMT 21/10/2010

Measuring Time:

07:25:08

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 882 Thermal Imaging camera a 320 x 240 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 160 x 120 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

6/10Page

Page 7: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_01184.BMT 15/11/2010

Measuring Time:

07:14:57

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 881 Thermal Imaging camera a 160 x 120 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 320 x 240 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

7/10Page

Page 8: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_00092.BMT 21/10/2010

Measuring Time:

07:25:48

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 882 Thermal Imaging camera a 320 x 240 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 160 x 120 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

8/10Page

Page 9: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

File:

IV_01188.BMT 15/11/2010

Measuring Time:

07:16:05

20.0Refl. temp. [°C]:

0.95Emissivity:

Picture parameters:

Date:

Thermal and Digital images taken with a Testo 881 Thermal Imaging camera a 160 x 120 pixel configurationThermal Imaging Camera.The image was taken for comparison purposes, to compare with a 320 x 240 pixel configuration ThermalImager, to highlight difference in image Quality / Resolution.Image displayed in " Iron " Palette.

Remarks:

Demonstration Thermography Report to highlight the differences in the Thermal Image Quality and Resolution.

This is an example report for Demonstration purposes only. The format is produced in the "Standard" report template from the selection of Report Templates available in the software.

This report is compiled to indicate the differences in the Quality and Resolution of the Thermal image when comparing images taken with a Testo 882 Thermal Imaging camera, 320 x 240 pixels, 60mK Thermal Sensitivity and a Testo 881-3 160 x 120 pixels, 80mK Thermal Sensitivity.

As can be seen and as expected, the image quality of the Testo 882 is superior.The objective of the Report was to be able to provide a comparison in the quality of the Thermal Image between the two pixel configurations.

The images are automatically Time and Date Stamped to verify the time and date when the images were taken.

The report also details the Emissivity value relating to the image taken.

Review:

9/10Page

Page 10: Demonstration thermography report comparison between 320 x 240 versus 160 x 120 pixel configuration

Demonstration Thermography report

A McGrath - Testo

,15/11/2010

10/10Page