Click here to load reader
Upload
mansoomro
View
1.723
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Corporate social Responsibility
Mansoor Ahmed Soomro
“Corporate Social Responsibilityis a commitment to improvecommunity well-being throughdiscretionary business practicesand corporate resources.”
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
“Business' commitment to contribute to sustainable economic development, working with employees, their families, the local community, and society at large to improve their quality of life.”
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
World Business Council
“Operating a business in a manner that meets or exceeds the ethical, legal, commercial, and public expectations that society has ofbusiness.”
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
The organization Business for Social Responsibility
“Corporate social initiatives are major activities undertaken by a corporation to support social causes and to fulfill commitments to corporate social responsibility.”
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
Corporate Social Initiatives
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
• AIDS prevention, • Early detection for breast
cancer, • Timely immunizations, • Safety (designated driver
programs, • Crime prevention, use of car
safety restraints), • Education (literacy, computers
for schools, special needs education),
• Employment (job training, hiring practices, plant locations);
• The environment (recycling, elimination of the use of harmful chemicals, reduced packaging);
• Community and economic development (low-interest housing loans); and other basic human needs
• Desires (hunger, homelessness, animal rights, voting privileges,
• antidiscrimination efforts).
Causes supported Through Initiatives
Cash contributions may come directly through a corporation or indirectly through a foundation it has established to focus on corporate giving on behalf of the corporation. Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
1. Cash contributions, 2. Grants, 3. Paid advertising, 4. Publicity, 5. Promotional sponsorships,6. Technical expertise, 7. In-kind contributions (i.e., donations of products such as
computer equipment or services such as printing),8. Employee volunteers, 9. Access to distribution channels.
Support Methods
• According to KPMG, a U.S. professional services firm, a 2002 survey of the Global Fortune Top 250 companies indicated a continued increase in the number of American companies reporting on corporate responsibility. In 2002, 45 percent of these companies issued environmental, social, or sustainability reports, compared with 35 percent in their 1999
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
Increased Reporting
A review of Fortune 500 web sites also indicates that a majority now have special reports on giving,with sections typically labeled "Corporate SocialResponsibility," "Corporate Citizenship,“"Community Development,“ "Community Giving," or "Community Involvement."
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
Establishment of a Corporate Social Norm to Do Good
Prior to the 1990s, decisions regarding the selection of social issues to support tended to be made based on themes reflecting emerging pressures for "doing good tolook good.“Funds were allocated to as many organizations aspossible, reflecting a perception that this would satisfy themost constituent groups and create the most visibility forphilanthropic efforts
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
The Traditional Approach: Fulfilling an Obligation
In the early 1990s, many turned to a new model of orporategiving, a strategic approach that ultimately impacted whatissues corporations supported, how they designed andimplemented their programs, and how they were evaluated.
selecting initiatives that support business goals; choosingissues related to core Products and core markets; supporting issues that provide opportunities to meetmarketing objectives, such as increased market shareMarket penetration, or building a desired brand identity.
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
The New Approach: Supporting Corporate Objectives as Well
Research and experience concludes that companies haveexperienced a range of bottom-line benefits, includingreference to several of the following: • Increased sales and market share.• Strengthened brand positioning.
The 2002 Cone Corporate Citizenship Study reported that84 percent of Americans said they would be likely to switchbrands to one associated with a good cause, if price andquality are similar. Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
WHY DO GOOD?
Increased Ability to Attract, Motivate, and Retain EmployeesA company's participation in social initiatives can have apositive impact on prospective and current employees, as wellas citizens and executives
Similarly, one noteworthy study conducted by Net Impact foundthat more than half of the 2,100 MBA students surveyedindicated they would accept a lower salary in order to workfor a socially responsible company.
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
WHY DO GOOD?
Decreased Operating Costs
Potential reduced costs is in advertising expenditures, especiallyas a result of increased free publicity.
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
WHY DO GOOD?
• Choosing a social issue, • Selecting an initiative to support this issue, • Developing and implementing program
plans, • Evaluating outcomes.
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
MAJOR CHALLENGES?
Some social issues are a better fit than others. Following are toughquestions to choose:
• How does this support our business goals?• How big of a social problem is this?• Isn't the government or someone else handling this?• What will our stockholders think of our involvement in this issue?• Is this something our employees can get excited about?• Won't this encourage others involved in this cause to approach us (bug us)
for funds?• Will this cause backfire on us and create a scandal?• Is this something our competitors are involved in and own already?
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
Choosing a Social Issue
Once an issue has been chosen, managers will need to be prepared to answertough questions:
• How can we do this without distracting us from our core business?• How will this initiative give visibility to this company?• Do these promotions really work? Who pays attention to them?• What if we tie our funding commitment to sales and end up writing them a
check for only $100? How will that look?• What if consumers find out that the amount of the sale that actually goes to
the cause is minuscule?• Have we calculated the productivity cost for giving our employees time off
for volunteering?• Giving visibility, especially shelf space in our stores, for this cause doesn't
pencil out. Shouldn't we just write a check or give a grant?
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
Selecting An Initiative To Support This Issue
Key decisions at this point include whether to partner with others and, if so, withwhom; determining key strategies, including communications and distributionchannels; assigning roles and responsibilities; developing timetables; anddetermining budget allocations and funding sources.
• How can we do this when money is needed for increased performance?• What do we say to stockholders who see this as money that belongs to them?• Why is our department being asked to fund this?• Will having partners bog down the decision-making process and therefore take
more of our staff time?• Will we be doing enough good for the cause to justify the expense?• What is our exit strategy?• How do we keep from looking hypocritical?
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
Developing And Implementing Program Plans
"Since the benefits related to CSR are not directly measurable,and most firms do not disclose expenses related to suchactivities, it is difficult to directly assess the return on CSRinvestment."
Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, “Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wiley, 2007
Evaluating Outcomes
SZABIST Mass Miniature Radiography (MMR) Program
The Mass Miniature Radiography (MMR) is being carried out with the collaboration of Pakistan Anti-Tuberculosis Association (PATA), Rotary Club Ludwigshafen-Rheinschanze (Germany) Rotary Club (Karachi) and the MMR Committee of Pakistan. A specialized X-Ray Machine is fitted in a Van with a generator and laboratory facilities for developing X-Ray film rolls. The Van is taken to various children schools in the underprivileged areas of Karachi. A Medical Doctor and Laboratory Technician conduct the medical tests on site at no charge.
http://szabist.edu.pk/CSRDivisions.asp
CSR BY SZABIST
Medical and Technical Assistant Program
The SZABIST Medical Technical Assistant's (MTA) Program for girls is based on a German model, and consists of 16 months of training in subjects such as Pharmacy, Pathology/ Laboratory, Radiology and Computer Typing/English. The program aims at skills development of girls who can work as medical technician-cum-secretary in a health center/ hospital/doctor's clinic. The MTA Program at SZABIST has completed 3 batches and the model developed at SZABIST has been adopted by 24 hospitals in 17 districts of Pakistan. 117 girls have been issued certificates by SZABIST. The MTA Program has been accepted as a model by WHO though the "Global Commission on Women Health" and is also being conducted in Kenya and Ghana.
http://szabist.edu.pk/CSRDivisions.asp
CSR BY SZABIST
Marketing Related
23
Thank You