If you can't read please download the document
Upload
raymund-sanchez
View
2.268
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Corporate Social ResponsibilityTowards the Competition
By
Raymund N. Sanchez
Agenda
Overview of CSR
Unfair competition- Definition- Antitrust laws- Microsoft case
Cartels
Intellectual Property Rights
Blood Diamonds
CSR Overview
CSR policy functions as a built-in, self-regulating mechanism whereby business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law, ethical standards, and international norms.
Unfair Trade Practices
Resorting to unethical business behavior to gain a competitive edge (advertising fraud, patent/ trademark infringement, socially irresponsible gimmicks, etc.)
Reasons why companies resort to Unfair Trade Practices
Globalization of competition
Better informed & more discerning customers
Increasing number of competitors
Rapid advance in both soft & hard technology
Advances in scientific fields
In short, competition is getting stiffer & stiffer,
Any kind of edge will count, which is why some
companies resort to unethical practices.
When profit maximization becomes the sole driving force of the business that it pursues it with any means necessary. Resorting to:
Fraud
Violation of human dignity
Patent/Trademark infringement
Socially irresponsible gimmicks
others
When does competition become UNFAIR?
Anti Trust Laws
Trust: or corporate monopoly was created for the purpose of eliminating competition in an area of business & of controlling the market for a product
Coverage of Anti Trust Laws
Price fixing between competitors
Abuses of market power by a monopolist or dominant firm
Agreement between competitors to restrict output
Price Fixing between Competitors
PRICE: often the principal way by which firms compete
Agreements on price initiatives, price ranges, price targets, collusion between competitors on floor prices are generally illegal under antitrust laws
Price Fixing between Competitors
Are similarity of prices, simultaneous price changes, or high price, indications of price fixing?
NO, not always
Supply & Demand can cause these. Price fixing must be PROVEN. (systematic exchanges of pricing information between competitors)
How do we determine the
Just Price
Pricing Process: requires business to effectively calculate resources/needs, supply/demand.
Just Price: one in which both buyer & seller are given what is due them (price a manufacturer charges its customers for G&S is total cost of investment plus normal profit)
How do we determine the
Just Price
Buying & selling were instituted for the common good of both parties since each needs the product of the other... Therefore, the contract between them should rest upon equality of thing to things. The measure of a value of a thing which is exchanged should be given by its money price. Hence to sell a thing dearer or buy it cheaper than it is worth is unjust -St. Thomas Aquinas
How do we determine the
Just Price
Prada
Louis Vuitton
Rolex
Rolls Royce
Q: Do these products ask for a Just Price?
Abusing Market Dominance
Dominance: refers to a position of considerable economic power in a market held over a period of time
Abusing Market Dominance
Q1: Is Being Dominant bad?
Q2: Why is the law punishing companies for being too good at what they do?
Abusing Market Dominance
Conduct of dominant companies that violate antitrust laws:Refusal to supply for non-objective reasons
Unfair discrimination between equivalent transactions
Non-objective refusal to grant access to essential facilities
Unfair / predatory pricing
Engaging in practices to raise rivals costs or foreclose competitor entry
Unfair rebating practices & customer ties
Case Study Microsoft IE
During the browser wars, 95% of PC were pre-loaded with Windows
Microsoft's IE was introduced in 1995 due to being incorporated into the Windows 95 OS
Market share diminished from Netscape who then charged Microsoft with anti competitive behavior
Oligopoly: Agreements between competitors
Oligopoly: agreements between competitors wherein prices can be set at highly profitable levels & restricts competition
Oligopoly: Agreements between competitors
Why is Oligopoly wrong?
1) It is basically a monopoly2) No competition = no benefit to the consumer -no improved product quality -no better price -no choice
Cartels
A cartel is a formal (explicit) agreement among competing firms. It is a formal organization of producers and manufacturers that agree to fix prices, marketing, and production.
Cartels
Strategies of Cartels
Market division & market sharing
Agreements between competitors to restrict output
Collective boycotts
Resale price maintenance agreements
Cartels
Market division & market sharing: conformity among competitors to divide sales territories or allocate customers (agreement not to compete)
Cartels
Agreements between competitors to restrict output: collusion between competitors to restrict production facilities in order to drive up the price
Cartels
Collective boycotts: conformity between competitors not to deal with anther person or business (illegal because it twists/deforms the competitive process by foreclosing competitive opportunities for suppliers or by denying customer choice)
Cartels
Resale price maintenance agreements: agreement between a supplier & dealer that fixes the minimum resale price of a product
Grey Areas
An agreement between competitors to adopt standards that require fire-resistant materials for certain products.
Con:The agreement to adopt is restrictive. The manufacturers have limited their own ability to use other materials & have limited supplier choice
Pro: Will benefit consumers in terms of safety
Q: Is this a Cartel? Should this be illegal?
Intellectual Property Rights
Intellectual Property: Constitutes those original creative works that have economic value & are protected by law
Reasons for
Intellectual Property Rights
They reward the creators of original works by preventing others from copying, performing or distributing those works without permission
They provide incentives for people to produce scientific & creative works that benefit society at large
Intellectual Property Rights
Patent law: protects inventions that demonstrate technological progress
Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright law: protects a variety of literary & artistic works, including paintings sculpture, prose, poetry, plays, musical competitions, dances, photographs, motion pictures, radio, TV, computer programs
Intellectual Property Rights
Trademark law: protects words & symbols that serve to identify different brands of G&S in the marketplace
Intellectual Property Rights
Q: By assigning exclusive rights to an idea/thing, doesn't it make IPR anti-competitive?
A: Trick Question. IPR has an expiration date.
Intellectual Property Rights
By giving IPR a termination date, it allows society to benefit from the idea/thing after the inventor has had an opportunity to earn a good/fair/reasonable reward.
Note: trademarks never expire
Intellectual Property Rights
Counterfeiting: a criminal offense of making an imitation of an article with intent to defraud others into accepting it as a genuine item
Intellectual Property Rights
Is piracy truly a 'Victimless' Crime?
No!
1) Creators are robbed of income supposed to be for them2) Consumers receive defective products
Intellectual Property Rights
Reverse Engineering: process of analyzing & copying products off the competitor, sufficient to replicate the parts using appropriate fabrication techniques & coming out with new products in the company's own version
Intellectual Property Rights
How do we protect IPR?Government implementation
Improved technology (digital watermarks)
Consumer understanding
References
Corporate Social Responsibility, Basic Principles & Best Practices by Jose Mario B. Maximo
Multinationals & Corporate Social Responsibility by Jennifer A Zerk
-END-
Click to edit the title text format