28
Adapting organisational behaviour to safeguard against the threat of corporate manslaughter Stuart Emslie BSc MSc CEng MIHM FIOSH Healthcare Governance director & Visiting Fellow, Loughborough University Business School Former Department of Health Head of Controls Assurance for the NHS in England

Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Adapting organisational behaviour to safeguard against the threat of

corporate manslaughter

Stuart Emslie BSc MSc CEng MIHM FIOSH

Healthcare Governance director & Visiting Fellow, Loughborough University Business School

Former Department of Health Head of Controls Assurance for the NHS in England

Page 2: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Outline…..

Ensuring compliance and implementing safeguards to minimise the risk of corporate manslaughter cases

Evaluating services and processes to reduce systemic risks Providing effective risk management training to engage all staff in

their responsibilities Promoting good management and the flow of decisions into policy Balancing the need to rewrite policies and procedures with day-to-

day compliance Managing financial constraints and associated risks to sustain Act

requirements in the long term

Page 3: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

1992: Compliance with Health & Safety Laws & Regulations

Around 500 safety related statutes in UK Approximately 60 of day-to-day concern >100 authoritative codes of practice

Page 4: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Safecode…….

Issued to all UK NHS organisations 1994

Audit compliance against 60 key H&S statutes

Comprehensive module for setting investment priorities for safety/risk management

Page 5: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

1994

Page 6: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

38 pages…..

1999 Controls assurance H&S standard

Page 7: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

www.cascara.co.uk

Page 8: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

2004 Standards for better health

“While Standards for Better Health will synthesise a large number of existing rules and guidance, NHS bodies will continue to be subject to the wider regulatory framework, such as health and safety legislation.”

Page 9: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Organisational behaviour – a function of organisational systems

Systems make things happen – people make it work

Adapting organisational behaviour to safeguard against the threat of

corporate manslaughter

Page 10: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ
Page 11: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

BSAQ Strategic Score

1.0.9.8.7.6.5

Su

rplu

s (£

mill

ion

)

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

r=.73, p<.001

Page 12: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

BSAQ Political Score

.9.8.7.6.5

Qu

alit

y o

f w

ork

-life

ba

lan

ce3.7

3.6

3.5

3.4

3.3

3.2

BSAQ Political Score

.9.8.7.6.5

Po

sitiv

e f

ee

ling

with

org

an

isa

tion

3.8

3.6

3.4

3.2

3.0

2.8

2.6

BSAQ Political Score

.9.8.7.6.5

Job

sa

tisfa

ctio

n

3.7

3.6

3.5

3.4

3.3

3.2

BSAQ Political Score

.9.8.7.6.5

Inte

ntio

n t

o le

ave

job

3.0

2.9

2.8

2.7

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.3

2.2

Quality of job design (r=.59)

Job satisfaction (r=.53) Intention to leave job (r=.53)

Positive feeling with organisation (r=.62)

Page 13: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ
Page 14: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ
Page 15: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ
Page 16: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust

Male, mid-forties dies due to air embolism during routine cardiac angiogram

Injected with air rather than radio-opaque fluid

No ‘safety check’ carried out Trust successfully prosecuted

under Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 for not having a ‘safe system of work’

Poor management…….

Page 17: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ
Page 18: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ
Page 19: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

The Scotsman 14 October 2007 - http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1641252007

Page 20: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

‘UK: blunders by doctors kill 40,000 a year’Sunday Times, 19 Dec 1999

“Medical error is the third most frequent cause of death in Britain after cancer and heart disease…….kills four times more people than die from all other types of accidents.”

NB – USA approx. 98,000/year; Australia approx. 10,000/year

Page 21: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

www.jcaho.org

Page 22: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

FMEAHFMEATM

SFMEA

Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisFailure Modes and Effects Analysis

Page 23: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

FMEA Steps…

1. Select a process (topic)2. Assemble your team3. Describe the process steps4. Identify the ways in which each process step can fail (failure

modes – e.g. drug maladministration; performing wrong site surgery; clinical mis-diagnosis; etc.)

5. Identify the root cause(s) of failure (Why?)6. Identify the most likely effect(s) (i.e. consequence of failure) of

each identified failure mode7. Assess risk associated with each failure mode (consequence and

likelihood – from risk matrix)8. Identify additional controls required (actions to effect

improvement)9. Implement additional controls10. Test process improvements

Page 24: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

1

2a

2b

4b3b

3c

5

4a

3a

Page 25: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ
Page 26: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Ten steps to compliance?

1. Ensure that you have in place an effective health and safety/risk management system, e.g. see OHSAS 180001:2007; HSG 65, Successful Health and Safety Management (HSE); AS/NZS 4360:2004 risk management (See also IoD/HSE guidance).

2. As part of the management system, ensure that a robust health and safety policy is in place. Within that policy all health and safety roles and responsibilities should be articulated.

3. Job descriptions of staff should reflect their role in health and safety management, particularly at a senior level.

4. Senior managers should be trained to ensure they understand their role in the effective management of health and safety. Reflect upon the competencies of existing senior managers with respect to health and safety management. Provide additional developmental opportunities to address any deficiencies.

5. Line managers should receive training to enable them to manage health and safety within the part of the organisation for which they are responsible.

Adapted from Local Government Employers - www.lge.gov.uk

Page 27: Corporate Manslaughter HSJ

Ten steps to compliance?…..cont…

6. Board members should receive awareness training on their role and responsibilities within the health and safety system. This is particularly important for non-executive directors. To help ensure adequate representation of health and safety issues, consider designating an executive director with responsibility for the management of health and safety.

7. Ensure that health and safety performance, including compliance with health and safety legislation, is regularly considered at board level. Remember that health and safety law applies to everyone, including patients!

8. Mainstream health and safety into decision-making processes and ensure proper scrutiny of the health and safety implications of policy decisions.

9. Ensure health and safety (including patient safety) is firmly part of an integrated approach to risk management across the organisation.

10. Adopt a robust and transparent approach to prioritising investment in improving the management of health and safety and other risks.

Adapted from Local Government Employers - www.lge.gov.uk