25
Education for public individuals: The possibilities of Web 2.0

Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

  • Upload
    tumbo

  • View
    432

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Education for public individuals: The

possibilities of Web 2.0

Page 2: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Has public education something to do with the

public development of

individuals?

Page 3: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Education

State

Educational.Corporations

Official.Politics

Page 4: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

The ongoing process where the state took control of the education had some resistance, but they were not capable to decline it. As Narodowski and Báez say, finally “it

produces the juxtaposition of the public with the state’s matters”.

(2006, Narodowski and Báez, p. 35).

Public.Education

State

Educational.

Corporations Official.

Politics

Education

Page 5: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“The Cartesian cogito is based on a rational operation which excludes perceptions, among others things. The way to know reality is based on a reduction: to leave behind every thing that can induce us to deceit or uncertainty; this, in a long term, will allow us to find the truth”.

(2006, M. Peña, p.18).

reason

Reality subject

Page 6: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Education Public.Sphere Governability

State

curriculum

books

Education

content

relationships identity

Government

Solidarity

Education Public.Sphere Governability

State

curriculum

books

Education

content

relationships identity

Government

Solidarity

Education Public.Matter? Governability

State

curriculum

books Education

content

relationships identity

Government

Solidarity

Is

a

Page 7: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

appearing

others

Identity.Construction

Action

Speech

Page 8: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“The object of government is not first and foremost the maintenance of capitalist exploitation, and its

essential subjects are not contesting social classes. On the contrary, ‘population’ has come to be ‘the ultimate

end of government: because fundamentally, what else could it be?’. At the same time, ‘population comes to be

a subject, as well as an object of government’”

(Online document, Foucault quoted by Curtis).

Nation

Government

Page 9: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“Consequently, public policies treated population’s movements like “vulnerable groups”: In this act, the

state not only reconfigure them, but depoliticized them, it persuade them with the need of order and technical

criteria to solve social problems”.

(Garcés and Valdés, 1999, p. 26).

Page 10: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Equality / Behaviour

Distintion / Difference

Equality / Behaviour

Distintion / Difference

Page 11: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

id

e

ntit

i

e

s

disclose

“For Arendt the reactivation of citizenship in the modern world depends upon both the recovery of a common, shared world and the creation of numerous

spaces of appearance in which individuals can disclose their identities and establish relations of

reciprocity and solidarity”.

(Philosophic Encyclopedia of Standford University)

Page 12: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Web2.0

As A device

ofrelationships

in education

contents

contents contents

contents

contents

contents

contents

contents contents

contents

curriculum books

content

Government

curriculum

curriculum

curriculum

curriculum curriculum

books

Government Government

Government

Government books

curriculum

contents

books

Government

curriculum

contents

curriculum

curriculum

content

Government

contents

curriculum

content

Government

contents

curriculum

content

Government

Page 13: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“As Brunner points out (2000), in the educational context this has several consequences. On one hand, acquiring of

knowledge is not anymore a stable and slow process, reaching out an unimaginable new dynamic. Therefore, the educational building is not the only space where young

people can acquire knowledge. On the other hand, there is recent inquiry about the traditional professor’s role and writing text, because they are not the exclusive supports of the educational system. In fact, there are people whose have doubts if classrooms still are being a key space for

socialization and learning”.(PNUD Chile, 2006, p. 138).

Page 14: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“Learning about implies a passive consumption of knowledge in the form of facts. Learning to be implies the

application of knowledge in the development of skills that allows us to fulfill a particular (professional or non-professional) role in society. But to highlight the fact

that being is not static, I’m using learning as becoming to signify an ongoing process. Learning, as constant becoming,

is the work of nomads…”. (Online document, Mejías, 2005).

Learning.to.be

Page 15: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“Most of this involves some involvement with other people either through conversation or by engaging with

the ways other people have put their thoughts into media. Learning, from this perspective, is a process of

rich and diverse encounters and experiences; it suggests that "it takes a village to educate a child"

(Online document, Lemke quoted by Owen et al).

Be.among.others

Learning.to.be

Individualization

Identity

Page 16: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Education Public Governability

State

curriculum

books

development

content

relationships identity

books

the

Can Governability

curriculum

books Education

content

relationships help

Government

Solidarity

Education Individuals? Governability

State

curriculum

books Education

content

relationships identity

Government

Solidarity

Web2.0

of

Page 17: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Difficult taxonomy

subject

tag

resources

Page 18: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“What this means is that if we are to build networks of value, then each person on the network needs to

find value for themselves before they can contribute value to the network. In the case of Del.icio.us, people find value saving their personal bookmarks first and foremost. All other usage is secondary”.

(Online document, Porter, 2006).

primary

secondary

resources subject

tag

Page 19: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“El sujeto no es un propagandista de sí mismo; por el contrario, todo sujeto oscila entre la reconstrucción del

entorno y la relación consigo mismo. Lo que indica que nunca está encerrado en sí mismo y tampoco se identifica

nunca con una obra de transformación en su entorno”. (2006, Touraine, p. 178).

resources subject

tag

Page 20: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

“If a taxonomy is defined but no one adheres to it, can it be said to exist? Folksonomies, on the other hand, do

not require consensus as much as they measure the consensus already established around the use of certain

words. In other words, folksonomies assume consensus without involving humans in the process”.

(Online document, Mejías, 2005).

resources subject

MyOwn Tag

Page 21: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

Tag

my

relationship

with theworld

Page 22: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

my

Tag

relationship

with theworld

Tag

my

samerelationship

Page 23: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0
Page 24: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0
Page 25: Conference: Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0

The.end