Upload
irecoop-toscana
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Municipality of CALENZANO - Florence
beyond reception politics, a stabilization model:
costs and expediencies about long-term solutions
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
Enrico PanziCouncellorship for Local Welfare & Housing Governance
Municipality of CALENZANOH
OU
SIN
G &
WELFA
RE
Municipality of CALENZANOH
OU
SIN
G &
WELFA
RE
Municipality of CALENZANOTown Council
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
Mayor: Mr. Alessio BiagioliDeputy Mayor: Mrs. Elena Papi
the Aldermen
Municipality of CALENZANO
1) what we are talking about:lodgings for not-EU workers
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
1) what we are talking about:lodgings for not-EU workers
Municipality of CALENZANO
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
1) what we are talking about:lodgings for not-EU workers
Municipality of CALENZANO
1) what we are talking about:lodgings for not-EU workers
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
40 not-EU citizen hosted in 12 flats
three user typologies: singles, groups, family units
lease standing: 3 years with right to renew
covered area: 1000 sq.m. live square: 650 sq.m.
low-energy consumption, based on district heating/cooling
Municipality of CALENZANO
1) what we are talking about:lodgings for not-EU workers
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
total cost: 1,905,000 euro
funding by Government of Tuscany: 654,000 euro
funding by Efficient District project: 81,000 euro
funding by Minister of Welfare and Labour: 200,000 euro
remaining:970,000 euro charged on Municipality balance20-years mortgage at 3.50%= around 60,000 euro/year as refund
Municipality of CALENZANO
2) how much spend the guests
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
preset lease: -25/30% compared to rent market
i.e. around 7 euro/sq.m./month
(utilities and apartment block are billed apart)
= over 50,000 euro/yearpaid directly to Municipality
Municipality of CALENZANO
3) how much spendsthe Municipality
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
running expense:administrative: -4,000 euro/yeargeneric: -6,000 euro/year
investments:970.000 euro charged on Municipality balance20-years mortgage at 3.50%
-60,000 euro/year as refund
current receipts: +50,000 euro/year as lease
Municipality of CALENZANO
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
then
intervention is self-sustainable
3) how much spendsthe Municipality
Municipality of CALENZANO
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
then
intervention is (almost)self-sustainable
3) how much spendsthe Municipality
Municipality of CALENZANO
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
HOWEVERthere are important elements of criticalness
then
intervention is (almost)self-sustainable
3) how much spendsthe Municipality
Municipality of CALENZANO
4) criticalness of local welfare
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
this specific intervention is self-sustainablejust because external fundings
but for all the rest
Municipalities cannot be left alone
(this sad rule applies always, for every italian Municipality)
Municipality of CALENZANO
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
Calenzano: total population
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
Calenzano: immigrant inhabitants
4) criticalness of local welfare
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
percentage of foreign inhabitants in our Municipality:
around 6% of resident population
percentage of foreign inhabitants in our local rankingsrelated to social services, economic subsidies, support for housing, help for school education:
between 25 and 40%
Municipality of CALENZANO
4) criticalness of local welfare
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
topics on immigration in Italy:• income taxes drained towards Central Administration• wealth on central Social Previdence balance• greater pressure on local social services• contention with vulnerable citizens for welfare access
= gain and advantages for Government agencies, but pressure and criticalness on Municipalities
Municipality of CALENZANO
4) criticalness of local welfare
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
topics on immigration in Italy:• income taxes drained towards Central Administration• wealth on central Social Previdence balance• greater pressure on local social services• contention with vulnerable citizens for welfare access
= gain and advantages for Government agencies, but pressure and criticalness on Municipalities
Municipality of CALENZANO
this is the italian local welfare paradox
5) advantages of a solid welfare
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
instead, when resources come back from CentralAdministration to Municipalities, then the model works fineand the paradigm turns from reception to stabilization
stabilization issues:• immigrants improve their personal life-project • they need less local welfare services• remittances towards homelands go down• in a long-term scenario, new citizen give back
to Municipalities more of what they had had
so finally stability becomes opportunityfor local communities
Municipality of CALENZANO
5) advantages of a solid welfare
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
RECEPTION PHASE• few available resources• low capability of project managing• costs and pressures dumped over Municipality• high remittances towards homelands
Municipality of CALENZANO
5) advantages of a solid welfare
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
RECEPTION PHASE• few available resources• low capability of project managing• costs and pressures dumped over Municipality• high remittances towards homelands
STABILIZATION PHASE• we need a more expensive startup• we need a long-term visionbut we expect permanent advantages on territories
Municipality of CALENZANO
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
then, to sum up: on short-term
income taxes,previdence
remittances
social servicesand local welfare
immigrant workers
Municipality
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
with a long-term stabilization model
expenditures and wealth on nearby territory
Municipality
immigrant workers
then, to sum up: on short-term
income taxes,previdence
remittances
social servicesand local welfare
Municipality
immigrant workers
some resources
Municipality of CALENZANO
HO
USIN
G &
WELFA
RE
Enrico PanziCouncellorship for Local Welfare & Housing Governance