Upload
rob-wflag
View
637
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Result of Government Gone Mad. This is still going on. These are the same officials who I took to Court and they simply ignored it and nobody made them.
Citation preview
IN THE ERIE COUNTY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
ROBERT E. WIDING III, VICTORIA )HOUSE COLLABORATIVE LLC, and ) Docket No. 10-002-HJOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE )(Other Current and Prospective )Residents of 1156 West 11th Street), )
)Complainants and Plaintiffs )
)v. )
)CITY OF ERIE ZONING HEARING )BOARD; CITY OF ERIE, BUREAU OF )CODE ENFORCEMENT; and CITY )OF ERIE, )
)Respondents and Defendants )
COMPLAINT
JURISDICTION
1. Jurisdiction is pursuant to the Erie County Human Relations Commission
Ordinance No. 59, 2004, Article V, Section D and Article VI, Section A (as
amended by Ordinance No. 39, 2007).
PARTIES
2. The Complainants herein are:
Name: Robert E. Widing IIIAddress: 1156 West 11th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Name: Victoria House Collaborative LLCAddress: 1156 West 11th Street
Erie, PA 16502
and
Names: John Does One Through Five (Other current and prospective residents of 1156 W. 11th Street)
Address: 1156 West 11th StreetErie, PA 16502
3. The Respondents herein are:
Name: City of Erie Zoning Hearing BoardAddress: 626 State Street
Erie, PA 16501
Name: City of Erie, Bureau of Code EnforcementAddress: 626 State Street
Erie, PA 16501and
Name: City of ErieAddress: 626 State Street
Erie, PA 16501
COUNT 1
Denial of Zoning Variance Request/ Disability DiscriminationFailure to Make Reasonable Accommodation/Disparate Treatment
4. Paragraphs 1 through 3 are incorporated herein by reference as though set
forth at length.
5. The Complainants, Robert E. Widing III and John Does One Through Five,
jointly and severally aver that their protected class is that of disabled
individuals, as delineated and defined under the Erie County Human Relations
Commission Ordinance No. 59, 2004 (as amended by Ordinance No. 39,
2007).
6. The Complainant, Victoria House Collaborative LLC, avers that it is a
domestic limited liability corporation, incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and doing business at all times relevant to
this Complaint in Erie County, Pennsylvania.
7. The Complainant, Victoria House Collaborative LLC, avers that it is the
successor of Victoria House LLC, which requested certain variances from the
Respondents related to the property located at 1156 West 11th Street in Erie,
PA, in April and August of 2009.
8. The Complainant, Victoria House Collaborative LLC, avers that it owns and
operates a Group Home, known as “Victoria House,” located at 1156 West
11th Street in Erie, PA (hereinafter referred to the “property”).
9. The Complainant, Robert E. Widing III, avers that, in addition to being a
disabled individual and resident of Victoria House, he is also the Property
Manager/House Manager/Responsible Agent of/for the property.
10. The Complainants aver that Respondents meet the definition of “person” as
such term is delineated and defined under the Erie County Human Relations
Commission Ordinance No. 59, 2004 (as amended by Ordinance No. 39,
2007).
11. The Complainants aver that, on or about April 28, 2009, they requested the
Respondents to grant a variance of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Erie,
Ordinance Number 80-2005 (hereinafter referred to as the “City Zoning
Ordinance”) as a reasonable accommodation to allow them to operate and
reside in a Group Home related to their disability.
12. The Complainants aver that Section 305.01 of the City Zoning Ordinance
provides for a variance/zoning exception for Group Homes such as Victoria
House.
13. The Complainants aver that the Respondents denied their initial request for
reasonable accommodation on or about May 8, 2009, mischaracterizing
Victoria House is a “half-way house” and/or “rooming house” (which
Respondents stated are not permitted uses in an R-2 zoning district) and
stating that Victoria House is a “half-way house without any formal oversight
or supervision.”
14. The Complainants aver that they filed an appeal with the Respondents, asking
the Respondents to reconsider the initial denial of the request for the zoning
variance/special exception as a reasonable accommodation related to their
disability.
15. The Complainants aver that the Respondents held a second hearing on the
Complainants’ request for reasonable accommodation on or about August 25,
2009.
16. The Complainants aver that, in the second hearing, the Respondents
acknowledged that Victoria House is, in fact, a “Group Home” that would be
covered under the “Group Home Special Exception” of Section 305.01 of the
City Zoning Ordinance.
17. The Complainants aver that the Respondents denied their second request for
reasonable accommodation on or about September 8, 2009, stating that
density control for a lot size in an R-2 district (3,000 square feet) allows one
or two families or three unrelated people only on a lot that size and that the
same standard should apply for disabled people as does for non-disabled
people.
18. The Complainants aver that the reasons stated by the Respondents for the
denial of their request for reasonable accommodation in both the denial of
May 8, 2009 and the denial of September 8, 2009 are purely pretext.
19. The Complainants aver that any other reason given by the Respondents for the
denial of the requested reasonable accommodation is purely pretext.
20. The Complainants aver that the actual reason that the Respondents denied
their request for reasonable accommodation in the form of the zoning
variance/special exception is solely because of the Complainants’ disability
and the bias of the Respondents against those with their particular disability.
21. The Complainants aver that any reasonable accommodation made by the
Respondents relative to allowing the zoning variance/special exception for
Victoria House to operate on the property would not pose an undue hardship
on or fundamentally alter the nature of the zoning ordinance.
22. The Complainants aver that there are only six (6) current or prospective
residents of Victoria House and that allowing two (2) families of non-disabled
persons to live on one property in an R-2 zoning district could easily mean
that more than six (6) people would be residing on such property at any given
time.
23. The Complainants aver that allowing six (6) unrelated persons to live in one
property in an R-2 zoning district as a reasonable accommodation due to their
disability does not place any more of an undue hardship on or fundamentally
alter the nature of the zoning ordinance than would allowing six (6) related
persons to live on the same sized property.
24. The Complainants aver that the property is, in fact, LARGER than the 3,000
square feet required for the R-2 zoning district and that the Respondents are
aware, or should be aware, that the property is larger than 3,000 square feet.
25. The Complainants aver that others outside their protected class are treated
differently than they have been treated by the Respondents.
26. The Complainants aver, by way of example, that the Respondents have
granted zoning variances to other Group Homes under the same or similar
circumstances, such as the Gertrude Barber Center and the City Mission.
27. The Complainants aver that others, with no disability and/or with different
disabilities than they have are treated more favorably by the Respondents than
the Complainants have been treated.
28. The Complainants allege that the Respondents violated Article IX, Section A,
of the Erie County Human Relations Commission Ordinance No. 59, 2004 (as
amended by Ordinance No. 39, 2007).
29. The allegations in the foregoing paragraphs hereof constitute an unlawful
discriminatory practice and are in violation of the Erie County Human
Relations Commission Ordinance No. 59, 2004 (as amended by Ordinance
No. 39, 2007).
30. The Complainants have filed an Appeal of the Respondents’ denial of their
zoning variance request with the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County,
Pennsylvania, but no action based on the aforesaid allegations of
discrimination has been instituted by the Complainants in any court or before
any other commission within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
31. The Complainants pray that the Respondents be required to provide all
appropriate remedies under Article VI, Section L of the Erie County Human
Relations Commission Ordinance No. 59, 2004 (as amended by Ordinance
No. 39, 2007) and to provide such further relief as the Commission deems
necessary and appropriate.
IN THE ERIE COUNTY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
ROBERT E. WIDING III, VICTORIA )HOUSE COLLABORATIVE LLC, and ) Docket No. 10-002-HJOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE )(Other Current and Prospective )Residents of 1156 West 11th Street), )
)Complainants and Plaintiffs )
)vi. )
)CITY OF ERIE ZONING HEARING )BOARD; CITY OF ERIE, BUREAU OF )CODE ENFORCEMENT; and CITY )OF ERIE, )
)Respondents and Defendants )
VERIFICATION
I hereby verify that the statements contained in this complaint are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge, information and belief and that I am authorized to make this
verification on behalf of all Complainants herein. I understand that false statements
herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 PA C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
________________________________________ ________________________Signature Date
________________________________________Street Address
________________________________________ (______)________________City, State and ZIP Code Telephone Number
IN THE ERIE COUNTY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
ROBERT E. WIDING III, VICTORIA )HOUSE COLLABORATIVE LLC, and ) Docket No. 10-002-HJOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE )(Other Current and Prospective )Residents of 1156 West 11th Street), )
)Complainants and Plaintiffs )
)v. )
)CITY OF ERIE ZONING HEARING )BOARD; CITY OF ERIE, BUREAU OF )CODE ENFORCEMENT; and CITY )OF ERIE, )
)Respondents and Defendants )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the within complaint was served on
all parties of record in this proceeding in accordance with the requirements of 1 Pa. Code
33.31 (relating to service by an agency) by hand delivery to the Complainants; and, to
each of the Respondents, by certified United States mail, return receipt requested, postage
prepaid, as follows:
Robert E. Widing III Victoria House Collaborative LLC1156 West 11th Street 1156 West 11th StreetErie, PA 16502 Erie, PA 16502
John Does One Through Five City of Erie Zoning Hearing Board1156 West 11th Street 626 State StreetErie, PA 16502 Erie, PA 16501
City of Erie, Bureau of Code Enforcement City of Erie626 State Street 626 State StreetErie, PA 16501 Erie, PA 16501
Dated this ____________ day of March , 2010.
BY: ___________________________________
THE COMMISSION’S ROLE
The Erie County Human Relations Commission Executive Director, Joseph
Aguglia, Jr., acts as the attorney for the Commission who investigates the claim. In no
way is the Executive Director, any representative of the Commission, and/or the
Commission itself your attorney or representative. In fact, you are encouraged to retain
private counsel if possible. If you desire to have an attorney, please contact the Lawyer
Referral Service of the Erie County Bar Association:
Erie County Bar AssociationLawyer Referral Service302 West 9th StreetErie, PA 16502-1427Phone: (814) 459-4411
The Human Relations Commission, Commission Staff and the Executive Director
do NOT give legal advice to you. Both the Commission and the Executive Director act
as a neutral court in the matter.
________________________________________ ________________________Signature Date
________________________________________Printed Name
________________________________________Street Address
________________________________________ ( )________________City, State and ZIP Code Telephone Number