Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Carol Anne Meyer's presentation at the Council of Science Editors 2014 annual meeting May 5 2014 Session Description: There are several organizations, such as CrossRef, the National Library of Medicine, ORCID and Ringgold, which are putting forth ideas to standardize data and data exchange throughout scholarly publishing. This session will discuss new initiatives that address such challenges as easily identifying funding sources, managing author disambiguation, managing institution disambiguation, and standardization of information exchange. Who Should Attend: Managing Editor/Publisher, Copy Editor/Production Editor, Editorin- Chief Standardizing Data and Data Exchange in Scholarly Publishing
Citation preview
Carol Anne Meyer CrossRef
@meyercarol ORCID:
0000-0003-2443-2804
Collaboration Through Interoperability FundRef and Other Metadata
Council of Science Editors Standardizing Data and Data Exchange in Scholarly Publishing
5 May 2013
http://xkcd.com/927/!
A not-for-profit trade association of global scholarly publishers
CrossRef Has 1950 Members,
Representing 4627 Publishers
5
Members Come from 81 Countries
Linking Reference Linking Cited-by Linking
Discovery and Delivery CrossRef Metadata Services Bibliographic Management
CrossRef Metadata Search Document Delivery
Multiple Resolution Link Resolvers
CrossRef APIs
Evaluating CrossCheck Article Level Metrics
CrossMark PreScore
FundRef
Collaborating Linked Data Text and Data Mining
FundRef NISO OA Indicator
Threaded Publications Journal Article Tag Set (JATS)
Enables
Powered by iThen.cate
Now we have 90 affiliates and 2045 libraries
Our Community Includes Affiliates and Libraries
We generate more than a billion annual “clicks” to our member
publishers’ sites
0
275,000,000
550,000,000
825,000,000
1,100,000,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
We have two offices: Lynnfield, MA and Oxford, UK
CrossRef has 25 Employees
6!2!
4!10!12!
43!64!
151!1612!
>500!201-500!101-200!
51-100!26-50!10-25!
5-10!1-5!<1!
# of Members!
Rev
enue
Tie
rs ($
milli
on)!
The Long Tail of Members
Mission
To be a trusted collaborative organization with broad community connections; authoritative and
innovative in support of a persistent, sustainable
infrastructure for scholarly communication.
Improving scholarly
communication through
community collaboration
6-Word Mission
• Protein Data Bank • Standards in Genomic Science • Organiza.on for Economic Development (OECD) • Public Library of Science • Interna.onal Union of Crystallography (IUCR)
More than 1 million data items/figures/components have CrossRef DOIs
http://xkcd.com/285/!
Best Editorial Practices to Increase Data Transparency
1. Ask Authors to store and cite data
2. Assign CrossRef DOIs to supplementary data
3. Encourage authors to assign DataCite DOIs to their data, and link to articles published using that data via CrossRef DOIs
4. Include journal article (or other publication) bibliographic metadata with data deposits
5. Cite data in publication reference sections using DOIs when available
6. CrossMark participants, link to data in the Publication Record tab.
• author (s) • journal title • article title • volume • issue • publication
date • ISSN
• page numbers • article IDs • internal identifiers • URL • DOI
Sample CrossRef Bibliographic Metadata
Additional CrossRef Metadata
• ORCID • CrossMark
ü Updates (related CrossRef DOIs)
ü Publication record information • Text and Data Mining Data • NISO Open Access Identifier
PDF!
HTML!
NISO OA Metadata & Indicators
• 2 simple tags:
ü “free_to_read”
ü “license_ref”
• Embargo periods supported
Additional Metadata for
• 3 simple tags:
ü funder_name
ü funder_identifier
ü award_number
A standard way of reporting funding sources for published scholarly research
Launched May 2013
For Further Reading
http://fundref.crossref.org/docs/funder_kpi_metadata_best_practice.html
The Funding Attribution Problem
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"> <p>This work was supported in part by NIH grant
R01 GM094800B to G.J.J., a gift to Caltech from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and a stipend from the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung to M.P. The
funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
manuscript.</p> </fn>
</fn-group> </back> </article>
<body> ... <sec> <title>Funding</title> <p>This work was supported by the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://www.grf.org" id="GS1">Generic Research Foundation</grant-sponsor>, the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://www.energy.gov" id="GS2">Department of Energy</grant- sponsor> Office of Science grant number <grant-num rid="GS2">DE-FG02- 04ER63803</grant-num>, and the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://www.nih.gov" id="GS3">National Institutes of Health</grant-sponsor>. </p> </sec> </body>
! Funding bodies cannot easily track the published output of funding
! Publishers cannot easily report which articles result from research supported by specific funders or grants
! Institutions cannot easily link funding received to published output
! Lack of standard metadata for funding sources makes it difficult to analyze or mine the data
Why Does This Matter?
! National Institutes of Health
! NIH? N.I.H.? National Institute of Health?
! Abbreviations, misspellings, translations...
The Solution
Publishers
Relationship with authors submitting
manuscripts
Established publishing and
peer-review systems
Funders
Relationship with researchers funded by agencies
Established award systems and research management processes
Institutions Funder compliance education Track funding received
The Public
Authors
Want accountability for how contributions/taxes spent
Have funding information at submission
FundRef Pilot Brought Together Publishers and Funders
The FundRef Registry is a Taxonomy of 6100 Funder Names
www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_registry.html
! 6100 funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry, donated to FundRef
! Hosted by CrossRef, available under CC0
! Updated and extended monthly—
! Publishers use this list to ensure consistency
More on the FundRef Registry
www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_registry.html
FundRef Registry
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder Production Systems
CrossRef Database & Query APIs
Funders Researchers Institutions Publishers
SHARE!
DOI
Funding Source
Award Number
Submission Workflow 1. Collect funding data from authors on submission using
FundRef Registry taxonomy
Workflow Issues 1. Collect funding data from authors on submission using
FundRef Registry taxonomy
http://www.crossref.org/fundref
Implementation Widget - http://labs.crossref.org
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder Production Systems
Implementation 2. Pass funding data from submission system to production
systems
Publisher
Editorial Check
http://labs.crossref.org
Workflow 3. Deposit FundRef data with CrossRef
CrossMark participants should deposit FundRef data within CrossMark deposits
CrossMark participation recommended for standard display of funding information
Workflow 3. Deposit funding data with CrossRef
Look up Funding Data
http://search.crossref.org/fundref
Search for Funder
Results
Search by Other Metadata
Search by Grant Number
Search by CrossRef DOI
Search by ORCID
How to Participate
1. Encourage researchers to submit FundRef info at manuscript submission. (Hint: Ask for ORCIDs too!) 2. Use FundRef Search, CrossRef Metadata Search & CrossRef APIs to retrieve funding information 3. Provide feedback on the tools 4. Use FundRef Registry for funding analysis 5. Always use CrossRef DOIs and ORCIDs when citing research output
• 71,000 + unique documents with FundRef records
• 75% of the funder names from these relationships are in the FundRef Registry
So, How Are We Doing?
AAAS ACSESS American Chemical Society American Diabetes Association American Institute of Physics American Psychiatric Publishing American Psychological Association American Physical Society American Society of Neuroradiology Association for Computing Machinery BioMed Central Bioscientifica Copernicus GmBH eLife Sciences Publications Elsevier FapUNIFESP (SciELO) Grupo Comunicar Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers International Union of Crystallography Internet Medical Publishing IOP Publishing Journal of Humanity Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development Just Medical Media, Ltd. KAMJE Kowsar Medical Institute Landes Bioscience National Library of Serbia Optical Society of America Oxford University Press Royal Society of Chemistry ScienceOpen Spandidos Publications Taylor & Francis The Royal Society Wiley-Blackwell
http://www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_agreement.html
These Deposits Come from 11 Publishers of 38 Signed Up
Publishers: sign up now!
FundRef Terms & Conditions: www.crossref.org/fundref
No fees for FundRef deposits
• CrossRef (with FundRef) provides the social and technology standards and practices that makes CHORUS and SHARE possible.
• CrossRef DOIs directs interested parties to the correct documents
• CrossRef’s existing metadata database will hold data about ORCID, FundRef, Open Access Indicator, Text and Data mining
• CrossRef’s Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and search interfaces will serve these new types of data.
PS: What Does FundRef Have to Do With CHORUS and SHARE?
FundRef
• CrossRef staff participate on the Technical Working Groups of CHORUS and SHARE
• CrossRef also has expressed an openness to make its infrastructure available for other public access initiatives
• CrossRef does not do custom development for projects that are specific to that project and not generalizable to the industry.
Full Disclosure: CrossRef Plays the Field
