Upload
rich-mironov
View
6.531
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Challenges of (Lean) Enterprise Product Management
Rich MironovCEO, Mironov Consulting
23 Aug 2016
1
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• Veteran product manager/exec/strategist• Organizing product organizations• Smokejumper VP Products• What will customers pay for?
• 6 startups, including as CEO/founder• “The Art of Product Management” • Founded Product Camp
About Rich Mironov
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m 3
Conversations, market information, priorities, requirements,
roadmaps, epics, user stories, backlogs, personas…
product bits
strategy, forecasts, commitments, roadmaps, competitive intelligence
budgets, staff,targets
Field input,Market feedback
Segmentation, messages, benefits/features, pricing,
qualification, demos…
Markets & CustomersDevelopment Marketin
g& Sales
Executives
ProductManagement
What Does a Product Manager Do?
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
W W W . M I R O N O V . C O M
• Identify pain/need (e.g. user journey, interviews)• Describe/position a possible solution• Validated learning (mock-up, smoke test, MVP)• Iterate to improve concept• Early sign-ups (crowdfund, ask for the order)• Iterate toward revenue product
Consumer-Focused Lean Validation
• User is buyer• We can talk to lots of target users (with plenty left)• We can run A/B tests with product variants, sign-up
variants, pricing options, alternate messaging…• Identifying need >> building solution • User can commit ahead of shipment/value/use
Often-Unstated Assumptions
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• Proposition A/B testability?• Buyer’s decision risk?• Purchase complexity?
• Buyer’s success metric?• Target audience size?• Product technical risk?
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• Proposition A/B testability?• Buyer’s decision risk?• Purchase complexity?
• Buyer’s success metric?• Target audience size?• Product technical risk?
growth hacking
• High-powered (expensive) sales teams• Small numbers of customers (100’s – 1000’s)• Big ticket deals, long sales cycles, lumpy revenue
streams Subjective (political) win/loss attribution
Enterprise Sales
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• Few prospects, some already in funnel• Heavily over-surveyed/over-marketed
personas (corporate CIOs)• Can’t afford A/B testing with serious
prospects• Sales wants to control every interaction• Real decision makers not obvious• Complex incumbent systems• Need to show hard ROI/efficacy
Enterprise Validation Challenges
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
Marketing/Sales Funnel
Target audience
Aware
Interested
Evaluating
Buyer
Repeat Buyer • Might take years with dozens of touches
• Message and product mostly stable throughout
W W W . M I R O N O V . C O M
• “Closing” meetings• Organized by Sales• Goal is to close• Anticipate/answer objections• Never raise new issues or ask about new needs
• Listening/learning meetings• Organized by Product Management• Open-ended questions• Dig for blockers, issues, ideas, new concerns• Trial-close unbuilt products, unproven solutions
Two Kinds of Customer Meetings
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• “A legacy system is any system that works.”- Bob Epstein, Sybase co-founder
• Every enterprise is already (sort of) operating• Uniquely confusing assembly of old systems, mis-designed
processes, inherited policies, acquired divisions, accidents
• We have to displace exactly one piece
Detailed Systems and Process Contexts Are Essential
No corporation ever fully replaces any production system
Your product fits here
W W W . M I R O N O V . C O M
• Bottom-up, land-and-expand, departmental• Jira, Slack, product-level marketing, recruiting, productivity, travel, events• Strategy: start with workgroups
• All-or-Nothing Major Systems• ERP, finance, corporate HR, security architecture…• Evaluation process, RFP, references substitute for real trial
Can Customers Directly Try/Test Your Product?
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• Mironov’s Theorem #2: whenever enterprise customers are really interested, Sales and Execs will convert “learning” into “early revenue commit” • “Beta,” “early access,” “preview,” “early adopter”
• MVP is whatever we can sell to someone sooner
Co-Opting “MVP”
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
Solo/SMB accounting vs. enterprise accounting:Validation approach, provability, mean-time-to-joy?
Collaborative Example #1
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
Single-family health insurance vs. F200 group policy:Validation approach, provability, mean-time-to-joy?
Collaborative Example #2
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• Every enterprise security company has the same benefit headline• “We will stop x% more bad stuff than competitors”
• How do enterprise customers choose?
Collaborative Example #3
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
• How many of your users logged in this week? • Strong predictor of Trial Paid• Strong predictor of Paid Renewal• Onboarding success, feature usage, problem
identification• Finally, a non-vanity enterprise metric
Instrumenting (Cloud) Apps
Prioritizing Based on Use
25Des Draynor, Intercom: https://blog.intercom.io/prioritising-features-wholl-use-it-how-often/
w w w . M I R O N O V . c o m
1. Product/market fits into complex environment2. Dozens of in-depth interviews replace
hundreds of pre-sale A/B tests3. Intense pressure for one-off features4. Must understand buying process/players5. Market adoption happens slowly6. Usage metrics typically post-sale
Enterprise Lean Takeaways
CONTACT
Rich Mironov, CEOMironov Consulting233 Franklin St, Suite #308San Francisco, CA 94102
RichMironov
@RichMironov
+1-650-315-7394