Upload
delhilovesbuses
View
273
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BRT- A must have for Delhi!
Air Quality
AIR
Delhi: NOx levels Rising steadily
Source: CSE computation based on CPCB data
0
30
60
Res. Areas Ind. Areas
microgram/ cubic metre
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
3
Delhi: at risk of losing gainsAfter a short respite the curve turns upward
Source: CPCB
0
60
120
180
Res. Areas Ind. Areas
microgram/ cubic metre
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
4
Present Scenario & Statistics S o u r c e s o f A ir P o l lu t io n in D e lh i :
7 0 %V E H IC U L A R E M IS S IO N
In d u s t r ia l E m is s io n
2 0 %
Source: M P D 2021, p57
D G s e t s , c o o k in g , b io m a s s10 %
Our Air is killing 21 people every day.
Since vehicles are the major pollution source, they are the major cause of respiratory fatalities in Delhi.
201169 LAKH Vehicles
201693 LAKH Vehicles
NOx = 84,200 kg/day
NOx = 84,200 kg/day
We are already at risky/ fatally high levels of Pollution, even without looking at future projections,
Therefore time has come for drastic paradigm change.
Present Scenario & Statistics Annual Average* of Critical Pollutants at Five Stations in Delhi (in µg/
m3)
Parameters
Punjabi Bagh
Mandir Marg
R K Puram Airport
Civil Lines
Prescribed Limit
SO2 7.81 9.40 6.34 19.53 23.2650
NO2 38.51 43.29 44.87 70.27 97.05 40
PM10 294.59 250.76 314.89 265.80 213.56 100
PM2.5 153.07 127.16 151.53 135.73 84.39 60
Benzene
0.75 1.18 0.93 22.01 14.83 5
Highlighted Data in red indicates Crossing of prescribed limit*Average data from January 2011 to October 2011
ategory M and Category N vehicles manufactured after the 1st April 2010 with gross vehicle weight not exceeding 3500 kg, shall be as under:
Mass Emission Standards for Bharat Stage –IV
Norms Passenger car (Gasoline (gm/Km)
Two wheelers (Gasoline) (gm/Km)
Heavy Vehicles (Diesel) (gm/Km Hr)
CO HC + NOx
CO HC + NOx
CO HC NOx PM
BS I 2.72 0.97 2.0 2.0 4.5 1.1 8.0 0.36
BS II 2.2 0.5 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.1 7.0 0.15
BS III 2.3 0.35 (COMBINED)
1.0 1.0 2.1 0.66 5.0 0.10
BS IV 1.0 0.18 (Combined)
- - 1.5 0.96 3.5 0.02
Emission norms for different categories of vehicles
Vehicle Category
Growth Rate 2012 2017
2- Wheelers 50% 4976488 7464732
3-Wheelers 10% 83163 91480
4-Wheelers (Pass Cars)
50% 2402548 3603823
4-Wheelers (Taxis, cabs)
100% 51018 102036
LCVs (Tata 407 etc)
50% 123237 184856
Trucks 30% 76785 99820
Buses and Others
30% 56600 73581
Projected growth of different categories of vehicles between 2012-2017
Number of vehicles registered in Delhi upto 31st March 2011 : 6889996
Pollutants Emission Load Kg/d
2007(baseline)
2012 (Business as Usual)
2017(Business as Usual)
Vehicular Emissions
PM 9747 12587 15425
CO 217791 277069 336207
HC 66741 85686 104608
Nox 84194 111124 138096
SO2 722 1057 1393
Baseline and next 5 year Projected Vehicular emission load
Air Quality Improvement Strategies:
AIR
Since Vehicles are the major source of NOx and PM pollution in Delhi, both of which are major causes of cancer and respiratory diseases, the following Plans are to be implemented in order to undice a mode shift in favour of Public Transport, in the next 5 years.
The following Modal Shift Strategies are to be implemented:
Move more People, not Vehicles – Augment usability, reliability of Public Transport System by Implementing BRT Network.
Parking Pricing to discourage car use.
Cycling Masterplan – to make cycling safe in Delhi.
MAXIMUM capacity of a Mixed Lane = (2.2x1200) = 2640 Passengers/ Lane/ hour
MINIMUM capacity of a Dedicated Bus Lane = 6000 - 20,000 Passengers/ Lane/ hour
Street without Dedicated Bus lanes
Street with Dedicated Bus lanes
Strategy 1: Move more People, in lesser vehicles
One Mixed Traffic Lane carries approx. 2600 Passengers per lane per hour
A dedicated BRT lane carries minimum of 6000 Passengers per lane per hour
• It is FASTER (possible only if there is Congestion for private vehicles)
• It is CHEAPER (possible with fuel price rise, hike in parking fee, etc.) People will move to Public Transport from Car – only if:
Car = 2.2 people Bus = 60 people
Which mode to take, if not car?
Source: Transport D emand F orecast Study, 2008Survey Data by R I TE S for D oT, GN C TD
AV
. TRI
P LE
NG
TH• Short car trips can shift to auto-rickshaws (if parking fee is hiked)• Medium to longer car trips can move to buses or Metro.• Shift form 2-wheelers to Buses possible only if bus-fares are made
cheaper.
Which mode to take, if not car?
Source: Transport D emand F orecast Study, 2008Survey Data by R I TE S for D oT, GN C TD
AV
. TRI
P LE
NG
TH• If short trips in the city (2-10 km) are not made on Buses & NMT, then this would
just mean more cars, more two-wheelers, more RTVs… Therefore every short trip will add to more pollution…
Which mode to take, if not car?
Source: Transport D emand F orecast Study, 2008Survey Data by R I TE S for D oT, GN C TD
AV
. TRI
P LE
NG
TH• People can buy cars but only use it on holidays or non-peak-hour trips. Private
modes should NOT be a necessity for reliable peak hour travel. Other modes - Metro, BRT, local buses, rickshaws, cycling, walking - should be made more convenient, cheaper, safer and more reliable compared to car trips.
BRT corridors take the buses out of the traffic jam, thus making the entire bus system many times more reliable and faster. Need for mode interchange removed at least at one end of the trip in BRT, because the local bus itself takes people to their home/final destination.
For Metro, a feeder mode is required at both ends, requiring time, money, inconvenience. This interchange delay is more acceptable when trip lengths are longer. For example, for a 6 km trip, an interchage after 3 km is undesirable and a direct mode is more preferable.
Why is Bus System Augmentation critical, inspite of Metro
Bus Corridor
fully segregated
Local bus routes
Metro Station
Interchange point
DESTINATION
ORIGIN
Feeders
Average Trip lengths in NCT is 10km. So bus is ideal and most convenient since it picks and drops door-to-door.
Metro is best for 15-20km trip, as longer trip length neutralizes the interchange time & hassle for the commuter.
Why is Bus System Augmentation critical, inspite of Metro
• 80% of Trips in Delhi are below 10 KMs.
MODE Average Trip Length (KM)•CAR 10.5
•2W 8.7
•AUTO RICKSHAW 4.7
•BUS 8.8
•METRO 13.8
•TRAIN (IR) 20.2
•BICYCLE 4.0
•CYCLE RICKSHAW 1.7
•WALK 1.1
Why is Bus System Augmentation critical, inspite of Metro
Source: Transport D emand F orecast Study, 2008Survey Data by R I TE S for D oT, GN C TD
For trip lengths between 5-10 KM, Bus is the ideal mode of Public Transport in Delhi.
By adding short trips to Metro (2-10km commuters), it makes Metro too crowded for long distance travellers, thus making them shift back to other modes. This has already happened in corridors like Vikas Marg, Gurgaon, etc. because bus commuter (instead of car ) have moved to the Metro!!
MODE
Base 2007(CURRENT)
Business as Usual (2021)
Metro + few Closed BRT (with Higher
Parking Charges) 2021
Open Network BRT/Bus System +
Higher Parking Charges
Mode Share (%)Mode Share
(%)Mode Share
(%)Mode Share
(%)
CAR 15.5 23.4 17.1 14.6
2-Wheeler 27.1 21.9 20.0 8.7
Auto-rickshaw 4.4 5.1 3.2 4.1
Public Transport 53.0 49.6 59.7 72.6
TOTAL TRIPS 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
FUTURE SCENARIOS – Business as Usual vs. Various Public Transport Scenarios.
• Continuing current trends shows a “decrease” in PT share.
• Implementing Metro & closed BRT only maintains the current Mode share.
• Implementing an Open/Hybrid BRT Netork along wit higher Parking Charges – induces a positive shift towards Public Transport!
Source: Transport D emand F orecast Study and I ntegrated R oad C um M ulti-modal P ublic Transport N etwork F or N C T, 2010; by R I TE S for D oT, GN C TD
Combination of Metro + Open BRT System – Lowest Emission
Source: Transport D emand F orecast Study and I ntegrated R oad C um M ulti-modal P ublic Transport N etwork F or N C T, 2010; by R I TE S for D oT, GN C TD
Lowest Emission Scenario
Hybrid BRT + Metro Public Transport Network Plan: 14 corridors in 5 years
14 Integrated Transport Corridors (ITC) to be taken up in next 5 years – shown in red
SYMBOLS: IIT- MUMBAI
Results form “Willingness to Pay” Survey done by RITES with private vehicle users at various parking locations:
•84% are willing to shift to “good” public transport System
•72% to shift if quality feeder system is available.
•45% of car users to shift to public transport if Parking fee is increased by 50%.
ackground Data:
Strategy 2: Increase Parking Charges to discourage Private Vehicle use.
Business As Usual
Metro + BRT
Metro + BRT + Parking Charges
The RITES Transport Model (GNCTD) shows that Increased Parking charges give an increased ridership (PHPDT) for Public Transport Modes.
PHPD
T
Various BRT/ ITC Corridors
PHPDT = Peak Hour Per Direction Trips; ITC = Integrated Transport Corridor
Source: Transport D emand F orecast Study and I ntegrated R oad C um M ulti-modal P ublic Transport N etwork F or N C T, 2010; by R I TE S for D oT , GN C TD
Increased Parking Charges to increase Public Transport Ridership.
Vehicle Ownership In Delhi Modal Share
VEHICLE OWNED % OF HOUSEHOLDS
•CAR
- 1 no. 16.4
- 2 nos. 2.5
- 3 nos. 0.4
≥ 4 nos. 0.1
TOTAL 19.4
•2W
- 1 nos. 37.7
- 2 nos. 5.1
- 3 nos. 0.5
≥ 4 nos. 0.1
TOTAL 43.4
•NO MOTOR VEHICLE 47.9
•BICYCLE 35.0
Strategy 3: Cycling Masterplan – Make Cycling Safe in Delhi!It is interesting to Note from the Data below that: Of the 19% car owning households of the city, 9% use their vehicles regularly for travel; However out of the 35% Bicycle Owners, only 5% use them for travel!!
MODE % of PERSON TRIPS
WITH WALK TRIPS (2007-08)
•CAR/TAXI 9.09
•2W 14.07
•AUTO RICKSHAW 2.36
•BUS 27.12
•METRO 2.66
•TRAIN (IR) 0.42
•BICYCLE 4.46
•CYCLE RICKSHAW 5.16
•WALK 34.67
TOTAL 100
TOTAL TRIPS/DAY 219.87 LAKH
Promotion of NMT/ Cycling helps in drastic reduction in Emissions
Data Source: www.unep.org
(Better Vehicles) (High Cycling & NMT use.
__E
A complete City-wide Safe Cycling Network to be developed.
Arterial Roads to have safe Cycle Tracks
A complete City-wide Safe Cycling Network to be developed.
Nallahs can be Cycle-Ecomobility corridors, forming a City-wide Network.
The South Delhi Greenways project (CDP, Delhi):.
• Continuous non-motorized corridor along Nallahs for connectivity to Metro/ BRT.
• Connects to heritage destinations.
• Provides scope to locally recycle sewage and infiltrate groundwater.
• Stormwater conveyance System with parks as temporary detention facilities.
• Forests allow for detention and infiltration facilities and green lungs.
© oasis designs
30
BEFOREAFTER
• Provides scope to locally recycle sewage and infiltrate groundwater.
• Stormwater conveyance System with parks as temporary detention facilities.
• Forests allow for detention and infiltration facilities and green lungs.
• Continuous non-motorized corridor along Nallahs for connectivity to Metro/ BRT.
• Connects to heritage destinations.
© morphogenesis
The South Delhi Greenways project (CDP, Delhi):.
31
3.5 KMS3.5 KMS
2.0 KMS2.0 KMS
NIZAMUDDIN NIZAMUDDIN STATIONSTATION
ISBT SARAI ISBT SARAI KALE KHANKALE KHAN
JANGPURA JANGPURA METRO STATIONMETRO STATION
Nallah Corridors become a shorter Cycling Connection to StationsNallah Corridors become a shorter Cycling Connection to Stations
BRT CORRIDORBRT CORRIDOR
32
Air Quality Improvement Plans:
AIR
Since Vehicles are the major source of NOx and PM pollution in Delhi, both of which are major causes of cancer and respiratory diseases, the following Plans are to be implemented in order to undice a mode shift in favour of Public Transport, in the next 5 years.
The following Modal Shift Strategies are to be implemented:
Move more People, not Vehicles – Augment usability, reliability of Public Transport System by Implementing BRT Network.
Parking pricing to discourage car use.
Cycling Masterplan – to make cycling safe in Delhi.