15
Bridging the Communication Gap Jill Andreu, Naylor LLC Sarah Patterson, AM&P Thomas J. Smith, Airports Council International – North America

Bridging the Communication Gap - Content Strategy & Benchmarking for Associations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Bridging the Communication Gap

Jill Andreu, Naylor LLCSarah Patterson, AM&P

Thomas J. Smith, Airports Council International – North America

OVERVIEW

• Why You Need a Content Strategy

• AM&P’s Communication Gap Analysis

• 2014 Association Communication Benchmarking Study Highlights

A 15-YEAR-OLD’S (UNINTENTIONAL) CONTENT STRATEGY

SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MEREDITH & YOU (THE COMMUNICATION PROFESSIONAL)

CONTENT STRATEGY MEREDITH YOU

Know Your Audience ?

Delivering the RightContent

?

Using the Right Form of Media

?

Integrating Your Media ?

Engaging in a Two-Way Dialogue

?

Measuring Effectiveness ?

Committed to Improvement

?

WHY IS A COMMUNICATIONGAP ANALYSIS NECESSARY?

A body at rest stays at rest. A body in motion creates membership value.

• Member/vendor demographics

• Information needs, hot topics

• Communication frequency

• Preferred delivery format

• Engagement levels with content and advertising

• Primary and secondary sources of contracting issues and best practices

• Help AM&P match members' needs, preferences with the organization's resources.

WHAT ARE THE RIGHT QUESTIONS?

IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

• Members aren’t reading everything we send –find ways to cut through the clutter

• Provide better, easier-to-find website value

• Better Listserv engagement

• Live events: New ideas for innovation and growth

• Customization challenges – need to cater to individuals and their industries

Source: AM&P Communications Gap Analysis. Naylor, 2014

SIMILIARITIES BETWEEN MEREDITH AND AM&P

CONTENT STRATEGY MEREDITH AM&P

Know Your Audience

Delivering the RightContent

Using the Right Form of Media

Integrating Your Media

Engaging in a Two-Way Dialogue

Measuring Effectiveness

Committed to Improvement

WHAT DO YOUR PEERS THINK?

2014 ASSOCIATION COMMUNICATION BENCHMARKING STUDY HIGHLIGHTS

OVERALL COMMUNICATIONS CHALLENGES

Leveraging Data For Optimal Engagement

Creating Better Content

Understanding Reader/Member/Advertiser Needs

Generating Non-Dues Revenue

Measuring Effectiveness

Hiring/Retaining Qualified Staff

*2014 Association Communications Benchmarking Report

24.3%

19.1%

17.8%

16.8%

16.4%

5.6%

ASSOCIATION PAIN POINTS

Associations need to do a better job of:

• Measuring effectiveness of communication strategies and using data to increase member engagement

• Creating content that is more relevant to readers

• Understanding the needs of those who pay the bills

• Generating more NDR

MORE THAN 475 TRADE AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS COUNT ON NAYLOR TO INCREASE ENGAGEMENTAND REVENUE THROUGH STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, EVENTS AND MARKETING SOLUTIONS.