26
Zaid Ali Alsagoff [email protected] Module 3: Module 3: Arguments Arguments Part 3 Part 3

Arguments (Part 3)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Module 3 - Arguments (Part 3)

Citation preview

Page 1: Arguments (Part 3)

Zaid Ali Alsagoff

[email protected]

Module 3:Module 3:ArgumentsArguments

Part 3Part 3

Page 2: Arguments (Part 3)

How many times does the letter “How many times does the letter “FF” ” appear in the following sentence?appear in the following sentence?

These functional fuses have been These functional fuses have been developed after years of scientific developed after years of scientific

investigation of electric investigation of electric phenomena, combined with the phenomena, combined with the fruit of long experience on the fruit of long experience on the

part of the two investigators who part of the two investigators who have come forward with them for have come forward with them for

our meeting today.our meeting today.

Page 3: Arguments (Part 3)

You = Entrepreneur? Why? You = Entrepreneur? Why?

““Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it.Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it.Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it.Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it.

Begin it NOW!” - GoetheBegin it NOW!” - Goethe

““Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it.Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it.Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it.Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it.

Begin it NOW!” - GoetheBegin it NOW!” - Goethe

EntrepreneursEntrepreneurship is not hip is not

genetic; it can genetic; it can be learned.be learned.

Page 4: Arguments (Part 3)

Interesting Statistics!Interesting Statistics!

The leading country for entrepreneurship is Brazil, where one in eight adults is an entrepreneur (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2000).

United States (one in 10)

Australia (one in 12)

Germany (one in 25)

United Kingdom (one in 33)

Finland and Sweden (one in 50)

Ireland and Japan (less than one in 100)

The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 1999 defined entrepreneurship as:

Source: http://www.certificate.net/wwio/biz0210014.shtml

““Any attempt at new business or new venture creation, Any attempt at new business or new venture creation, such as self-employment, a new business organization, such as self-employment, a new business organization,

or the expansion of an existing business, by an individual, or the expansion of an existing business, by an individual, a team of individuals, or an established business."a team of individuals, or an established business."

““Any attempt at new business or new venture creation, Any attempt at new business or new venture creation, such as self-employment, a new business organization, such as self-employment, a new business organization,

or the expansion of an existing business, by an individual, or the expansion of an existing business, by an individual, a team of individuals, or an established business."a team of individuals, or an established business."

Page 5: Arguments (Part 3)

11 Essential Entrepreneurial Power Skills11 Essential Entrepreneurial Power Skills

1.1. Assess the present situation accuratelyAssess the present situation accurately

2.2. Go after bold visionsGo after bold visions

3.3. Be unstoppableBe unstoppable

4.4. Negotiate firmly and “win-winly”Negotiate firmly and “win-winly”

5.5. Solve problemsSolve problems

6.6. Make good decisionsMake good decisions

7.7. BrainstormBrainstorm

8.8. Mobilize powerful resourcesMobilize powerful resources

9.9. Communicate effectivelyCommunicate effectively

10.10. Act decisivelyAct decisively

11.11. Behave with integrityBehave with integrity

Source: Entrepreneurship 101, Michael E. Gordon. URL - http://www.trumpuniversity.com/entrepreneurship101/ (exhibit 02-01)

Page 6: Arguments (Part 3)

Module 3: Arguments - Part 3 (of 3)Module 3: Arguments - Part 3 (of 3)

1. Distinguishing Fact & Opinion

7. Evaluating Arguments

2. What is an Argument?

5. Deduction &Induction

6. Analyzing Arguments

8. Writing Arguments

3. Identifying Premises & Conclusions

4. What Is Not an Argument?

Page 7: Arguments (Part 3)

““Our very eyes are sometimes, Our very eyes are sometimes, like our judgments, blind” like our judgments, blind”

- Shakespeare- Shakespeare

Page 8: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Evaluating Arguments3.7 Evaluating Arguments

What is a good argument?What is a good argument?

A good argument (2 conditions) - All premises are true, and the premises provide good reasons to accept the conclusion.

An argument is deductively valid if the conclusion must be true if the premises are true.

An argument is inductively strong if the conclusion is probably true if the premises are true.

Arguments that are both deductively valid and have all true premises are said to be deductively sounddeductively sound.

Arguments that are both inductively sound and have all true premises

are said to be inductively cogentinductively cogent.

A good argument, fundamentally, is an argument

that is either deductively sounddeductively sound or inductively inductively cogentcogent.

A good argument, fundamentally, is an argument

that is either deductively sounddeductively sound or inductively inductively cogentcogent.

This definition is

NotNot fully adequate.

Page 9: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Evaluating Arguments3.7 Evaluating Arguments

A A good argumentgood argument from the standpoint of critical from the standpoint of critical thinking is:thinking is:

The most important critical thinking standards are:

AccuracyAccuracy – Are all the premises true?

Logical CorrectnessLogical Correctness – Is the reasoning correct? Is the argument deductively valid or inductively strong?

Also, other critical thinking standards must be taken into account, including clarity, precision, relevance, consistency, completeness and fairness.

An argument that satisfies the An argument that satisfies the relevant critical thinking relevant critical thinking

standards standards that apply in a particular that apply in a particular

context.context.

An argument that satisfies the An argument that satisfies the relevant critical thinking relevant critical thinking

standards standards that apply in a particular that apply in a particular

context.context.

Agree I do!

Page 10: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Evaluating Arguments3.7 Evaluating Arguments

General GuidelinesGeneral Guidelines (Key questions):

Are the premises true?

Is the reasoning correct? Is the argument deductively valid or

inductively strong?

Does the arguer commit any logical fallacies (Module 4)?

Does the arguer express his or her points clearly and precisely?

Are the premises relevant to the conclusion?

Are the arguer’s claims logically consistent? Do any of the arguer’s

claims contradict other claims made in the argument?

Is the argument complete? Is all relevant evidence taken into account

(given understandable limitations of time, space, context and so on)?

Is the argument fair? Is the arguer fair in his or her presentation of the

evidence and treatment of opposing arguments and views?

Page 11: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Evaluating Arguments3.7 Evaluating Arguments

When is it reasonable to accept a premise?

In general, it is reasonable to accept and unsupported claimunsupported claim as trueas true when:

1. The claim does not conflict with personal experiences that we have no good reason to doubt,

2. the claim does not conflict with background beliefs that we have no good reason to doubt, and

3. The claim comes from a credible source.

Women are smarter than Men! Men gossip more than Women!Women are better leaders than

Men!Men are more creative than

Women!

Women are smarter than Men! Men gossip more than Women!Women are better leaders than

Men!Men are more creative than

Women!

Under what Under what conditions is conditions is it reasonable it reasonable

to accept to accept such claims?such claims?

Page 12: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Evaluating Arguments3.7 Evaluating Arguments

1. Does the Claim Conflict with our Personal Experiences?1. Does the Claim Conflict with our Personal Experiences?

People often place too much trust in their own observation and experiences.

Personal experiences are often less reliable than we think. We need to be aware that “believing” is often “seeing” and that things are not always as they appear.

My dog is “as gentle as a kitten.” Got it!

Really?

Critical thinkersCritical thinkers recognize that their beliefs, hopes, fears, expectations, and biases can affect their observations.Critical thinkersCritical thinkers recognize that their beliefs, hopes, fears, expectations, and biases can affect their observations.

Page 13: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Evaluating Arguments3.7 Evaluating Arguments

2. Does the Claim Conflict with our Background Beliefs?2. Does the Claim Conflict with our Background Beliefs?

Background beliefsBackground beliefs – A vast network of conscious and unconscious convictions we use as a framework to assess the credibility of claims that can’t be verified directly.

“It was snowing in Kuala Lumpur last 31st August.”

“It was raining in Kuala Lumpur last 31st August.”

Critical thinkersCritical thinkers think very carefully about the beliefs they accept.

Never believe without sufficient evidence and never believe more strongly than the evidence warrants. – Watchwords of the wise.

Critical thinkersCritical thinkers think very carefully about the beliefs they accept.

Never believe without sufficient evidence and never believe more strongly than the evidence warrants. – Watchwords of the wise.

Page 14: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Evaluating Arguments3.7 Evaluating Arguments

3. Does the Claim Come from a Credible Source?3. Does the Claim Come from a Credible Source?Is the source a genuine expert or authority?

Does the source speak in his or her area of expertise?

Is the source biased or has some other motive to lie or mislead?

Is the accuracy of the source’s personal observations or experiences questionable?

Is the source contained in a source that is generally unreliable (e.g. gossip magazine) ?

Has the source been cited correctly or has been quoted out of context?

Is the issue one that can be settled by expert opinion?

Is the claim made by the source highly improbable on its face?

Critical thinkersCritical thinkers must ask, “Are all premises true?” and “Do the premises provide good reasons to accept the

conclusion?”

Critical thinkersCritical thinkers must ask, “Are all premises true?” and “Do the premises provide good reasons to accept the

conclusion?”

Page 15: Arguments (Part 3)

3.7 Exercise3.7 Exercise

For each of the following unsupported claimsunsupported claims, indicate whether or not it would be reasonable to accept the claim. Also, state the criteria you use in reaching your decision.

Black cats bring bad luck.

98% of statistics are just made up.

I read the entire Encyclopedia Britannica last summer

(said by a stranger at a party).

There is no hard scientific evidence that smoking is addictive (said

by a tobacco company executive).

Ghosts really exist.

Aliens have visited the earth in some form.

Page 16: Arguments (Part 3)

““Make it thy business to know thyself, which Make it thy business to know thyself, which is the most difficult lesson in the world.” is the most difficult lesson in the world.”

- Cervantes- Cervantes

Page 17: Arguments (Part 3)

Writing ArgumentsWriting Arguments

We construct arguments to:

Decide

Explain

Predict

Persuade

Etc.

Although your objective might be to win, your success in an argument should be measured by how well you defend your claim and fair,

accurate, and honest you are in presenting your case. Whether in the end your

opponent agrees or disagrees with you, you should strive to put forward the

most rational and even-handed presentation you can muster.

Although your objective might be to win, your success in an argument should be measured by how well you defend your claim and fair,

accurate, and honest you are in presenting your case. Whether in the end your

opponent agrees or disagrees with you, you should strive to put forward the

most rational and even-handed presentation you can muster.

Page 18: Arguments (Part 3)

3.8 Writing Arguments3.8 Writing Arguments

Before You WriteBefore You WriteKnow Yourself Why are you writing an argument? Are you willing to grant your opponent his or her good points and to defend your own fairly and honestly. Know Your Audience Adjust your style to the audience and anticipate their reactions. Always assume the best about your audience (open-minded, intelligent, rational and humane), which will prevent you from overstating your case.Choose and Narrow Your Topic Select a topic that is both controversial and interesting to you. Write a Sentence that Expresses Your Claim Provide a single statement of your central claim and organize your material in an manner that will allow your readers to easily recognize your premises. Gather Ideas: Brainstorm and Research List supporting and opposing premises. Distinguish between facts and opinions.Organize Your Ideas

Page 19: Arguments (Part 3)

3.8 Writing Arguments3.8 Writing Arguments

Writing the First DraftWriting the First DraftProvide an Interesting Opening Examples: Controversial, attention-grabber, surprising statistics, famous quote, interesting story, and a little-known fact.Include a Thesis StatementGive a clear and carefully worded statement of your claim somewhere in the opening paragraph.Develop your Body ParagraphsStart each body of paragraph with a topic sentence and develop the paragraph with details that support your topic. Be certain that you have defended your premises and any assumptions on which your argument is based. Defend your claim with factual evidence, expert opinion, examples and with appropriate analogies. Provide a Satisfying ConclusionExamples: Return to the opening, make a prediction, ask a question, call for action, end with a story different from the one you started with, and emphasize the importance of your claim.

Page 20: Arguments (Part 3)

3.8 Writing Arguments3.8 Writing Arguments

After the First DraftAfter the First DraftRead What You Have Written and Revise Look for both small issues (e.g. grammatically errors) and larger issues and evaluate your argument from the point of view of someone who disagrees with you. Be honest and question your evidence and logic.Consider What You Have not Written and ReviseTry to disagree with what you have written by finding a way to reject each of the premises you have offered as support. It will help reveal areas where connections are left unexplored or where unexamined assumptions are guiding your thinking.Show Your WorkBefore your write your final, edited draft seek the advice of your professor, a tutor, or a peer who might alert you to any shortcomings in the argument you may have failed to notice.Edit Your WorkCheck for grammatical mistakes, misused or missing punctuation, misspellings, and typographical errors. Also, try reading your paper out loud to hear how it sounds. Doing so can sometimes help reveal awkward phrases or repetitive sentence structures.Hand It InYour argument will be evaluated on its strength, its form and content, its support, etc.

Page 21: Arguments (Part 3)

Group ActivityGroup Activity

Break into groups of 4 - 6, read the articles (2) about entrepreneurship provided by the lecturer, and then:

Use the general guidelines (critical thinking standards) to evaluate the arguments stated in the articles.

Is Entrepreneurship Genetic or Can It be Learned?

What is your group’s opinion based on the articles provided and your previous knowledge and experiences about entrepreneurship?Document the group’s opinion and reasons to support it (less than 150 words).

10 min Read the articles

10 min Group discussion - Is Entrepreneurship Genetic or Can It be Learned?

5 min Document the group’s opinion and reasons to support it.

15 min Group presentation & discussion

The Group leader must submit their findings in hard-copy or soft-copy format to the lecturer before or during the next class.

Page 22: Arguments (Part 3)

SummarySummary

7. Evaluating Arguments

A good argument from the standpoint of critical thinking is an argument that satisfies the relevant critical thinking standards that apply in a particular context.

The most important critical thinking standards are:

1) Accuracy – Are all the premises true?

2) Logical Correctness – Is the reasoning correct? Is the argument deductively valid or inductively strong?

3) Also, other critical thinking standards must be taken into account, including clarity, precision, relevance, consistency, completeness and fairness.

8. Writing Arguments

Before You Write - Know yourself, Know your audience, Choose and narrow your topic, Write a sentence that expresses your claim, Gather ideas: brainstorm and research and Organize your ideas.

Writing the First Draft - Provide an interesting opening, Include a thesis statement, Develop your body paragraphs and Provide a satisfying conclusion.

After the First Draft - Read what you have written and revise, Consider what you have not written and revise, Show your work, Edit your work and Hand it in.

Page 23: Arguments (Part 3)

Any Questions? Any Questions?

Page 24: Arguments (Part 3)

The EndThe End

Page 25: Arguments (Part 3)

Contact DetailsContact Details

Zaid Ali AlsagoffZaid Ali Alsagoff

UNIVERSITI TUN ABDUL RAZAK 16-5, Jalan SS 6/1247301 Kelana Jaya

Selangor Darul EhsanMalaysia

E-mail: [email protected]    

Tel: 603-7627 7238 Fax: 603-7627 7246

Page 26: Arguments (Part 3)

ReferencesReferences

BooksBooksChapter 8 (Evaluating Arguments) & 13 (Writing Argumentative Essays): G Bassham, W Irwin, H Nardone, J M Wallace, Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction, McGraw-Hill International Edition, 2007

Online ResourcesOnline ResourcesEntrepreneur checklist (group activity): http://www.sitepoint.com/article/entrepreneurs-checklist Nature Vs Nurture (group activity) http://www.cnn.com/2006/BUSINESS/08/11/execed.genes/index.htmlGlobal Entrepreneurship Monitor: http://www.gemconsortium.org/

GraphicsEntrepreneurship 101 (book): http://www.trumpuniversity.com/lib/images/products/bkentrepreneurship101/entr101Cover.jpg Tony Fernandes: http://www.adasia2005.org.sg/images/speakers/TF.gif Nazir (CIMB): http://www.theedgedaily.com/cms/storage/images/com.tms.cms.image.Image_3dedfd01-cb73c03a-6279d000-d6e74387/1/Nazir_Razak_inside.jpg Lim Kok Wing: http://www.uptimax.com/smispro/N_samp/BrandEntrepreneurs_files/p3.jpg Richard Branson: http://www.richard-branson.com/rbranson.jpg Donald Trump: http://images.askmen.com/men/business_politics/pictures/folder_1/donald_trump/donald_trump_150.JPG Bill Gates: http://www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/images/Bill_Gates.jpg Sean Combs: http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/73/039_39751~Puff-Daddy-Posters.jpg Steve Jobs: http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/040727/040727_10greatestJObs_vmed_12p.widec.jpg Warren Buffet: http://www.getrichslowly.org/images/warrenbuffet.jpg Oprah Winfrey: http://www.vh1.com/shared/media/images/movies/people/w/winfrey_oprah/150x223.jpgMr Bean: http://home.zcu.cz/~petrx/bean/1.jpg Angry dog: http://www.pets.info.vic.gov.au/01/images/content/angry_dog.gif