25
LWV February 2, 2008 Residents Voice 2/7/8 Residents Voice 1

Agenda 02 07 08

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

1. GM Survey Statistics 2. Review of Audits

Citation preview

Page 1: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 1

LWVFebruary 2,

2008Residents Voice

2/7/8

Page 2: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 22/7/8

“Following the Money”

2/7/2008

Tonight’s Subjects !

• “Milt Johns & His Statistics!”

• “Review of Audits”

Page 3: Agenda 02 07 08

2/7/8 Residents Voice 3

Milt Johns 1/18/8 TV 6 Interview

Cheryl Walker1/21/8 OC Register Article

PCM Statistics!

Page 4: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 42/7/8

How Many People Were Included in the Numbers?

• MJ When Interviewed by Rob Merritt– 150-200 people, face to face, letters, emails,

telephone calls, etc.

• OC Register Article– 96 people Face to Face– 76 people via other means

• Total of 176 people

Page 5: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 62/7/8

Reference to Percentages

Source Positive Neutral Negative Total

1st ref

2nd ref

OC Reg

40%

40%

43%

20%

20%

35%

25%

35%

22%

85%

95%

100%

Page 6: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 72/7/8

Why the Differences in the Percentages?

• Nervous speaking in front of TV Audience!

• Didn’t have enough time to prepare for TV Interview!

• Who Cares! No one would notice!

Page 7: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 82/7/8

Conclusion!

• Give PCM at least three chances to come up with the right answer.

Page 8: Agenda 02 07 08

2/7/8 Residents Voice 9

Reviewof

AuditsC. Grundke

Page 9: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 102/7/8

Type of Audit Overview

• Yearly audit.

• Operational/Organizational Audit.

• Forensic/Detailed Audit.

Page 10: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 112/7/8

Yearly Audit

• Performed by KPMG to verify that we comply with Government Regulations. It does not verify the input data. Basically verifies the output only.

• Just like verifying that your hand calculator equals 4 when you add 2 + 2.

Page 11: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 122/7/8

Operational/Organizational Audit

• Understand the responsibilities and risks faced by an auditable department, unit or process, i.e.; Maintenance, MIS, etc.

• Assess the level of control exercised by management.

• Effectiveness and efficiency of operations .

• Safeguarding of assets.

Page 12: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 132/7/8

Forensic/Detailed Audit

“Forensic” auditing could be defined as the application of auditing skills to situations that have legal consequences.

For us, we would more appropriately require a “Detailed” audit.

Page 13: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 142/7/8

FRAUDULENT CLAIMS

John B. Richardson III, CPA, CFE

PO Box 26

Gibson Island, MD 21056

---

Tel: (410) 255-5162

Fax: (410) 360-6296

E-Mail: [email protected]

Presented by:

Page 14: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 152/7/8

FRAUDULENT CLAIMS

Common Types of Fraud Claims

What is Fraud?

Methods of Prevention

Page 15: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 162/7/8

What is Fraud?

“… all multifarious means which human ingenuity can devise, and which are resorted to by one individual to get advantage of over another by false suggestions or suppression of the truth. It includes all surprise, trick, cunning or dissembling, and any unfair way by which another is cheated.”

Page 16: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 172/7/8

Fraud Categories

• Misrepresentation of Material Facts • Concealment of Material Facts • Bribery • Conflicts of Interest • Theft of Money or property • Theft of Trade Secrets/Intellectual

Property • Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Page 17: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 182/7/8

Misrepresentation of Material Facts

• A Material False Statement • Knowledge of its Falsity • Reliance on the False Statement • Damages Suffered

Page 18: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 192/7/8

Difficulty of Determining Fraud

In every good Fraud there is an:

-- Element of Truth –

I.E.; “We are within the Budget!”

Page 19: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 202/7/8

Common Types of Fraud Claims

Left to the Imagination

of the

Actors Involved!

Page 20: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 212/7/8

Common Types of Fraud Claims

• Fictitious costs • Non-allowable costs • Non-allocable costs • False documentation • Inflated costs • Duplicate costs

Page 21: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 222/7/8

Common Types of Fraud Claims

• Erroneous methodology • Conflicts of interest • Conspiracy • Bid rigging • Related party transactions

Page 22: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 232/7/8

Detection/Prevention Techniques

Contractual Provisions

• Cost definitions • Cost measurement framework • Access to books and records • Audit Provision • Audit as an entitlement 

Page 23: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 242/7/8

Detection/Prevention Techniques

Project Procedure

• Timely cost variance reporting and variance resolution. 

• Question and resolve issues on a monthly basis.• Body of knowledge to measure/report costs. • Adequately staff the job accounting. • Strong project controls.

Page 24: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 252/7/8

Past Audits

• Yearly audit by KPMG.• Corbin & Wertz MIS audit in 2000.• Ernst & Young audit in 1997.• Science Management Corporation Internal

audit in 1991.

Page 25: Agenda 02 07 08

Residents Voice 262/7/8

THE END