CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

A Model of Learning:

Turn what you Know,

Into what you Do

By Peter Anyebe

AGAPE

CONSULTANTS

9th

October, 2014

View

my profile

WordPress

Google Me

Google+

Website:

www.identi

tykit.org

Keywords: Forms, Objects, Reality, Relativity, Normality,

Relationships, Duality, Phenomenology, Behaviorism

To turn what you know into what you do,

it is sufficient that

phenomena are reduced into forms

CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

A Model of Learning

That Turns what you Know

Into what you Do By

Peter Anyebe

Value creation has a form.

Ultimately, knowledge is it.

But there has to be a person, for knowledge to

be relevant.

And the link factor that makes knowledge

relevant, or not, is learning. Serially:

Objectivity, f0 is the approximation of the natural order, N-O by the personal order,

P-O. It is the capacity to reconstruct the standard procedure series, SPS which is

the analogue of the N-O. The N-O outlines the unit perspective of reality that

approximates truth, within a certain tolerable limit. It is founded on the following

principles:

Relativity

Normality

Duality

Thus following Einstein’s relativity principle, the universe is characterized by

curved space. This distorts the perspective of reality. And the distortion is

View my profile Google Me WordPress

3. Learning, F Productivity

2. Knowledge, L 6. Power, Po

1. Person, A 5. Objectivity, f0

4. Value Creation, S

operationalized in the infinite number of possible

perspectives of phenomena that the sphere

represents. Notice that an event in space can be

viewed from an infinite number of positions,

each of which represents a perspective of the

event. But by the normality principle in games

theory, a game of infinite moves can be reduced

into one unit move; which is then iterated, until

the game ends. This indicates the possibility to

reduce the infinite perspectives of reality into one

unit perspective that is acceptable. By Plato’s

duality principle, nature is characterized by two, 2 worlds as follows:

The world of forms, L

The world of objects, A

This requires a conversion factor or procedure, F to translate events from one world

to the other. The duality series in operations research suggests the outline of the

procedure, which would at once define the unit perspective. Serially:

Maxima, F

Minimax, L

Maximin, A

Minima, S

To derive this perspective, it is sufficient to define

the form of the phenomenon, S. Forms are

adequately characterized by three, 3 features,

according to the three, 3 components of the mind;

which include the will, A the intellect, F and the

emotion, L. These features define the work, L that is to be done, the energy, F with

which the work is to be funded, and the exhaust, A by which progress is to be

tracked. But objects are material. And matter has been reduced into waves, which

are adequately defined by two, 2 features that include location and size. The

standard procedure series, SPS is therefore derived by fission of the factors L, A,

and F to define the six, 6 components of the series exemplified above and presented

below:

While forms are derived intuitively, Pc the wave equivalents are determined

rationally, Rn. The Thomas Troward principle of reciprocity is basis to confirm that

each of the first, 1st four, 4 active items of the series are located appropriately. In

thought therefore, a position, L2 is usually taken, which describes the nature of the

phenomenon that is anticipated. The choice of position is then defended, by a

precedent, L1 which identifies an initial state of the phenomenon that has to be

nurtured into the expected matured nature. The defense is then supported by two, 2

antecedents, F1and F2, which represent the impulse and sustenance components of

the phenomenon respectively. The former defines the rate of improvement from

nurture to nature, and the latter is the requirement that ensures that the process is

completed.

Recall that the first, 1st four, 4 items of the standard procedure series describe the

work that is to be done, and the energy that is required. The fifth, 5th

item defines the

exhaust, or the principle that ties up the process defined in the four, 4 steps; which is

basis for tracking. And the sixth, 6th

item on the series is the purpose that is to be

achieved. It would therefore be sufficient to outline the first, 1st four, 4 items of the

series, as evidence that the person has understanding. Then, the person would be

expected to act on what they know. Recall that antecedents build on phenomena

that occurred earlier in time (precedents?), as evidence that the phenomena that

follow in the series, will ultimately occur in the future. This minimizes the risk of

uncertainty that is due to relativity and a curved-space universe.

To be learned therefore, it would be sufficient to derive the first, 1st four, 4 items of

the standard procedure series, SPS. Then, it would be certain that what the person

knows can turn into what they do. A model of learning is presented that summarizes

this concept. Diagrammatically:

F

L

A

3. F1 S

2. L2 6. A2

1. L1 5. A1

4. F2

By this model, learning would be rooted in desire, which resides in the emotion, L

but remains dormant until a decision is made for fulfillment. This generates all the

energy, in the form of the motive strength, C’ that is required, for the process;

according to the level of commitment, C of the will, A. The energy is expended on

the following two, 2 processes:

To derive the procedure for desire fulfillment, for CWK = Work

To overcome the vagaries of the environment that pose as obstacles in the

process, for CNd = Need

Then, C’ = CWK + CNd. And a correlation coefficient, r of r = 0.9996 has been found

between C and C’. The factor-C is actually a measure of character, C which has also

been found to relate to the factor-A for A’ = 19(C - 1). This relationship is confirmed

in another relationship that describes need, ? in terms of the factor-A for A = L2.?

.

The two, 2 factors A, and A’ are correlated, for r = 0.95. In this case, need, ? is

evaluated as ? = 1 – Po, where the factor-Po describes the power, Po that has been

stored in the personality, F for response to stimuli. It is optimum at 0.98, for Po =

0.98. This is when the number of essential elements, Nu that the person is able to

derive equals four, 4 for Nu = 4. This power is acquired in the learning process. It

puts a value on the intellect, F where the process is carried on.

The procedure that is derived in this

process is stored in the emotion, L from

where it is recalled, for action, when

required. Émile Coué has reduced

mental memory into the following three,

3 spaces:

Consciousness, F which is intellectual

Sub-conscious, L is emotional and

Un-conscious, A is the will

The un-conscious memory regulates the visceral systems that sustain life. Usually,

this memory cannot be accessed directly. But it defines a standard for the sub-

conscious memory, which is derived consciously, by the intellect. The standard is

attained at the approximation of the N-O. Intuition, Pc is rooted in the sub-

conscious, which controls reflex actions. When the procedures that have been stored

here are standardized, then L = F, where both factors are a unity, for L = F = 1.

Deviances from the standard are evaluated as, L = 1/A F2, as the factor-A tends

towards a unity, for A → 1. In the myth of

the elephant and the skeleton presented

beside, the skeletal-intellect only takes

charge of the elephanted-emotion when

the standard is approximated. Emotional

Intelligence?

Selected Bibliography 1. Aaron, Raymond (1967) Main Currents in

Sociological Thought, 1

Penguine Books;

Auguste Comte: pp63-109

2. Aaron, Raymond (1967) Main Currents in

Sociological Thought, 2

Penguine Books;

Emile Durheim: pp 21-117

Max Werber: pp 185-258

3. Brooks, Harry C (1922) The Practice of

Autosuggestion by the Method

of Emile Coue.

Dodd, Mead & Co.

4. Carpenter, Harry W. (2005) The Power of your

Sub-Conscious Mind:

How it works, and how to use it.

Anaphase Publishing

2739 Wightman Street

Sandiego CA 92104-3526

5. Carroll, H.A. (1969) Mental Hygiene The

Dynamics of Adjustment

Prentice – Hall Inc.

6. Catell, R. B. (1965) The Scientific Analysis of

Personality. Penguine Books

7. Coombs, C. et al (1970) Mathematical

Psychology, An Elementary

Introduction. Prentice Hall Inc.

8. Cosgrove, M. P. (1977) The Essence of Human

Nature. Zondervan Publishers

9. Coué, E (1920) Self Mastery Through Conscious

Autosuggestion PSI TEK edition

10. De La Cruz, A. et al (1981) Physiological Basis

of Human Behaviour KEN

inc. Quezon City Philippines

11. Gladwell, Malcolm (2008) OUTLIERS The Story

of Success. Little, Brown and

Company New York •

Boston • London

12. Fitz-enz, Jac (2,000) The ROI of Human Capital:

Measuring the Economic Value of Employee Performance.

American Management Association; AMACOM

13. Freud, Sigmund (1924) A General Introduction to

Psycho-Analysis

Washington Square Press Inc.

N.Y. June 1966.

14. Hume, D. (1740). A Treatise of Human Nature

(1967, edition).

Oxford University Press, Oxford.

15. Kant, Immanuel (1963) Critique of Pure Reason

(1781; rev. ed. 1787),

trans. N. K. Smith (London:

MacMillan & Co.).

16. Maltz, Maxwell (1960) Psycho-Cybernetics: A

New Approach for using your

Subconscious Power.

Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Englewood Cliffs, N.J

17. Niven, David (2000) THE 100 SIMPLE

SECRETS OF Happy People:

What Scientists Have Learned

And How You Can Use It.

Harper San Francisco; A Division

of Harper Co Ums Publisbers

18. Pickering, W. S. F. (1975) Durkheime on

Religion, A Selection of Readings.

RKP

19. Rae Alastair (1986) Quantum Physics, Illusion or

Reality? Cambridge University

Press, NY

20. St. Augustine (1950) The City of God. Edited by

Vernon J Bourke Image Books,

1958 Garden City, N.Y.

21. Wann, T. W. (1964) Behaviourism and

Phenomenology, Constrasting

Bases for Modern Psychology.

University of Chicago Press.

Contributors: Sigmund Kock,

R. B. Macleod,

Nroman Malcolm,

Carl Rogers,

Micheal Scriven,

B. F. Skinner.

My Links: Literature

1. The Character Model; An Approach to put a Value on People uniquely, according to their Capacity

for Productivity, Leadership, and therefore Self Containment and Sustainability

2. Niche:

A Model of Energy Transfer

3. Thought Systems

4. The Identity Kit:

A Measure of Personal Development

5. The Mind:

A Perception Model

6. The Model Human:

A Thinker and a Learner

7. The Natural Order:

Globalisation of HR Metrics to Optimise People Value for Sustained Organisational Growth and a

Liquefied Business Environment

8. The Identity Kit:

Toward a Cultural Revolution, Driven by a Precise HR

9. Performance Appraisal:

A Talent Management Platform for Sustainability and a Stable Society

10. The Standard Procedure Series:

A Phenomenology Model of Being that is the Basis for Performance Appraisal by the Sustainability

Model

11. The Hourglass:

The Shape of the Human Form

12. Endorsements, Consciousness, Productivity, and the Creation of Value

13. Environmental Determinism:

Toward a Work Culture that is the Secret Plan Nature has worked out via a Universal History

14. A Model Of Learning

15. The Value Creation Model

16. God:

The Breath that Fires the Equations that Describe the Universe

17. Philosophy in the 3rd Millennium:

The Meeting Point of Physics and Psychology

18. Precision:

Making the Best of the Information Revolution

E-Book: The Path to Soul: Toward a Value Creation Paradigm, An alternative to The

Profit and Loss Paradigm in the determination of the ROI.pdf

Instruments 1. The Productivity Model

2. The Leadership Model

3. Bill of Health Index

4. Sustainability

5. Pc Recommend

6. Recommendations