Upload
vishwanath-koti
View
84
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
2. 626 B. TAMBAT, K. VISHWANATH, G.N. CHAITHRA AND T.S. HAREESH F O R M A T T E D P R O O F habitat destruction, which influences the local microclimate, could be one of the major cause for reduced germination and survival of G. canarica. As for as seed germination is concerned the species possess hard seed coat and shown lower germination under nursery conditions (unpublished). It is likely that the species may have seed coat induced dormancy, as observed in few forest species (Naidu et al., 2000; Tigabu and Oden, 2001). The present study aims to assess the effective seed treatment that would enhance seed germination under laboratory conditions and thereby facilitate conservation of G. canarica an endangered tree species through re-introduction or enrichment planting. The reintroduction of species in to its natural habitat is one of the best strategies for the conservation of critically endangered endemic species, as it would act as a functional bridge between the ex situ and in situ conservation methods (Frankel et al., 1995). Materials and methods Mature seeds of Gymnacranthera canarica Warb. were collected from Kathlekan forest, Siddapura range (14 16' 250, 74 44' 880) of Uttara Kannada in Karnataka during October and November 2004. The seeds were washed in water and bulked before imposing any treatment. The seed viability was confirmed by following 2,3,5-Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride (TTC) test using randomly selected 300 seeds of 100 seeds in each replications from the seed lot (Agrawal and Dadlani, 1995). The seeds were allowedto germinate in pots containing sand under ambient conditions, as Bhat and Kaveriappa, (2002) have shown better germination by sand method than blotter in laboratory condition (25-28C) in Gymnocranthera farquhariana Hook. (Synonymous with Gymnacranthera canarica Warb., Gamble 1935). Totally 14 treatments were imposed including control with three replications of 50 seeds and details as follows; (1) Control (without any treatment), (2) Entire seed coat removal, (3) Diaphragm aperture + GA3 @50 ppm (16hrs), (4) Diaphragm aperture + GA3 @100 ppm (16hrs), (5) Diaphragm aperture + GA3 @250 ppm (16hrs), (6) Diaphragm aperture + GA3 @500 ppm (16hrs), (7) Diaphragm aperture + IAA @50 ppm (16hrs), (8) Diaphragm aperture + IAA @100 ppm (16hrs), (9) Diaphragm aperture + IAA @250 ppm (16hrs), (10) Diaphragm aperture + IAA @500 ppm (16hrs), (11) Boiling water (100C for 15 sec), (12) Boiling water (100C for 15 sec)+ IAA @100 ppm (16 hrs), (13) Boiling water (100C for 15 sec) + GA3 @100 ppm (16 hrs) and (14) Cold (-12C for 12 hrs). The number of seeds germinated was recorded by taking out the seedling from the sand bed. Per cent germination was computed based on normal seedling basis. The data of germination was subjected to arcsin transformation for statistical analysis. Following Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and adopting Fischers Analysis of Variance Technique critical difference values were calculated at 5 per cent probability level (where F test was significant). Dunnetts t test was then performed to compare control with all other treatments (Panse and Sukhatme, 1967). 3. 627 IMPROVED GERMINATION OF GYMNACRANTHERA CANARICA F O R M A T T E D P R O O F Results and discussion From Tetrazolium test it was confirmed that viability of seeds selected for imposing dormancy treatments was 98 per cent and were showed deep red embryonic axis and cotyledons. Only two per cent of seeds were showed unstained embryonic axis and pale red staining with unstained areas in cotyledons. However, we could observe only 40 per cent germination under ambient condition, emphasizing the presence of dormancy in these seeds. Pre sowing treatments have been shown to enhancing seed germination in many species (Kattimani et al., 1999; Pandey et al., 2000; Joshi and Dhar, 2003). The effect of seed treatment on germination of Gymnocranthera canarica after four months has been shown in figure 1. Per cent germination of seeds with 14 treatments varied from 0 to 79 per cent. As for as improved germination, seed coat removal alone increased the germination by 20 per cent indicating the partial permeability of seed coat to the water. Such results were also noticed by Naidu et al., (2000) in Sapindus trifoilatus and Tigabu and Oden, (2001) in Albizia sp. The application of GA3 along with partial seed coat removal further enhanced the germination (40% over control). However, the per cent germination varied with the concentration of GA3; we observed maximum germination (79%) in seeds treated with 100 ppm GA3 then that of other treatments (i. e. 73 % @ 50 ppm and 70% @ 250 ppm). Forest species are known to contain certain inhibitory compounds in seed coat and (or) Figure 1. Mean seed germination (%) as influenced by the treatment in Gymnacranthera canarica. (Note: Hormonal treatments was imposed by soaking the seeds in different concentrations of hormone solution after diaphragm aperture / partial removal of seed coat for 16 hours). * 1 - Significantly superior over control * 2 - Significantly inferior over control NS - Non significant over control 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Control Entireseedcoatremovel HormoneGA350(16hr) HormoneGA3100(16hr) HormoneGA3250(16hr) HormoneGA3500(16hr) HormoneIAA50(16hr) HormoneIAA100(16hr) HormoneIAA250(16hr) HormoneIAA500(16hr) Boilingwater(100oC-15sec) Bolingwater+IAA100 Bolingwater+GA3100 Cold(-12oC-12hrs) MeanGermination(%) LSD(P