Upload
andrew-ma
View
2.555
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
November 21, 2013
Asia Pacific
2014 Outlook: Back on track
Portfolio Strategy Research
DM recovery and China reform drive our North Asia preference
Better absolute and relative returns
We expect 13% total US$ return in 2014 (MXAPJ 525 target), which would
be an improvement on the region’s 2% return in 2013 and 20% under-
performance vs. DM. We see improving global growth, the related tapering
of quantitative easing in the US, policy adjustment in Asia (China reform,
south Asia macro tightening), and politics as key macro themes.
Earnings: key performance driver
We expect earnings to accelerate back to trend in 2015 after 4 years of sub-
trend growth. Our top-down EPS growth forecasts are 10% and 14% for
2014 and 2015. Capex discipline and moderating input costs should help
non-financial margins improve 50bp to 7% in 2015 after a 20bp gain in ’14.
Little room for valuation expansion, except in China
Equal-weighted P/E valuations are 15.9x forward earnings, 0.8sd above the
10-yr mean and 31% higher than cap-weighted multiples. Macro models
and real earnings yield gaps point to flat valuations. EPS growth will
therefore be the main return driver. China is the exception: we expect
multiples to recover from a low base as confidence in reform builds.
Upgrade China, Taiwan; three flavors of earnings
We upgrade China on improving reform momentum, and also raise
Taiwan and stay Overweight Korea for their exposure to improving DM
growth. By macro slice, we advocate global cyclicals vs. asset-sensitive
financials. Stock ideas: three flavors of earnings: delta (rising margins),
value (attractively priced growth), and destination (Europe-exposed).
Secular themes: consumption digitalization, urbanization and green GDP.
China’s valuations may respond favorably to reforms; Korea and Taiwan
are most sensitive to stronger global growth
Source: FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Timothy Moe, CFA +852-2978-1328 [email protected] Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.
Kinger Lau, CFA +852-2978-1224 [email protected] Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.
Richard Tang, CFA +852-2978-0722 [email protected] Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.
Sunil Koul +852-2978-0924 [email protected] Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.
Ketaki Garg +91(80)6637-8601 [email protected] Goldman Sachs India SPL
Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investorsshould be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investorsshould consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and otherimportant disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. Analysts employed bynon-US affiliates are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA in the U.S. This report is intended fordistribution to GS institutional clients only.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Global Investment Research
AU
CN
HK
IN
ID
KR
MY
PH SG
TWTH
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Sen
sit
ivit
y
Correlation
Asian markets and global cycle
5
10
15
20
25
J-01 J-03 J-05 J-07 J-09 J-11 J-13
12-month forward P/E (MXCN)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 2
Table of contents
Executive summary: Back on track 3
Market view changes: Upgrade China and Taiwan to Overweight 8
Implementation: Emphasizing earnings 14
Key questions for 2014 21
Performance context: Intra-regional differentiation at play 26
Macro: Return expectations, views, and path 29
Earnings: Back to trend growth in 2015 after 4 years of weakness 37
Valuations: Not much room for expansion except for China 43
Positioning: Potential for continuing shift to North Asia 46
Secular themes: Buy on dips 49
Events in 2014 and beyond 55
Appendix 1: Goldman Sachs macro forecasts 56
Appendix 2: Valuations at a glance 57
Appendix 3: China reform policies 58
Disclosure Appendix 62
The authors would like to thank Vincent Lau and Nitin Chanduka for their valuable contributions.
All prices in this report are as of November 18, unless mentioned otherwise.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 3
Executive summary: Back on track
After a year of flat returns and dramatic underperformance vs. DM, we expect 2014 to
be a better year in absolute and relative terms. We believe earnings growth will be
the main performance driver since aggregate valuations are full. We favor China on
improving reform momentum, Korea and Taiwan for their exposure to better DM
growth, and three flavors of earnings growth (delta, value, and revenue-source).
Regional return. We expect the MXAPJ index to reach 525 by end-2014, implying
10% price and 13% total returns in USD. Earnings growth will be the key propellant,
but 3% weighted-average exchange rate depreciation and some valuation
compression may serve to offset some of the earnings gains. Within the region,
we upgrade China and Taiwan to Overweight and stay positive on Korea. Total
US$ returns for these markets could be 15% to 23%.
Expected path. Our 3m and 6m targets are 485 and 490, implying a modest start
to the year and a stronger 2H. Key influences are likely to be the timing and
magnitude of Fed tapering, the reaction to China’s reform policies, the political
calendar in markets like India and Indonesia, and whether corporate Asia is able to
deliver earnings. Policy decisions will be sensitive to high-frequency macro
indicators, which means markets will be data dependent and the price path noisy.
Key themes. The main macro themes we see are the improvement in global
growth to 3.6% from 2.8% (PPP terms) driven by the US, and the related tapering
of quantitative easing as US monetary policy begins to normalize. Within the
region, policy adjustment (China reform, south Asia macro tightening) and
politics will also impact markets. The key micro theme is the potential earnings
growth recovery in 2015 (which the market will anticipate in 2H14), driven in good
measure by supply side factors such as capex discipline and cost management.
Performance context. Regional equities are roughly flat for 2013 with wide
amplitude of intra-year swings. Performance is at the 36th percentile in absolute
terms relative to the MXAPJ’s 26-year history and the 20th percentile relative to DM
equities over the same time frame. Market rotation was greater than sector
rotation, and FX weakness reduced USD returns by 5%. Looking forward, we
expect currency to be an important component of returns (albeit less negative),
and expect meaningful market, theme and stock performance differentiation.
Earnings: key return driver. We expect earnings growth to accelerate back to
trend in 2015 after 4 years of sub-trend growth. Our top-down regional earnings
growth forecasts are 10% and 14% for 2014 and 2015 (EPS integers are $38.40 and
$43.70). These are 2% below and 4% above the respective consensus expectations.
Demand-side models have overestimated earnings recently, because the shortfall
has come from margins rather than revenues. Regional capacity utilization
currently stands at 67.3%, a full 10pp below the 77.6% level in the US, and this
excess capacity has depressed profitability. Capex discipline and moderating input
cost pressures should result in non-financial margins improving 50bp to 7% in
2015 after a 20bp uptick in 2014.
Valuation: Not much room for expansion. The region currently trades at 12.1x
forward 12m earnings and 1.6x trailing book value, about 0.7sd below the 10-yr
mean. However, cap-weighted valuations are distorted downwards by China SOEs
and Korea electronics stocks. Equal-weighted valuations are 31% higher at 15.9x
forward earnings, which is 0.8 sd above average and from which point historical
returns have been subdued. Macro models point to flat valuations relative to our
forecasts, and real earnings yield gaps also look fair relative to range. In sum, we
expect little valuation change in 2014: EPS growth will be the main return driver.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 4
Positioning: Potential for continuing shift to N Asia. Regional equity flows
recovered after the mid-year selloff, with $28bn ytd inflows overall. India continues
to attract the highest flows ($17bn) with Korea and Taiwan next at $14bn
combined, and Thailand and Indonesia seeing net selling. Active positioning
remains biased towards south Asia, with mutual funds overweight India and
ASEAN by 495 and 948bp and underweight China, Korea and Taiwan by 582, 769
and 649bp. Given better macro characteristics relative to our global forecasts, we
see scope for added flows to N Asia and for flows from bonds to equities.
Risks: The principal macro threats to our more constructive stance are a) global
growth falling short of our expected improvement, b) more aggressive Fed policy
tightening, c) China faltering on reform implementation, d) politically-driven
volatility, e) an oil shock (we expect a benign price path), and f) contagion from
other EMs. The main micro risk is continuing earnings shortfall if Asian companies
are not able to deliver the margin recovery we expect.
Secular themes. Focal areas include:
o Digitalization of consumption: Smartphone demand, internet
commercialization, disruptive technologies like array cameras, and big
data and cloud computing.
o Urbanization: Includes infrastructure and healthcare.
o Green GDP: Environmental protection is emerging as a key China theme,
and includes alternative energy such as solar, gas, wind and hydro.
Key questions.
o Asia vs DM relative performance. Our forecasts for the key global
regions imply more equivalent returns in 2014 as opposed to the
lopsided performance in 2013. The region’s relative performance may
improve later in 2014 if earnings show signs of a pickup as we expect.
o ASEAN. We expect ASEAN to continue to lag the broader region after
outperforming from 2006 to 2012. 2H14 may be a better time to revisit
once the current cyclical macro adjustment is more mature.
o China internet and Macau gaming. These were the strong performers of
2013 and helped many investors perform. We advocate buying
corrections because the fundamental theme is powerful and not yet
mature.
o China banks. The top 10 country-sectors in the MXAPJ index account for
42% of market cap, meaning decisions in this area will have outsized
impact on relative performance. China banks are the fourth largest
country sector (after Australia banks and Taiwan and Korea tech). Risk is
to the upside near-term given reform momentum.
o Tech. Tech is the 2nd largest sector regionally, accounting for 15% of
market cap. We are overweight and expect ‘old tech’ to perform well,
along with ‘new tech’.
Markets: Raise China and Taiwan, continue to favor Korea
o Overweight
China: Upgrade: policy reform could raise valuation off low base
Korea: Attractive macro profile, mid-teens EPS growth, inexpensive
Taiwan: Upgrade: favorable macro exposure enhanced by high yield
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 5
o Market weight
India: Reduced external vulnerability, earnings holding up
Malaysia: Upgrade given moderating external risk and low vol; full vals
Philippines: Strongest ASEAN-4 fundamentals; valuations still high
Singapore: Downgrade: better alternatives in N Asia
o Underweight
Australia: Weak domestic fundamentals, significant AUD downside risk
Hong Kong: Challenges from QE exit; high valuation relative to China
Indonesia: Tighter policy to impact n/t growth; outlook better later in 2014
Thailand: Downgrade on macro/policy risks; earnings/valuations fair
Sectors: selected cyclicals
o Overweight: Autos, tech hardware & semis, banks, software, transport
o Market weight: Energy, health care, capital goods, insurance,
metals/mining, chemicals, retail
o Underweight: Real estate, utilities, staples, telecom
Implementation: Emphasizing earnings
o Markets: long Korea; HSCEI 3-month call spreads, China reform-
beneficiary basket
o Macro slices: global cyclicals vs. asset-sensitive financials (GSSZMSGC
vs. GSSZMSFA)
o Three flavors of earnings: Delta earnings (margin expansion); Value
earnings (attractively priced growth); Destination earnings (Europe-
exposed stocks)
o Secular themes: Plays on consumption digitalization, urbanization, green
GDP
o Derivatives: Preferred downside hedge is ASX 200 Mar-end puts.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 6
Exhibit 1: We expect more balanced returns between regions in 2014
Note: TOPIX EPS is based on fiscal, not calendar years.
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 2: We prefer North Asia
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 3: Market scorecard
Note: Blue cells refer to favorable metrics, whilst grey cells refer to unfavorable ones. For GDP, blue (grey) cells indicate sharp acceleration (deceleration) vs 2013. For inflation, blue (grey) cells indicate sharp deceleration (acceleration) vs 2013. For sensitivity, blue cells refer to significant positive impact in equity market returns given changes in our Global Leading Indicator. For detail, please refer to Asia Pacific: Portfolio Strategy: Bridging macro to micro: 18 ideas for North Asia, October 24.
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Total Forward P/E
Price Price Target Price Return Return EPS Growth Current Year-End
Index 19-Nov-13 3-mo 6-mo 12-mo 3-mo 6-mo 12-mo (USD) 2014E 2015E Consensus 2014E
TOPIX 1,237 1,350 1,375 1,450 9 % 11 % 17 % 12 % 21 % 14 % 14.3 x 13.6 x
Stoxx Europe 600 323 330 340 360 2 5 12 19 14 13 13.5 12.9
MXAPJ 478 485 490 525 1 2 10 13 10 14 12.1 12.0
S&P 500 1,788 1,800 1,850 1,900 1 3 6 8 8 8 14.9 15.2
EPS growth (%) 12-month return forecasts (%)
Allocation Market Index
Index
level (Nov
18)
CY14E CY15E
Local
price
return
FX
change
Dividend
yield
USD
total
return
China HSCEI 11,307 10 11 10.0 13,600 20 -1 3 23
Taiwan TWSE 8,191 11 13 14.0 9,200 12 2 3 17
Korea KOSPI 2,011 15 15 9.1 2,350 17 -3 1 15
Singapore FSSTI 3,203 8 14 12.5 3,300 3 8 4 15
Malaysia FBMKLCI 1,792 8 10 15.3 1,950 9 0 3 12
Philippines PCOMP 6,343 8 16 15.5 6,300 -1 9 2 10
India NIFTY 6,189 12 18 13.7 6,900 11 -3 2 10
Indonesia JCI 4,394 12 17 13.0 5,000 14 -2 3 15
Thailand SET 1,424 9 11 11.8 1,510 6 -1 4 8
Hong Kong MXHK 13,310 6 9 15.0 14,100 6 -1 3 8
Australia AS51 5,385 8 11 14.5 5,900 10 -9 5 5
Asia Pacific ex Japan (USD) MXAPJ 478 10 14 12.0 525 12 -3 3 13
Asia ex Japan (USD) MXASJ 556 11 13 11.4 625 13 -1 3 15
Underweight
Target
P/E (X)
Index
target
Marketweight
Overweight
Ch
ina
Taiw
an
Ko
rea
Sin
gap
ore
Ma
lay
sia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ind
ia
Ind
on
esi
a
Au
str
ali
a
Th
ailan
d
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
2014 GDP growth (%) 7.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 5.0 6.3 5.0 5.3 2.0 4.2 3.7
2014 Inflation (%) 3.1 1.4 2.4 3.3 2.8 3.8 6.5 6.8 2.9 2.8 3.3
Sensitivity to global growth √ √ √ √
2014E-15E EPS CAGR (%) 11 12 15 11 9 12 15 15 10 10 8
NTM P/E (X) 9.3 14.1 8.8 14.1 15.5 18.5 14.4 13.3 14.5 11.9 15.0
LTM P/B (X) 1.5 1.8 1.2 1.5 2.2 3.1 2.5 3.1 2.0 2.2 1.3
Avg. of 10y Z scores for P/E & P/B (1.0) (0.2) (0.8) (0.4) 0.7 1.5 (0.6) (0.1) 0.1 0.5 (0.6)
Currency 12-mo chg vs. US$ (%) (0.6) 1.9 (3.4) 8.4 0.1 8.8 (6.0) (1.7) (9.3) (1.3) (0.6)
Positioning Asia-fund bp OW/UW √ √ √ X O O X O X X X
OW OW OW MW MW MW MW UW UW UW UW
Macro
Valuations
EPS growth
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 7
Exhibit 4: Cyclicals over defensives
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 5: China, Taiwan, Korea and 3 flavors of earnings
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
GS Asia STAMP
Current STAMP Scores based on our macro views and latest dataMacro EPS Relative Current Current GS
Views Sentiment Valuation STAMP Score Allocation
Autos & Components √√ √√ √ √√ Overweight
Tech Hardware & Semis √√ x √√ Overweight
Banks √ √√ √√ Overweight
Software & Services √√ √√ xx √ Overweight
Transportation x Overweight
Energy √√ √√ √√ Marketweight
Health Care √ √ Marketweight
Capital Goods xx √ Marketweight
Insurance & other Financials √ Marketweight
Metals & Mining √ x Marketweight
Chemicals & other Materials xx x xx Marketweight
Consumer Retail & Services √ xx xx xx Marketweight
Real Estate x √ √√ Underweight
Utilities x xx x Underweight
Consumer Staples xx x xx Underweight
Telecom Services xx x √ xx Underweight
Current "Simplified"Macro Views
Growth: A mild pick upDom. vs. Extenal: ExternalInfl. vs. Growth: NeutralPolicy: Neutral
Current metric is:√√ Very favorable√ Favorable
Neutralx Negativexx Very Negative
Our trade recommendations
China: Reform beneficiaries; HSCEI 3-month call-spreads
Taiwan: Stock ideas in 'Old Tech'
Korea: EWY, KOSPI 200 6-month call-spreads
Macro slices Global Cyclicals vs Asset-Sensitive Fins. <GSSZMSGC vs. GSSZMSFA>
Margin expansion (Delta Earnings)
Growth at value (Value Earnings)
Europe-exposed (Destination Earnings)
Downside Hedge March expiry outright puts on ASX 200 (Australia)
Secular Themes Digitalization of consumption, Urbanization, and Green GDP
Style / Themes:
Earnings Growth
Markets
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 8
Market view changes: Upgrade China and Taiwan to Overweight
China: Upgrade to OW on improving reform momentum; 3 ways to
engage
We upgrade China to Overweight from Market weight for the following reasons:
The long-waited catalyst has materialized: A full plenary document was
released on November 15, a few days after the closure of the session. The detailed
document, which covers many specific commitments including market
deregulation/financial reform, fiscal and tax policy, safety nets/demographics,
urban/rural; and SOE reform, has reinvigorated market expectations on reform and
China’s longer-term growth prospects.
Reform momentum is likely to stay strong in the coming months: While we
are mindful of being carried away by policy-driven sentiment swings as the speed
and effectiveness with which the measures will be executed remains to be seen
and China still needs to work through numerous structural challenges, we believe
there is a reasonable chance that we may see a more concrete timetable and
implementation details to be announced at the ministry level in the coming
few months.
A decent fundamental configuration: Our economists expect China’s GDP to
grow 7.8% on a real basis in both 2014 and 2015, leading to stable 10% and 11%
EPS growth for China in those respective years based on our top-down forecast.
Inexpensive valuations: China currently trades on 9.3x forward P/E and 1.5x
trailing book, 0.9 and 1.1 s.d. to the attractive side of their respective 10-year
ranges. We fully acknowledge that low valuation is not always a strong argument
to turn bullish, but we think it is a tailwind for returns when catalysts emerge.
Light positioning: EPFR data suggests GEM- and Asia-focused funds are currently
underweight China by 290 bps and 582 bps respectively, suggesting favorable
positioning normalization risk.
Implementation: We recommend 3 ways to get upside exposure to China
o We continue to favor reform beneficiaries and highlight 9 buy-rated
stocks which revolve around the themes of mass market consumption,
healthcare, brokers and defense (Exhibit 8).
o Chinese banks, which are the fourth largest country-sector in MXAPJ, are
trading at very low absolute valuations (5.1X 2014E P/E, 0.9X P/B) and may
see asymmetric upside risk if more bank-specific reform policies are laid
out in the foreseeable future. We are OW banks at both regional market
and China levels.
o We recommend investors take advantage of moderate vol and elevated
call-skew (OTM calls expensive relative to ATM calls) by buying call-
spreads on HSCEI. 3-month 105/115% call-spreads currently cost 2.15%,
at 27% cost-savings to outright 105% calls (2.95%), much higher than
similar call-spreads on most markets globally. The trade provides a
maximum payout of 4.7x if HSCEI rallies 15% by expiry. Risks: Buyers of
105/115% call-spreads risk capped upside if HSCEI rises more than 15%
and loss of up-front premium if HSCEI rises less than 5% by expiry.
Key risks to our upgrade: Reform implementation falls short of market
expectation, and tighter-than-market-expected liquidity. Also see China: Portfolio
Strategy Research: Third Plenary: Ambitious blueprint to boost sentiment,
November 18.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 9
Exhibit 6: Chinese banks are trading at attractive
valuation levels
Exhibit 7: Active managers are underweight China
Source: FactSet, EPFR, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: FactSet, EPFR, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 8: We favor China reform-beneficiaries
* indicates the stock is on our regional Conviction List.
Source: FactSet, MSCI, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 9: HSCEI call-skew has increased with OTM calls
trading expensive vs. ATM calls, compared to their
historical relationship
Exhibit 10: Call-spreads on HSCEI currently offer
meaningful cost savings (27%) unlike most major
markets globally
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
9.3
5yr z-score:
-0.73
12.1
5yr z-score:
-0.09
4
10
16
22
28
Ma
y-0
6
Au
g-0
6
No
v-0
6
Fe
b-0
7M
ay
-07
Au
g-0
7
No
v-0
7
Fe
b-0
8
Ma
y-0
8
Au
g-0
8
No
v-0
8
Fe
b-0
9M
ay
-09
Au
g-0
9
No
v-0
9
Fe
b-1
0M
ay
-10
Au
g-1
0
No
v-1
0
Fe
b-1
1M
ay
-11
Au
g-1
1
No
v-1
1
Fe
b-1
2
Ma
y-1
2
Au
g-1
2
No
v-1
2
Fe
b-1
3M
ay
-13
Au
g-1
3
No
v-1
3
MXCN 12m fP/E MXCN 12m fP/E ex. banks
Forward PE
-290
10yr z-score:
-0.32
-582
10yr z-score:
-0.89
-800
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
Sep
-03
Fe
b-0
4
Ju
l-04
Dec-0
4
May-0
5
Oct-
05
Mar-
06
Au
g-0
6
Ja
n-0
7
Ju
n-0
7
No
v-0
7
Ap
r-08
Sep
-08
Fe
b-0
9
Ju
l-09
Dec-0
9
May-1
0
Oct-
10
Mar-
11
Au
g-1
1
Ja
n-1
2
Ju
n-1
2
No
v-1
2
Ap
r-13
Sep
-13
Fund Allocation (OW/ UW, bps)EM Funds Asian Funds
China
Bloomberg Name Reform Theme Sector
Listed
Mkt Cap
(US$ mn)
6M
ADVT
(US$ mn)
Price
(Quote)
GS
Rating
12m
Potential
+/(-)%
2013E
EPSg
(%)
2014E
EPSg
(%)
2014E
P/E
(X)
2014E
P/B
(X)
2014E
D/Y
(%)
6881 HK China Galaxy Financial reform Other financials 1,182 7 5.42 B 25% 21% 18% 13.0 1.2 2.0%
151 HK Want Want One child policy Cons. Stap. 18,487 20 10.84 B 15% 19% 20% 23.3 8.6 2.9%
2357 HK AviChina National defense Industrials 1,173 4 3.86 B 24% 20% 21% 19.3 1.6 1.0%
1193 HK China Resources Gas Environment protection Utilities 5,751 10 20.05 B* 22% 19% 22% 16.8 2.8 1.2%
270 HK Guangdong Investment Environment protection Utilities 5,263 7 6.54 B 31% 8% -4% 11.5 1.4 3.4%
958 HK Huaneng Renewables Environment protection Utilities 1,455 8 3.23 B -7% 106% 36% 14.1 1.5 1.2%
2196 HK Shanghai Fosun Pharm. Health care reform Healthcare 867 6 20.00 B -5% 4% 12% 17.4 2.1 1.5%
867 HK China Medical System Health care reform Healthcare 2,099 4 6.74 B* 26% 22% 25% 16.1 3.5 2.3%
700 HK Tencent Mass market consumption Internet 100,634 180 419.6 B* 7% 27% 28% 30.3 8.2 0.4%
Avg 16% 27% 20% 18.0 3.4 1.8%
0.86
0.88
0.90
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
1.00
1.02
1.04
Jan‐10
Apr‐10
Jul‐10
Oct‐10
Jan‐11
Apr‐11
Jul‐11
Oct‐11
Jan‐12
Apr‐12
Jul‐12
Oct‐12
Jan‐13
Apr‐13
Jul‐13
Oct‐13
HSCEI 3-mo call-wing skew(25-delta call / ATM vol)
42%
27%25%
23%
13% 13% 12%
7% 7% 6% 4% 4% 4% 3%2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Bovespa
HSCEI
Nikkei 225
TOPIX
NIFTY
RDXUSD HSI
KOSPI 200
S&P 500
EuroStoxx50
MSCI W
orld
TWSE
FTSE 100
MSC
I Sing
ASX
200
Call-spread cost-saving vs. calls(3-mo 105/115% call-spreads vs. 105% calls)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 10
2) Taiwan: US + China exposures; upgrade to OW
We upgrade Taiwan to Overweight from Market weight for the following reasons:
A favorable macro profile: Top-down, we still feel very comfortable on how
Taiwan stacks up against its global and Asia EM peers: Taiwan’s leverage is not
excessive, the current account is in significant surplus (12% of GDP), the currency
is not overvalued and FX volatility is low, and the FX reserve (to GDP) provides a
strong liquidity cushion.
These characteristics should help Taiwan weather market volatility when investors
turn their attention to EM macro vulnerability and contagion risk, possibly when
the Fed begins to taper, which our economists expect will be in March 2014.
Compelling thematic exposures: In addition to Korea, we view Taiwan as an
efficient market to gain global cyclical exposures as its economy and equity market
are closely linked to the US (25% of revenue). Additionally, we feel China reform
optimism may have positive sentiment spillover to ‘China Plays’ in Taiwan,
including petrochem/materials, select financials, and tourism, which in aggregate
represent 16% of equity market revenue.
A more sustainable and balanced earnings growth profile in 2014: After
growing earnings by 27% in 2013 from a low base, Taiwan is likely to deliver a
more sustainable mid-teen EPS growth of 11% and 13% in 2014 and 2015 as
margins gradually recover to mid-cycle levels. Growth contribution is likely to be
more balanced than in previous years when upstream semi (TSMC) and select
non-tech sectors subsidized the losses from PC supply chain segments and the
petrochem industry.
Valuations are not low but should not be a key concern: Taiwan currently
trades on 14.1X forward P/E and 1.8X trailing book, 17% and 9% above the
regional aggregates (0.68 and 1.0 s.d.).
The high absolute and relative valuations have been a key consideration
preventing us from turning more positive on Taiwan, but given our economists’
rising conviction on DM recovery and Taiwan-specific merits (a favorable macro
profile, high and stable dividend yields), we feel the valuation burden should not
dismiss our positive investment case (and return expectation) on Taiwan which
will be driven primarily by fundamental earnings growth.
Light investor positioning: Similar to China and Korea, global- and Asia-focused
investors are underweight by a wide margin – 249bps by GEM funds and 649bps
by Asian-mandated funds. The recent FINI inflows of US$7.6bn since July look
high at the first glance, but less significant compared with the depth of the market.
A better year for ‘Old tech’. As we detail in the ‘Key questions’ section, we expect
'Old tech', which accounts for half of total market cap, to have a better year in
terms of absolute return as:
o Valuation has now reached arguably attractive levels, especially
relative to ‘New tech’ which focuses on software design and other tech-
related value-added services.
o Taiwan tech appears more favorably skewed towards a DM recovery story
given their revenue exposures there.
o Our analyst remains fundamentally bullish on TSMC (Buy, on Conviction
list), the largest stock in MSCI Taiwan (20%) and TAIEX (12%).
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 11
Exhibit 11: Taiwan’s macro profile looks solid relative to
global/Asia EMs
Exhibit 12: Taiwan’s fundamentals are well linked to the
US and China
Source: Haver, CEIC, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global investment Research
Source: MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global investment Research
Exhibit 13: Growth contribution is likely to be more
balanced in 2014
Exhibit 14: Valuations are not low but shouldn’t be a
major concern
Source: I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: FactSet
Exhibit 15: Stocks we highlight in Taiwan
B* indicates the stock is on Conviction Buy list.
Source: I/B/E/S, Lionshare, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
86%
68%
25%
12%
-14%
37%
22%
9%1%
10%
20%
44%
8%
0%
8%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FX reserve/GDP
(%)
GDPg correl. with
the US
Sales Exp. to the
US
C/A as % of GDP
(%)
FX over-
/undervaluation
Taiwan AeJ EM
(%)
25%19%
12% 9% 8% 6% 8%3% 3%
12%
16%
3%11% 13%
8% 9%3%
5%1%
9%
10%
14% 13% 12%
9%8%
6%5%
4%
11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Taiw
an
Ind
ia
Ko
rea
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Au
str
alia
Sin
ga
po
re
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Mala
ysia
Th
ail
an
d
MX
AP
J
MSCI Indexes Revenue Exposure (%)
% from EU % from CN % from US
-7%3%
32%
8%13%
25%
25%20%
11%
24% 19%
9%
17%15%
7%
13%11%
3%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2013E Earnings 2014E Earnings 2014E Earnings
Growth
Contribution
Technology Distributors
wafer
PCB
Solar power
Other Tech
IC packaging and testing
Acer
Consumer electronics
LED
Touch screen
ODM/OEM
Other components (NB)
Fabless design
Foundry
Others
Financials
Petrochem
TFT-LCD (panel)
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%N
ov
-03
No
v-0
4
No
v-0
5
No
v-0
6
No
v-0
7
No
v-0
8
No
v-0
9
No
v-1
0
No
v-1
1
No
v-1
2
No
v-1
3
Fwd PE Prem/ Disc (%)
Fwd PE Prem/ Disc (MXTW vs. MXAPJ)
MXTW - 12M forward P/E
fPE: 14.1X
5-yr z-score: 0.42
Forward PE (X)
Ticker Name Sector
Listed Mkt
Cap (US$
mn)
6M
ADVT
(US$
mn)
Price
(Quote)
GS
Rating*
12m
Pot.
+/(-)%
14E
EPSg
(%)
Agg. EM
Funds
OW/UW
(bps)
5yr
avg.
ROE
5yr
avg.
CROCI
14E
P/E
(X)
5yr
PE z-
score
14E
P/B
(X)
2330 TT TSMC Semi 91,212 116 104.00 B* 25% 16% 14.5 23% 18% 12.5 -0.2 2.7
2317 TT Hon Hai Comp. H/W 33,440 81 75.30 B 17% 3% -76.2 16% 13% 9.4 -0.5 1.1
2308 TT Delta Elec Comp. H/W 11,838 23 144.00 B 17% 27% -23.2 19% 24% 15.7 0.9 3.3
2891 TT Chinatrust Fin. Banks 9,406 21 18.90 B* 22% 21% -23.1 9% - 11.3 -0.2 1.3
2311 TT Advanced Semi Semi 7,897 19 30.10 CS - 23% -15.7 14% 10% 12.5 -0.2 1.8
3008 TT Largan Comp. H/W 4,510 45 994.00 B 36% 18% -9.1 26% 41% 12.6 -1.1 3.3
2474 TT Catcher Tech. Comp. H/W 4,507 38 177.50 B 7% -3% -9.5 17% 14% 10.4 -0.5 1.8
2823 TT CH Life Insur. (TW) Insurance 2,555 12 27.75 B 23% 7% -5.2 18% - 12.6 -0.5 1.5
2439 TT Merry Electronics Comp. H/W 640 8 107.50 B* 35% 60% 0.1 11% 14% 12.2 1.2 2.8
Avg 23% 19% -16.4 17% 19% 12.1 -0.1 2.2
TW Avg - 11% -6.9 11% 14% 17.8 0.6 2.2
Ta
iwan
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 12
3) Korea: A global cyclical recovery play; reiterate Overweight
We reiterate our Overweight stance for Korea’s leverage on the global cyclical recovery.
Our end-2014 target for KOSPI is 2,350, implying 17% upside. Our arguments are as
follows:
Macro: well positioned for DM recovery, improving domestic sentiment.
Korea is among the markets that are most leveraged to the global macro cycle. In
value-added terms, the US and Europe are the two largest markets for Korea
exports. Our economists expect GDP growth to accelerate to 2.9% in 2014 from
1.7% in 2013 in the US, and 1.1% from -0.4% in the Euro area. China, the third
largest export destination for Korea, will likely maintain stable growth in our view.
We are also seeing early signs of a pickup in domestic demand after a long period
of weakness. Housing markets have gradually improved, imports of machinery
have further risen, and credit expansion has resumed. Given the “twin engines”
of growth, we expect GDP growth to accelerate to 3.7% next year from 2.9% in
2013.
Earnings: highest growth in the region. We forecast 15% EPS growth in Korea
each in 2014 and 2015, compared to consensus of 20% and 11%. Although some
moderate negative revisions are likely, we expect Korea will still be the market
with the fastest earnings growth in the region next year. Even without valuation
expansion, Korea should be able to deliver decent returns just “riding on
earnings”.
Valuation: attractive relative to the region. Korea is currently trading at 8.8X
forward P/E and 1.2X trailing P/B, which are 0.5 and 1.2 s.d. below the 10-year
average. It is also trading at a deep discount to the region (27% for P/E and 32%
for P/B). Although relative valuations have risen, they are only 13% and 18%
above trough levels. We believe there is potential for further valuation expansion.
Positioning: potential for inflow to continue given funds’ underweight. Year-
to-date, foreigners have bought US$6.5bn of Korean equities. Despite the inflows,
mutual funds remain strongly underweight the market (by 769bp). Given light
investor positioning, we see potential for more inflows.
Implementation: Buy EWY (US-listed ETF); prefer KOSPI 200 call-spreads for
asymmetric exposure. We suggest buying EWY (US-listed ETF on MSCI Korea) as
a direct way to position for long exposure in Korea. Although EWY is US-
denominated and hence exposed to FX risk, we see modest depreciation pressure
on KRW next year.
Investors who can trade derivatives and want to limit any downside risk can take
advantage of low implied volatility. 6-month implied vols on KOSPI 200 are
currently trading at 15.4v, which is less than 1 vol point above its lows (14.8v) and
in the 3rd percentile of its history since 2007. We prefer call-spreads to outright
calls. 6-month 105/115% call-spreads on KOSPI 200 currently cost 1.9% with
maximum potential payout of 5.3x. Risks: Buyers of 105/115% call-spreads risk
capped upside if KOSPI 200 rises more than 15% and loss of up-front premium if
KOSPI 200 rises less than 5% by expiry.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 13
Exhibit 16: “Twin engines” of growth: DM recovery and
improving domestic sentiment to lift GDP growth in 2014
Exhibit 17: We expect Korea to deliver the strongest
earnings growth in the region
Source: Source: EPFR, FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Source: Source: EPFR, FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 18: Korea’s valuations remain attractive vs. the
region
Exhibit 19: Active managers are still underweight the
market
Source: EPFR, FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: EPFR, FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
8.7
7.6
4.5 4.94.3
3.5 3.6 3.42.8
2.41.6 1.5 1.5
2.33.3
4.2 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.3
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.0
10.0
201
0-1
Q
201
0-2
Q
201
0-3
Q
201
0-4
Q
201
1-1
Q
201
1-2
Q
201
1-3
Q
201
1-4
Q
201
2-1
Q
201
2-2
Q
201
2-3
Q
201
2-4
Q
201
3-1
Q
201
3-2
Q
201
3E
-3Q
201
3E
-4Q
201
4E
-1Q
201
4E
-2Q
201
4E
-3Q
201
4E
-4Q
Real GDP (yoy)
Korea
15%
12%12%
11%10%
9% 8% 8% 8% 8%
6%
10%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Ko
rea
Ind
on
esia
Ind
ia
Taiw
an
Ch
ina
Th
ail
an
d
Au
str
ali
a
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ma
lay
sia
Sin
gap
ore
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
MX
AP
J
2014E EPS growth (%)
-80%
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
No
v-9
5
No
v-9
6
No
v-9
7
No
v-9
8
No
v-9
9
No
v-0
0
No
v-0
1
No
v-0
2
No
v-0
3
No
v-0
4
No
v-0
5
No
v-0
6
No
v-0
7
No
v-0
8
No
v-0
9
No
v-1
0
No
v-1
1
No
v-1
2
No
v-1
3
Valuation Prem/ Disc (MXKR vs MXAPJ)
Trailing PB Prem/ Disc
Fwd PE Prem/ Disc
-25%
10yr z-score:
-0.29
-31%
10yr z-score:
-1.24
-1200
-800
-400
0
400
800
1200
Oct-
03
Ap
r-04
Oct-
04
Ap
r-05
Oct-
05
Ap
r-06
Oct-
06
Ap
r-07
Oct-
07
Ap
r-08
Oct-
08
Ap
r-09
Oct-
09
Ap
r-10
Oct-
10
Ap
r-11
Oct-
11
Ap
r-12
Oct-
12
Ap
r-13
Oct-
13
ASEAN India
Hong Kong China
Korea Taiwan
Asia-fund
OW/UW (bps)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 14
Implementation: Emphasizing earnings
1) Earnings growth: Stylistic and thematic implementation
One of our core themes for 2014 is seeking earnings growth without too much exposure to
valuation risk. We highlight three different flavors of earnings-related implementation: a)
Delta Earnings (Margin expansion) b) Value earnings (attractively priced growth) and c)
Destination earnings (Europe-exposed stocks), as described in detail below.
a) Margin expansion Identifying cyclical margin recovery and structural margin expansion stocks:
We believe the magnitude of margin improvement next year will remain mild, but
that it will be much stronger in 2015. Despite this, we see a few sectors with
potential for early margin recovery on improving demand/supply dynamics.
Together with names that have structural margin expansion stories, we highlight a
list of 12 stocks in the region (Exhibit 20).
Entry points matter: Within our list, some China names have rallied sharply along
with the overall market on reform enthusiasm. While we are confident on their
improving margin outlook, we suggest investors wait for better entry levels.
Appealing growth/valuation profile: Our analysts forecast these stocks overall
will see 2014 earnings growth accelerating to 18% (from 1% in 2013), and they are
trading at 10.8X 2014E P/E on median. Their growth/valuation profile thus looks
favorable compared to the overall market.
Exhibit 20: Stocks whose earnings may benefit from expanding margins
B* indicates the stock is on Conviction Buy list.
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Ticker Name Country Sector
Listed Mkt
Cap (US$
mn)
6M
ADVT
(US$ mn)
Price
(Quote)
GS
Rating
12m
Potential
+/(-)%
2013
EPSg
(%)
2014
EPSg
(%)
2013
NM
(%)
2014
NM
(%)
2015
NM
(%)
2014
P/E (X)
2014
P/B (X)
2014
D/Y
(%)
005380 KP Hyundai Motor Korea Autos 51,576 96 249000 B 18% 1% 14% 10% 10% 11% 5.6 0.9 0.8%
TTMT IS Tata Motor India Autos 16,437 53 386 B* 18% 34% 18% 7% 7% 7% 6.8 1.8 0.2%
914 HK Anhui Conch Cement China Materials 4,567 39 27.25 B* 19% 32% 18% 16% 17% 18% 11.5 1.8 1.7%
3323 HK China National Building Material China Materials 2,822 36 7.60 B 30% 9% 31% 5% 6% 7% 4.0 0.8 3.7%
SMM SP Sembcorp Marine Singapore Industrials 7,394 10 4.41 B 20% -1% 53% 10% 11% 11% 12.1 2.9 4.1%
2039 HK China Itnl' Marine Containers China Industrials 2,601 2 14.10 B 16% -36% 90% 2% 3% 5% 12.5 1.3 2.4%
012630 KP Hyundai Dev. Korea Industrials 1,701 7 24000 B* 13% NM NM -3% 5% 5% 8.2 0.8 4.2%
386 HK Sinopec China Oil and gas 21,388 67 6.50 B 12% 17% 14% 3% 3% 3% 6.8 1.0 5.8%
023530 KP Lotte Shopping Korea Retailing 11,164 13 377000 B 17% -9% 11% 3% 4% 4% 10.1 0.6 0.4%
2331 HK Li Ning Co. Ltd. China Retailing 1,169 5 6.62 B 30% -85% -115% -6% 1% 5% 125.5 2.5 0.0%
2439 TT Merry Elec. Taiwan Retailing 640 8 108 B* 35% 102% 60% 9% 12% 13% 12.2 2.8 3.5%
347 HK Angang Steel China Steel 682 9 4.87 B* 31% -130% 90% 2% 3% 5% 11.8 0.6 4.5%
Median 18% 1% 18% 4% 5% 6% 10.8 1.2 3.0%
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 15
b) Growth at value We classify the bottom 25 percentile of stocks based on Forward PE as Value stocks and
top 25 percentile of stocks based on sales growth in each market as Growth stocks and
make the following observations:
Growth has outperformed value 9 years in a row (Exhibit 21).
Growth looks quite expensive relative to value (51% PE and 44% PB premium), but
growth remains scarce, and value stocks could be a trap given low ROEs.
We prefer select growth stocks with reasonable valuations. We screen the bottom
25th percentile of stocks among Growth stocks based on their P/E. The combined
Growth+Value strategy has performed better than either Growth or Value
individually. We highlight Sembcorp Marine, Largan Precision, Tata Motors and
Geely as stocks that screen well within our list (Exhibit 25).
Exhibit 21: Growth has outperformed value 9 years in a
row
Exhibit 22: Value stocks are valued at high discounts to
growth stocks
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 23: The combined growth+value strategy has
performed even better
Exhibit 24: Value has low ROE but growth seems
expensively priced
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
-60%
-30%
0%
30%
60%
90%
120%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013Y
TD
Annual Return (%)
Value Growth MXAPJ
-15%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
201
3 (
Cu
rr.)
Growth vs. ValueRel Fwd PE Prem/ Disc
Growth stocks
more expensive
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Ja
n-1
0
Mar-
10
May-1
0
Ju
l-10
Sep
-10
No
v-1
0
Ja
n-1
1
Mar-
11
May-1
1
Ju
l-11
Sep
-11
No
v-1
1
Ja
n-1
2
Mar-
12
May-1
2
Ju
l-12
Sep
-12
No
v-1
2
Ja
n-1
3
Mar-
13
May-1
3
Ju
l-13
Sep
-13
Rebased Index
Value Growth
Growth (Value) MXAPJ
Value vs Growth
Value Growth MXAPJGrowth
(+Low fPE)
2014 EPSg 9.9% 20.1% 12.1% 20.2%
2015 EPSg 9.3% 16.5% 10.2% 13.0%
2014 SPSg 6.8% 18.7% 7.0% 20.5%
2015 SPSg 6.4% 15.3% 6.0% 11.1%
Fwd PE 9.8 14.9 12.6 9.2
10yr z-score (0.58) 0.76 (0.28) (0.36)
Trailing PB 1.4 2.0 1.7 1.2
10yr z-score (1.21) (0.33) (0.87) (0.86)
Return (Ytd) 1.0% 10.4% 3.1% 5.1%
Volatility (10Y, Ann.) 25% 26% 27% 30%
Sharpe Ratio (10Y, Ann.) 0.66 1.06 0.32 1.23
Fu
nd
em
en
tal
Va
luati
on
Pri
ce
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 16
Exhibit 25: Growth stocks at modest valuations
B* indicates the stock is on Conviction Buy list.
Source: FactSet, MSCI, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
c) Europe-exposed stocks
While our Global Cyclicals thematic slice is largely concentrated in the Info Tech sector, we
also look at specific stocks that have high revenue exposures to DM (US and Europe) and
should therefore benefit from a meaningful recovery in external demand. We note that US-
exposed stocks (with at least 35% revenue exposure to the US) have risen 16% on an
average from June lows (vs. 12% for MXAPJ) and outperformed MXAPJ by 12% year-to-
date. On the other hand, the Europe-exposed stocks have lagged underperforming MXAPJ
by 11% year-to-date. Our economists forecast expansion in Euro area GDP of 1.1% in 2014
and 1.5% in 2015 coming after two years of contraction in output, which should bode well
for our EU-exposed stocks, in our view.
We highlight a list of 18 stocks with at least 30% revenue exposure to Europe and that are
currently trading at less than 20x P/E on 2014 expected earnings (Exhibit 26). The portfolio
has an average revenue exposure of 43% to Europe, compared to 8% for the overall region.
With 20.5% EPS growth and 13.1x P/E for next year (PEG ratio of 0.64), our Europe-exposed
portfolio offers a better growth/valuation profile than the overall region on average (15.9x
avg. P/E, 16.7% avg. EPS growth and PEG ratio of 0.95). The growth/valuation profile of our
Europe-exposed portfolio is also higher than the US-exposed basket with an average
revenue exposure of 51% to US and PEG ratio of 0.9 (16.5x avg. P/E and 19% EPS growth).
>75th
Percentile<15X
Ticker Name Country Sector
Listed
Mkt Cap
(US$ mn)
6M
ADVT
(US$ mn)
Price
(Quote)
GS
Rating
12m
Potential
+/(-)%
2014E
EPSg
(%)
2015E
EPSg
(%)
2014E
SPSg (%)
Fwd PE
(X)
2014E
P/E (X)
2014E
P/B (X)
2014E
D/Y
(%)
2014E
ROE
(%)
2015E
ROE
(%)
037620 KP Mirae Asset Korea Insur. & other fin. 1,272 4 32300 NC - 66% 10% 69% 8.1 7.8 0.6 2.5% 8% 8%
SMM SP Sembcorp Marine Singapore Industrials 7,394 10 4.41 B 20% 26% 8% 28% 14.2 14.0 3.0 3.9% 22% 21%
PGAS IJ PT Perusahaan Gas Indonesia Utilities 10,118 13 4850 N 3% 31% 8% 25% 10.7 10.5 3.3 5.0% 32% 29%
813 HK Shimao Property China Property 8,509 17 19.00 B 3% 25% 15% 23% 6.6 6.5 1.1 4.7% 17% 17%
3008 TT LARGAN Precision Taiwan Computer H/W 4,510 45 994 B 36% 15% 12% 20% 13.0 12.9 3.7 3.0% 29% 27%
HCLT IS HCL Technologies India I.T. services 11,988 22 1086 B 22% 24% 12% 20% 12.8 12.7 3.5 1.4% 28% 25%
1 HK Cheung Kong Hong Kong Property 36,175 58 121 B* 19% 8% 6% 18% 9.4 9.3 0.7 2.8% 8% 8%
TTMT IS Tata Motors India Autos 16,437 53 386 B* 18% 22% 12% 15% 8.2 8.0 2.0 0.6% 24% 22%
3968 HK China Merc. Bank China Banks 9,071 42 15.32 B* 28% 6% 13% 15% 5.6 5.6 1.0 4.9% 18% 17%
175 HK Geely Automobile China Autos 4,518 33 3.98 B* 31% 14% 13% 15% 8.8 8.7 1.5 1.6% 17% 16%
Avg 24% 11% 25% 9.7 9.6 2.0 3.0% 20% 19%
APJ Avg. 17% 16% 11% 15.9 15.4 2.4 2.9% 15% 15%
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 17
Exhibit 26: We expect Europe-exposed Asian stocks to benefit as external demand recovers
Criteria: EU sales exposure > 30%, 2014 P/E < 20x
Note: B= Buy, N= Neutral, NC=Not Covered; * denotes stock is on our Regional Conviction List
Source: FactSet, MSCI, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 27: While US-exposed stocks have outperformed, Europe-exposed stocks have lagged in the recent rally
Note: Europe-exposed stocks comprises of Asian stocks with more than 30% sales exposure to Europe; US-exposed stocks comprises of Asian stocks with more than 35% sales exposure to US
Source: FactSet, MSCI, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Ric Name
EU Sales
Exposure Market Sector Curncy
Price
(Quote)
Listed
market cap
(US$ mn)
3M ADVT
(US$ mn) GS Rating 2014 P/E
2014 EPS
Growth
HGG.AX Henderson Group 90% Australia Financials AUD 3.79 3,948 10.4 B 14.8 11.9
VARD.SI Vard Holdings 80% Singapore Industrials SGD 0.83 776 3.1 N 8.1 40.2
028050.KS Samsung Engineering 63% Korea Industrials KRW 64,800 2,460 30.0 N 14.1 -
AMC.AX Amcor 55% Australia Materials AUD 11.12 12,608 38.5 N 15.6 15.5
TEML.NS Tech Mahindra 51% India Software and services INR 1,734 6,144 34.4 B* 12.7 14.0
0013.HK Hutchison Whampoa 46% Hong Kong Industrials HKD 95.9 52,071 66.7 B 12.1 12.2
SCMN.SI Sembcorp Marine 46% Singapore Industrials SGD 4.41 7,394 9.4 B 14.0 26.0
006360.KS GS Engg & Construction 42% Korea Industrials KRW 32,200 1,525 17.0 N 14.3 -
BIOS.SI Biosensors International 40% Singapore Health Care SGD 0.89 1,205 2.6 N 14.2 4.4
000210.KS Daelim Industrial 38% Korea Industrials KRW 96,000 3,177 18.5 N 7.9 19.0
TISC.NS Tata Steel 38% India Steel, aluminium INR 386.1 5,762 48.0 NC 10.0 50.7
BXB.AX Brambles 35% Australia Industrials AUD 9.30 13,631 40.5 B 17.7 14.0
ITMG.JK PT Indo Tambangraya 34% Indonesia Oil and gas IDR 31,200 3,151 2.8 N 11.0 30.4
2439.TW Merry Electronics Co. 34% Taiwan Consumer Discretionary TWD 115 640 9.9 B* 12.8 55.3
IOIB.KL IOI Corp. Bhd. 33% Malaysia Consumer Staples MYR 5.46 10,937 7.2 N 17.9 1.7
0005.HK HSBC Holdings 32% Hong Kong Banks HKD 86.3 206,973 128.1 B 10.9 7.2
REDY.NS Dr. Reddy's Laboratories 30% India Health Care INR 2,464 6,610 12.5 CS 18.8 14.5
2018.HK AAC Technologies 30% China Offshore Comp. hardware/assemblers HKD 31.5 4,846 22.9 B 11.4 2.6
43% 13.1 20.5
8% 15.9 16.7
Europe-exposed stocks (Average)
MXAPJ (Equal-weight, Avg.)
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
Jan‐12
Mar‐12
May‐12
Jul‐12
Sep‐12
Nov‐12
Jan‐13
Mar‐13
May‐13
Jul‐13
Sep‐13
Nov‐13
MXAPJ
Europe-
exposed stocks
US-exposed
stocks
STOXX
600
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
Jan‐12
Mar‐12
May‐12
Jul‐12
Sep‐12
Nov‐12
Jan‐13
Mar‐13
May‐13
Jul‐13
Sep‐13
Nov‐13
MXAPJ
(rhs)
Europe-exposed stocks
vs. MXAPJ
(Equal-weighted)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 18
2) Global Cyclicals vs. Asset Sensitive Financials
We recommended Global Cyclicals vs. Asset Sensitive Financials as one of our preferred
trades for the fourth quarter. So far, the trade has gained 5% while the MXAPJ has posted
flat returns. We continue to like this trade for 2014 as we believe Asian equities will benefit
next year from a moderate improvement in growth (largely helped by the recovery in the
US and EU) while liquidity will marginally tighten (Fed tapering and domestic policy
normalization). The net impact should be positive for areas with export orientation and
high revenue exposures to external demand while negative for asset price inflation. Along
these lines, the Global Cyclicals and Asset Sensitive Financials (which largely includes
property stocks) remain at opposite ends.
The entry point of the long/short trade still looks attractive with almost 13% upside to 2011
highs. In addition to this, growth/valuations profile for Global Cyclicals is also better than
that of Asset Sensitive Financials. Global Cyclicals trade at 9.8x forward P/E, which is a
20% discount to Asset Sensitive Financials (at 12.5x forward P/E). With 2014 EPS growth
of 16%, Global Cyclicals offers higher growth at a lower price (PEG ratio of 0.6) than both
Asset Sensitive Financials (PEG ratio of 1.0) and the overall region (PEG ratio of 1.1).
Exhibit 28: Global Cyclicals vs. Asset Sensitive Financials theme could continue to generate alpha as external demand
recovers and monetary policy normalizes
Source: Bloomberg, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 29: Global Cyclicals offer better growth at lower price than both Asset Sensitive Financials and broader region
Source: Bloomberg, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
Dec-0
9
Ma
r-10
Ju
n-1
0
Sep
-10
Dec-1
0
Ma
r-11
Ju
n-1
1
Sep
-11
Dec-1
1
Ma
r-12
Ju
n-1
2
Sep
-12
Dec-1
2
Ma
r-13
Ju
n-1
3
Sep
-13
Dec-1
3
Global Cyclicals vs. Asset Sensitive Financials
(Relative performance, indexed)
GSSZMSGC / GSSZMSFA
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
(1.00) (0.50) 0.00 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
US
Gro
wth
Se
nsi
tivi
ty
US Rates Sensitivity
Global Cyclicals
Rate-Sensitive Financials
Asset-Sensitive Financials
Commodity Cyclicals
Defensives
Domestic Cyclicals
Size of bubble indicates sensitivity to China Growth
6X
8X
10X
12X
14X
16X
18X
20X
22X
24X
26X
Dec-0
3
Dec-0
4
Dec-0
5
Dec-0
6
Dec-0
7
Dec-0
8
Dec-0
9
Dec-1
0
Dec-1
1
Dec-1
2
Dec-1
3
NT
M P
E
Global Cyclicals Asset-Sensitive Financials
Global Cyclicals are
trading at 20%
discount to Asset
Sensitive Financials
Global
Cyclicals
Asset-
Sensitive
Financials
MXAPJ
Valuation
P/E (NTM) 9.8 12.5 12.1
10yr Z-score P/E (NTM) (1.1) (0.9) (0.3)
Consensus Earnings
Growth
2013E (%) 19.2 4.9 7.02014E (%) 16.0 12.7 11.1
P/E to EPS growth
ratio
2014E (X) 0.6 1.0 1.1
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 19
3) Preferred downside hedge: Buy ASX 200 Mar-end 95% puts
Given the potential event risk in the early part of the year regarding timing and magnitude
of Fed tapering (our expectation is for tapering to begin in March), we highlight our
preferred hedge for investors looking to limit downside risk. We recommend buying
March-expiry outright puts on ASX 200 given our cautious stance on Australian equities
on weak domestic fundamentals coupled with inexpensive option pricing and attractive
risk-reward to recent lows. We summarize our key arguments below:
Implied vol is low globally and currently trading in the bottom decile of its 7-
yr history across most markets. Short-dated implied vols have declined
significantly over the last few months with 3-month ATM implied vol on most
markets currently trading in the bottom decile of its 7-year history.
We prefer outright puts to put-spreads given low vol and moderate skew.
Short-dated put -skew is still low, trading below average in most markets.
Consequently cost savings on put-spreads is currently less significant. Outright
puts thus offer better risk-reward for hedging, in our view.
ASX 200 is more sensitive to a taper surprise given significantly higher
weighting in the high-yield defensives. The high-yield defensive parts of the
market may potentially come under pressure from Fed tapering. ASX 200 has
around 60% weighting in the high-yield defensives (dividend yield > 4%, beta <1)
significantly higher than other major markets globally and thus is more sensitive
to taper surprise in our view (Exhibit 32).
ASX 200 puts are currently the most inexpensive across major markets
globally. Indicatively March-end expiry 95% puts on ASX 200 currently cost 1.55%,
the least expensive across markets globally.
ASX 200 puts offer best payouts if markets revert to their recent lows. Given
event risk of potential Fed tapering, we look at the payouts (return on premium
paid) on various March-end expiry 5% OTM put options if indices were to revert to
their recent lows in late June / early July. Based on this metric, ASX 200 puts
would provide a return of 465% on premium paid, the highest across major
markets we track globally.
Risks: ASX 200 95% put buyers risk loss of upfront premium if index falls less than
5% by March-end expiry.
Exhibit 30: ASX 200 puts are the most inexpensive across
major markets globally
Exhibit 31: ASX 200 puts offer best returns if markets
revert to their respective lows in June/July this year
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
EWZ
Nikkei 225
RDXUSD
EEM FXI
EWY
HSCEI
EWJ
EuroStoxx50
Bovespa
HSI
NIFTY
S&P 500
FTSE 100
KOSPI 200
TWSE
ASX
200
Indicative cost of Mar-end 95% puts(as % of spot)
‐50%
50%
150%
250%
350%
450%
550%
ASX
200
EuroStoxx50
EWY
Bovespa
KOSPI 200
HSI
S&P 500
HSCEI FXI
Nikkei 225
EWJ
RDXUSD
FTSE 100
EEM
EWZ
NIFTY
TWSE
Return on premium paid at expiry(if markets revert to their respective June/July lows)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 20
Exhibit 32: ASX 200 has significantly higher weighting in
the high-yield defensives vs. rest of the world
Exhibit 33: Implied vol is low across markets and
currently trading in the bottom decile of its 7-yr history
Source: FactSet, local exchanges, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
57
36
28
13
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Australia UK Canada Europe US
Country wgt. in defensive
high yield
Country-weight in high-yield defensives(Div. yield > 4%, beta < 1)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Jan‐07
Jun‐07
Nov‐07
Apr‐08
Sep‐08
Feb‐09
Jul‐09
Dec‐09
May‐10
Oct‐10
Mar‐11
Aug‐11
Jan‐12
Jun‐12
Nov‐12
Apr‐13
Sep‐13
AEJ 3-month ATM implied vol (%)(Avg. of KOSPI 200, HSI, HSCEI, NIFTY,
TWSE and ASX 200)
%tile since 2007: 5%
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 21
Key questions for 2014
Will Asia recover its underperformance vs. DM in 2014?
We believe Asia’s relative performance may improve if it can deliver the earnings
growth that we expect it to in 2014 and 2015, given:
o A low starting point: Asia (MXAPJ) has trailed the world index since mid-2010. In
2013 (ytd), Asia has lagged the global benchmark by 17pp, the 20th percentile over
the past 25 years. This underperformance has been driven by compression in
relative valuation, which has retreated to 2005 levels in term of forward P/E.
o A better fundamental configuration: Our forecasts imply a more balanced return
profile among major equity markets globally, suggesting Asia is better
positioned fundamentally relative to DM in 2014 than in the past few years.
o Earnings recovery in Asia: Asia has struggled to grow earnings in the past 3 years.
While its DM peers have as well, investors seem to have traded weak margins
more than solid topline growth in Asia, leading to valuation de-rating. We forecast
Asia’s EPS to grow 10% and 14% in 2014/2015, with margins modestly expanding
in 2014 and further in 2015.
o Narrowing policy gaps: We expect the US to start normalizing its policy in 2014,
whereas Asia is already at a more mature tightening cycle. The closing gaps may
help support Asia’s relative returns, especially if the risks of tapering are better
reflected in asset prices than in summer 2013, as we argue in the macro section.
Exhibit 34: Asia has lagged the world index since 2010
Exhibit 35: Asia’s P/E discounts are back to 2005 levels
now
Exhibit 36: Margins will likely further recover in Asia
Exhibit 37: Policy gaps between DM and Asia may
narrow
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
Ja
n-0
0
Ap
r-0
1
Ju
l-0
2
Oct-
03
Ja
n-0
5
Ap
r-0
6
Ju
l-0
7
Oct-
08
Ja
n-1
0
Ap
r-1
1
Ju
l-1
2
Oct-
13
Relative Performance Index (MXAPJ vs. MXWO)
-26pp
2013ytd rel. return: -17pp
(20th percentile in annal rel. return)
144
14.4
10yr z-score:
0.51
12.1
10yr z-score:
-0.27
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
No
v-0
3
No
v-0
4
No
v-0
5
No
v-0
6
No
v-0
7
No
v-0
8
No
v-0
9
No
v-1
0
No
v-1
1
No
v-1
2
No
v-1
3
Fwd PE Prem/ Disc (MXAPJ v.s MXWO) MXAPJ vs. MXWO
The World index
MXAPJ
Forward PE (X)
-16%
10yr z-score:
-0.90
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
201
0
201
1
201
2
20
13
E
20
14
E
20
15
E
201
0
201
1
201
2
20
13
E
20
14
E
20
15
E
Consensus EPSg Consensus NM Consensus SPSg
MXWO MXAPJ
Less Margin
Compression
4.44.3
4.3
1.7
2.12.3
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Fe
b-0
9
Ju
l-0
9
De
c-0
9
May
-10
Oct-
10
Ma
r-1
1
Au
g-1
1
Ja
n-1
2
Ju
n-1
2
No
v-1
2
Ap
r-1
3
Se
p-1
3
Fe
b-1
4
Ju
l-1
4
De
c-1
4
5Y govt yield (%)
Yield Gap (RHS) Asia (GDP-weighted) US
Yield Gap (%)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 22
Will ASEAN regain momentum in 2014?
We believe it may continue to lag the region in 2014 after having outperformed
from 2006 to 2012. 2H14 could be a better time to revisit.
We believe the classic EM growth story remains intact for the ASEAN region:
Favorable base effect, ample room for productivity enhancement, strong demographics,
and much stronger balance sheet than in the previous crisis period (e.g. AFC).
However, a few factors could pressure equity returns cyclically:
o Indonesia and Thailand need to slow excess credit growth, which has been
running hot in recent years. Also, they have to trim their current account deficits
further, mainly through suppressing domestic demand (i.e. higher policy rates,
demand-side tightening).
o These macro adjustments mean growth estimates may need to be revised down
further, leading to lower EPS growth. Our earnings forecasts for ASEAN markets
are generally below consensus in 2014; and
o ASEAN markets’ relative valuations to the region remain at the expensive side
of their historical ranges.
We look to re-engage in 2H14 when political visibility emerges and cyclical
adjustments become mature.
Exhibit 38: The classic EM story remains intact for
ASEAN
Exhibit 39: While the base is low, cyclical adjustments are
needed in Indonesia, and to a lesser extent, Thailand
Note: Excess credit growth is calculate by subtracting the GDP growth (209-2012) from the nominal credit growth (2009-2012)
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 40: More downward revisions may take place
Exhibit 41: Valuations do not look attractive yet
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
ASEAN4 AeJ G7
*Capita stock
per worker
(US$)
18,432 49,276 225,191
*GDP per
Capita (US$)5,532 5,956 45,798
Population
below 4071% 62% 53%
Avg worker
wages (Mth,
US$)
372 1061 3494
* The numbers are weighted by GDP.
273%253%
238%
172%152% 145%
130%
96%85%
56%
48%52%
46%
31%
-7%
14%25%
11%8%
42%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Sin
gap
ore
Ch
ina
Mala
ysia
Ko
rea
Taiw
an
Th
ailan
d
Ind
ia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ind
on
esia
Total debt to GDP (%)
Total Debt to GDP (2012)
Excess Credit Growth (09-12, RHS)
Excess Credit Growth (%)
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
Jan
-03
Ju
l-03
Jan
-04
Ju
l-04
Jan
-05
Ju
l-05
Jan
-06
Ju
l-06
Jan
-07
Ju
l-07
Jan
-08
Ju
l-08
Jan
-09
Ju
l-09
Jan
-10
Ju
l-10
Jan
-11
Ju
l-11
Jan
-12
Ju
l-12
Jan
-13
Ju
l-13
ASEAN Consensus Estimates GDP (yoy)
2004 GDP 2005 GDP 2006 GDP
2007 GDP 2008 GDP 2009 GDP
2010 GDP 2011 GDP 2012 GDP
2013 GDP 2014 GDP
19%
5yr z-score:
0.84
21%
5yr z-score:
0.67
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Ju
l-06
No
v-0
6
Mar-
07
Ju
l-07
No
v-0
7
Mar-
08
Ju
l-08
No
v-0
8
Mar-
09
Ju
l-09
No
v-0
9
Mar-
10
Ju
l-10
No
v-1
0
Mar-
11
Ju
l-11
No
v-1
1
Mar-
12
Ju
l-12
No
v-1
2
Mar-
13
Ju
l-13
No
v-1
3
Valuation Prem/ Disc (ASEAN vs. MXAPJ)
Fwd PE Prem/ Disc
Trailing PB Prem/ Disc
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 23
What will re-rate Chinese banks?
We believe specific policies will be the key re-rating catalysts for Chinese banks in
2014. We see upside risks to the sector as reform momentum gathers pace.
Chinese banks are the fourth largest country-sector in MXAPJ, and are trading at
very low absolute valuations (5.1X 2014E P/E, 0.9X P/B), meaning decisions in this
area will have outsized impact on relative performance.
Chinese banks’ valuations have significantly de-rated relative to their global and
regional peers, and are now implying a 6.1% NPL ratio, versus the 1% reported in 3Q.
These suggest a great deal of banks specific risk is already priced in.
However, we do not think cyclical growth on its own or liquidity improvement
would be enough to re-rate Chinese banks (or prompt outperformance) because they
have become less sensitive to macro factors.
In that vein, we think bank-specific policies including a timetable of interest rate
liberalization (remove overhang), more clarity on preferred share issuance scheme
(improve capital structure), more transparency on accounting and classifying liability
and NPLs (estimate potential loss), and potential measures regarding bad debt
management (NPL carve out, loss absorption, etc.) will be important share price drivers.
Exhibit 42: China banks are the 4th largest country sector
in AeJ, and are trading at very low absolute valuations
Exhibit 43: Current market prices are implying 6.1% NPL
for Chinese banks
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 44: Chinese banks have de-rated relative to global
peers
Exhibit 45: Chinese banks have become less sensitive to
macro factors
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
9%
6% 5%4%
4%
3%
3% 2% 2%
1%
13.8 14.0
7.3
5.1
12.012.6
8.9
10.9
18.4
14.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
AU
Ban
ks
TW
Te
ch
KR
Tech
AU
Meta
l
HK
Pro
pe
rty
CN
En
erg
y
CN
Te
lco
s
HK
In
su
ran
ce
IN B
an
ks
MXAPJ Weighting (%) 2014E PE (X)
Ch
ina B
an
ks
6.35.7
6.4
8.4
6.0 5.85.5
6.7
8.2
6.6
5.8
6.7
8.8
6.16.1
5.2
6.05.6 5.85.8
4.8
6.2
5.35.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ICB
C (
H)
BO
C (
H)
CC
B (
H)
AB
C (
H)
Bo
Co
m (
H)
CM
B (
H)
CN
CB
(H
)
Min
sh
en
g (
H)
CQ
RC
B
ICB
C (
A)
BO
C (
A)
CC
B (
A)
AB
C (
A)
Bo
Co
m (
A)
CM
B (
A)
CN
CB
(A
)
Min
sh
en
g (
A)
SP
DB
Ind
ustr
ial
Hu
a X
ia
BO
NB
BO
BJ
BO
NJ
CE
B
Formation covered by general provision Implied new formation
Buy-rated stocks 2013 NPL ratio
Average = 6.1
-29%
5yr z-score:
-1.34
-9%
5yr z-score:
-1.68
-19%
5yr z-score:
-1.00
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
Ju
l-0
5
Dec-0
5
Ma
y-0
6
Oct-
06
Ma
r-0
7
Au
g-0
7
Ja
n-0
8
Ju
n-0
8
No
v-0
8
Ap
r-0
9
Se
p-0
9
Fe
b-1
0
Ju
l-1
0
Dec-1
0
Ma
y-1
1
Oct-
11
Ma
r-1
2
Au
g-1
2
Ja
n-1
3
Ju
n-1
3
No
v-1
3
Trailing PB Prem/ Disc (%) CN Banks vs. MXAPJ Banks
CN Banks vs. World Banks
CN Banks vs. EM Banks
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Sep
-08
Dec-0
8
Mar-
09
Ju
n-0
9
Sep
-09
Dec-0
9
Mar-
10
Ju
n-1
0
Sep
-10
Dec-1
0
Mar-
11
Ju
n-1
1
Sep
-11
Dec-1
1
Mar-
12
Ju
n-1
2
Sep
-12
Dec-1
2
Mar-
13
Ju
n-1
3
Sep
-13
Rolling 3Y t-Stat of CN CAI, FCI on MXCN banks return
CN FCI CN CAI
Insignificant zone (Critical value = +/- 1.96)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 24
China internet and Macau gaming: Buy, hold, or sell?
We recommend buying on any major corrections, China internet in particular.
Macau gaming and China internet (HK- and US-listed) have been the favorite
‘consensus buy’ sectors in the HK/China universe. They boast strong fundamental
investment case; they are liquid; and have performed well enough that many investors
can’t afford to go underweight.
Top-down, we think these two sectors are not yet at the levels where investors
should be too concerned about risks of overshooting, because:
o Their past 3Y returns don’t look stretched relative to historical boom-bust episodes;
o Their performance has been supported by fundamental earnings growth (and
upgrades), which appears healthier than past cases where valuation was a key
return driver.
Bottom-up, while our analysts (and consensus) continue to forecast strong but declining
EPS growth for these two sectors, the growth is mostly contributed by top-line as
opposed to margin expansion (China internet in particular), suggesting that their
optimistic EPS growth forecasts are not aided by stretching their profitability
assumptions.
Exhibit 46: Macau gaming and China internet have been
the two best performing sectors in the past few years
Exhibit 47: Their performance does not look stretched
relative to some historical episodes
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 48: The rally has been backed by fundamentals
Exhibit 49: EPS growth is not driven by stretching
margins
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
66%
64%
66%
43%
67%
60%
21%
56%59%
45%
52%55%
62%
51%
61%
51%
40%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
-100%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
700%
Maca
u (
62
6%
)
CN
In
tern
et
(24
4%
)
HK
Te
lco
s (
82
%)
HK
Dis
c. (5
6%
)
HK
In
du
str
ials
(5
1%
)
CN
Uti
liti
es (
47
%)
HK
Uti
liti
es (
33%
)
HK
Fin
. (1
9%
)
CN
Te
lco
s (
10%
)
CN
Sta
p. (-
1%
)
CN
En
erg
y (
-4%
)
CN
He
alt
hcare
(-1
6%
)
CN
Fin
. (-
18%
)
CN
Dis
c.
(-2
1%
)
CN
In
du
str
ials
(-2
6%
)
CN
Ma
teri
als
(-4
3%
)
HK
I.T
. (-
47%
)
Return since 2010 (%)
Return since 2010
% of buy rating (RHS)
I/B/E/S Consensus Rating (%)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
T=
0
T=
7
T=
14
T=
21
T=
28
T=
35
T=
42
T=
49
T=
56
T=
63
T=
70
T=
77
T=
84
T=
91
T=
98
T=
105
T=
112
T=
119
T=
126
T=
133
T=
140
T=
147
T=
154
Rebased Performance Index
KR Telcos (TMT)
KR ID (China 03-07)
CN Property
(China 03-07)
CN Materials
(China 03-07)
Macau Gaming
TW I.T. (TMT)
JP Property (1980s)
CH Software
(# of Weeks)
3 years before the peak
63%
472%
603%
475%
630%
244%182%
-19%
294%
84%185% 136%
-18% -13%
82%
178%519% 290%
494%
262%195%
-100%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
700%
-100%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
700%
Ja
pa
n P
rop
ert
y
KR
Te
lco
s +
TW
I.T
.
Ch
ina
Re
al
Esta
te
Ch
ina
Ma
teri
als
Ko
rea
In
du
str
ials
Ma
ca
u G
am
ing
Ch
ina
So
ftw
are
% Chg in country sectors rally (since 3 years before the peak)
Price Chg
Earnings Chg
Valuation Chg
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
20
11
20
12
20
13
E
20
14
E
20
15
E
EPSg NM SPSg
Macau Gaming
20
11
20
12
20
13
E
20
14
E
20
15
E
China Internet
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 25
How should investors position in the tech sector?
While we think internet and software (a.k.a new technology) will continue to do
well in 2014, we expect ‘Old tech’ to perform better than in 2013.
Tech is the 2nd largest sector in MXAPJ, accounting for 14.5% of the regional index
weighting of which 54% comes from Samsung and TSMC combined.
Regional tech has performed reasonably well so far in 2013 but with noticeable
divergence: ‘New tech’ has significantly outperformed ‘Old tech’, which primarily
focuses on semi and hardware design and manufacturing.
As noted in several sections in this report, we expect ‘New tech’ to continue to perform
well, backed by secular growth drivers. However, we think ‘Old tech’ will likely have a
better year in absolute return terms, because:
o Valuation has now reached arguably attractive levels in both absolute and
relative terms;
o Our analysts remain fundamentally bullish on Samsung (Buy) and TSMC (Buy,
on Conviction List), the largest and 5th largest stocks in MXAPJ;
o Thematically, ‘Old tech’ appears more favorably skewed towards a DM recovery
story given their revenue exposures there.
Exhibit 50: ‘New tech’ has generated significant alpha for
investors in 2013...
Exhibit 51: ...but ‘Old tech’ still remains important for
absolute returns given its heavy index weighting
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 52: The valuation gaps between ‘New’ and ‘Old’
are quite substantial
Exhibit 53: ‘Old tech’ seems better positioned for a DM
recovery theme
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
78%
68% 65%
31%
8% 7%1%
-11% -12%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
KR
So
ftw
are
CN
So
ftw
are
CN
Se
mi
IN S
oft
ware
MX
AP
J T
ech
TW
Se
mi
KR
Sem
i
TW
Co
mp
. H
/W
KR
Co
mp
. H
/W
Ytd Return (%, USD)
KR Semi
33%
KR Software
4%
KR Comp. H/W
3%
TW Semi
23%
TW Comp. H/W
16%
CN Software
10%
CN Comp. H/W
2%
CN Semi
0%
IN Software
8%
Korea
39%
Taiwan
39%
China
12%
India
8%
Weighting in MXAPJ Tech (%)
22.5
10yr z-score:
0.81
12.1
10yr z-score:
-0.19
8.4
10yr z-score:
-1.055.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
15.0
17.0
19.0
21.0
23.0
25.0
Jan
-10
Mar-
10
May
-10
Ju
l-10
Sep
-10
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Mar-
11
May
-11
Ju
l-11
Sep
-11
No
v-1
1
Jan
-12
Mar-
12
May
-12
Ju
l-12
Sep
-12
No
v-1
2
Jan
-13
Mar-
13
May
-13
Ju
l-13
Sep
-13
No
v-1
3
Fwd PE (X)MXAPJ Software & Services
MXAPJ Technology H/W
MXAPJ Semi
99% 97%
75%
61%51% 49%
42%
16%
8%
13%22%
38%
21%
53%
9%17% 17%
9%
20%
24%
9% 9% 10%4%
17%8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CN
Software
KR
Software
KR
Comp.
H/W
CN
Comp.
H/W
TW
Comp.
H/W
TW Semi KR Semi IN
Software
Sales exposure as % of totalOthers EU US Asia
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 26
Performance context: Intra-regional differentiation at play
Year-to-date, the MXAPJ index essentially posted flat returns, but beneath the headline,
the region had a tough summer followed by a sharp rebound. With excessive volatility
coupled with frequent market rotations, the risk-reward on AEJ equities this year has been
less attractive compared to DM equities or Asian currencies. We highlight various themes
that were in play in 2013 which inform our views and implementation ideas for next year:
A difficult “flat” year with less attractive risk-reward. MXAPJ has essentially
posted flat returns ytd, but beneath the surface the region has witnessed a roller-
coaster ride with four rallies and four pullbacks. Looking over the past 26 years of
history, the ytd returns for MXAPJ are well below historical averages (at 36th
percentile in absolute terms and at 20th percentile relative to DM equities). To
capture the excessive volatility, we compare AEJ with DM equities and currencies
on a risk-adjusted return basis (as measured by returns / realized vol) and note that
DM equities and Asian FX have had much better risk-adjusted returns than AEJ
equities.
Frequent market rotations: country macro in focus. Market leadership
continued to rotate frequently in 2013, continuing the pattern in 2012. Korea fell
almost 15% during 1H13, underperforming MXAPJ, but bounced back 15% in 3Q
posting the best returns in the region. Similarly ASEAN retained its leadership in
1H13 but underperformed in 2H13 on concerns over Fed tapering. Sector
leadership saw relatively less intense rotations. Looking at the dispersion of
returns (as measured by standard deviation) also shows that country dispersion
was higher in 2013.
Currency weakness impacting total equity returns. Most Asian currencies
weakened in 2013 impacting the total returns in dollar terms (particularly for South
Asian markets). For example, currency depreciation subtracted 13% and 17% from
India and Indonesia, respectively, in US dollar total return terms and 5% return
from the overall region. We have previously noted that FX changes make up on
average 25% of short and longer-term total returns and expect currency to play an
important role next year as well.
Better stock picking opportunities. Average stock correlations, which had risen
during the May-June sell-off, have reduced meaningfully suggesting more
opportunities for bottom-up stock picking.
Several intra-regional themes at play. The excessive volatility coupled with
frequent market rotations made navigating the investment environment tougher
this year. But several intra-regional trends were still at play, as summarized below:
o North Asia outperformed ASEAN. We argued at the beginning of the
year that ASEAN would underperform the region in 2013 after 7 years of
consistent outperformance. Although ASEAN continued to do well early in
the year, it came under intense pressure during the summer. The North
Asian markets also rallied strongly post summer and outperformed South
Asia (India, ASEAN) by 23% from their July low.
o Thematic alpha opportunities. Notwithstanding frequent rotation,
several macro themes, as embodied in our “macro slice” framework,
priced consistently in 2013. Global Cyclicals consistently outperformed
given tailwinds of improving DM growth and weaker Asian currencies.
Asset Sensitive Financials and Commodity Cyclicals remained under
pressure given headwinds of Fed tapering and slowing China growth.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 27
Exhibit 54: DM equities have had much better risk-adjusted returns than MXAPJ in 2013
Source: Bloomberg, FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 55: Most Asian currencies have also had better risk-adjusted returns than AEJ equities
Source: Bloomberg, FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 56: Stock correlations have reduced, suggesting
“alpha” opportunities
Exhibit 57: Correlation of market returns is still quite
negative, indicating frequent rotation
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Price returns Realized vol
2013 Ytd %tile vs. Vol-adj returns %tile vs. returns 26-yr history (Returns / vol) 26-yr history
S&P 500 ($) SPX 26.1% 76% 10.0 2.61 96%
Topix (¥) TPX 44.4% 96% 23.3 1.91 84%
Stoxx Europe 600 (£) SXXP 15.5% 60% 11.5 1.35 64%
MSCI Asia-Pac ex-Japan ($) MXAPJ 2.5% 36% 12.6 0.20 36%
MSCI Emerging Market ($) MXEF -3.0% 40% 13.1 -0.23 40%
MXAPJ vs. MSCI Dev. World ($) MXAPJ / MXWO -15.6% 20% 11.0 -1.42 4%
Risk-adjusted returns
Equities Ticker 2013 Ytd rlzd vol (%)
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
IDR
Australia
INR
JPY
AUD
PHP
Malaysia
MYR
TWD
THB
SGD
Philippines
Taiwan
Hong Kong
India
Singapore
China
EUR
Thailand
KRW
MXAPJ
HKD
Korea
Indonesia
Equities FX3.6
Absolute Risk-adjusted returns
(Returns / realized vol, YTD)
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
No
v-0
8
May
-09
No
v-0
9
May
-10
No
v-1
0
May
-11
No
v-1
1
May
-12
No
v-1
2
May
-13
No
v-1
3
Avg Stock Correlation
(3-mo correlation with MXAPJ)"Macro"
Trading
"Micro"
Trading
-0.50
-0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
Ma
y-9
6
Ma
r-9
7
Ja
n-9
8
No
v-9
8
Se
p-9
9
Ju
l-00
Ma
y-0
1
Ma
r-0
2
Ja
n-0
3
No
v-0
3
Se
p-0
4
Ju
l-05
Ma
y-0
6
Ma
r-0
7
Ja
n-0
8
No
v-0
8
Se
p-0
9
Ju
l-10
Ma
y-1
1
Ma
r-1
2
Ja
n-1
3
No
v-1
3
Correlation This month's return vs. last month's return
(across Asian markets, 12-mo avg)
Relative to the past 17 years, 2012 and 2013 are years of extreme rotation
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 28
Exhibit 58: Market rotation has been more intense than sector rotation
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 59: Markets have varied more than sectors,
indicating country macro was more in focus
Exhibit 60: Currency weakness has had a significant
impact on MXAPJ market returns in USD terms
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 61: North Asian markets have outperformed
South Asia
Exhibit 62: Global Cyclicals have outperformed Asset
sensitive financials
Source: FactSet, MSCI
Source: Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Quarterly Market Rotation (US$ Returns)
1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Qtd
Australia 8% Taiwan 2% Korea 15% India 7%ASEAN 6% ASEAN -5% China 11% China 6%
HK 3% HK -6% Australia 10% Korea 4%Taiwan 0% India -6% HK 8% Australia 4%India -3% China -9% Taiwan 1% ASEAN 3%
Korea -4% Korea -10% India -6% HK 3%China -5% Australia -15% ASEAN -6% Taiwan 1%
Outperform
In-Line
Underperform
Quarterly Sector Rotation (US$ returns)
1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Qtd
Healthcare 7% Telcos. 1% Materials 13% Cons. Disc. 6%Utilities 6% Info. Tech. -4% Cons. Disc. 10% Info. Tech. 5%
Financials 6% Cons. Disc. -4% Industrials 9% Healthcare 5%
Cons. Stap. 4% Healthcare -6% Info. Tech. 7% Materials 5%
Info. Tech. 1% Cons. Stap. -7% Energy 7% Financials 5%
Cons. Disc. 0% Utilities -8% Financials 5% Energy 4%
Industrials -1% Industrials -9% Healthcare 3% Cons. Stap. 3%
Telcos. -2% Financials -10% Cons. Stap. 2% Industrials 2%
Energy -4% Energy -14% Telcos. 1% Utilities 1%Materials -9% Materials -15% Utilities 1% Telcos. -1%
Outperform
In-Line
Underperform
(6.0)
(4.0)
(2.0)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
Mar-
06
Ju
l-0
6
No
v-0
6
Mar-
07
Ju
l-0
7
No
v-0
7
Mar-
08
Ju
l-0
8
No
v-0
8
Mar-
09
Ju
l-0
9
No
v-0
9
Mar-
10
Ju
l-1
0
No
v-1
0
Mar-
11
Ju
l-1
1
No
v-1
1
Mar-
12
Ju
l-1
2
No
v-1
2
Mar-
13
Ju
l-1
3
No
v-1
3
in Local currency in USD
Higher COUNTRYdispersion
Higher SECTORdispersion
Country LESS Sector Dispersion(Rolling 3-mo return basis)
%YTD returns
(Local)YTD returns
(US$)
Australia 17% Hong Kong 8%
Philippines 11% Australia 5%
Malaysia 8% Philippines 4%
Hong Kong 8% Korea 3%
MXAPJ 7% Malaysia 3%
India 5% Taiwan 3%
Taiwan 4% China 3%
Singapore 3% MXAPJ 2%
China 3% Singapore 1%
Korea 2% Thailand -4%
Thailand -1% India -8%
Indonesia -2% Indonesia -19%
85
90
95
100
105
110
Ja
n-1
3
Fe
b-1
3
Ma
r-1
3
Ap
r-1
3
May
-13
Ju
n-1
3
Ju
l-1
3
Au
g-1
3
Sep
-13
Oct-
13
No
v-1
3
MXAPJ
(local, +7% ytd)
MXAPJ
(US$, +2% ytd)
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
Jan‐13
Feb‐13
Mar‐13
Apr‐13
May‐13
Jun‐13
Jul‐13
Aug‐13
Sep‐13
Oct‐13
Nov‐13
North Asia vs.South Asia (Relative performance, indexed)
North Asia = China, Korea and Taiwan ; South Asia = India and ASEAN
+23%
-9%
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
De
c-1
2
Jan
-13
Feb
-13
Ma
r-1
3
Ap
r-13
Ma
y-1
3
Ju
n-1
3
Ju
l-1
3
Au
g-1
3
Se
p-1
3
Oct-
13
No
v-1
3
Global Cyclicals vs. Asset Sensitive Financials
(Relative performance, indexed)
GSSZMSGC / GSSZMSFA
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 29
Macro: Return expectations, views, and path
Bottom-line: Roughly 10% fundamental-driven returns, event-
dependent path and trading strategies
Our 2014 macro forecasts for Asia: Growth to improve moderately (6.1% to 6.4%),
inflation to stay in check (3.4% to 3.9%), policy to tighten marginally (+40bps on
average across AeJ), and Asian FX to weaken vs. the USD (-3% weighted by GDP).
The key growth delta is the macro recovery in DM, and its reinforcing impact on
domestic demand in Asia.
Top-down returns expectation: Close to 10% fundamental upside for MXAPJ
(slightly different from our official forecast); likely range between 470 and 580, +/-
10% from our end-14 MXAPJ target of 525.
An eventful policy and political year: QE tapering in the US (March 2014), growth
rebalancing and reform in China, potential further easing in Japan (April 2014),
and important elections in Europe and South Asia in mid-2014.
An event-dependent path and intra-year allocation, specifically:
1. Start the year with a positive tilt to China on a favorable yoy growth trend
and liquidity combo and potential carry-through of positive reform
momentum from 4Q13, and stay conservative on ASEAN due mainly to the
looming tapering concerns;
2. Look to accumulate Korea, especially on weakness, around the BoJ
meeting in April to trade a better external demand picture in 2H14 and 2015;
3. Watch for buying opportunities for Indonesia, and possibly India around
summer when political visibility emerges and cyclical adjustments mature
there;
4. Turn aggressive on broad market beta in 2H14, notably our three earnings-
related ideas, for a potential acceleration in earnings growth in 2015.
Baseline views for 2014: Growth to improve moderately, inflation to
stay in check, and policy to tighten marginally
Our economists expect the overall growth picture for AEJ to improve next year,
from 6.1% in 2013 to 6.4%, in line with current consensus;
The driver of growth would be a meaningful recovery in external demand, and
the resulting positive spillover to domestic private consumption growth. The
external demand recovery will be led by the US (2.9% in 2014), which may operate
close to trend growth, and the Euro area, which may return to expansion (+1.1%)
after staying in recession for two consecutive years (-0.6% for 2012 and -0.4% for
2013);
Inflation is likely to edge higher to 3.9% for 2014, from 3.4% in 2013 as output
gaps close;
Liquidity normalization may continue given our expected QE tapering in the US,
and forecasted policy rate hikes across Asian economies;
Except for SGD and PHP, our economists see Asian FX generally trading weaker
against the USD as the US begins to normalize its policy in 2014.
Details of our economists’ forecast on growth, inflation, rates, and FX are shown in
Appendix 1.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 30
Exhibit 63: The growth and inflation configuration for
AEJ is likely to be similar to 2013
Exhibit 64: Our economists expect a moderate pickup in
growth, in line with consensus expectation
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 65: Growth contribution will likely come from net
exports and the ripple effects on local consumption
Exhibit 66: Liquidity conditions may normalize in Asia,
partly driven by QE tapering in the US
Note: The forecasted paths are calculated based on our interest rate forecasts
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Translating our macro expectations into equity returns
Approach 1: Top-down regression model points to 8% upside for the region.
While we fully acknowledge the drawbacks of basing our views on regression
models, it helps distill the macro-to-market transmission mechanisms and locate a
reasonable range of where fair value may lie relative to macro fundamentals, in
our view.
Specifically, we employ two models—level and yoy return for MXAPJ—to estimate
fundamental upside for the region. Our models, which incorporate GDP growth,
inflation, financial conditions (US and Asia), and nominal earnings in Asia, show
8% potential upside for the MXAPJ index in 2014 (USD), based on our end-14
forecasts on these variables.
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
20122013E
2014E
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
An
nu
al
real
GD
P (
yo
y)
Annual CPI (yoy)
YearGS Consensus GS Consensus
Dec-03 6.4% 7.3% 6.5% 90 bp 10 bp
Dec-04 8.2% 6.8% 6.8% -140 bp -140 bp
Dec-05 7.7% 7.6% 7.1% -10 bp -60 bp
Dec-06 8.7% 8.2% 7.6% -50 bp -110 bp
Dec-07 9.5% 8.5% 8.8% -100 bp -70 bp
Dec-08 7.0% 5.5% 6.3% -150 bp -70 bp
Dec-09 5.7% 8.7% 7.6% 300 bp 190 bp
Dec-10 9.1% 8.4% 7.8% -70 bp -130 bp
Dec-11 7.4% 7.1% 7.2% -30 bp -20 bp
Dec-12 6.2% 6.9% 6.6% 70 bp 40 bp
Dec-13 6.1% 6.4% 6.4% 30 bp 30 bp
Change in GDP growth
expectationsGS Current year
expected GDP
(yoy)
Next year GDP growth
(yoy)
Asia ex-Japan
2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.7
1.01.7
0.8 0.91.0
1.2
0.6 0.4
0.4
0.4
2.6 2.5
3.9 3.4
1.4 1.4
0.4
1.0
0.3 0.4
0.0 0.2
0.20.7
1.0
0.7
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
2013E 2014E 2013E 2014E 2013E 2014E 2013E 2014E
AeJ China South Asia North Asia
Real GDP (yoy) Net Exports
Total Fixed Investment
Public consumption
Private Consumption
99 (1% yoy)
102 (0.7% yoy)
96
98
100
102
Ja
n-0
9
Ju
n-0
9
No
v-0
9
Ap
r-1
0
Sep
-10
Fe
b-1
1
Ju
l-11
Dec-1
1
May-
12
Oct-
12
Mar-
13
Au
g-1
3
Ja
n-1
4
Ju
n-1
4
No
v-1
4
FCI Ex-Equity (Yr 1999 = 100)US FCI AeJ FCI
Financial tightening
Financial loosening
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 31
Approach 2: Earnings growth/valuation sensitivity suggests the fair value of
MXAPJ may range from 470 to 580.
We complement our top-down return forecasts with bottom-up earnings and
valuation analysis.
A combination of our 14/15 EPS growth forecast of 10%/14% and a target forward
P/E multiple of 12.0X in Dec 2014 suggests MXAPJ should trade at 525 by end-14,
10% upside from current levels.
To account for forecasting errors (EPS growth) and potential valuation over-/under-
shoots (+/- 0.5 standard deviation), we believe the reasonable fair-value range for
MXAPJ should be bounded between 470 and 580, about 10% downside/upside
from our base-case return. This is admittedly a wide range but not an implausible
one given the volatility that we have seen so far this year.
Exhibit 67: Our top-down model for MXAPJ suggests around 8% for the regional market
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Bloomberg
Exhibit 68: A combination of our EPS growth forecast and target P/E multiple suggests a reasonable range of 470 to
580
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Bloomberg
514
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Dec-9
5
Dec-9
6
Dec-9
7
Dec-9
8
Dec-9
9
Dec-0
0
Dec-0
1
Dec-0
2
Dec-0
3
Dec-0
4
Dec-0
5
Dec-0
6
Dec-0
7
Dec-0
8
Dec-0
9
Dec-1
0
Dec-1
1
Dec-1
2
Dec-1
3
Dec-1
4
MXAPJ Index Level
MXAPJ
Fitted line
Dependent Variable = MXAPJ price level
Format Variables Coefficients t-Stat Assumption
Level Intercept -59 -4.8 -
yoy Regional GDP 1866 12.5 6.4%
yoy Regional CPI 837 4.2 3.9%
yoy Regional FCI -3293 -8.1 0.7%
level nominal tEPS 11 29.5 10.0%
R^2 89%
2014 expected annual return 8%
Format Variables Coefficients t-Stat Assumptions
Level Intercept -0.6 -12.9 -
yoy Regional GDP 10.2 16.5 6.4%
yoy Regional CPI 0.9 1.2 3.9%
yoypp UST10Y 11.7 7.6 0.5%
yoy Regional FCI -8.6 -5.9 0.7%
R^2 75%
2014 expected annual return 7%
7%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Dec-9
5
Dec-9
6
Dec-9
7
Dec-9
8
Dec-9
9
Dec-0
0
Dec-0
1
Dec-0
2
Dec-0
3
Dec-0
4
Dec-0
5
Dec-0
6
Dec-0
7
Dec-0
8
Dec-0
9
Dec-1
0
Dec-1
1
Dec-1
2
Dec-1
3
Dec-1
4
MXAPJ (USD, yoy)
MXAPJ
Fitted line
Dependent Variable = MXAPJ yoy return
Avg. 2014 expected annual return = 8%
Estimate - 5% Estimate + 5%
-2.5% 0.0% 2.5% 5.0% 7.5% 10.0% 12.5% 15.0% 17.5% 20.0% 22.5%
10.8 417 427 438 449 459 470 481 491 502 513 523
11.0 426 437 448 459 470 481 492 503 514 525 536
Target - 0.5SD 11.3 436 447 458 470 481 492 503 514 525 537 548
11.5 446 457 469 480 491 503 514 526 537 549 560
11.8 455 467 479 490 502 514 525 537 549 560 572
12.0 465 477 489 501 513 525 537 549 560 572 584
12.3 475 487 499 511 523 536 548 560 572 584 596
12.5 484 497 509 522 534 547 559 571 584 596 609
Target + 0.5SD 12.8 494 507 519 532 545 557 570 583 596 608 621
13.0 504 517 530 543 556 568 581 594 607 620 633
13.3 514 527 540 553 566 579 593 606 619 632 645
2014 EPS Growth (%)
Targ
et
Fo
rward
PE
Mu
ltip
le (
X)
GS 2014E
EPS Growth
2014 year-end target
Fwd PE multiple
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 32
Framing views and path around macro and political events
We anticipate an eventful year in terms of macro, political, and policy developments
globally: QE tapering in the world’s largest economy, growth rebalancing and reform in
the 2nd largest (China), a potential increase of QE in the 3rd largest (Japan), and important
elections in select parts of Europe and Asia where the results may have significant
implications to the rest of their regions, and even to the global markets.
In this vein, while our macro forecasts, which drive our equity return forecast for Asia,
reflect our best estimate of how fundamentals may evolve over the course of 2014, these
event uncertainties imply the variance around our base case would likely be high.
Additionally, the rapid advancement and adoption of technology, globalization, and
high equity valuations (average) will likely further complicate the reaction functions
in the equity market than would normally be implied by simple historical analysis.
Below, we overlay our fundamental return expectations with our view on the
aforementioned macro and political events, aiming to form a guide as to how and when
the market may trade these events, and calibrate our intra-year market allocations and
strategies accordingly.
Exhibit 69: Our hypothetical path of return: A slow start, followed by a strong finish
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
1) QE tapering in March 2014: A less dramatic response than in summer 2013
Our expectations: The Fed to begin tapering in March 2014 (from US$85bn/month
to US$75bn), and exit QE by the end of 2014. However, its strong commitment to
forward guidance should keep financial conditions at very accommodative levels,
especially at the front-end of the yield curve. Our economists expect the 10Y UST
to rise to 3.25% by end-14.
Non-linear and specific impact to Asian equities: Equities that are favorably
exposed to improving global demand but less affected by rising rates (interest cost,
valuation, FX, and property), and vice versa. By markets and sectors, they include
Korea, autos, and select financials on the long side, and Australia, Philippines, HK,
utilities, telecoms, and property on the short side (Exhibit 70).
470
480
490
500
510
520
530
De
c-1
3
Ja
n-1
4
Fe
b-1
4
Mar-
14
Ap
r-14
May-1
4
Ju
n-1
4
Ju
l-14
Au
g-1
4
Sep
-14
Oct-
14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
MXAPJ Index
Mar 2014
1)US QE Tapering
2)China policy
momentum carries
over 1Q
Apr 2014
BOJ Monetary
Policy Meeting
(Potential stimulus
announcement)
2H2014
2015E EPS growth
accelerates
2014E MXAPJ
return +10%
May-July 2014
Indonesia, India, UK,
Spain, Portugal,
Greece Election
1Q14 2Q14 3Q14
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 33
How will the market react when the Fed tapers in March? We believe the
reaction will be less dramatic than in summer 2013 when MXAPJ plunged 16%
from peak to trough, given: a) the meaningful macro and asset market adjustments
that have been made in several CA deficit economies; b) US rates are less
undervalued from a term-premium standpoint and relative to our Sudoku model,
and; c) market participants are arguably better prepared, mentally and in terms of
positioning. That said, we still believe the expectation of QE tapering will keep
Asia, notably South Asia, under pressure until this overhang is removed.
Exhibit 70: QE tapering framework: We think the impact on Asian equities would be non-linear and specific
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 71: We expect current accounts in South Asia to
improve in 2014
Exhibit 72: US rates are currently more in line with
fundamentals
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 73: Asian financial assets appear less vulnerable to the QE/liquidity shocks than they were in May
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Improving growth and
rising interest rate
Higher Interest rate
AU/ TH;
Utilities/
Transport.
Utilities/
TelecomsPhilippines
Multinational
banks and
regional insurers
PropertyForeign
Exchange
Growth recovery
(Better demand
outlook)
Korea,
Taiwan
Autos/
Industrials
Cost of
funding
Yield
compression
Valuation
compression
Yield curve
shift/
steepening
Exporters Cyclicals
Potentially
stronger
USD
Real asset
valuation
Hong Kong/
Regional
property
Asian
exporters
to the US
Companies
reporting in
USD/ CA deficit
Potential
Beneficiaries
Potential
Losers
16.5
1.0 1.5 1.7
3.0
8.3
-5.1
-3.1
-1.4
0.82.0
-4.4 -4.0-3.9
-2.9-2.2
-4.9
-3.1 -3.8-2.9
3.84
2.49
2.61
2.75
3.25
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
-6
-3
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2009 2013-2Q 2013E-3Q 2013E-4Q 2014E
Current Account Deficit (As % of GDP)
Malaysia Thailand
Indonesia India
UST10Y (RHS)
UST10Y Yield
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
201
4
201
5
201
6
(%)+/- 1 std dev. US 10-yr yield
Sudoku 'Fair' Value Current Market Pricing
Old GS forecast
5%
-1%-1%-4%-5%-5%
-7%
-13%-16%-17%
-28%
-4%
10%
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
Ko
rea
Ch
ina
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Ta
iwa
n
Au
str
ali
a
Ma
lay
sia
Sin
ga
po
re
Ind
ia
Th
ail
an
d
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ind
on
esia
MX
AP
J
SP
X
Chg in equities since May peak (USD, %)
3%
1%0%
0%-2%
-6%-6% -6%
-8%
-13%
-15%
-4%
-16%
-12%
-8%
-4%
0%
4%
KR
W
CN
Y
HK
D
TW
D
SG
D
PH
P
TH
B
MY
R
AU
D
INR
IDR
DX
Y
Chg in FX since May peak (%)
239
121
75 7150 46 43 41 39 34
-56
58
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Ind
on
esia
Ind
ia
Au
str
alia
Ch
ina
Th
ail
an
d
Ko
rea
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Sin
gap
ore
Taiw
an
Mala
ysia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
US
Chg in bond yield Since May Peak (bps)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 34
2) China: 1H is likely a better trading environment
A reasonably favorable growth + liquidity combo in 1H14; reform momentum may
continue. Besides improving reform momentum, which is the key argument for our
upgrade on China, we suggest starting the year with a positive tilt to China because:
Growth: Our economists project yoy GDP growth momentum to be strong in 1H14,
mainly on a favorable base effect, but the sequential trend could be weak due to
inventory destocking. Overall, this seems to provide a conducive environment for
equity returns in 1H as we note that the market tends to trade yoy growth rather
than sequential growth (Exhibit 75).
Liquidity: Liquidity conditions tend to be more accommodative early in the year.
As last June’s interbank rate spike and ensuing market sell-off demonstrated,
China’s asset markets are sensitive to liquidity conditions, especially given the
increase in corporate leverage in recent years.
Exhibit 74: China’s yoy and sequential growth
momentum is likely to diverge in 1H14
Exhibit 75: Equity markets tend to trade yoy growth
more than sequential growth momentum
Period of analysis: Since 2007, monthly frequency. The calculation is done with a 1-month lag to take into account the reporting lag of China econ data.
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 76: Liquidity conditions have tended to be more
favorable in the early part of the year in China
Exhibit 77: Reform may bode well for the economy, but
the fundamental impact on the equity market is likely to
be mixed
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8
8.1
8.2
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
20
12
-1Q
20
12
-2Q
20
12
-3Q
20
12
-4Q
20
13
-1Q
20
13
-2Q
20
13
-3Q
20
13
E-4
Q
20
14
E-1
Q
20
14
E-2
Q
20
14
E-3
Q
20
14
E-4
Q
China GDP (qoq. Ann.)
GDP (qoq. Ann.) GDP (yoy, RHS)
China GDP (%)
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
AP
J
Ch
ina
HK
Ind
ia
Ind
on
esia
Ko
rea
Mala
ysia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Sin
ga
po
re
Taiw
an
Th
ail
an
d
Au
str
ali
a
yoy +, seq +
yoy +, seq -
yoy -, seq +
yoy -, seq -
308.8
-129.0
403.1
98.6
-2.5
117.4
-269.7
-60.5
12.9
-307.1
-162.3
-36.5
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Average difference in NSA. TSF and SA. TSF since 2002 (RMBbn)
Better liquidity conditions in 1Q
17% 17%
13% 9%
16%16%
25%40%
28%18%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Market cap weighted 2013E earnings
weighted
Impact of Policy Reforms on MXCN Sectors (%)
Others
Negative (Banks)
Negative
Neutral
Positive
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 35
3) Abenomics: Limited impact on AEJ’s fundamentals, more manageable headwinds to Korea this time around
Abe’s first arrow set to be loosed again. Our economists expect the BoJ to step
up its monetary easing effort to offset the negative impacts of the consumption tax
hike in April and to boost inflation which is far short of its 2% target. They believe
the monetary policy easing is likely to be the most important driver for USD/JPY
(JPY to weaken), and continue to expect USDJPY to rise to 107 in 12 months.
Muted fundamental impact on AEJ so far. At the macro level, the relationships
between Japan’s FCI and AEJ’s have been weak, suggesting limited
financial/liquidity spillover to the region from Abenomics so far (Exhibit 79).
In terms of real activity, Korean exports (nominal and relative to Japan’s exports),
which have been widely regarded as the major loser when JPY depreciates, have
posted record numbers in the latest October print, supporting our strong and long-
held view that Korean exports’ FX sensitivity is much lower than investors have
generally perceived.
Potential headwinds to Korea in March/April, but more manageable than in
1H13. However, investors’ perception/concern remains entrenched: Korea
underperformed MXAPJ by 8pp in 1H13 when USDJPY and TPX rallied 16% and
28%. Looking ahead to the April BoJ meeting, we believe Korea will be less
impacted, mainly because:
a) the extent to which the JPY may depreciate should be much smaller than
when Abenomics was first announced; and,
b) investors should be less concerned about Korea’s deteriorating FX
competitiveness by then given the resilient export performance since
September 2012.
We would take any JPY-created market weakness as a buying opportunity to
position for global growth acceleration in the next two years.
Exhibit 78: Our economists expect the BoJ to announce further easing measures in April
Source: FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Jan 1 NISA initiation
Mid Jan. Ordinary Diet Session begins (FY2014 budget, FY2013 supplementary budget bills deliberation)
Late Jan. - Feb. Earnings results for 3Q13/14
Jan. 21-22 Jan. 21-22 BOJ Monetary Policy Meeting (Interim assessment on the BOJ outlook report)
Feb. 22-23 G20 Finance minister & central bank governors meeting (Sydney)
Feb-Mar Annual spring wage negotiation
End Mar FY2014 budget established
Apr 1 Consumption tax rate hike from 5% to 8%
Apr 30
BOJ Monetary Policy Meeting (Outlook Report) - Our Econ team expected that BOJ will
remain under pressure to provide additional easing to mitigate the impact of the tax hike. If
economic conditions deteriorate versus BOJ’s current scenario, our econ team believes BOJ
will make additional easing moves by purchasing ETFs and other risking assets.
May 20-21 BOJ Monetary Policy Meeting
Jun 4-5 G8 Summit Meeting (Russia)
Jun 12-13 BOJ Monetary Policy Meeting
During Jun Public works from the October 2013 economic package starts to kick in
Mid Nov 2014 Q3 GDP (Important for final devision of 2nd consumption tax rate hike, from Oct 2015)
Key Events in 2014
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 36
Exhibit 79: Japan’s financial conditions do not seem to
have significant spillover impact on AEJ
Exhibit 80: Korea’s exports do not seem severely
impacted by a weakening JPY
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 81: Korea has traded more negatively than what
history would suggest when JPY depreciates
Exhibit 82: We expect JPY to weaken further, but the
magnitude should be moderate
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
4) Elections in South Asia and Europe
While we do not take a view on the outcome of these elections, we believe they may be
market-moving events with fundamental implications in some cases, and investors should
monitor developments for better risk management and more effective tactical trading.
In this vein, we have compiled a detailed timetable of policies and events that may
have significant implications for Asia in the Appendix.
We believe these events include the parliamentary and presidential elections in India and
Indonesia, and a number of parliamentary elections in the peripheral European economies
which may have spillover effects to specific areas (e.g. Europe-exposed stocks) and even to
the global markets.
89
91
93
95
97
99
101
103
105
107
Ja
n-0
5
Ju
n-0
5
No
v-0
5
Ap
r-0
6
Sep
-06
Fe
b-0
7
Ju
l-07
De
c-0
7
May-0
8
Oct-
08
Mar-
09
Au
g-0
9
Ja
n-1
0
Ju
n-1
0
No
v-1
0
Ap
r-1
1
Sep
-11
Fe
b-1
2
Ju
l-12
De
c-1
2
May-1
3
Oct-
13
Financial Condition Index (Yr 2005 = 100)
Japan Korea Regional FCI
Financial tightening
Financial loosening
148
11.3
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
15.590
100
110
120
130
140
150
May-0
9
Au
g-0
9
No
v-0
9
Fe
b-1
0
May-1
0
Au
g-1
0
No
v-1
0
Fe
b-1
1
May-1
1
Au
g-1
1
No
v-1
1
Fe
b-1
2
May-1
2
Au
g-1
2
No
v-1
2
Fe
b-1
3
May-1
3
Au
g-1
3
Rebased Index
Relative export Index (KR vs JP)
KRW/JPY (RHS)
JPY/KRW (Reverse)
18% 17% 17% 16% 15% 15% 14% 14% 13%
9%
4%
17%
21%
12%
17%
-15%
7%
-7%
23%
-16%
4%6%
9%
1%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Ch
ina
Ind
ia
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Ko
rea
Mala
ysia
Sin
ga
po
re
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Au
str
alia
Ind
on
esia
Ta
iwa
n
Th
ail
an
d
MX
AP
J
Market Return Correlation with USDJPY10 Year
Since Sep 2012
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
Jan
-12
Ju
n-1
2
No
v-1
2
Ap
r-13
Sep
-13
Feb
-14
Ju
l-14
De
c-1
4
Rebased Currency Index
JPYUSD JPYKRW
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 37
Earnings: Back to trend growth in 2015 after 4 years of weakness
We see limited room for further multiple expansion given current valuation levels.
Therefore, equity returns next year will have to be primarily driven by earnings. We expect
earnings growth to accelerate back to trend in 2015 after 4 years of sub-trend growth.
Our top-down regional earnings growth forecasts are 10% and 14% for 2014 and 2015.
Demand-side models have overestimated earnings recently because the shortfall has come
from margins rather than revenues. Weak capacity utilization and excess capacity have
depressed profitability. Looking forward, capex discipline and moderating input cost
pressures should result in non-financial margins improving 50bp to 7% in 2015 after a
20bp uptick in 2014.
We outline our logic below.
Revenue growth should stay steady; the wild card is margins
Revenue growth has generally followed the path of nominal GDP growth. In our view, the
region will be able to deliver roughly 7% revenue growth in the next two years given our
assumption of gradually improving economic growth.
The wild card is margins. During 2011 and 2012, a sharp margin decline offset positive
revenue growth, leading to flat earnings for two consecutive years. Margins have now
troughed, but the magnitude of improvement has been minimal, with merely 20bp
potential expansion this year. What has driven the weakness in margins? We believe there
are two major reasons.
Costs have outgrown revenues
Operating costs have outgrown revenues, leading to a sharp drop in margins.
Commodity prices rose 50% from mid-2010 to mid-2011. Brent price, for example,
went from a low of US$70/barrel to a high of US$125. We expect a gradual decline
in commodity prices over the next few years given supply debottlenecking.
Wages have grown rapidly. In China, CAGR has been 10% in real terms over the
past 5 years. Although it is likely that labor wages will continue to go up, we
believe the pressure is at least not intensifying.
With this outlook in mind, Asian firms are likely to see some relief in cost pressure in our
view. However, we do not see a significant uplift to profit margins until 2015 as we believe
the degree of operating leverage will remain dampened next year due to overcapacity.
Overinvestment in capex has led to low capacity utilization and hurt margins
Overcapacity in Asia has not been driven by weaker demand alone. We believe aggressive
supply addition (i.e. capex) has played an important role. To illustrate why it is important
to consider supply dynamics, we update our top-down earnings model, which takes into
account three core macro variables – domestic demand, exports, and inflation. This
approach, which is largely demand based, significantly over-estimated actual
earnings growth in 2011-2012 and 2005-2007, even with perfect foresight forecasts on
the macro variables. During these two periods, we saw a significant drop in capacity
utilization, and net margins pulled back offsetting revenue growth.
We make the following points on capex and capacity utilization.
Capex intensity in Asia over the past few years is back on the rise, in both
capex/sales and capex/depreciation terms. Capex growth has slowed, but not
enough relative to the magnitude of demand slowdown.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 38
This has led to weak capacity utilization, which forms a sharp contrast with
the US. Revenue growth in both regions dropped, but Asian margins fell very
sharply while those in the US held up, similar to its utilization rate.
Heavy capex of the past years is also draining cash away. As of 2012, capex
alone took up 100% of operating cash flow generated by Asian firms, who had to
draw on their cash reserves and raise debt to finance other operations. As a result,
leverage increased noticeably.
In our view, Asia is unlikely to be able to afford more capex with internal
funding. In fact, we observe that capex intensity has started to decline.
We expect to see better supply discipline, and stronger margin expansion, as
we move into 2015. Margins have historically troughed roughly 1-2 years after
capex peaked. In our view, a sharp drop in capex intensity in 2013 could lead to a
meaningful margin pickup in 2015. From a bottom-up perspective, we also study
the potential changes in supply growth by sector; the result indicates that although
some sectors may see a reduction in excess capacity next year, most are smaller in
index weights (China steel/cement, China solar, regional bulkers, etc.). The broad-
based improvement should be more visible as we move into 2015.
Below-trend EPS growth in 2014; stronger margin expansion to fuel
growth acceleration in 2015
Based on the above, we assume a modest 20bp margin expansion in 2014. Together with
high-single digit revenue growth assumption, we believe profit growth will remain
moderate, and we maintain our 10% MXAPJ EPS growth forecast. As we move into 2015,
margins will likely improve by a larger magnitude of 50bp, and this should fuel EPS growth
acceleration back to trend at 14% after 4 years of weakness.
This compares to 12% and 10% EPS growth consensus expectations.
By market, our forecasts are meaningfully different vs consensus. For 2014 estimates, we
are most below consensus for Korea and Thailand. Despite our expectation of negative
revisions, we still expect Korea’s earnings growth will still be the highest in Asia. We are
slightly above consensus for the Philippines, and roughly in line with consensus for China,
Taiwan, Singapore and Malaysia.
Risks to our forecasts
As much as we discuss the supply-side dynamics, the demand side of the earnings
equation is also important, and it heavily depends on the macro outlook.
We expect the banks and insurance sectors to contribute one-fifth of the 10% earnings
growth we forecast for the region next year. Earnings in these sectors generally have a
strong relationship with the macro environment. Our high single digit to mid-teens %
growth forecasts for most sectors are driven by the view of steadily accelerating Asia GDP
growth and an eventual rise in interest rates.
Of note, the growth improvement we expect is fairly dependent on the improvement of
external demand (as we highlighted in the macro section). For this reason, the pace of US
and Europe macro recovery will be a critical risk factor to our earnings growth forecasts.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 39
Exhibit 83: We expect Asian earnings to return to trend growth in 2015, after 4 years of
weakness Earnings growth time series
Source: FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 84: We maintain our 10% EPS growth forecast for 2014; our expectation for 2015 is
14%, 4pp above current consensus GS top-down and consensus earnings growth forecasts by market
Source: FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 85: We expect 2014 earnings growth to be driven by a broad range of sectors
2014 earnings growth contribution by sector, based on our estimates
Source: FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI.
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
199
4
199
7
200
0
200
3
200
6
200
9
201
2
20
15
E
MXAPJ EPS growth (local currency)
+59% +49%+184%
-17% -36%-52%
-47%
Average:
14%
GS top-down Consensus
Markets 2014E 2015E 2014 2015
Australia 8% 11% 11% 8%
China 10% 11% 10% 10%
Hong Kong 6% 9% 9% 11%
India 12% 18% 14% 15%
Indonesia 12% 17% 16% 15%
Korea 15% 15% 20% 11%
Malaysia 8% 10% 9% 9%
Philippines 8% 16% 6% 14%
Singapore 8% 14% 9% 10%
Taiwan 11% 13% 12% 9%
Thailand 9% 11% 14% 12%
MXAPJ 10% 14% 12% 10%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Ban
ks/i
ns.
Cap
. g
oo
ds
Mate
rials
Reta
il
Au
tos
Oth
ers
En
erg
y
Sem
i
Uti
liti
es
Pro
pe
rty
Sta
ple
s
Ha
rdw
are
Inte
rnet/
IT s
vcs
Healt
h c
are
Oth
er
fin
.
Tele
co
ms
Tra
nsp
ort
MX
AP
J
2014 EPS growth contribution
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 40
Exhibit 86: We assume roughly 7% sales growth in the
next 2 years MXAPJ sales growth time series
Exhibit 87: Margin improvement in 2014 should remain
modest, but we expect strong margin expansion to fuel
acceleration of earnings growth in 2015 MXAPJ net margin time series
Exhibit 88: Both cost of goods sold and SG&A as % of
sales have sharply increased again during 2011-2012,
contributing to a drop in net margin Cost structure of MXAPJ companies
Exhibit 89: A simple demand-based model has not been
able to explain the earnings disappointment over the
past few years Actual vs. fitted of our top-down (demand-based) EPS model
Exhibit 90: Low capacity utilization has dampened
margin recovery over the past few years... Capacity utilization of Asia ex Japan and US
Exhibit 91: ... as Asia has over-invested in capacity
relative to the moderation in sales growth, in our view Revenue vs. Net PP&E growth in APJ and US
Source: FactSet, Haver, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013P
2014E
2015E
MXAPJ sales growth (actual and GS forecasts)
Including financials
Excluding financials
Nominal GDP growth
8.4%8.6%8.8%
9.3%
6.1%6.3%6.5%
7.0%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
201
3P
201
4E
201
5E
MXAPJ net margin (actual and GS forecasts)
Including financials
Excluding financials
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Cost breakdown
Net margin
Taxes & othersInterestOther opex
SG&A
COGS
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%1994
1997
2000
2003
2006
2009
2012
Actual
EPS growth
Fitted EPS growth
from top-down model
Significant over-estimation
by our top-down model
60
65
70
75
80
85
May-8
8
May-9
0
May-9
2
May-9
4
May-9
6
May-9
8
May-0
0
May-0
2
May-0
4
May-0
6
May-0
8
May-1
0
May-1
2
Capacity utilization
Asia Pacific ex Japan
US
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
Jan
-10
Jan
-12
3-year CAGR for both, APJ
Revenue
Net PP&E (RHS)
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
Jan
-10
Jan
-12
3-year CAGR for both, US
Revenue
Net PP&E
(RHS)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 41
Exhibit 92: Capex intensity in Asia has sharply risen Capex/sales and capex/depreciation ratios, global comparison (ex-financials, energy, utilities)
Exhibit 93: Capex spending alone is now taking up 100%
of the operating cash flow generated by Asian companiesCapex as % of operating cash flow, global comparison (ex-
financials, energy, utilities)
Exhibit 94: Firms are rapidly drawing their cash reserves
to finance their other cash usages Cash balance ratio, global comparison (ex-financials, energy,
utilities)
Source: FactSet, MSCI.
Exhibit 95: Capex intensity is starting to reduce as companies cannot afford more capex
with their internal cash, but margin has historically troughed roughly 1-2 years after capex
peak; a sharp drop in capex intensity in 2013 suggests a meaningful margin pickup in 2015 Capex intensity (reversed) vs. net margin
Source: FactSet, MSCI.
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
14%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Capex/sales
APJ
US
Europe
Japan
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Capex/depreciation
APJ
US
Europe
Japan
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
Capex as % of OCF
US
Europe
Japan
APJ
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
14%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Cash balance as % of total asset
US
Europe
Japan
APJ
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Capex/depreciation (X) Net margin (%)
2y
Same
1y
2y1y
Same
?Capex/dep(reversed)
Net margin
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 42
Exhibit 96: Our study on sector supply suggests that most sectors in Asia will still have supply expansion in 2014; we
may see more broad-based improvement in supply discipline in 2015
Note: margin change is with respect to the past 5 years. Net debt/equity ratio is as of 2013. Potential change in capacity is for 2014. Black shading is applied to sharp margin contraction over the past 5 years, high net debt/equity and potential reduction in capacity. Blue shading is applied to sharp margin expansion over the past 5 years, low net debt/equity and potential expansion in capacity.
Source: FactSet, industry sources, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 97: The top 5 sectors contribute about 80% of earnings in each market
Source: FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI.
Margin change
(pp) (%)
Hong Kong 1.0% 8.2 n.m. 10% →Korea 0.5% 0.2 7% 37% →China 0.4% (0.9) -13% -11% →Australia 0.3% 9.9 n.m. 35% →Australia 2.2% 1.0 25% 30% →China 0.7% (0.3) -6% 6%
Korea 0.6% (3.6) -37% 30% →India 0.5% 3.5 30% 9%
India 0.9% (0.1) -1% -44% →China 0.5% (11.6) -30% -44%
Korea 0.3% 17.6 n.m. -21%
Taiwan 2.5% (0.5) -15% -2%
Korea 0.4% (0.5) -11% 16%
Korea 8.7% 6.5 n.m. -31% →Taiwan 2.8% 4.8 33% -6%
China 2.1% (1.6) -10% -23%
Singapore 0.5% (2.7) -12% 30%
Australia 0.4% 0.1 0% 98%
Taiwan 0.4% (4.6) -22% -1%
Hong Kong 0.8% (12.9) -39% 41%
China 0.6% 9.3 851% 164%
Potential
chg in
capacity
Telecom services 4%
Retail / gaming 3%
Consumer staples
and Health Care5%
Utilities 3%
Software and
services2%
Computer
hardware3%
Semiconductors 12%
Net
D/E
ratio
Sector
2014
Erns
wgt
Top
markets
2014
Erns
wgt
Margin change
(pp) (%)
China 3.5% (1.8) -21% 37%
Australia 1.2% (14.4) -64% 38%
India 0.9% (7.8) -55% 16%
Thailand 0.6% 2.0 67% 39%
Korea 0.5% 1.0 83% 33%
Korea 0.8% (0.3) -11% 69%
Taiwan 0.5% 3.3 78% 18%
China 0.5% (1.7) -18% 192%
Australia 0.4% 2.0 60% 72% →Metals & mining 4% Australia 3.5% 5.3 38% 41%
Korea 0.8% (5.8) -65% 62%
Australia 0.5% 43.5 -183% 84% →India 0.2% (2.8) -41% 140%
Taiwan 0.1% (2.1) -35% 79% →China 0.0% (2.0) -177% 182%
Korea 1.7% (0.3) -15% 72% →China
Sing
Australia 0.4% (4.0) -43% 76% Cont.
China 0.3% 4.7 219% 76% Bulk.
Korea 3.9% 2.4 151% 23%
China 0.6% 5.4 111% -15%
India 0.4% (1.0) -14% 12%
Potential
chg in
capacity
29%
Building materials 1%
Steel, aluminium 2%
(1.6) -38%Shipbuilding
Transportation 1%
Autos 5%
5%
Oil and gas 7%
Upstream
Refining
Chemicals 2%
Singapore 0.7%
Net
D/E
ratio
Sector
2014
Erns
wgt
Top
markets
2014
Erns
wgt
Banks
Banks
Property
Banks
Banks
Semi
Banks
Industrials
Banks
Semi
Banks
Mining
Energy
Ins.
Energy
Autos
Autos
Utilities
Banks
Industrials
Computer HW
Energy
Staples
Telco
Durables
Tech
Telco
Banks
Staples
Telco
Property
Banks
Chem.
Ins.
Prop.
Utilities
Staples
Staples
Ind.
Ind.
Property
Telco
Ins.
Building Mat.
Property
Insurance
Industrials
Autos
Building Mat.
Chemicals
Telco
Utilities
Staples
Chemicals
Telco
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Australia
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Korea
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
Taiwan
Thailand
Earnings weight of top 5 sectors (2014E)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 43
Valuations: Not much room for expansion except for China
As we have noted, Asia’s headline valuations may look undemanding (at 12.1X forward
P/E), but the region doesn’t look particularly attractive as average stock valuations are 31%
higher (at 15.9x) and expensive relative to history. Overall, we would argue the current
valuations for Asia are at best fair relative to the macro backdrop, except for China where
we expect multiples to recover from a low base as confidence in reforms builds. We
expect the aggregate region to trade at 12.0X forward P/E at the end of 2014, a slight de-
rating from current elevated levels. We summarize our key arguments below:
Headline regional valuations are undemanding relative to its history. MXAPJ
is currently trading at 12.1X forward 12m earnings and 1.6x trailing book, which
are 0.3 and 1.0 standard deviation below their ten year averages, respectively.
Even looking at individual markets, cap-weighted valuations for most markets
except Philippines and Malaysia are trading near or below their 10 year averages.
But average stock valuations look expensive. As we have noted previously, the
region doesn’t look particularly attractive on equal-weighted (average) valuations.
The average stock valuation for MXAPJ is 31% higher at 15.9, which is 0.8
standard deviations on the expensive side of its 10-year history.
While the valuation gap between headline and average does exist in other
regions, the effect is more pronounced in Asia. The valuation divergence
between market-cap weighted and average valuations is largely due to
inexpensive but large sectors in Asia, such as China banks and Korean exporters,
which are increasingly weighing down aggregate (i.e. market cap weighted)
valuations. Indeed, looking within individual markets we note that China & Korea’s
cap weighted valuations are approximately 30% below their equal weighted
valuations. While valuation gaps do exist in other regions, we note that the effect
is more pronounced in Asia than in other parts of the region (Exhibit 101).
Macro fundamentals suggest valuations are at best fair for headline but
expensive on an average basis. Our macro-models based on global and
domestic growth, long-term rates and inflation indicate that the region could trade
at 11.5x forward earnings on a market-cap weighted basis, which is at best fair
compared to current valuations. The average valuations however look expensive
relative to the macro backdrop as the average stock model is more sensitive to
growth and valuations have expanded despite slowing growth expectations.
Most markets look fair relative to the current liquidity backdrop, but a rise in
bond yields could cause valuations to come under pressure. Based on the yield
gap (difference between earnings yield and real short rates) analysis, we find that
most Asian markets look fairly priced relative to their ranges. However, a rise in
bond yields could potentially cause valuations to come under pressure.
Empirical evidence also suggests flat returns at current average valuation
entry points. As we have noted (see AsiaPac Valuations: What works, and when,
Mar 12, 2012), the starting point of valuations plays a vital role in determining
subsequent returns. From the current expensive levels of average stock P/E, the
region’s subsequent returns have historically been almost flat.
We see limited room for further re-rating except for China. While the valuation
changes hinge upon both domestic and global growth changes, we note that the
recent re-rating in Asia was largely because of global factors as evident in recent
re-rating in equities globally. We expect MXAPJ to trade at 12.0X forward P/E at
the end of 2014, a slight de-rating from current elevated levels. China is the
exception, where we expect multiples to recover from a low base as confidence in
reform builds.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 44
Exhibit 98: MXAPJ headline valuations look
undemanding compared to historical averages...
Exhibit 99: ...but average stock valuations look expensive
Exhibit 100: The average stock valuations are 30% higher
than the cap-weighted headline valuations in the region
Exhibit 101: The valuation gaps between headline and
average P/E are higher in Asia than in US and EU
Exhibit 102: Our model suggests that the current
headline valuations are fair, based on our macro
expectations...
Exhibit 103: Yield gap analysis shows most Asian
markets look fairly valued relative to the liquidity
backdrop
Source: FactSet, MSCI, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Valuation vs. 10-Year History
Current 10-year Z-scoreP/E P/B P/E P/B Avg.
(NTM) (LTM) (NTM) (LTM) Z-ScoreChina 9.3 1.5 -0.9 -1.1 -1.0Korea 8.8 1.2 -0.5 -1.2 -0.8Hong Kong 15.0 1.3 -0.4 -0.8 -0.6India 14.4 2.5 -0.2 -1.1 -0.6Singapore 14.1 1.5 0.1 -1.0 -0.4Taiwan 14.1 1.8 0.1 -0.5 -0.2Indonesia 13.3 3.1 0.5 -0.7 -0.1Australia 14.5 2.0 0.7 -0.4 0.1Thailand 11.9 2.2 1.0 0.1 0.5Malaysia 15.5 2.2 1.1 0.3 0.7Philippines 18.5 3.1 1.8 1.3 1.5
MXAPJ 12.1 1.6 -0.3 -1.0 -0.7
15.9
10yr z-score:- 0.8
12.1
10yr z-score:- -0.3
8x
10x
12x
14x
16x
18x
20x
De
c-0
0
De
c-0
1
De
c-0
2
De
c-0
3
De
c-0
4
De
c-0
5
De
c-0
6
De
c-0
7
De
c-0
8
De
c-0
9
De
c-1
0
De
c-1
1
De
c-1
2
De
c-1
3
Market Cap-weighted P/E
MXAPJ 12-mo forward P/E (X)
Equal-weighted P/E
China 13.5x 8.8x 53%
Korea 13.0x 8.6x 51%
Thailand 15.7x 11.8x 33%
Australia 18.6x 14.5x 28%
Taiwan 17.7x 14.1x 26%
India 17.5x 14.0x 25%
Singapore 16.4x 13.9x 18%
Malaysia 17.7x 15.5x 14%
Indonesia 14.5x 13.2x 10%
Hong Kong 15.8x 14.7x 7%
Philippines 19.0x 18.4x 4%
MXAPJ 15.9x 12.1x 31%
12-mo forward P/E (X)
Market
Equal-
weighted
Market Cap-
weightedDifference
31%
22%
17%
13%
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
No
v-0
2
No
v-0
3
No
v-0
4
No
v-0
5
No
v-0
6
No
v-0
7
No
v-0
8
No
v-0
9
No
v-1
0
No
v-1
1
No
v-1
2
No
v-1
3
Fwd PE premium between index headline Fwd PE and equal-
weighted Fwd PE
MXAPJ SPX
STOXX TPX
6x
8x
10x
12x
14x
16x
18x
Dec-0
3
Dec-0
4
Dec-0
5
Dec-0
6
Dec-0
7
Dec-0
8
Dec-0
9
Dec-1
0
Dec-1
1
Dec-1
2
Dec-1
3
Dec-1
4
MXAPJ Actual 12-mo forward P/E
MXAPJ Fitted 12-mo forward P/E
R-sq = 72%
11.5X
(5)
-
5
10
15
20
Au
str
ali
a
Ch
ina
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Ind
on
esia
Ind
ia
Ko
rea
Ma
lay
sia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Sin
ga
po
re
Ta
iwa
n
Th
ail
an
d
Yield gap (Earnings yield - real short rates, %) Average Current level
+/- 1 Std.dev. High/low
more extended valuations relative to
the liquidity environment
more attractive valuations relative to
the liquidity environment
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 45
Exhibit 104: Average stock valuations look expensive relative to the macro backdrop
Source: DataStream, FactSet, MSCI, I/B/E/S, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 105: Asia’s valuations have risen largely due to
the re-rating of global equities
Exhibit 106: Empirical evidence indicates almost flat
returns at current average valuation entry levels
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: DataStream, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
6x
8x
10x
12x
14x
16x
18x
20xD
ec-0
3
Dec-0
4
Dec-0
5
Dec-0
6
Dec-0
7
Dec-0
8
Dec-0
9
Dec-1
0
Dec-1
1
Dec-1
2
Dec-1
3
Dec-1
4
MX
AP
J e
qu
al-
we
igh
ted
fo
rwa
rd P
/E
Fitted Actual
Downgrades to Asian GDP
growth estimates but average stock valuations
re-rated on global factors
-11%-6%
1%-5%
-25%
36%
-12% -13%
13% 14%
2%
11% 11% 13%
-5%
-2%
-6%
3%
-13%
12.112.8
14.3
15.5
10.8
14.5
12.8
10.3
11.912.1
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Re-/de-rating due to Asia's
specific factors
Changes in global equities'
valuations
MXAPJ forward P/E (X)
Fwd PE (X)Re-de-rating (%) Starting Avg. P/E and Forward Return
When MXAPJ % of Average Returns
Avg. PE is... (X) obs 1-mo 3-mo 6-mo 1-yr
Less than 9.5 1 % 5 % (3)% 33 % 81 %
9.5 to 11.0 5 3 % 15 % 25 % 45 %
11.0 to 12.5 16 0 % 3 % 10 % 23 %
12.5 to 14.0 25 0 % (0)% 2 % 8 %
14.0 to 15.5 28 0 % (0)% (3)% (2)%
15.5 to 17.0 14 0 % (0)% (0)% (5)%
17.0 to 18.5 8 2 % 5 % 7 % (1)%
18.5 to 20.0 3 0 % 7 % 7 % (7)%
Greater than 20.0 1 (0)% (4)% (8)% (31)%
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 46
Positioning: Potential for continuing shift to North Asia
Foreign flows have recovered after a tough summer, with flows primarily favoring North
Asia. Allocation data still shows investable gaps, and more aggressive allocations to North
Asia could amplify returns, in our view. We continue to expect flows to rotate out of bonds
to equities, which could be supportive for overall equities in 2014. We summarize our key
points below:
Foreign flows have recovered post summer as risk appetite picked up. After
net outflows of US$16bn since their respective May peak (for the Asian markets
that report exchange-level net foreign activity), the region has seen inflows of
US$23bn since September with net inflows of US$28bn year-to-date. The recovery
in foreign flows has coincided with the 10% rebound in MXAPJ from its August
lows as regional risk appetite picked up after the tough summer.
Flows have primarily favored North Asia. The North Asian markets have
received the lion’s share of recent foreign inflows. Since August lows, Korea and
Taiwan have seen cumulative net foreign buying of almost US$20bn (Korea:
US$12.5bn, Taiwan: US$7.4bn). The recent foreign buying is partly reflective of the
higher sensitivity of these markets to a better external environment with less
exposure to the risk of US monetary policy normalization, in our view.
Active funds still have strong underweights in North Asia; we see potential
for more inflows. While many investors argue that recent flows and performance
indicate that long North Asia is already a “consensus trade”, we note that
allocation data still shows investable gaps in North Asia. Based on allocation data
from EPFR, both GEM and Asia-focussed mutual funds remain underweight North
Asia by a significant margin. For example, mutual funds with Asia mandates still
have strong underweights in Korea (-769bp) and Taiwan (-649bp) while holding
strong overweights in India (+495bp) and ASEAN (+948bp). Given allocation gaps
and our view that North Asian markets offer the clearest way to gain exposure to
improving global growth, we see potential for more inflows to North Asia.
Active managers have performed in line with the region despite a strong
start; more aggressive allocations to North Asia could amplify returns. Asia-
Pacific focused mutual funds had a strong start to the year, outperforming MXAPJ
by 5pp in the first two quarters of the year. But the post summer rebound has seen
active funds underperforming MXAPJ with the year-to-date tracking in line vs.
region. The underperformance since 3Q may partly be attributed to the fact that
North Asian markets outperformed South Asian markets and the relative
allocations to North Asian markets are still low. More aggressive allocations to
North Asia in 2014 could help amplify performance, in our view.
‘Meta level’ flow / positioning dynamics remain constructive for equities. As
per ICI flow data, bond funds are on pace for their first year of net outflows since
2004. Excluding the ETFs, active bond funds have already seen US$30bn net
outflows post the Fed’s taper debate in June. We continue to anticipate investor
flows to rotate from bond to equities in 2014. Also comparing investor positions
in equity and debt markets, we continue to believe that investor positions are less
extended in equity markets (relative to debt markets). Foreign positioning risk still
looks relatively higher in local currency debt markets given a significant rise in
foreign ownership levels post the GFC and the relatively lower liquidity of bond
markets.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 47
Exhibit 107: Net foreign buying in EM Asia
Exhibit 108: Foreign flows have been favoring North Asia
Source: Bloomberg
Source: Bloomberg
Exhibit 109: After net outflows of US$ 16bn during summer, the region has seen net inflows of US$ 24bn
Source: Bloomberg
Exhibit 110: Active funds are still underweight North
Asian markets and overweight South Asia
Exhibit 111: AEJ-focused MFs have performed in line
with MXAPJ ytd
Top 50 AEJ benchmarked funds covering US$10 bn of assets
Source: EPFR, FactSet, MSCI
Source: Bloomberg, FactSet
18 20
1
3630 33
18
-2
-70
61 65
-14
51
28
(80.00)
(60.00)
(40.00)
(20.00)
-
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
YT
D
Annual foreign buy of EM Asia cash equities
USD bn
-$4
$1
$6
$11
$16
$21
$26
$31
$36
Ja
n-1
2
Fe
b-1
2
Mar-
12
Ap
r-1
2
May-1
2
Ju
n-1
2
Ju
l-12
Au
g-1
2
Sep
-12
Oct-
12
No
v-1
2
Dec-1
2
Ja
n-1
3
Fe
b-1
3
Mar-
13
Ap
r-1
3
May-1
3
Ju
n-1
3
Ju
l-13
Au
g-1
3
Sep
-13
Oct-
13
No
v-1
3
North Asia
South Asia
Cumulative FII net buying ($ bn)
FII flows: How much "came out" during May-June sell-off and subsequently recovered?
Inflows to May 22 Outflows till July 8
Since 2013 Prior % of last % of 2013 % of 2013 YTDbeginning 3 Months $ mn 3-mo flows flows till May $ mn outflows net flows
India 14,723 6,465 -1,017 16% 7% 5,039 495% 16,677
Korea -4,338 -4,140 -4,237 n/a n/a 12,471 294% 6,453
Taiwan 5,078 3,177 -5,686 179% 112% 7,438 131% 8,341
Thailand -146 -24 -2,550 n/a n/a 127 5% -3,656
Indonesia 2,665 1,075 -2,921 272% 110% -277 n/a -1,058
Philippines 1,601 762 -74 10% 5% -354 n/a 935
Emerging Asia 19,584 7,314 -16,486 225% 84% 24,444 148% 27,692
Inflows since Aug 28
-1600
-1200
-800
-400
0
400
800
1200
Oct-
03
Ap
r-0
4
Oct-
04
Ap
r-0
5
Oct-
05
Ap
r-0
6
Oct-
06
Ap
r-0
7
Oct-
07
Ap
r-0
8
Oct-
08
Ap
r-0
9
Oct-
09
Ap
r-1
0
Oct-
10
Ap
r-1
1
Oct-
11
Ap
r-1
2
Oct-
12
Ap
r-1
3
Oct-
13
ASEAN India Hong Kong China North Asia (Korea, Taiwan)
Asia-fund
OW/UW (bps)
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
De
c-0
9
Mar-
10
Ju
n-1
0
Se
p-1
0
De
c-1
0
Mar-
11
Ju
n-1
1
Se
p-1
1
De
c-1
1
Mar-
12
Ju
n-1
2
Se
p-1
2
De
c-1
2
Mar-
13
Ju
n-1
3
Se
p-1
3
De
c-1
3Asia ex-Japan Avg. Mutual Fund Performance
Avg. MF return vs. MXAPJ (Indexed)
YTD: in-line with MXAPJ;
Strong start to the year but underperformed since 3Q
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 48
Exhibit 112: We continue to anticipate flows to shift from
bonds to equities
Exhibit 113: We see less extended positions in most
equity markets (except India)
Source: ICI, AMG, Lipper US Fund Flows
Source: Bloomberg
Exhibit 114: Foreign ownership of Asian equities has
steadily risen...
Exhibit 115: ...while foreign ownership of bonds has risen
significantly post GFC
Source: Bloomberg,, local stock exchanges
Source: CEIC, AsianBondsOnline
Exhibit 116: Positioning risk still looks higher in bonds, given a significant rise in ownership and relatively lower
liquidity
Source: Bloomberg, CEIC, Stock exchanges, AsiaBondsOnline
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Ja
n-1
1
Mar-
11
Ma
y-1
1
Ju
l-1
1
Sep
-11
No
v-1
1
Ja
n-1
2
Mar-
12
Ma
y-1
2
Ju
l-1
2
Sep
-12
No
v-1
2
Ja
n-1
3
Mar-
13
Ma
y-1
3
Ju
l-1
3
Sep
-13
No
v-1
3
Equity Funds Bond Funds (RHS)
US$ bn US$ bnCumulative net buying (ex ETF) since 2011
-$2
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
-$5
$5
$15
$25
$35
$45
Ja
n-1
2
Mar-
12
May-1
2
Ju
l-1
2
Sep
-12
No
v-1
2
Ja
n-1
3
Mar-
13
May-1
3
Ju
l-1
3
Sep
-13
No
v-1
3
India
ASEAN(rhs)
Cumulative FII net buying ($ bn)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Oct-
01
Ap
r-02
Oct-
02
Ap
r-03
Oct-
03
Ap
r-04
Oct-
04
Ap
r-05
Oct-
05
Ap
r-06
Oct-
06
Ap
r-07
Oct-
07
Ap
r-08
Oct-
08
Ap
r-09
Oct-
09
Ap
r-10
Oct-
10
Ap
r-11
Oct-
11
Ap
r-12
Oct-
12
Ap
r-13
Oct-
13
Equity Foreign ownership (%)
Korea
Taiwan
India (FII, Quarterly)
Thailand
Philippines
31.0
17.9
31.2
9.8
77.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40M
ar-
96
Ja
n-9
7
No
v-9
7
Sep
-98
Ju
l-99
May-0
0
Mar-
01
Ja
n-0
2
No
v-0
2
Sep
-03
Ju
l-04
May-0
5
Mar-
06
Ja
n-0
7
No
v-0
7
Sep
-08
Ju
l-09
May-1
0
Mar-
11
Ja
n-1
2
No
v-1
2
Sep
-13
MY TH ID KR AU (rhs)
Foreign ownership of Asian local govt. bonds
Cumulative
FII flows
Avg daily
value traded
# Days
trading in
case of a
Current
foreign
Foreign
ownership
Avg daily
value traded
# Days
trading in
case of a
since 2010 (US$ mn) full unwind ownership in 2010 (US$ mn) full unwind
India 70,024 2,495 28.1 507 47.4
Philippines 6,036 246 24.5 - - 320 -
Indonesia 5,951 617 9.6 31.2 18.6 79 164.1
Korea 32,498 5,488 5.9 9.8 7.0 2,406 6.5
Taiwan 13,925 3,162 4.4 - - 7,786 -
Thailand 1,235 1,560 0.8 17.9 3.2 796 42.8
Malaysia - 570 - 31.0 13.3 459 73.2
Australia - 4,829 - 77.1 62.0 700 60.4
Note: Local govt. bonds ownership and liquidity estimates do not include corporate or foreign currency bonds
Equities Local government bonds
Market
Cum. FII buying of $ 24 bn
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 49
Secular themes: Buy on dips
As we highlighted in our outlook piece last year, we see certain global and Asia-specific
macro trends that are rapidly changing our daily lives, as well as reshaping the investment
landscape and offering potentially rewarding returns when they are available at reasonable
valuations.
Broadly, we group them under three main categories in Asia: Digitalization of
consumption, urbanization, and green GDP.
They all share some common characteristics:
They boast a clear investment case of delivering strong secular topline growth;
Importantly, they aren’t just investment themes under the broad Asia growth
story— they are (and have become) influential building blocks of that story;
Stocks which are favorably exposed to these themes tend to trade at high
valuation multiples. Our strategy is to ensure we understand the logic and driver
of growth, identify potential winners in these areas through a micro lens, and
await opportunities to accumulate these stocks when market corrections come
or attractive entry levels emerge.
We highlight stocks which may benefit from these themes, complemented by our
analysts’ bottom-up industry positioning and micro fundamental analysis in
Exhibit 117.
Exhibit 117: Buy on dips: Any major weakness would present strategically sound opportunity to accumulate these
potential long-term winners, in our view
*Denotes stock is on our regional Conviction List.
Source: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Bloomberg Name Country Sector
Listed Mkt
Cap (US$
mn)
6M ADVT
(US$ mn)
Price
(Quote)Curncy
GS
Rating
12m
Potential
+/(-)%
2013E
EPSg
(%)
2014E
EPSg
(%)
2014E
P/E
(X)
2014E
P/B
(X)
2014E
D/Y
(%)
EM smartphone demand
005930 KP Samsung Electronics Korea Semi 196,418 320 1424000 KRW B 26% 35% 13% 6.9 1.4 1.0%
2330 TT TSMC Taiwan Semi 90,793 117 103.50 TWD B* 26% 11% 16% 12.5 2.7 2.9%
2454 TT Mediatek Taiwan Semi 18,741 82 410.50 TWD NR - 53% 29% 15.8 2.7 3.8%
Potential disruptive technology - Array camera
2382 HK Sunny Optical China Computer H/W 958 10 6.77 HKD B 40% 17% 57% 10.5 2.1 2.1%
Big Data & Cloud computing
2308 TT Delta Electronics Taiwan Computer H/W 11,759 23 143 TWD B 17% -3% 27% 15.6 3.3 4.0%
Internet commercialization
700 HK Tencent China Internet 98,526 179 411 HKD B* 10% 26% 38% 24.5 7.7 0.5%
BIDU UW Baidu China Internet 43,436 516 159 USD N 1% 9% 26% 24.0 6.5 0.0%
Infrastructure - Railroad
601006 CG Daqin Railway China Transportation 17,692 32 7.25 CNY B 23% 10% 15% 7.4 1.3 8.1%
601299 CG China CNR China Industrials 9,181 40 5.42 CNY B* 14% 12% 27% 11.6 1.4 2.6%
Infrastructure - Construction
LT IS Larsen & Toubro India Industrials 13,753 46 939 INR B* 2% -1% 9% 15.9 2.1 1.2%
Urbanization - Staples and healthcare
KLBF IJ PT Kalbe Farma Indonesia Healthcare 5,719 9 1300 IDR B 18% 18% 30% 23.0 6.2 2.2%
1099 HK Sinopharm China Healthcare 2,647 13 20.65 HKD N 11% 8% 20% 19.3 2.2 1.6%
867 HK China Medical System China Healthcare 2,096 4 6.73 HKD B* 26% 25% 25% 15.7 3.5 2.5%
Green Energy
600900 CG China Yangtze Power China Utilities 17,090 19 6.31 CNY B 35% -5% 1% 10.4 1.2 5.3%
1193 HK China Resources Gas China Utilities 5,751 10 20.05 HKD B* 22% 14% 23% 17.5 2.9 1.4%
958 HK Huaneng Renewables China Utilities 1,447 8 3.21 HKD B -7% 93% 55% 16.3 1.9 1.4%
Port. Avg. 20% 26% 15.4 3.1 2.5%
APJ Avg. 8% 18% 15.6 2.7 2.9%
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 50
Digitalization of consumption
We remain structurally positive on the growth potential for the rising penetration,
broadening usage, and further commercialization of internet/mobile technology.
Our main argument is that we believe the virtuous cycle of amalgamating
consumption and technology remains intact. Specifically, significant capex in
mobile communication infrastructure (4G/LTE) is likely to increase penetration for
mobile devices, which incentivizes investment in new technology and hardware
components. That will subsequently drive demand for mobile applications and
(big) data. Data allows corporates to analyze consumer behavior more accurately
and target customers in a more efficient and scalable manner, thereby innovating
new online business models and offline business strategies.
Among many sub-themes that look promising, including 3D printing, LED, internet
gaming and media, and battery technology, we think liquid investment
opportunities in Asia are clustered around the following areas:
o EM smartphone demand: Samsung Electronics, Mediatek and TSMC
o New and potential disruptive technology – Array camera: Sunny Optical
o Big data and cloud computing: Delta
o Internet commercialization: Tencent and Baidu
Exhibit 118: The virtuous cycle of consumption
digitization
Exhibit 119: Infrastructure of mobile communication is
likely to see strong growth in 2014
Exhibit 120: EM smartphone demand has risen strongly
Exhibit 121: Rising demand for smartphones has
incentivized innovation and new technology
Source: IDC, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Infrastructure capex
Mobile devices
Software and components
Big Data/Cloud computing
Consumption digitalization
Boost
demand
Incentivize
investment
Efficient
customer
strategy
Drive data
traffic
Stimulate further
investment
5
54
85
101 104
101
90
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
2012 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
Total 4G LTE Capex in China (Rmb bn)
89 110 183 249 296 337 364 38051 63
116
223
384
721
955
1,172
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13E
20
14E
20
15E
Global Handset Sales Volumn (mn)
EM Smartphones
DM Smartphones
0% 0%
1%
3%
6%
9%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2012 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E
(mn units) Total array camera shipment and penetration rate
(main and front-facing camera)
Total array camera shipment (LHS)
Array camera penetration rate (RHS)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 51
Exhibit 122: A wider usage of mobile communication has
led to more demand for data traffic, storage, and
analysis...
Exhibit 123: ...which opens up business opportunities and
creates new business models
Source: IDC
Source: Euromonitor
Urbanization + Infrastructure in EM Asia
A favorable base effect has been one of the key arguments for investing in Asia
as it implies growth potential here could be high if the appropriate institutional
setup is in place.
The two inter-related supply-side factors—urbanization and infrastructure—
largely determine to what extent EM Asia may realize its growth potential, in our
view.
Clearly, these two themes have been well broadcasted, but we believe investors
may not have fully grasped the direct implications and ripple effects they might
have on aggregate demand.
For infrastructure, while there have been hiccups and disappointments due to
political, safety, funding, and specific implementation issues, we believe it remains
one of the most promising growth stories in EM Asia, particularly if investors
get their bottom-up picks right, because: a) infrastructure quality in EM Asia,
notably in ASEAN and India, is far below global standards; and, b) governments
understand the lack of infrastructure investment will suppress growth and trigger
inflation. Indeed, we continue to see strong infrastructure investment growth in
China and select parts of South Asia.
Urbanization will become more or less a natural economic development if
good infrastructure is in place as the latter should help facilitate labor and capital
movements, and raise productivity.
Importantly, this is conducive to middle-income class formation across EM Asia,
which will drive demand for consumer staples and healthcare as income grows.
Related areas which offer liquid and compelling bottom-up stories include:
o Railroad: CNR and Daqin Railway
o Infrastructure: Larsen & Toubro
o Staples and healthcare, mass market consumption: CMS, Sinopharm,
and Kalbe Pharma
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E
Global wireline and mobile broadband traffic volume (Annual, in exabytes)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
2013
E
2014
E
2015
E
2016
E
Size of internet retailing
World
Asia Pacific
World (US$bn) Asia Pacific (US$bn)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 52
Exhibit 124: The base effect still looks favorable in EM
Asia
Exhibit 125: Urbanization continues to be a powerful
trend
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: World Bank
Exhibit 126: Urbanization requires the support of better
infrastructure
Exhibit 127: Strong infrastructure investment growth is
likely to continue
Source: World Bank
Source: Local Government Data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Exhibit 128: The rise of middle-income class will create
significant demand for consumer goods and services in
EM
Exhibit 129: Healthcare-related services remain one of the
most compelling themes in Asia, in our view
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: World Bank, Ministry of Health, Taiwan, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
167,119
133,695
45,718
28,691 24,431 15,414
8,428 5,976
80,016
225,191
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Taiw
an
Ko
rea
Mala
ysia
Th
ailan
d
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ind
ia
Asia
G7
Capital stock per urban worker (US$)
83%
74%71%
53% 52%49%
34%32%
61%
80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Ko
rea
Mala
ysia
Taiw
an
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esia
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Th
ailan
d
Ind
ia
Asia
G7
Urbanization rate (%)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Ko
rea
Taiw
an
Mala
ysia
Ch
ina
Ind
ia
Ind
on
esia
Th
ail
an
d
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Infrastructure Quality IndexRailroads Ports
Air Transport Electricity Supply
US$bn
(2013-2020)CN IN PH TH ID MY
Transport 2,188 345 36 51 104 20
Power 2,184 380 5 16 53 11
Water 291 142 8 - 4 2
I.T. & Comm. 259 177 1 1 23 -
Social Infra. 973 - 12 4 - 11
Total 5,895 1,044 62 72 183 45
% of Next 5yr
GDP10% 8% 3% 3% 3% 2%
1,876
3,638
50916
498
299
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2010 Brazil Russia India China G7 RoW 2030
Global Middle Class Population (mn)
Net Changes8608
5939
4065 3609
16161322 1121
807 346 278 202 97 95 59
17%
9%
9%9%
7%7%
10%
6%
3%4%
4% 4%3%
4%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
US
Au
str
ali
a
Ja
pa
n
UK
Ko
rea
Ta
iwan
Bra
zil
Ru
ssia
Mala
ysia
Ch
ina
Th
ail
an
d
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ind
on
esia
Ind
ia
Per Capita Expenditure on Health (2011)
Total Expenditure on Health as % of GDP (2011)
(RHS)
(USD)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 53
Green GDP (in China)
We believe the theme of environmental protection has gradually evolved from
an investment idea that syncs well with national policy to a crucial driver of
sustainable, high quality growth for China going forward.
Simply, the strong growth in China over the past 30 years has partly come at the
expense of inefficient use of natural resources, and the side effects are clear: Area
of arable land, air quality, and clean-water available per capita have noticeably
deteriorated in the past five years (Exhibit 130).
Generally, two options are available: (a) lower growth and consumption of
resources, which is not likely to be a wise policy choice when growth is
challenged; or (b) grow in a more environmentally friendly and/or more efficient
manner, which makes more political and economic sense. This puts alternative
energy, among other pollution-control-related areas (e.g. filters for coal-fired
power plant, water and air purifiers, etc.) under the spotlight.
Indeed, largely due to policy support and rising public concern, we are seeing a
gradual shift of energy consumption away from coal to renewable and less
polluting energy sources, including natural gas, hydro, wind, and solar power,
leading to explosive growth of capacity installation in these new energy sources in
recent years.
While the alternative energy space has been developing fast, we believe it is still
at the nascent stage because: (a) China’s energy dependence on coal remains
very high in global terms; and (b) the economics of using renewable energy
havemeaningfully improved, and application of technology will likely bring costs
down further in the foreseeable future.
We like the following market leaders in the alternative energy space:
o Gas: China Resources Gas
o Wind: Huaneng Renewable Energy
o Hydro: Yangtze Power
Exhibit 130: Environmental protection has become a
serious concern in China
Exhibit 131: The shift in energy consumption mix is
gradually taking place
Source: Aquastat,, World Bank, CNEMC
Source: BP Statistical Review
71
76
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
2007 2011
Aiur Pollution Index
(Avg. of 62 cities)
2159
2060
2,040
2,060
2,080
2,100
2,120
2,140
2,160
2007 2011
Renewable water per capita
(tho. m^3)
11.8%
11.9%
12.0%
12.1%
12.2%
12.3%
12.4%
12.5%
12.6%
12.7%
12.8%
2007 2011
Arable Land
(As % of Total)
12.8%
11.9%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
20
04
20
06
20
08
20
10
20
12
Energy Consumption Mix by Energy Categories in China
Renewable and others Hydro Natural gas Oil Coal
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 54
Exhibit 132: Capacity installation for solar, nuclear, and
wind energy are forecasted by our analysts to remain
strong in 2014 and 2015
Exhibit 133: Economics of using alternative energy has
meaningfully improved
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
34%29%
14%11%
5%
78%
39%
24%
14%
6% 4%
49%
36%
20%
12%
4% 4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Solar Nuclear Wind Natural gas Hydro Coal
Capacity Expansion (yoy)
2013E 2014E 2015E
213%
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.30.2
0.8
0.5 0.5
0.30.3
0.2
0.7
0.5 0.5
0.30.3
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Solar Wind Gas Coal Hydro Nuclear
2011 2012 2013ELCOE (Rmb/kWh)
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 55
Events in 2014 and beyond
Exhibit 134: Near-term events include China CEWC, Fed taper, BOJ easing, India/Indonesia elections
Event timeline
Source: Consensus Economics, media sources, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
Month Country Events/elections/government changes and meetings
Nov - Dec India Legislative elections in India
Early Dec China Central Economic Working Conference (CEWC)
Dec Korea Potential appointment of the next central bank governor
Late this year Korea Potential change of cabinet (earliest time line)
Feb - Apr Asia: 4Q13/FY13 reporting season
Mar 18-19 United States Potential QE tapering announcement
Apr 1 Japan Consumption tax hike from 5% to 8%, BOJ Tankan Report
Apr 9 Indonesia Parliamentary election
Apr 30 Japan BOJ Monetary Policy Meeting (Potential further easing)
May - Jun Asia: 1Q14 reporting season
May India Parliamentary election
May 22 - 25 European Union Presidential election
May United Kingdom Parliamentary election
May Greece Presidential election
May Portugal Parliamentary election
May Spain Parliamentary election
Jun 4 Korea Municipal election
Jul - Aug Asia: 2Q14 reporting season
July Indonesia Presidential election
Oct - Nov Asia: 3Q14 reporting season
Nov G-20 G-20 summit in Brisbane
Late 2014 Taiwan Municipal election
Time Country Next round of elections
2015 Thailand Parliamentary
2016 Australia Parliamentary
2016 Hong Kong Legislative
2016 Japan Parliamentary
2016 Philippines Presidential, legistlative and local elections
2016 Singapore Parliamentary
2016 Korea National Assembly
2016 Taiwan Presidential and parliamentary
2017 Hong Kong Presidential (Chief Executive)
2017 Singapore Presidential
2017 Korea Presidential
2018 China New govt at National People's Congress
2018 Malaysia Parliamentary
2014
2015 onwards
2013
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 56
Appendix 1: Goldman Sachs macro forecasts
Exhibit 135: GDP growth forecasts
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Exhibit 136: Inflation forecasts
Exhibit 137: Foreign exchange forecasts
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Greater China & North Asia
China 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.9 8.2 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.8
Hong Kong 1.5 3.2 3.7 4.4 2.9 3.7 1.8 3.9 4.3 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
Taiwan 1.3 2.4 3.8 3.9 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.4 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8 3.9
Korea 2.0 2.9 3.7 3.8 3.3 4.2 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9
India & ASEAN markets
India 5.1 4.5 5.0 6.2 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.9 5.4 5.7 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.6
Singapore 1.3 3.2 3.8 4.2 3.8 5.0 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.8 4.2 4.2 4.3
Indonesia 6.2 5.6 5.3 6.0 5.6 5.0 5.6 5.3 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.1 5.4 6.1
Malaysia 5.6 4.7 5.0 5.2 5.0 5.1 4.9 5.1 4.9 4.9 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.2
Philippines 6.8 7.0 6.3 6.5 7.0 5.9 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.7 6.3
Thailand 6.5 3.4 4.2 4.5 2.7 2.5 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5
Asia ex Japan 6.1 6.1 6.4 6.7 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.4 6.4 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.8
Australia 3.7 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.9
Japan 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 1.3 1.1 0.6 0.0 1.5 1.9 1.2
US (yoy) 2.8 1.7 2.9 3.2 1.7 2.0 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.0
US (qoq ann.) 2.8 1.7 2.9 3.2 2.8 1.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Euro area (0.6) (0.4) 1.1 1.5 (0.4) 0.4 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6
World 3.1 2.8 3.6 4.0 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9
Real GDP
forecasts (% yoy)2012 2013 2014 2015
2013E 2014E 2015E
Inflation (yoy) 2012 2013F 2014F 2015F
Australia 1.8 2.4 2.9 2.6
China 2.7 2.6 3.1 3.0
Hong Kong 4.1 4.0 3.3 3.3
India 7.5 6.3 6.5 6.1
Indonesia 4.3 8.2 6.8 5.5
Korea 2.2 1.2 2.4 2.6
Malaysia 1.7 2.3 2.8 2.6
Philippines 3.2 3.2 3.8 3.5
Singapore 4.6 3.0 3.3 3.5
Taiwan 1.9 0.8 1.4 1.8
Thailand 3.0 2.5 2.8 3.0
AeJ 3.7 3.4 3.9 3.7
FX (vs. USD) 2012 2013F 2014F 2015F
Australia 1.04 0.96 0.87 0.85
China 6.29 6.14 6.05 6.05
Hong Kong 7.75 7.80 7.80 7.80
India 54.78 64.00 65.00 66.95
Indonesia 9670 12000 11800 11800
Korea 1071 1080 1100 1150
Malaysia 3.06 3.20 3.15 3.00
Philippines 41.19 43.50 40.00 38.00
Singapore 1.22 1.25 1.15 1.15
Taiwan 29.14 29.80 29.00 28.70
Thailand 30.63 33.00 32.00 30.00
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 57
Appendix 2: Valuations at a glance
Exhibit 138: Consensus bottom-up valuations
Source: FactSet, I/B/E/S, MSCI.
Bloomberg P/E (X) EPS growth (%) P/B (X) D/Y (%) ROAE (%)
ticker 2013E 2014E 2013E 2014E 2013E 2013E 2013E
MSCI markets (local currency)
Australia MXAU 16.0 14.4 4.9 10.5 2.0 4.4 12.9
China MXCN 10.1 9.2 12.8 10.3 1.5 3.2 15.5
Hong Kong MXHK 16.4 14.9 9.7 9.6 1.3 2.7 8.3
India MXIN 16.2 14.2 5.7 14.0 2.5 1.5 16.0
Indonesia MXID 15.2 13.2 10.4 15.5 3.1 2.7 21.6
Japan MXJP 17.1 14.5 64.3 18.7 1.3 1.8 8.2
Korea MXKR 10.4 8.6 9.6 20.1 1.2 1.0 11.3
Malaysia MXMY 16.7 15.4 -1.6 9.0 2.2 2.9 13.5
Philippines MXPH 19.5 18.4 9.7 6.0 3.1 2.3 16.5
Singapore Free SIMSCI 15.2 14.0 -3.8 8.7 1.4 3.4 9.8
Taiwan MXTW 15.6 13.9 27.0 11.9 1.8 3.1 11.6
Thailand MXTH 13.5 11.8 11.3 14.2 2.2 3.2 16.8
AC Asia Pacific ex Japan MXAPJ 13.3 11.9 8.5 12.3 1.6 3.1 12.6
AC Asia ex Japan MXASJ 12.6 11.1 10.1 13.1 1.5 2.5 12.5
USA MXUS 16.6 15.1 6.4 10.0 2.6 2.0 16.1
Europe (USD) MSDUE15 15.2 13.3 -3.2 14.4 1.7 3.3 11.7
EAFE (USD) MXEA 15.5 13.6 2.9 13.6 1.6 3.1 10.8
Emerging Markets MXEF 11.7 10.7 2.8 9.1 1.5 2.8 13.3
AC World (USD) MXWD 15.4 13.9 4.1 11.1 2.0 2.5 12.8
MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan GICS sectors (local currency)
Energy MXAPJEN 11.7 10.5 0.7 11.1 1.4 3.4 12.3
Materials MXAPJMT 15.3 12.7 -2.1 19.8 1.6 2.7 10.6
Industrials MXAPJIN 18.2 14.1 -10.1 29.2 1.4 2.5 7.7
Consumer discretionary MXAPJCD 12.9 11.2 6.9 14.5 2.0 1.9 16.0
Consumer staples MXAPJCS 22.0 19.4 2.2 13.4 2.8 2.8 13.1
Health care MXAPJHC 24.2 20.9 12.9 16.1 4.4 1.7 18.9
Financials MXAPJFN 11.9 10.9 7.3 9.0 1.4 3.9 12.0
Information technology MXAPJIT 11.7 10.5 34.0 11.0 2.0 1.6 18.0
Telecommunication services MXAPJTC 14.5 13.8 5.8 5.4 2.1 4.4 15.3
Utilities MXAPJUT 15.6 13.4 24.7 16.5 1.5 3.2 9.4
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 58
Appendix 3: China reform policies
Exhibit 139: Key reforms from the 3rd Plenum
Source: Xinhua News, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Key reforms from Third Plenum decision document
Market economy/deregulation/financial reform
New approach: negative list, easier company registration/approval, registered capital subscription
Market pricing reform in water / oil / gas / power / transport / telecom
Land market: Unify urban/rural construction land market
Financial reform:
Private small/medium banks
Registration system for IPO
Speed up interest rate deregulation
Market-pricing of CNY / treasury yield
Speed up capital account convertibility
Deposit insurance
Capital market exit channel (bankruptcy/delist?)
Corporate-oriented reform in science/ academia
Support FTZ development
Improve market entry institution / customs regulation / investment protection / e-commer
Potentially open more FTZs In other qualified regions
More opening up of inland adjacent areas
Liberalize foreign investment access
SOE vs private enterprise
Maintain essential role of the public ownership economy
Support mixed ownership economy: cross holdings between public/private
State owned assets mgmt: establish various state owned assets mgmt companies
SOEs to focus on public good: focus on national security, crucial sectors, public services etc
Social security fund: transfer some SOE shares over to fund safety nets
Natural monopoly SOEs: separate party and operational structure
Encourage competition, open the market for competitive business to non-SOEs
Corporate governance focus, enhance transparency/disclosure and market based operation
Payout ratio raise to 30% by 2020, for social welfare use
Create fair environment for private capital and allow to non-SOEs enter authorized business area
Lower entry barrier/establish negative list for investment. Simplify business registration procedures
Fiscal / taxBudget system reform: more longer term, more accountability and transparency
Enhance debt management and risk alert system for central and local governments
Fiscal expenditure structure: Increase transfer payments to underdeveloped areas
Tax:
simplify VAT
Increase consumption tax for high pollution / energy inefficient / luxury products
Speed up legislation for property tax, resource taxes, environmental protection taxes
Expenditure allocation between central/local gov'ts: fiscal transfer reforms
Establish governmentbalance sheet at national and local levels
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 59
Exhibit 140: Key reforms from the 3rd Plenum
Source: Xinhua News, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Key reforms from Third Plenum decision document
Urban / rural
More asset ownership rights to farmers: Allow farmers to trade / lease / profit land or property, establish
rural property market
More protection to farmers: encourage investment projects in rural areas
Urbanization:
Allow local government to diversify funding channels including debt and private capital
Hukou reform: fully open hukou in smaller cities, gradually open hukou in mid sized cities
Include urban residents with rural hukous into the social and housing safety net system
Connect rural pension / healthcare programs with urban systems
Allow diversified investment (incl foreign) into areas like childcare, senior care, etc
Safety nets
Establish appropriate income distribution system: (some overlap with income redist above)
Align wage growth with productivity growth, ensure minimum wages
Improve collective bargaining system
Improve income redistribution through tax, transfer payments and social welfare system
Establish individual income/asset ownership data system
Social welfare / pension system:
Improve personal pension account system, incentivize contribution
Improve minimum living standards protection for urban/rural areas
Expand social insurance coverage, lower fee rates
Improve fiscal contribution and budgeting into welfare system
Develop diversified pention products such as annuities
Study gradual increase of retirement age threshold
Health care reform:
Comprehensive reform on medicial insurance, service, pharm chains and supervision;
Encouraging private capital involvement in hospital operations
Eliminate subsidizing service fees with medicine revenue
Enhance critical illnesses treatment / insurance schemes
Anti-corruption/govt administration
Streamline administrative processes: reduce meetings, documents and other unnecessary items
Control spending
Fortify budgeting and auditing system
Reduce 'san gong' spending and govt buildings construction
Explore 'official residence' system
Regulate business affairs of officials' relatives
Sophisticate macro control system: monetary / fiscal / price / industry specific policies
Develop national database of individual property ownership and credit records
Withdraw administrative approvals, tackle overcapacity
Revise econ KPI for gov't officials: include environment / debt / overcapacity / innovation etc
Gradually restructure public institutions into corporates
Streamline administration structure, control public service headcounts
Others
One child policy: Two children will be allowed for a couple as long as one of the couple is an only child
Environmental protection: enhance natural resources assets ownership/usage system, apply usage
with compensation system, increase industrial land price.
Culture reform: consolidate media resources; encourage mergers and acquisitions
Reform standardized testing system: lean away from one time college education system
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 60
Equity Basket disclosures
The Securities Division of the firm may have been consulted as to the various components
of the baskets of securities discussed in this report prior to their launch; however, none of
this research, the conclusions expressed herein, nor the timing of this report was shared
with the Securities Division.
The ability to trade these baskets will depend upon market conditions, including liquidity
and borrow constraints at the time of trade.
MSCI disclosures
All MSCI data used in this report is the exclusive property of MSCI, Inc. (MSCI). Without
prior written permission of MSCI, this information and any other MSCI intellectual property
may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used create any
financial instruments or products or any indices. This information is provided on an “as is”
basis, and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this
information. Neither MSCI, any of its affiliates nor any third party involved in, or related to,
computing or compiling the data makes any express or implied warranties or
representations with respect to this information (or the results to be obtained by the use
thereof), and MSCI, its affiliates and any such third party hereby expressly disclaim all
warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose with respect to any of this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in
no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in, or related to,
computing or compiling the data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive,
consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the
possibility of such damages. MSCI and the MSCI indexes are service marks of MSCI and its
affiliates. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) were developed by and is the
exclusive property of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s. GICS is a service mark of MSCI and
S&P and has been licensed for use by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
ETF disclosures
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are redeemable only in specified units and only through a
broker that is an authorized participant in that ETF program; redemptions are for the
underlying securities. The public trading price of a redeemable unit of an ETF may be
different from its net asset value; an ETF can trade at a discount or premium to the net
asset value. There is always a fundamental risk of declining stock prices, which can cause
investment losses.
Availability of information
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses of an ETF carefully before investing. Each ETF prospectus contains such information about the ETF, and it is recommended that investors review carefully such prospectus before investing. A copy of the prospectus for all ETFs mentioned in this material can be obtained by investors from their Goldman Sachs sales representative, or from the offices of Goldman, Sachs &
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 61
Co., 200 West Street, New York, NY, 10282, Attn: Prospectus Dept. (1-212-902-1171). Prospectuses are also available from ETF distributors.
Goldman Sachs trading and roles
Goldman Sachs is an authorized participant in each ETF mentioned in this material and
participates in the creation and redemption of shares of each ETF mentioned in this
material. Goldman Sachs, as an authorized participant or otherwise, acquires securities
from the issuers of the ETFs mentioned in this material for the purposes of resale. As of
November 15, 2013, Goldman Sachs has the following positions: EWY – long. Professionals
who authored this material have no financial interest in any ETF mentioned in this material.
One or more affiliates of Goldman Sachs is a specialist, market maker or designated
liquidity provider for the following ETFs: EWY.
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 62
Disclosure Appendix
Reg AC
We, Timothy Moe, CFA, Kinger Lau, CFA, Richard Tang, CFA and Sunil Koul, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this report accurately
reflect our personal views about the subject company or companies and its or their securities. We also certify that no part of our compensation was,
is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.
I, Ketaki Garg, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views, which have not been influenced by
considerations of the firm's business or client relationships.
Disclosures
Option Specific Disclosures
Price target methodology: Please refer to the analyst’s previously published research for methodology and risks associated with equity price
targets.
Pricing Disclosure: Option prices and volatility levels in this note are indicative only, and are based on our estimates of recent mid-market
levels(unless otherwise noted). All prices and levels exclude transaction costs unless otherwise stated.
General Options Risks – The risks below and any other options risks mentioned in this research report pertain both to specific derivative trade
recommendations mentioned and to discussion of general opportunities and advantages of derivative strategies. Unless otherwise noted, options
strategies mentioned in this report may be a combination of the strategies below and therefore carry with them the risks of those strategies.
Buying Options - Investors who buy call (put) options risk loss of the entire premium paid if the underlying security finishes below (above) the
strike price at expiration. Investors who buy call or put spreads also risk a maximum loss of the premium paid. The maximum gain on a long call or
put spread is the difference between the strike prices, less the premium paid.
Selling Options - Investors who sell calls on securities they do not own risk unlimited loss of the security price less the strike price. Investors who
sell covered calls (sell calls while owning the underlying security) risk having to deliver the underlying security or pay the difference between the
security price and the strike price, depending on whether the option is settled by physical delivery or cash-settled. Investors who sell puts risk loss of
the strike price less the premium received for selling the put. Investors who sell put or call spreads risk a maximum loss of the difference between the
strikes less the premium received, while their maximum gain is the premium received.
For options settled by physical delivery, the above risks assume the options buyer or seller, buys or sells the resulting securities at the
settlement price on expiry.
Distribution of ratings/investment banking relationships
Goldman Sachs Investment Research global coverage universe
Rating Distribution Investment Banking Relationships
Buy Hold Sell Buy Hold Sell
Global 31% 54% 15% 50% 42% 37%
As of October 1, 2013, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research had investment ratings on 3,570 equity securities. Goldman Sachs assigns stocks
as Buys and Sells on various regional Investment Lists; stocks not so assigned are deemed Neutral. Such assignments equate to Buy, Hold and Sell
for the purposes of the above disclosure required by NASD/NYSE rules. See 'Ratings, Coverage groups and views and related definitions' below.
Disclosures required by United States laws and regulations
See company-specific regulatory disclosures above for any of the following disclosures required as to companies referred to in this report: manager
or co-manager in a pending transaction; 1% or other ownership; compensation for certain services; types of client relationships; managed/co-
managed public offerings in prior periods; directorships; for equity securities, market making and/or specialist role. Goldman Sachs usually makes a
market in fixed income securities of issuers discussed in this report and usually deals as a principal in these securities.
The following are additional required disclosures: Ownership and material conflicts of interest: Goldman Sachs policy prohibits its analysts,
professionals reporting to analysts and members of their households from owning securities of any company in the analyst's area of
coverage. Analyst compensation: Analysts are paid in part based on the profitability of Goldman Sachs, which includes investment banking
revenues. Analyst as officer or director: Goldman Sachs policy prohibits its analysts, persons reporting to analysts or members of their
households from serving as an officer, director, advisory board member or employee of any company in the analyst's area of coverage. Non-U.S. Analysts: Non-U.S. analysts may not be associated persons of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and therefore may not be subject to NASD Rule 2711/NYSE
Rules 472 restrictions on communications with subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by the analysts.
Additional disclosures required under the laws and regulations of jurisdictions other than the United States
The following disclosures are those required by the jurisdiction indicated, except to the extent already made above pursuant to United States laws
and regulations. Australia: Goldman Sachs Australia Pty Ltd and its affiliates are not authorised deposit-taking institutions (as that term is defined in
the Banking Act 1959 (Cth)) in Australia and do not provide banking services, nor carry on a banking business, in Australia. This research, and any
access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act, unless otherwise agreed by Goldman
Sachs. Brazil: Disclosure information in relation to CVM Instruction 483 is available at http://www.gs.com/worldwide/brazil/area/gir/index.html.
Where applicable, the Brazil-registered analyst primarily responsible for the content of this research report, as defined in Article 16 of CVM Instruction
483, is the first author named at the beginning of this report, unless indicated otherwise at the end of the text. Canada: Goldman, Sachs & Co. has
approved of, and agreed to take responsibility for, this research in Canada if and to the extent it relates to equity securities of Canadian issuers.
Analysts may conduct site visits but are prohibited from accepting payment or reimbursement by the company of travel expenses for such
visits. Hong Kong: Further information on the securities of covered companies referred to in this research may be obtained on request from
Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. India: Further information on the subject company or companies referred to in this research may be obtained from
Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Private Limited; Japan: See below. Korea: Further information on the subject company or companies referred to
in this research may be obtained from Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Seoul Branch. New Zealand: Goldman Sachs New Zealand Limited and its
affiliates are neither "registered banks" nor "deposit takers" (as defined in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989) in New Zealand. This research,
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 63
and any access to it, is intended for "wholesale clients" (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008) unless otherwise agreed by Goldman
Sachs. Russia: Research reports distributed in the Russian Federation are not advertising as defined in the Russian legislation, but are information
and analysis not having product promotion as their main purpose and do not provide appraisal within the meaning of the Russian legislation on
appraisal activity. Singapore: Further information on the covered companies referred to in this research may be obtained from Goldman Sachs
(Singapore) Pte. (Company Number: 198602165W). Taiwan: This material is for reference only and must not be reprinted without permission.
Investors should carefully consider their own investment risk. Investment results are the responsibility of the individual investor. United Kingdom: Persons who would be categorized as retail clients in the United Kingdom, as such term is defined in the rules of the Financial Conduct
Authority, should read this research in conjunction with prior Goldman Sachs research on the covered companies referred to herein and should refer
to the risk warnings that have been sent to them by Goldman Sachs International. A copy of these risks warnings, and a glossary of certain financial
terms used in this report, are available from Goldman Sachs International on request.
European Union: Disclosure information in relation to Article 4 (1) (d) and Article 6 (2) of the European Commission Directive 2003/126/EC is available
at http://www.gs.com/disclosures/europeanpolicy.html which states the European Policy for Managing Conflicts of Interest in Connection with
Investment Research.
Japan: Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd. is a Financial Instrument Dealer registered with the Kanto Financial Bureau under registration number Kinsho
69, and a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, Financial Futures Association of Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms
Association. Sales and purchase of equities are subject to commission pre-determined with clients plus consumption tax. See company-specific
disclosures as to any applicable disclosures required by Japanese stock exchanges, the Japanese Securities Dealers Association or the Japanese
Securities Finance Company.
Ratings, coverage groups and views and related definitions
Buy (B), Neutral (N), Sell (S) -Analysts recommend stocks as Buys or Sells for inclusion on various regional Investment Lists. Being assigned a Buy
or Sell on an Investment List is determined by a stock's return potential relative to its coverage group as described below. Any stock not assigned as
a Buy or a Sell on an Investment List is deemed Neutral. Each regional Investment Review Committee manages various regional Investment Lists to a
global guideline of 25%-35% of stocks as Buy and 10%-15% of stocks as Sell; however, the distribution of Buys and Sells in any particular coverage
group may vary as determined by the regional Investment Review Committee. Regional Conviction Buy and Sell lists represent investment
recommendations focused on either the size of the potential return or the likelihood of the realization of the return.
Return potential represents the price differential between the current share price and the price target expected during the time horizon associated
with the price target. Price targets are required for all covered stocks. The return potential, price target and associated time horizon are stated in each
report adding or reiterating an Investment List membership.
Coverage groups and views: A list of all stocks in each coverage group is available by primary analyst, stock and coverage group at
http://www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. The analyst assigns one of the following coverage views which represents the analyst's investment outlook
on the coverage group relative to the group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation. Attractive (A). The investment outlook over the following 12
months is favorable relative to the coverage group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation. Neutral (N). The investment outlook over the
following 12 months is neutral relative to the coverage group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation. Cautious (C). The investment outlook over
the following 12 months is unfavorable relative to the coverage group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation.
Not Rated (NR). The investment rating and target price have been removed pursuant to Goldman Sachs policy when Goldman Sachs is acting in an
advisory capacity in a merger or strategic transaction involving this company and in certain other circumstances. Rating Suspended (RS). Goldman
Sachs Research has suspended the investment rating and price target for this stock, because there is not a sufficient fundamental basis for
determining, or there are legal, regulatory or policy constraints around publishing, an investment rating or target. The previous investment rating and
price target, if any, are no longer in effect for this stock and should not be relied upon. Coverage Suspended (CS). Goldman Sachs has suspended
coverage of this company. Not Covered (NC). Goldman Sachs does not cover this company. Not Available or Not Applicable (NA). The
information is not available for display or is not applicable. Not Meaningful (NM). The information is not meaningful and is therefore excluded.
Global product; distributing entities
The Global Investment Research Division of Goldman Sachs produces and distributes research products for clients of Goldman Sachs on a global
basis. Analysts based in Goldman Sachs offices around the world produce equity research on industries and companies, and research on
macroeconomics, currencies, commodities and portfolio strategy. This research is disseminated in Australia by Goldman Sachs Australia Pty Ltd
(ABN 21 006 797 897); in Brazil by Goldman Sachs do Brasil Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A.; in Canada by Goldman, Sachs & Co.
regarding Canadian equities and by Goldman, Sachs & Co. (all other research); in Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.; in India by Goldman
Sachs (India) Securities Private Ltd.; in Japan by Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.; in the Republic of Korea by Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Seoul
Branch; in New Zealand by Goldman Sachs New Zealand Limited; in Russia by OOO Goldman Sachs; in Singapore by Goldman Sachs (Singapore)
Pte. (Company Number: 198602165W); and in the United States of America by Goldman, Sachs & Co. Goldman Sachs International has approved this
research in connection with its distribution in the United Kingdom and European Union.
European Union: Goldman Sachs International authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority
and the Prudential Regulation Authority, has approved this research in connection with its distribution in the European Union and United Kingdom;
Goldman Sachs AG and Goldman Sachs International Zweigniederlassung Frankfurt, regulated by the Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, may also distribute research in Germany.
General disclosures
This research is for our clients only. Other than disclosures relating to Goldman Sachs, this research is based on current public information that we
consider reliable, but we do not represent it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as
appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Other than certain industry reports published on a periodic basis, the large
majority of reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment.
Goldman Sachs conducts a global full-service, integrated investment banking, investment management, and brokerage business. We have
investment banking and other business relationships with a substantial percentage of the companies covered by our Global Investment Research
Division. Goldman, Sachs & Co., the United States broker dealer, is a member of SIPC (http://www.sipc.org).
Our salespeople, traders, and other professionals may provide oral or written market commentary or trading strategies to our clients and our
proprietary trading desks that reflect opinions that are contrary to the opinions expressed in this research. Our asset management area, our
proprietary trading desks and investing businesses may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views
expressed in this research.
The analysts named in this report may have from time to time discussed with our clients, including Goldman Sachs salespersons and traders, or may
discuss in this report, trading strategies that reference catalysts or events that may have a near-term impact on the market price of the equity
November 21, 2013 Asia Pacific
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 64
securities discussed in this report, which impact may be directionally counter to the analyst's published price target expectations for such stocks. Any
such trading strategies are distinct from and do not affect the analyst's fundamental equity rating for such stocks, which rating reflects a stock's
return potential relative to its coverage group as described herein.
We and our affiliates, officers, directors, and employees, excluding equity and credit analysts, will from time to time have long or short positions in,
act as principal in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research.
This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be
illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of
individual clients. Clients should consider whether any advice or recommendation in this research is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if
appropriate, seek professional advice, including tax advice. The price and value of investments referred to in this research and the income from them
may fluctuate. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could have adverse effects on the value or price of, or income derived from, certain investments.
Certain transactions, including those involving futures, options, and other derivatives, give rise to substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors.
Investors should review current options disclosure documents which are available from Goldman Sachs sales representatives or at
http://www.theocc.com/about/publications/character-risks.jsp. Transaction costs may be significant in option strategies calling for multiple purchase
and sales of options such as spreads. Supporting documentation will be supplied upon request.
In producing research reports, members of the Global Investment Research Division of Goldman Sachs Australia may attend site visits and other
meetings hosted by the issuers the subject of its research reports. In some instances the costs of such site visits or meetings may be met in part or in
whole by the issuers concerned if Goldman Sachs Australia considers it is appropriate and reasonable in the specific circumstances relating to the
site visit or meeting.
All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client websites. Not all
research content is redistributed to our clients or available to third-party aggregators, nor is Goldman Sachs responsible for the redistribution of our
research by third party aggregators. For research or data available on a particular security, please contact your sales representative or go to
http://360.gs.com.
Disclosure information is also available at http://www.gs.com/research/hedge.html or from Research Compliance, 200 West Street, New York, NY
10282.
© 2013 Goldman Sachs.
No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or (ii) redistributed without the prior written consent of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.