Triple Quadrupole Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry Re-imagined: Increased...

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Key Learning Objectives: • Identify emerging triple quadrupole Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) technology designed to address increasing regulatory demands and requirements • Explore potential time savings in sample prep, method development/transition, and data analysis • Demonstrate how to optimize the GC-MS/MS workflow from sample prep to sample analysis to automated data analysis Overview: Regulatory lab requirements continue to drive detection limits lower with an ever increasing list of compounds to analyze. These requirements also demand greater precision at these lower limits. Triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS is a viable option for enhanced analysis and increased productivity with an emphasis on simplicity. We discuss emerging trends and technologies designed to ensure that laboratories are well-equipped to address these increased demands with minimal investment in training and method development. Find out how you can adopt triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS technology in your laboratory using existing methods and source parameters in most instances while requiring less sample prep and enjoying the benefits of automated data analysis for increased simplicity and productivity. For more information: www.thermoscientific.com/tsq8000

Citation preview

1

The world leader in serving science

Increased Simplicity and Productivity

Triple Quadrupole GC-MS/MS Re-imagined

2

Tough challenges faced in the laboratory

• High sample loads/short deadlines

• Keeping sample analysis costs down with more and more challenging LODs and matrices

• Integrating and maintaining new methods and technologies into production workflows to remain competitive

3

What‘s required...

• Realization of the productivity advantages of high performance GC-MS/MS

• Minimizing the impact of adoption and implementation to current laboratory operations

4

Triple Quadrupole GC-MS/MS is an essential part of a cost-effective, high productivity analytical method in today’s laboratory

5

Many laboratories are already investing in and exploring GC-MS/MS as a tool to obtain a competitive edge in their analyses

6

GC-MS/MS – What’s so special?

• Low detection limits

• Reduced sample preparation

• Consolidated analytical methods

• Faster, automated data processing

...it is a high selectivity technique...

7

Selectivity in a method

McLafferty circa. 1980

8

Method performance requirement

• Target compounds

• Matrices

• Sensitivity

Method performance requirement

9

First sample prep..

Ste

p 1

– e

xtr

ac

tio

n

Ste

p 2

- c

lea

n u

p (

1s

t)

Ste

p 3

- c

lea

n u

p (

2n

d)

Method performance requirement

10

...then instrument detection...

Ste

p 1

– e

xtr

ac

tio

n

Ste

p 2

- c

lea

n u

p (

1s

t)

Ste

p 3

- c

lea

n u

p (

2n

d)

Ste

p 4

- G

C-M

S d

etec

tio

n (

sin

gle

qu

ad S

IM)

Total method selectivity

Method performance requirement

11

Analytical Benefits for Single Quadrupole GC-MS

• Robust• Run more samples between cleaning

• Sensitive Precision• Accurate and reproducible results at the lowest levels

• Unknown Analysis• Full scan for unknown library searches

• Alternating full scan/SIM for unknowns and low level analysis

• Flexibility• Switch quickly between dedicated EI and CI sources

• Easy to Use and Maintain

12

Full Scan/SIM Methodology for Drinking Water

14

Challenging Samples for Single Quadrupole GC-MS

• Matrix Challenges• Concentration

challenges• Difficult to prove

contamination

Gamma BHC

Methiocarb Mevinphos

15

...what about GC-MS/MS?...

Ste

p 1

– e

xtr

ac

tio

n

Ste

p 2

- c

lea

n u

p (

1s

t)

Ste

p 3

- c

lea

n u

p (

2n

d)

Total method selectivity

Ste

p 4

- G

C-M

S/M

S d

etec

tio

n (

Trip

le q

ua

d S

RM

)

Method performance requirement

16

Use GC-MS/MS to reduce clean-up...

Ste

p 1

– e

xtr

ac

tio

n

Total method selectivity

Ste

p 2

- G

C-M

S/M

S d

etec

tio

n (

Trip

le q

ua

d S

RM

)

Method performance requirement

17

Use GC-MS/MS to consolidate methods...

Ste

p 1

– e

xtr

ac

tio

n

Total method selectivity

Ste

p 2

- G

C-M

S/M

S d

etec

tio

n (

Trip

le q

ua

d S

RM

)

Method 1performance requirement

Method 2performance requirement

Method 3performance requirement

18

Use GC-MS/MS to consolidate methods...

Ste

p 1

– e

xtr

ac

tio

n

Total method selectivity

Ste

p 2

- G

C-M

S/M

S d

etec

tio

n (

Trip

le q

ua

d S

RM

)

Consolidated multi-residue method

19

What will GC-MS/MS do for my lab?

High selectivity

• Possibility the reduce selectivity in sample preparation

• Reduced sample prep steps creates a more generic sample prep method – more compounds & matrices

• Consolidated GC-MS methods due to high performance – buffer against requirements

• Compressed chromatography possible

• Easy peak evaluation – auto-integrators

20

Step 1: Ions are produced in the source

21

Step 2: Ions are focused in the s-shaped prefilter

22

Step 2: Ions focused by prefilter, removing neutrals

23

Step 3: Ions are isolated by molecular weight in Q1

24

Step 3: Ions are isolated by molecular weight in Q1

25

Step 4: Ions further fragmented in collision cell

(With same mass as analyte)

26

Step 4: Ions further fragmented in collision cell

27

Step 5: Unique ions to analytes chosen in Q3

28

Only unique fragments to analyte detected

Step 5: Unique ions to analytes chosen in Q3

29

AutoSRM Overview

1) Precursor ion selection

2) Product ion selection

3) Collision energy optimization

SR

M C

reation

Wo

rkflow

30

Step 1 – Pick Your Precursor Ions

31

Step 1 – Pick Your Precursor Ions

32

Step 1 – Pick Your Precursor Ions

33

Step 2 – Pick Your Product Ions

34

Step 2 – Pick Your Product Ions

35

Step 3 – Optimize Your Transitions

36

Step 3 – Optimize Your Transitions

37

Export from AutoSRM to Instrument Method

38

Timed-SRM Method Overview

Acquisition Windows centered around retention time and Window

39

Timed-SRM Method Overview

Acquisition windows allowed to overlap

40

Timed-SRM Advantages

Segmented SRM

Timed SRM

41

Timed-SRM Advantages

Acquisition Windows

Segmented SRM

Timed SRM

42

Timed-SRM Advantages

• Removes wasted dwell time

• Allow higher overall dwell times

• Leads to higher sensitivity

Wasted Dwell Time

43

Timed-SRM Advantages

• Peaks centered in acquisition window

• No peak elutes near acquisition break

• Allows for retention time shift (e.g. due to heavy matrix)

44

Instrument Parameters

45

Timed-SRM from Thermo Scientific TSQ 8000 GC-MS

Screenshot of a section of the analytical run showing the “acquisition map” automatically created by the TSQ™ 8000 System using t-SRM.

46

Calibration Curves

• All calibration curves correlation coefficients greater than 0.99

• Example calibration curve for Cyfluthrin, R2 = 0.9996

47

Transitions for Pesticides from PAR ver 2

• SRM peaks at 4 ppb from Terbacil (left, 161.1 > 88.0, CE 15 V) and Alachlor(right, 188.1 > 130.1, CE 25 V)

• SRM peaks at 4 ppb from Tolylfluanid (left, 238.1 > 137.1, CE 15 V) and Pyridaben (right, 309.1 > 147.1, CE 15 V)

48

The world leader in serving science

A Second Level of Selectivity

Structure and Mass Defect

49

Thermo Scientific TSQ Quantum XLS Ultra – HyperQuad™ Technology Inside

Patented HyperQuad technology meets with GC/MS for the first time to create highest performing GC Triple on the market

6 mm hyperbolic precision quads allow excellent ion transmission at standard resolution as well as opportunity to use enhanced mass resolution to 0.1 Da peak width

Effective pre-cursor ion filtering with strongly reduced matrix interference

Improved signal/noise & quantitative precision

50

U-SRM: Two Modes of Selectivity

• Ultra selective-Single Reaction

Monitoring (U-SRM)

• Offers a unique opportunity to increase selectivity using triple quadrupole.

• Combination• Increased Q1 mass resolution • MS/MS Structural based

selectivity

• For use when standard SRM does not provide enough selectivity

m/z

Increased mass resolution

Structural selectivity (MS/MS)

51

Precursor Ion Selection Q1 (Standard SRM mode)

• At standard mass resolution precursor selection • Q1 = 0.7 Da FWHM• Higher probability that interfering

species are transmitted to the collision cell with the target compound mass

• These matrix interferents are often orders of magnitude higher than target compounds

• If they are not completely discriminated against in by CID then the resulting product ion detection can have a higher background noise present

Matrix components transmitted through Q1 during SRM

Q1= 218.9 m/z (0.7 Da res.)

Q1 Transmission Window

Q1= 0.7Da

219217

221

52

219

Precursor Ion Selection Q1 (U-SRM mode)

HyperQuad does not allow matrix through through Q1 during U-SRM

• When operated in U-SRM mode, the TSQ Quantum XLS Ultra narrows the pre-cursor mass window to <0.2Da

• This increased resolution allows the HyperQuad to discriminate against common matrix component masses for targets showing a large enough

Δmass defect.

• This allows for better collision cell performance and robustness as well as reducing chemical noise

• Lindane carries a Δmass defect and can be isolated from matrix in this example

Q1= 0.1Da

219217 221

Q1= 218.86 m/z (0.1 Da res.)

53

U-SRM: Effect of Increasing Q1 Resolution

• Real life effect of the lindane example…

• Lindane isomers in green tea

• As Q1 resolution is increased into the ultra range signal/noise ratio increases dramatically

Inc

rea

sin

g Q

1 r

es

olu

tio

n

Inc

rea

sin

g S

ign

al/

No

ise0.1 Da

0.4 Da

0.7 Da

54

U-SRM in action

• PCB 28 in industrial soil sample at ca.100fg (ASE extraction with no clean-up)

• Continuum full scan spectrum shows background removed with HyperQuad at increased resolution

contocpSCAN003 #1594-1597 RT: 13.68-13.69 AV: 4 SM: 7B NL: 4.04E7T: + p EI Q1MS [200.000-300.000]

255.0 255.2 255.4 255.6 255.8 256.0 256.2 256.4 256.6 256.8 257.0 257.2

m/z

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00016_110329102653 3/29/2011 10:26:53 AM

RT: 13.33 - 15.12 SM: 7G

13.4 13.6 13.8 14.0 14.2 14.4 14.6 14.8 15.0

Time (min)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

RT: 13.69

14.54

14.4614.3014.64

14.68

14.7214.4014.16

14.7713.73 14.24

14.94 15.0214.09

14.05 14.8913.96

13.94

13.81

13.56

NL: 1.05E5

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 255.960 [185.965-185.975] MS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00016_110329102653

SRM (Q1 0.7Da)

0.7 Da

256 m/z

Q1 precursor selection

2,4,4'-Trichlorobiphenyl

55

U-SRM in action

• PCB 28 in industrial soil sample at ca.100 fg (ASE extraction with no clean-up)

• Continuum full scan spectrum shows background removed with HyperQuad at increased resolution.

• Dramatically improved detection using U-SRM

C:\XCALIBUR\...\contocpSCAN004 4/14/2011 5:27:58 PM

contocpSCAN004 #1469-1471 RT: 13.68-13.69 AV: 3 SM: 7B NL: 3.02E6T: + p EI Q1MS [200.000-300.000]

255.0 255.2 255.4 255.6 255.8 256.0 256.2 256.4 256.6 256.8 257.0 257.2

m/z

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

contocpSCAN003 #1594-1597 RT: 13.68-13.69 AV: 4 SM: 7B NL: 4.04E7T: + p EI Q1MS [200.000-300.000]

255.0 255.2 255.4 255.6 255.8 256.0 256.2 256.4 256.6 256.8 257.0 257.2

m/z

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139 3/29/2011 7:41:39 AM

RT: 13.33 - 15.12 SM: 7G

13.4 13.6 13.8 14.0 14.2 14.4 14.6 14.8 15.0

Time (min)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

RT: 13.69 NL: 3.21E3

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 255.960 [185.965-185.975] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139

XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00016_110329102653 3/29/2011 10:26:53 AM

RT: 13.33 - 15.12 SM: 7G

13.4 13.6 13.8 14.0 14.2 14.4 14.6 14.8 15.0

Time (min)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

RT: 13.69

14.54

14.4614.3014.64

14.68

14.7214.4014.16

14.7713.73 14.24

14.94 15.0214.09

14.05 14.8913.96

13.94

13.81

13.56

NL: 1.05E5

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 255.960 [185.965-185.975] MS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00016_110329102653

U-SRM (Q1 0.1Da)

Matrix interefent transmitted in standard mode (0.7Da) but rejected during U-SRM (0.1Da) precursor selection

PCB 28 Precursor mass 2 55.96 m/z selected

0.1

Da

0.7

Da

SRM (Q1 0.7Da)

0.7 Da

0.1 Da

56

Environmental: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBS)XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00017_110329105955 3/29/2011 10:59:55 AM

RT: 13.17 - 16.75 SM: 7G

13.2 13.4 13.6 13.8 14.0 14.2 14.4 14.6 14.8 15.0 15.2 15.4 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 16.4 16.6

Time (min)

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

Re

lativ

e A

bu

nd

an

ce

0

50

100

0

50

100

RT: 14.04AA: 725579SN: 97

RT: 14.35AA: 37646SN: 280

RT: 14.78AA: 201199SN: 229

RT: 15.03AA: 140023SN: 185

RT: 14.38AA: 94563SN: 88

RT: 16.03AA: 24964SN: 94

RT: 16.03AA: 26376SN: 160

NL: 1.01E5

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 255.960 [185.965-185.975] MS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00017_110329105955

NL: 1.53E5

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 257.960 [185.965-185.975] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00017_110329105955

NL: 1.37E4

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 289.920 [219.935-219.945] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00017_110329105955

NL: 7.06E4

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 291.920 [219.935-219.945] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00017_110329105955

NL: 1.01E4

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 323.880 [253.905-253.915] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00017_110329105955

NL: 1.42E4

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 325.880 [255.905-255.915] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00017_110329105955

XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139 3/29/2011 7:41:39 AM

RT: 13.17 - 16.75 SM: 7G

13.2 13.4 13.6 13.8 14.0 14.2 14.4 14.6 14.8 15.0 15.2 15.4 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 16.4 16.6

Time (min)

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

Re

lativ

e A

bu

nd

an

ce

0

50

100

0

50

100

RT: 13.69AA: 5479SN: 859

RT: 13.70AA: 5485SN: 862

RT: 14.37AA: 4122SN: 1454

RT: 14.36AA: 1393SN: 393

RT: 16.05AA: 2033SN: 352

RT: 16.04AA: 3693SN: 412

NL: 3.21E3

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 255.960 [185.965-185.975] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139

NL: 2.87E3

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 257.960 [185.965-185.975] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139

NL: 2.74E3

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 289.920 [219.935-219.945] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139

NL: 1.02E3

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 291.920 [219.935-219.945] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139

NL: 1.54E3

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 323.880 [253.905-253.915] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139

NL: 2.53E3

TIC F: + c EI SRM ms2 325.880 [255.905-255.915] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00011_110329074139

Tri, Tetra, Penta PCBs 100 fg in Contaminated land (industrial soil) sample

Standard SRM ( Q1=0.7 Da)

TSQ Quantum XLS Ultra U-SRM

( Q1=0.1Da )

57

Environmental: Pesticides

Endrin 1pg in contaminated land sample ran both in SRM (Q1 0.7 amu) and U-SRM (Q1 0.1 amu)

U-SRM

SRM

C:\Xcalibur\...\XLSULTRA_NPV_0104OCP048 4/2/2011 7:39:50 PM

RT: 16.93 - 17.25 SM: 3G

16.95 17.00 17.05 17.10 17.15 17.20

Time (min)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

Re

lative

Ab

un

da

nce

NL: 1.68E5

m/z= 190.43-191.43 F: + c EI SRM ms2 262.910 [190.925-190.935, 192.925-192.935] MS XLSULTRA_NPV_0104OCP048

NL: 1.83E5

m/z= 192.43-193.43 F: + c EI SRM ms2 262.910 [190.925-190.935, 192.925-192.935] MS XLSULTRA_NPV_0104OCP048

NL: 1.25E4

m/z= 190.43-191.43 F: + c EI SRM ms2 262.910 [190.925-190.935, 192.925-192.935] MS ICIS xlsultra_npv_0104ocp031

NL: 1.86E4

m/z= 192.43-193.43 F: + c EI SRM ms2 262.910 [190.925-190.935, 192.925-192.935] MS ICIS xlsultra_npv_0104ocp031

XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00015_110329095349 3/29/2011 9:53:49 AM

RT: 15.48 - 17.07 SM: 7G

15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 17.0

Time (min)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Re

lativ

e A

bu

nd

an

ce

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Re

lativ

e A

bu

nd

an

ce

RT: 16.56AA: 28533SN: 31RMS

RT: 15.95AA: 29627SN: 31RMS

16.59

16.56

16.71

16.89

16.8416.6516.7715.95

16.30 16.5016.3816.23 16.43

16.0615.85 16.0815.77

NL: 1.74E4

m/z= 175.47-176.47 F: + c EI SRM ms2 245.950 [175.965-175.975] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00015_110329095349

NL: 7.78E3

m/z= 245.45-246.45 F: + c EI SRM ms2 317.940 [245.945-245.955] MS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00015_110329095349

XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00013_110329084745 3/29/2011 8:47:45 AM

RT: 15.48 - 17.07 SM: 7G

15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 17.0

Time (min)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Re

lativ

e A

bu

nd

an

ce

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Re

lativ

e A

bu

nd

an

ce

RT: 16.56AA: 12784SN: 708RMS

RT: 15.95AA: 7444SN: 412RMS

RT: 16.86AA: 380SN: 22RMS

RT: 16.67AA: 198SN: 19RMS

RT: 16.52AA: 129SN: 14RMS

16.56

15.95

16.53 16.6216.4116.11 16.2315.85 16.76 16.7916.3616.03 16.91

NL: 6.83E3

m/z= 175.47-176.47 F: + c EI SRM ms2 245.950 [175.965-175.975] MS ICIS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00013_110329084745

NL: 1.16E3

m/z= 245.45-246.45 F: + c EI SRM ms2 317.940 [245.945-245.955] MS XLSULTRA_NPV_OCP00013_110329084745

U-SRM

SRM

o,p-DDE & p,p-DDE 100fg in contaminated land sample ran both in SRM (Q1 0.7 amu) and U-SRM (Q1 0.1 amu)

58

• New technology• Sample through-put

• Time savings

• Lower detection limits

• Triple Quadrupole GC-MS/MS provides selectivity with flexibility

• Advanced Triple Quadrupole GC-MS/MS can deliver two modes of selectivity• Increased resolution

• Structural selectivity through MS/MS

Conclusion

59

Thank You for Your Attention!

Questions?

Stay connected with us

Twitter @ChromSolutions

Chromatography Solutions Blog http://chromblog.thermoscientific.com/blog

YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/ChromSolutions

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/ChromatographySolutions

Pinteresthttp://pinterest.com/chromsolutions/

Recommended