THE ECOLOGY OF TIMING IN HOST- PARASITE INTERACTIONS

Preview:

Citation preview

THE

ECOLOGY

OF TIMING

IN HOST-

PARASITE

INTERACTIONS

Probing The Particulars

Of Periodicity In

Plasmodium Parasites

Aidan O’Donnell

Nicole Mideo

Sarah Reece

Artificial Biological Clock by Cohen Van Balen

~24 hours

Artificial Biological Clock by Cohen Van Balen O’Donnell et al 2011 Proc. R. Soc B.

0

1

2

3

Reversed Cycle Normal Cycle

Mismatched Matched

Pa

rasi

te d

en

sity

x 1

09

/ m

l

Reversed Light Room Normal Regime Room

Artificial Biological Clock by Cohen Van Balen

0

1

2

3

Ring Troph

Matched Mismatched

0

1

2

3

IV IP

Matched Mismatched

Stage Route

2013

Pa

rasi

te d

en

sity

x 1

09 /

ml

O’Donnell et al 2011 Proc. R. Soc. B

0

1

2

3

Reversed CycleNormal Cycle

Mismatched Matched

Reversed Room Normal Room

Pa

rasi

te d

en

sity

x 1

09

/ m

l

0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

pa

rasi

te d

en

sity

(x10

8 m

l-1)

Day post infection

Matched MisMatched

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2

pa

rasi

te d

en

sity

(x10

5 m

l-1)

Infection

control

measure?

Barrier to

infection?

Timing matters in host

Timing & transmission

Does timing matter to

the mosquito?

Indirect consequences

to parasites?

What are

the fitness

consequences

of timing

to mosquitos?

Activity of An. stephensi

Rowland (1989) Physiol Entomol

Expected Unexpected

Drosophila:

Periodicity in

susceptibility to

infection Stone (2012) PLoS Pathog.

7pm 7pm 7am 7am 1pm 1pm 1am

GMT

Evening feed 8pm

Morning feed 10am

Rowland (1989) Physiol Entomol

0

5

10

Matched Mismatched

Cu

mu

lative

pa

rasi

te d

esn

ity

(x 1

08 m

l-1)

P. berghei p = 0.75

0

50

100

150

200

250

Evening Morning

Evening

Morning

Oocysts

p = 0.15

Proportion infected :

~95% infection success

No difference between Eve/Morn

(p = 0.56)

Oo

cyst

de

nsi

ty

0

20

40

60

80

control infected

me

an

clu

tch

siz

e

Clutch size

Reduced fecundity in

Infected mosquitos

No effect of timing

21 = 5.12; P = 0.0271

Time: 21 = 3.39; P = 0.06567

Treatment: 21 = 5.46; P = 0.01944

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

evening morning

pro

po

rtio

n la

yin

g e

gg

s

control infected

Proportion that laid

Timing effects likelihood to

lay

Infection reduces likelihood to

lay

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

evening morning

Pro

po

rtio

n t

ha

t la

y

control

infected

First day of egg lay (day 5)

F(1,16) = 17.10; P = 0.0008

Morning fed

mosquitos lay as

soon as they can

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

evening morning

Pro

po

rtio

n t

ha

t la

y

control infected

F(1,18) = 7.70; P = 0.013

Egg lay day 8+

Overall, uninfected

mosquitos more

likely to lay & lay

later

-No difference in mortality

of inf vs. uninf when no

egg lay

-Increased longevity

through reduced

fecundity

Morning infected

Investing in

Immediate

reproduction

Vézilier (2012) Proc. R. Soc. B

Timing matters directly to parasites

in the host

Timing also matters indirectly through its effect on mosquitos

Transmission

potential could

depend on when

the vector is infected

Mosquito

adaptation

to bed-nets

Parasite

adaptation

to timing

-Moiroux (2012) J Infect Dis.

-Charlwood (1987) Med. Vet. Entomol.

Thank you for listening

Reece Group

Recommended