Debate Digital & Private life

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

DEBATE SESSION

BRAND, DIGITAL AND CREATION

PRIVATE LIFE IN A DIGITAL LIFE

FEBRUARY 2013

VINAY, José SergioJO, Junhyon

YANG, ChunjiayiVOINEA, Andra

SAVOCA, GabrieleLAUK, Andreas WANG, Hsing-Yi VIJAYKAR, Sneha

#1THE DIGITAL

REVIEW

Press / digital review: digital communication / facts news Individual review of digital related topics to be presented in a short talk (5 mn max)The article / document / photograph is to be accessible for the entire group (through a link or a photocopy or any other copy)

#2THE DEBATE

VINAY, José SergioMORITZ, Paloma

HU, Feining

SAVOCA, GabrieleLU, Lanyao

LEJARD, Julie

JO, JunhyonVOINEA, Andra

MASMEJEAN, Louise

LAUK, Andreas LI, Mengying

ACHART, Isabelle

Group 1 Group 2

Is Internet the end of our private life ?

Is Internet transparency a condition to security, honesty and tranquillity.

RESPECT THE RULES

THE DEBATE

KEY PARADOXES

TO REMEMBER

1. OIKOS VS POLIS

INTIMACY AS A POLITICAL QUESTION

THE PARADOX OF A CONSTANTLY

CHANGING NOTION

• TRADITIONAL OPPOSITION BETWEEN OIKOS (THE INDIVIDUALLY RULED PERSONAL SPACE) AND THE POLIS (CITY)

• BEFORE THE 18TH CENTURY, NO LEGITIMACY OF PRIVATE LIFE HABERMAS « REPRESENTATIONAL CULTURE »

• AFTER THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, THE BOURGEOIS SOCIETY INVENTS PRIVATE LIFE (EG. THE DIARY) SEPARATED FROM THE PUBLIC SPHERE (OFFENTLICHKEIT).

• MASS MEDIA ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE WEAKENED THE PUBLIC SPHERE DURING THE 20TH CENTURY.

• INTERNET – THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE PUBLIC SPHERE OF THE 21ST CENTURY – IS INVADED BY PRIVATE LIVES AND A HIGH CONFUSION BETWEEN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LIFE.

https://www.google.com/

settings/ads/onweb

2. DIGITAL INTIMACY IS NOT ABOUT WHO YOU ARE, BUT ABOUT WHAT YOU DO

3. SOME USERS ARE TRYING TO

TAKE PROFIT OUT OF PRIVATE LIFE

LOSS

http://www.intel.com/museumofme/r/index.htm

…LOOSING SOME INTIMACY MAY BE

A SOURCE OF UTILITY

4. RADICAL TRANSPARENCY IS

SEEN AS A CONDITION OF

PROGRESS

OPEN SOURCE, TRANSPARENCY

AND ULTRA-FREEDOM AS

CONDITIONS FOR DEMOCRACY

5. TRANSPARENCY AS A FRONTIER IN

OUR CONTEMPORARY

WORLD

BUT DEFINITELY CREATING A MONITORED

WORLD ANTIDOTES:

BANALITY/TRIVIALITYPERSONA

ABUNDANCE

BIBLIOGRAPHY

WEBOGRAPHY

http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/03/09/how_youth_find.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09cell.html?_r=2&

http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2006/05/20/erosion_of_yout.html

http://www.artisopensource.net

http://wikileaks.org

Recommended