View
499
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
enfuse group
2 SPEED IT AND HOW TO GET THEREAgile Delivery 2016
enfuse group
Who Am I?
HARRY VAZANIASDelivery & Transformation Director
harry.vazanias@enfusegroup.com+44 (0) 7973 824469
linkedin.com/in/harryvazanias
@harryvazanias
“IT needs to shape up. IT no longer provides a service to the business, IT is the business and vice versa.
IT needs to reinvent itself for a customer centric, technology savy world where slow and steady just doesn’t cut it.”
enfuse group
I FEEL THE NEED… THE NEED FOR SPEED!
enfuse group
“Ironically, in a changing world, playing it safe is one of the riskiest things you can do”Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn co-founder
enfuse group
McKinsey’s Two Speed IT…
McKinsey’s Two Speed IT…
enfuse group
Systemsof Innovation
Systemsof Record
Systems of Differentiation
Mode 1
Mode 2
Chan
geGovernance
+
-
-
+
enfuse group
“The two-speed approach is no silver bullet. It can be complicated to maintain a hybrid architecture… When one retailer adapted its legacy systems to support multichannel delivery, for instance, fast-track software teams bumped up against outdated IT systems built in programming languages their young developers had never used.
…many businesses that opt for this approach become so focused on the fast part of the two-speed model they forget to consider the changing demands of the foundational systems—and that oversight can undermine the success of the project.”McKinsey & Company
enfuse group
2 SPEED IT / BIMODAL = ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE
enfuse group
… aka ‘IT Crowd’ and ‘Iron Man’…
Two Speed IT
enfuse group
… Samurais and Ninjas
Gartner’s Bimodal IT
enfuse group
EXAMPLE GOVERNMENT ORGNeed for a different delivery approach for IT
Fast moving, challenging landscape…
High levels of tech fuelled disruption
More demand than ever for IT related change
Mature, ITIL and Prince 2 based IT function seen as slow and expensive
Business try to avoid IT when they want to make things happen fast
enfuse group
EXAMPLE GOVERNMENT ORGMode 2 was born
In late 2015 a decision to pilot a 2 speed IT delivery model was made
Need to be able to tailor delivery approach to business needs, so new delivery mode required
Fresh, Agile based approach seen as opportunity to drive down delivery costs
Desire to be able to deliver faster and earlier by applying a delivery model better suited to the circumstances
enfuse group
EXAMPLE GOVERNMENT ORGApproach to launching mode 2
Today•No formal Mode 2 – CDM closest but limited to Agile software development
FY 16/17•Pilot Mode 2 for select initiatives•Refine Mode 2 for future rollout next year
FY 17/18•Scale out use of Mode 2 •Widen scope to include further Proposition and Run activities
FY 18/19+•Further broaden scope of Mode 2 engagements, looking at options such as Enterprise DevOps and the scoping of the pipeline
Build Pipeline
Scope Initiative Mobilise Build & Deploy Run and
Maintain
Agile Dev(Independent of Mode
2)
Mode 2 FY16/17
Mode 2 FY17/18
Mode 2 FY18/19
Increasing % of Change Portfolio
enfuse group
Mode 1
Tightly integrated systems
Business delivered to (i.e. they are the customer)
Deliverables against timescales
Scope is fixed
Project or Programme
Mode 2
Loosely coupled / island systems
Business heavily involved
Outcomes and value delivered
Scope frequently changing
Portfolio of demand
Can’t fail on release Fix forward acceptable
End state can be well defined upfront End state difficult to define upfront in detail
Inception through to hand off to BAU support Full value stream*
Deliver change in a linear fashion, typically with few and large releases
Deliver change continuously in frequent and small increments
Funding allocated for delivery of target outputs Funding allocated for period of time
Business or technology led change Technology led change
Release Reliability
Business Involvement
Ideal Architecture
Delivery Focus
Scope
Ideal Type of Demand
End state
Breadth of value stream
What is it
Funding Structure
Technology Change
EXAMPLE GOVERNMENT ORGCriteria for selecting Mode 1 and Mode 2
enfuse group
2 SPEED IT Making the pilot a success1. Get the right senior sponsorship – business and IT2. Do not do Mode 1 to Mode 23. Acknowledge that Agile is a big part of this4. Invest in making this an exemplar pilot with the right value stream/portfolio5. Staff with Mode 2 people – go getters – and train them6. No big song and dance about Mode 2 – just do it7. Embed coach and other experienced Mode 2 people into the first few initiatives 8. Establish Working Group to get buy-in, engagement and ownership across the
organisation9. Get your pilot project(s) right – fail fast is part of Mode 2, but it helps if you succeed
first!10. Don’t forget about Mode 1 – roll out improvements to Mode 1 as well
enfuse group
End-to-End Value Stream
Agile Portfolio & Delivery Approach
Agile Architecture
Delegated Authority
Business Partnership
DevOps People & Culture
Focus on Value
Different Risk Profile
KEY FEATURES OF MODE 2
enfuse group
Question… is this not what we want for everything?
McKinsey & Company
THE TWO SPEEDS NEED TO COEXIST
enfuse group
KEY STEPS
1. Be clear on why you are doing 2 speed and what this means2. Agree a transformation roadmap with milestones3. Recognise potential blockers – people, process, technology,
security4. Pilot Mode 2 in a business friendly area5. Build Mode 2 support infrastructure 6. Incrementally scale out the use of Mode 2
BUT… DO NOT MODE 1 YOUR MODE 2 ROLLOUT
enfuse group
FINAL THOUGHTS FOR THE DAY
Is 2 Speed IT… a) The end goal for IT?b) A stepping stone to a multi-modal, fast IT world?c) Completely the wrong thing to do – should go all out?
Recommended