Yahoo Content Connections: What Premium Content Looks Like and Why It Matters

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

We know inherently that there's a difference between high-quality and low-quality content online, and when it comes to news, sports and finance reporting, this difference drives our behaviour. But what does "high quality" look like? And does it actually matter when building marketing plans? (um... actually, yes, and we can prove it!)

Citation preview

1

HOW & WHY Consumers Find and Consume Content Online

Nick DrewHead of Research, Yahoo!

Canada

#YahooResearch@YahooAdBuzzCA

2

CANADIANS’ MEDIA HABITS

Sources: TVB 2011/12, 2006/7; NADbank top 19 markets,; comScore Feb ’07, Feb ‘12

TELEVISION

Watch 27.4hrs per week.

Increase of 3% since 2007.

NEWSPAPERS

12.2m weekly readers.

Readership up 3% since 2007.

INTERNET

65.7bn minutes a month spent on the internet.

14% increase since 2007.

*comScore

TECH NEWS

EDUCATIONPHOTO

SHARING

AUTOMOTIVE

TRAV

EL

SPORTS

FINANCE

NEWS

HEALTH

RETAIL

BANKING

SEARCH

SOCIAL NETWORKING

MAPS

LIFESTYLE

BLOGS

GAMESTV

BRAND

SITES

THE WHOLE WORLD ONLINE

BUT SOME CONSTANTS STILL REMAIN

*comScore

TECH NEWS

EDUCATIONPHOTO

SHARING

AUTOMOTIVE

TRAV

EL

SPORTS

FINANCE

NEWS

HEALTH

RETAIL

BANKING

SEARCH

SOCIAL NETWORKING

MAPS

LIFESTYLE

BLOGS

GAMESTV

BRAND

SITES More Canadians visit NEWS sites than use social networks each month

The top 7 publishers account for more than half the time spent on SPORTS sites each month

In the last 2 years, the share of time spent on the 10 biggest LIFESTYLE sites has grown by 60%

25% more Canadians use FINANCIAL NEWS sites now than did 3 years ago.

THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Is “quality content” still relevant to consumers who have the whole world at their fingertips?

And for online marketers, is quality of content still important, or do the tools available for efficient advertising make it redundant?

7

WHAT WE DID

Review of existing thinking.

In-depth discussions with experts.

Detailed qualitative work with Canadian consumers.

Quantitative study among 2,000 Canadian internet users.

CONSUMERS STILL HAVE TRADITIONAL NEEDS

THESE ARE INTERNET USERS66% ARE REGULAR ONLINE NEWS USERS

36% REGULARLY USE LIFESTYLE CONTENT ONLINE

22% ARE SPORTS FANS

IN TOTAL, ARE ENGAGED ONLINE WITH SPORTS, NEWS OR

LIFESTYLE

79%

ENGAGEMENT COMES IN SEVERAL FLAVOURS

GOING DEEPER Delve into a particular topic; read several articles for analysis, perspective or opinion. 20% of internet users go deep with news online every day.

CATCHING UPQuick check of headlines and what's happening.54% of internet users catch up on news online each day.

TAKING A BREAK Fill a little time, read an article or two, watch a couple of videos, check a handful of other sites.53% of sports fans take a break with sports online most days.

BOOKMARKSSHARING

FORUMSLINKS IN

EMAIL

APPS

TRADITIONAL NEEDS, NEW METHODS OF DISCOVERY

Browsing content sites

Direct toSPECIFIC PUBLISHERS

51%58%

CONTENT FOLLOWS PEOPLE ACROSS DEVICES

During the Olympics,

61% of the traffic to the (Canadian)

consortium’s digital properties came from

mobile devices(As reported 3rd August 2012) I really depend on

680 News and CP 24 News Alerts

during the day… on my work phone

m, 34

Usually before I go to bed, lying

in bed, I have my laptop on the

bed, I might read an article

m, 28

…AND THROUGH THEIR DAILY ROUTINES

THE NEWS FAN

THE SPORTS FAN

…AND THROUGH THEIR DAILY ROUTINES

THE LIFESTYLE FAN

…AND THROUGH THEIR DAILY ROUTINES

DISTINCTIONS EXIST BETWEEN SOURCES

HOW DO WE DEFINE THESE DISTINCTIONS?

“ Expertise: it’s quality if the consumer learned something by watching or reading it. ”

Jason Rapp, President, Maholo

“What’s most important is timeliness, constant updating, relevance to the audience; aggregating, your expert voice, and… getting contributors …engaged in the conversation”

Lewis Dvorkin, CPO Forbes

“Consumers will decide whether it’s useful to them; and editors will decide whether the contributions… meet their standards.”

Luke Beatty, TechStars

COMPARING SOURCES

BUT WHAT DOES ‘QUALITY’ MEAN?HOW DO USERS COMPARE SITES?

0

10

20

30

40

50

46

43 4240 39

3331 31 30

25

22 21

97

4

Perceived quality of website(% saying high quality)

BUT WHAT DOES ‘QUALITY’ MEAN?

LOW QUALITY SITES9.6

HIGH QUALITY

SITES34.5

Likelihood to read webpage(% saying they would)

Poorquality

TrustworthyInformative Biased

Insightful

Features leading

columnists/writers

For someone like me

Well-organised

Well-written

Worth sharing

WHAT MAKES IT WORTH READING?

Easy to read

Believable

Annoying

Entertaining

Easy to navigate

Has something

for everyone

SomethingI’m interested

in

Funny

Inspiring

Provides original

viewpoints

Sensationalistic

Provideslocal info

Visually Appealing

Popular

Worth payingfor

Has enough detail

Has a good reputation

Frequently updated

Inspiring

24%

11%

Inspiring

INSPIRING

24%

Easy to read

Easy to read

EASY TO READ

80%

35%

Informative

Informative

INFORMATIVE

77%

30%

EASY TO NAVIGATE

Well written

Well written

74%

33%

INSIGHTFUL

Insightful

Insightful

51%

21%

Entertaining

Entertaining

ENTERTAINING

42%

22%

Worth sharing

Worth sharing

SOMETHING I’M

INTERESTED IN

57%

23%

WORTH SHARING

Easy to navigate

Easy to navigate

42%

15%

COMPARING SOURCES

High quality sites Low quality sites

Category 1 Category 3 Category 20

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80 Well organised

Well organised

BELIEVABLE

73%

22%

Visually Appealing

Visually Appealing

WELL-ORGANISED

69%

20%

Believable

Believable

WELL-

WRITTEN

65%

18%

AboutSomething

I’m interestedIn

AboutSomethingI’m interestedIn

VISUALLY APPEALING

65%

18%

Trustworthy

Trustworthy

TRUSTWORTHY

55%

13%

For someone

like me

For someone like me

FOR SOMEONE LIKE ME

48%

13%

COMPARING SOURCES High quality sites Low quality sites

WHAT DOES QUALITY MEAN FOR BRANDS?

REALLY?

49

30

ADS ARE MORE MEMORABLE

10 5

High quality sites Low quality sites

TRUSTWORTHY

25

31

High quality sites Low quality sites

POOR QUALITY

19

10

VISUALLY APPEALING

29

39

16

29

GOOD FIT WITH THE SITE

ENTERTAINING

11

17

…AND THEY’RE SEEN MORE FAVOURABLY

ULTIMATELY, ADS HAVE A GREATER IMPACT

6

4

9

6

High quality sites Low quality sites

BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER

Consumers still have traditional needs for news, sports, financial news and lifestyle content.

Ways of discovering this content have changed, but how users determine what’s worth their time has not.

Websites that provide informative, well-written, believable and well-laid out content are seen as better sources.

Ads benefit from this source quality

…and perform significantly better on high-quality sites.

#YahooResearch@YahooAdBuzzCA

Nick DrewHead of Research, Yahoo! Canada

ndrew@yahoo-inc.com

Recommended