2014 Law firm trends and outlook

  • View
    402

  • Download
    2

  • Category

    Law

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Law firms face more supply constraints than companies in nearly any other industry. With fewer space options, your firm may find itself battling with competitors not only for clients—but for desired office location as well. Learn how leading firms are combating the space squeeze with modern, cost-cutting location and workplace strategies. And, see the top markets across the country in asking rents, Class A premiums, law firm concentration and more.

Citation preview

Key themes shaping the

U.S. Law firm market

2014

Market dynamics creating waves of opportunity

for law firms

While the tides are slowly shifting,

opportunities to optimize costs remain

for law firms that focus on maximizing

the efficiency of their real estate

footprint, while enhancing strategies

around talent in fringe urban cores

where Millennials live and ideally want

to work.

The Rightsizing wave is peaking

have put efficiency

measures in

place in new or

restructured leases.

Market timing is critical

for firms with upcoming

lease expirations due to

limited supply and a

slowdown of second

generation options

coming to the market.

55–90% of law firms in primary

and secondary markets

Tenants should consider

relocation to less-

expensive submarkets, or

fringe CBD micromarkets

where Millennials live OR

execute deals in well-

located or repositioned

second-gen buildings.

With office space in limited supply

and rents on the rise (up 3.3%) in

top-tier CBD assets, tenants will pay

an average 18.1% premium for

Trophy space.

18.1%

Law firms are feeling the squeeze

It’s all about talent

when it comes to

site selection and

long-term talent

acquisition.

Evolving real estate areas growing in appeal

for firms and attracting Millennials:

River West

(Chicago)

Mount Vernon Triangle

(Washington, DC)

LoDo

(Denver)

Hudson Yards

(Manhattan)

South Lake

Union (Seattle)

Location does not equal status

Improved technology has

enabled firms in high-cost

metros such as Boston, New

York, Washington, DC and

San Francisco to relocate

nonrevenue functions

(i.e. administrative, marketing,

human resources) to lower

cost areas:

Firms can stay

competitive, maximize

profitability and

increase efficiency.

the Sunbelt,

Midwest, Mountain

West or to cheaper

buildings to save

on rent and labor.

Firms relocating non-revenue functions to save on costs

Personal space is

more desirable – U.S.

firms spend a large

portion of their time on

research and writing.

Despite moves toward

efficiency, U.S. firms by in

large are wary of adapting

to more contemporary

open-space.

More “me” than “we” space is still the name of the game

1 Silicon Valley

$88.44 p.s.f.

Top 10 markets: Average Class A asking rent ($ p.s.f)

2. New York $76.96

3. San Francisco $62.79

4. Washington, DC $60.28

5. Boston $54.61

6. Fairfield County $47.31

7. Austin $43.14

8. Houston $42.22

9. Miami $41.09

10. Los Angeles $38.13

Source: JLL Research

Top 10 markets: Annual change in Class A asking rent (%)

Source: JLL Research

1 Raleigh-Durham

15.6%

2. Fort Lauderdale 12.9%

3. Oakland 11.8%

4. N. Virginia 10.4%

5. San Francisco 8.7%

6. Portland 8.3%

7. San Diego 8.3%

8. Boston 7.6%

9. Seattle 6.9%

10. Houston 6.4%

Top 10 markets: Average rent premium for Trophy space (%)

Source: JLL Research

1 Baltimore

40.0%

2. Fort Lauderdale 36.2%

3. Raleigh-Durham 36.0%

4. Chicago 34.0%

5. Seattle 30.0%

6. Dallas 30.0%

7. Denver 30.0%

8. Richmond 30.0%

9. Columbus 30.0%

10. N. Virginia 25.2%

Top 10 markets: % of Class A market occupied by law firms

Source: JLL Research

1 Washington, DC

45.0%

2. Silicon Valley 44.2%

3. Fort Lauderdale 37.6%

4. Austin 29.1%

5. Cleveland 27.4%

6. Columbus 26.7%

7. Richmond 23.4%

8. Miami 20.4%

9. Philadelphia 20.0%

10. St. Louis 19.7%

Source: JLL Research

Top 10 markets: Firms occupying > 50,000 s.f.

1 New York

119

2. Washington, DC 92

3. Chicago 54

4. Los Angeles 36

5. Dallas 31

6. Boston 28

7. Houston 27

8. Atlanta 27

9. San Francisco 26

10. Philadelphia 23

This publication is the sole property of Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc. and must not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, either in whole or in part, without

the prior written consent of Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc. The information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources generally regarded to be reliable. However, no

representation is made, or warranty given, in respect of the accuracy of this information. We would like to be informed of any inaccuracies so that we may correct them. Jones Lang

LaSalle does not accept any liability in negligence or otherwise for any loss or damage suffered by any party resulting from reliance on this publication.

Contacts

12

Americas Brokerage

Tom Doughty, International Director

Tom.Doughty@am.jll.com

+1 202 719 5652

Elizabeth Cooper, International Director

Elizabeth.Cooper@am.jll.com

+1 202 719 6195

Research

John Sikaitis, Regional Director

John.Sikaitis@am.jll.com

+1 202 719 5839

Lauren Picariello, National Director

Lauren.Picariello@am.jll.com

+1 617 531 4208

Phil Ryan, Research Analyst

Phil.Ryan@am.jll.com

+1 202 719 6295

Recommended