Fiona coupar

Preview:

Citation preview

Effectiveness of interventions for

upper limb recovery after stroke

Fiona Coupar, Alex Pollock, Phil Rowe,

Christopher Weir and Peter Langhorne

Methods – Systematic Review

Inclusion criteria – RCT

– Stroke

– UL targeted interventions

– UL functional or impairment outcomes

– Comparisons: placebo, no treatment,

standard care

Cochrane stroke group trials register

Standard SR methodology

Review profile

11000 titles

827 abstracts

Ten interventionsConstraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT);

Electrostimulation; Robotics; Repetitive Task Training;

Therapy approaches; Increased intensity;

EMG biofeedback;

Imagery; Splinting; Bilateral training

72 trials

Constraint-induced movement therapy

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

22 4 4 18

Electrostimulation

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

13 2 0 7

Electromechanical / Robotic devices

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

10 3 2 7

Repetitive task training

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

8 5 1 6

Approach of therapy

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

5 2 1 3

Intensity of therapy

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

4 3 1 4

Biofeedback

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

4 4 0 3

Mental practice / Imagery

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

4 0 0 3

Splinting

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

3 2 2 3

Bilateral arm training

Trials Allocation concealment Intention to treat Blinding

2 1 0 2

Limitations

Heterogeneity

Nature of included trials

Strengths

Comprehensive searching

Only RCTs included

Explicit and systematic methods

SummarySome evidence of benefit from:

–CIMT

– Imagery/mental practice

–Robotics

–EMG biofeedback

Applicability & generalisability

limitations

Repetitive, intense, task-specific

practice

Implications

Clinical Research