Dr Mary Hickson - Hospital nutritional care and protected mealtimes

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Hospital Nutritional Care and

Protected Mealtimes

Dr Mary Hickson

Therapy Research Lead, Imperial College

Healthcare NHS Trust

&

Honorary Senior Lecturer, Imperial College

London

Hospital population • 63% of 65-74 year olds and 72% of people

aged over 75 years report a long-standing

illness

• Almost two thirds of general and acute

hospital beds are used by people aged over

65 years

• People over 75 years have on average

significantly longer hospital stays

2002 data

Who are Elderly?

UK National Statistics, 2009

Prevalence of malnutrition

• 3 million at risk of malnutrition in the UK

• 93% live in the community

Malaysia:

• Children

• Elderly – rural and care home populations

• Increasing problems with obesity in adults

Prevalence of malnutrition

Increased risk in hospital

Malnourished people have:

Costs: £13 billion / year (UK)

Also:

Mortality

OR:

1.6-1.9

Functional

Decline

OR:2.2-2.8

Pressure

Ulcers

OR: 1.9-2.6

Infections

OR: 1.5

Change in malnutrition risk

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Not at risk Moderate Risk High Risk

%week 1

week 2-3

Nematy et al. JHND

2006; 19(3): p209-18.

BMI on admission

• Mean age 85.3yrs (sd=1.5)

• Significantly lower mean BMI than UK elderly

population

• 22kg/m2 v 27kg/m2

• 36% had BMI <20kg/m2

• 72% had a BMI <24kg/m2

Energy deficit

9 month follow up

• Mortality

• 9 deaths

• 7 from high risk of malnutrition group

• 1 moderate risk

• 1 not at risk

Poor food intake

3083 3230

5040

6115

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

B D E Normal

Diet Category

En

erg

y i

nta

ke (

KJ)

Wright et al, (2005) J Hum Nutr Diet 18(3) 213–219

General Hospital Patients

• Daily meals provided 2007+/-479 kcal and 78+/-21 g of protein and exceeded patients' minimum needs by 41% and 15%, respectively.

• 975/1416 (69%) patients did not eat enough.

• The food intake of 572/975 (59%) underfed patients was not predominantly affected by disease but other factors.

Dupertuis et al 2003

Factors associated with

inadequate energy intake (multivariate analysis)

• poor appetite

• higher BMI

• diagnosis of infection or cancer,

• delirium

• need for assistance with feeding. Mudge AM et al. Helping understand nutritional gaps in the elderly (HUNGER):

A prospective study of patient factors associated with inadequate nutritional

intake in older medical inpatients. Clin Nutr. 2011 Jan 22; 30(3):320-5.

Hospital Malnutrition cycle

What is the best way to screen?

71 tools in the literature (Green & Watson

2005)

• Only some are validated

• Only any good if used routinely

• Only any good if the results are followed

through

Recommended tools

• ESPEN

–NRS 2002 (hospital use)

–MUST (community)

–MNA (elderly – NH / RC etc)

• BAPEN

–MUST (all areas)

Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) Table 1: Initial screening Ye

s

No

1 Is BMI <20?

2 Has the patient lost weight within the last 3 months?

3 Has the patient had a reduced dietary intake in the last week?

4 Is the patient severely ill ? (e.g. in intensive therapy)

Yes: If the answer is 'Yes' to any question, the screening in Table 2 is

performed.

No: If the answer is 'No' to all questions, the patient is re-screening at

weekly intervals. If the patient e.g. is scheduled for a major operation, a

preventive nutritional care plan is considered to avoid the associated

risk status.

Table 2: Final screening Impaired nutritional status Severity of disease ( increase in requirements)

Absent

Score 0

Normal nutritional status Absent

Score 0

Normal nutritional requirements

Mild

Score 1

Wt loss >5% in 3 mths

or

Food intake below 50-75% of normal

requirement in preceding week.

Mild

Score 1

Hip fracture*

Chronic patients, in particular with acute

complications: cirrhosis*, COPD*.

Chronic hemodialysis, diabetes, oncology.

Moderate

Score 2

Wt loss >5% in 2 mths

or

BMI 18.5 - 20.5 + impaired general

condition

or

Food intake 25-50% of normal

requirement in preceding week

Moderate

Score 2

Major abdominal surgery*

Stroke*

Severe pneumonia, hematologic

malignancy.

Severe

Score 3

Wt loss >5% in 1 mth (>15% in 3

mths)

or

BMI <18.5 + impaired general

condition

or

Food intake 0-25% of normal

requirement in preceding week in

preceding week.

Severe

Score 3

Head injury*

Bone marrow transplantation*

Intensive care patients (APACHE>10).

Score: + Score: = Total score:

Age: if 70 years: add 1 to total score above = age-adjusted total score:

Score 3: the patient is nutritionally at-risk and a nutritional care plan is initiated

Score < 3: weekly rescreening of the patient. If the patient e.g. is scheduled for a major operation, a

preventive nutritional care plan is considered to avoid the associated risk status.

Taste and

Smell

Teeth and

oral health

Medical

conditions

Social

Factors

Psychological

factors

Appetite and

thirst

What prevents good intake?

Taste and smell First taste of puree:

Young 80%

Old 33%

Young 63%

Old 7%

Schiffman SS (1997) JAMA 278,

(16) 1357-1362.

Roberts et al (1994) jama 272(20) 1601-1606

Underfeeding Ad libitum

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

underfeedinghunger score

underfeedingsatiety score

ad lib HS Ad lib SS

young

old

Moriguti et al. (2000) J Gastroent Biol Sci, 55A, 12, B580-587

Re-nutrition Research suggests it is more difficult to treat

malnutrition in the elderly than in the young.

Hebuterne X, et al (1997) Clinical Nutrition 16, 283-289.

Nutritional supplements

• Reduced mortality: RR = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.64-

0.97) (undernourished only)

• Weight gain: 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.5%)

• Risk of complications reduced: RR=0.86

(95% CI 0.75-0.99)

• But no difference in LoS: -0.8days

(95% CI: -2.8d - 1.3d)

• No functional benefits Milne AC, 2009, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003288.

• Groups most likely to benefit from supplements are:

– Over 75yrs

– Unwell

– Hospitalised

– Given an addition 400kcal+ / day

• Compliance seems to be good in many studies but

this may be ‘trial effect’

• Worse in older adults in hospital

Milne AC, 2009, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003288.

Supplement use

• UK NICE Guidance

• Healthcare professionals should consider oral nutrition support to improve nutritional intake for people who can swallow safely and are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. [A]

Timing of supplements

• Give between meals

• >1 hour before the next

meal.

• Supplements with

meals adversely affects

intake

Wilson M-M.G. et al. (2002) Effect of liquid dietary supplements

on energy intake in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr. 75 p944-7.

High energy and protein meals

• Improve energy and protein intake

• Some evidence for weight gain

• No evidence for functional gains

• BUT

• Weak study designs

• Many fewer studies

Hospital related factors

• Systems fail

• Inflexible food service

• Lack of food choices

• Quality and presentation of food

• Eating environment

• Lack of clear responsibility for food

• Low priority placed on food and eating in

hospital

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

South Eastern Southern Western Nordic CCEE total

proportion of units screening Schindler et al. How

nutritional risk is

assessed and

managed in

European

hospitals: A

survey of 21,007

patients findings

from the 2007–

2008 cross-

sectional

nutritionDay

survey

Volume 29, Issue 5,

October 2010,

Pages 552–559

What are screening rates in

your hospital or wards?

How are patients at risk of

malnutrition cared for in your

hospital or wards?

Nutritional care

• Nutritional care processes not well

implemented

• Limited studies with objective data

• Inappropriate nutritional intervention

• Inadequate mealtime assistance

• Hospital mealtime environment

• Inadequate monitoring

Nutrition care processes

O’Flynn 2005 Clin Nutr

Nutrition Assistants • Duncan et al, (2006) Age Ageing, 35, 148-153

• Dietetic assistants in orthopaedic ward increased energy intake and decreased mortality.

• Hickson et al (2004) Clin Nutr, 23, 69-77.

• Healthcare assistants showed no benefit – but this was not targeted care.

• Lassen et al (2008) BMC Hlth Serv Res. 8, 168

• Trained healthcare assistants – showed reduced food wastage

Volunteers

• Wright et al (2008) J Hum Nutr Diet, 12, 555-562

• Volunteers to help dysphagic patients increased energy intake.

• Robinson et al (2002) Geriatr Nurs. 23, 332-5.

• Trained volunteers, Higher meal intake as % of food served

• Walton et al (2008) Appetite 51, 244-8

• Increased energy and protein at lunch but only daily protein increased

• Wong et al (2008) J Nutr, Hlth Aging 12, 309-12

• Volunteers to help semi-dependent patients, intake improved at lunch and weight increased

Assistance

• Mixed results

• Positive effects

• Well accepted

• But could reduce care provided by routine

staff

• Needs to be in context of improved

nutrition care environment and assignment

of responsibility

Mealtime environment

• Improve the environment

• Reduce interruptions

• Focus on eating

• Protected mealtimes

• Family style dining

• Ward dining room

Does protected mealtimes work? • Limited data

• Lack of evidence of implementation

• 1 study showed increased energy intake and

reduced interruptions

• Latest study: Modest increases in the

proportion of elderly patients meeting their

daily energy and protein requirements.

Similar in both PM and assistants groups.

Young AM et al. Clin Nutr. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]

Dining room to increase intake

L. Wright, M. Hickson & G. Frost (2006) Eating together is important: using a dining

room in an acute elderly medical ward increases energy intake. J Hum Nutr Dietet,

19, pp. 23–26

Take home messages

• Hospital is a challenging environment to

support nutritional intake

• Screening is important but useless without

implementation of care plans

• Supplements work

• Assistance, improved environment, &

dinning rooms have a small effect

Recommended