9. us cattel production current approaches to brd in us feedlots

Preview:

Citation preview

1

US cattle production –Current approaches to BRD in US feedlots

2

Why the risk is so high for pneumonia in US cattle

Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD)

3

Calves on the farm

4

US Beef cattle production

• Beef Cows – 32,434,500 head• Replacement Heifers – 5,646,500

head• Number of operations – 766,350 • Average herd size (cows) – 42.3

USDA. 2008 Beef 2007-08, Part III: Changes in Beef Cow-Calf Industry, 1993-2008

5

US beef cattle production

• 54.1 percent of cows from herd size 100 head or more

• Calves born from Feb-April – 58.8 %• Calf average age at weaning – 207 days• Calf average weaning weight

– Bulls and steers – 559 lbs (254 kg)– Other heifers – 515 lbs (234 kg)– Replacement heifers – 532 lbs (241 kg)

USDA. 2008 Beef 2007-08, Part III: Changes in Beef Cow-Calf Industry, 1993-2008

6

US beef cattle production

USDA NASS

7

Trailer to the auction

8

Through the auction

9

US beef cattle production

• Marketing Methods in the US– Auction – 82.4 %– Direct-video – 1.1 %– Direct-private treaty – 11.6 %– Consignment – 1.1 %– Forward contract – 0.3 %

USDA. 2008 Beef 2007-08, Part III: Changes in Beef Cow-Calf Industry, 1993-2008

10

Re-grouped into trucks

11

US beef cattle production

• Transported to feedlots in “pots”– Pots are the common term for the type of

trailer used– A full trailer is termed a “pot load”– A pot load = 50,000 lbs (22,680 kg) of

calves– At 500 lbs a head = approximately 100

head of calves per pot load– On average – calves from at least 2 origins

on each pot load

12

Into the feedlot (150K head)

13

US beef cattle production

• US Feedlots – in 1995– 41,365 feedlot operations in the top 13

states marketed 23.4 million cattle– 95.3% of feedlots had less than 1000 head

one time capacity– Feedlots with 1000 head or greater one

time capacity marketed 90.2% of cattle– Number of 1000 head plus capacity –

approximately 1,800 (1999)

Managing for Today’s Cattle Market and Beyond, March 2002, CE Ward, TC Schroeder

14

US beef cattle production

Managing for Today’s Cattle Market and Beyond, March 2002, CE Ward, TC Schroeder

22

15

US beef cattle production

Animal Health Research Reviews 10(2); 101-103, 2009. DG Miles

16

US beef cattle production

NASS, USDA, Agriculture Statistics Board, Cattle on Feed, December 2009

17

US beef cattle production

NASS, USDA, Agriculture Statistics Board, Cattle on Feed, December 2009

18

Processed at the feedlot

19

US beef cattle production

USDA. 2000 Part I: Baseline Reference of Feedlot Management Practices, 1999.

20

US beef cattle production

USDA. 2000 Part I: Baseline Reference of Feedlot Management Practices, 1999.

21

2 points of antibiotic use

Off the truck Sick in pen

22

US beef cattle production

USDA VS Info Sheet, Treatment of Respiratory Disease in US Feedlots, October 2001

23

US beef cattle production

USDA VS Info Sheet, Treatment of Respiratory Disease in US Feedlots, October 2001

24

US beef cattle production

USDA VS Info Sheet, Treatment of Respiratory Disease in US Feedlots, October 2001

25

US beef cattle production

Animal Health Research Reviews 10(2); 101-103, 2009. DG Miles

26

US beef cattle production

Animal Health Research Reviews 10(2); 101-103, 2009. DG Miles

27

Terminology

Metaphylaxis= control = prevention

Treatment = pull & treat

28

US beef cattle production

Treatment protocol

Arrival processing at feedlot

“Low risk”

No metaphylaxis

1st pull treatment“Expensive” long acting product

Re-pull treatmentCheaper product

Possible “moratorium”

Risk determination based on origin, source and history

29

US beef cattle production

Canadian Veterinary Journal 2008; 49:373-378. MW Sanderson, DA Dargatz, BA Wagner

30

US beef cattle production

J Anim Sci 2009.87:314-327. AH Babcock, BJ White, SS Dritz, DU Thomson, DG Renter

31

US beef cattle production

J Anim Sci 2009.87:314-327. AH Babcock, BJ White, SS Dritz, DU Thomson, DG Renter

32

US beef cattle production

• Data from Midwest feedlot collected from 1 Jan 2001 to 2 Feb 2006

• 31,131 cattle treated for respiratory disease• Diagnosis based on opinion of feedlot

personnel– Diagnosis based on– Animal appearance– Animal demeanor – Body temperature

J Anim Sci 2009.87:314-327. AH Babcock, BJ White, SS Dritz, DU Thomson, DG Renter

33

US beef cattle production

Conclusions

• For 5WT and 6WT cattle, the earlier in the feeding period that cattle were diagnosed with BRD and treated the more times they were treated and had a decrease in ADG

• Steers were treated an average of 1.6 times

J Anim Sci 2009.87:314-327. AH Babcock, BJ White, SS Dritz, DU Thomson, DG Renter

34

Key individual

Pen rider

35

US beef cattle production

• Pen rider – “Cowboy”• The most important decisions

about health• Determines the need for further

evaluation and/ or treatment–Diagnosis of “buckets”

• BRD, GI, lameness, brainer, other

36

US beef cattle production

• Illness determination• Almost uniformly “subjective”• Animal appearance

– Lack of rumen fill, nasal discharge, increased respiratory rate and/or effort

• Animal demeanor– Lowered head and ears, reluctance to move,

decreased response to stimuli• Rectal temperature ?

– Must be interpreted in the context of the animals other clinical signs

2007, 79th Western Veterinary Conference, Robert L Larson

37

US beef cattle production

Metaphylaxis protocol

Arrival processing at feedlot

“High risk”

Metaphylaxis

Treat all animals in the group

“Expensive” long acting product

Re-pull treatmentCheaper product

Possible “moratorium”

Risk determination based on origin, source and history

38

US beef cattle production -Metaphylaxis

• Definition – the mass treatment of animal populations currently experiencing any level of disease before the onset of blatant illness

• Can be considered as a prevention as well as a curative treatment

Vet Clin Food Anim 26 (2010) 285-301. JS Nickell, BJ White

39

US beef cattle production -Metaphylaxis

• General guidelines for metaphylactictreatment– 1. clinical appearance of cattle on arrival– 2. current (and expected) morbidity/ mortality

patterns– 3. feed consumption– 4. elevated body temperature – 5. efficacy of products labeled for the control of BRD

Vet Clin Food Anim 26 (2010) 285-301. JS Nickell, BJ White

40

US beef cattle production -Metaphylaxis

• Factors to consider in predicting BRD – Lightweight cattle from multiple origins– Previous health history– Distance of travel to feedlot– Time of year– Weather– Transit conditions (weather extremes)

It may be helpful to plot BRD cases to predict disease incidence using epidemic curves

Vet Clin Food Anim 26 (2010) 285-301. JS Nickell, BJ White

41

US beef cattle production -Metaphylaxis

Vet Clin Food Anim 26 (2010) 285-301. JS Nickell, BJ White

42

Questions?