View
74
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Open Science is perfectly adapted to support the basic needs for impact in a "Publish or Perish" reality, so why is community uptake low? With inertia on numerous advocacy and e-infrastructure initiatives funded by EC and national funders in the ERA, the cultural barriers and discipline-specific behaviour are becoming the bottle neck. The presentation focuses on how to get the right mix of advocacy and infrastructure development, in order to support long-term implementation of Horizon 2020 Mandate on Access to Scientific Knowledge (Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6).
Citation preview
Advocacy e-‐Infrastructures
Ivo Grigorov, DTU AQUA @EUROBASIN Project Manager
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014
Mixing it right &Open Science
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
1 Advocacy for Open Science
What did we do wrong ?
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
*scepVcal, suspicious & scienVfic
Who is the target audience?
Homo SSSapiens*
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
Administrator ScienVst
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
So, what are the consequences for advocacy?
2And why is this relevant to
to e-‐Infrastructures ?
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
Because advocacy
and infrastructures must have a clear WHY,
the HOW comes second …
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
Source: Bryn Nelson 2009, Data Sharing: Empty Archives, Nature 461, 160-‐163 (2009)
… or we risk this:
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
HOW DO «MARINE USERS»
USE e-‐INFRASTRUCTURE ? 3
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
“Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, et al. (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 h"p://www.plosone.org/ar0cle/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
IDEA & PROPOSAL
TESTS
DATA
MODEL CODE
ARTICLES
Idealised Research Lifecycle
Open Notebook Science DOI
OpenAIRE
DOI GitHub
DOI
REF IMPACT
We archive data at generaVon … and (hopefully) publish as peer-‐reviewed data products & reanalysis in a number of journals
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
90 % of publicaXons
are Open Access (vs 20-‐40% avrg.)
SOCIAL MEDIA ATTENTION
Source: Personal Trials 2009-2011 using Google Scholar
… among “OCEAN ACIDIFICATION” & “GEO-‐ENGINEERING” publicaVons …
2008 2009 2010
visible on Google Scholar
<40%
WHERE next ? 4EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
FUNDERS: NaXonal & EC
Academic Staff
Today`s Graduate Student
ScienXst of Tomorrow
Project Managers
INSTITUTIONS
Knowledge Managers
Join the experiment:
www.fosteropenscience.eu @fosterscience
#fosteropenscience EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
#OpenScience feeds the need for impact in a
“Publish or Perish” reality …
… so we have to make openness part of REF* credit !
*Research Excellence Frameworks measuring research performance
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
Thank you for the invitation & your attention!
Join the Open Science experiment at www.fosteropenscience.eu
@ fosterscience # fosteropenscience ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
FP7 FOSTER (Science in Society) DuaraVon: 2014-‐2015 (24 months)
Eloy Rodrigues, Un. Minho FOSTER Coordinator
eloy@sdum.uminho.pt
Petr Knoth, Open University Research Associate
WP3 Leader e-‐Learning Placorm
Iryna Kuchma, eIFL WP4 Leader Training iryna.kuchma@eifl.net
Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua FP7 Project Manager,
WP2 Lead Content & ValidaXon ivgr@aqua.dtu.dk
Birgit Schmidt, Un. Goehngen FP7 OpenAIRE Project Officer & WP5 Leader Networking bschmidt@sub.uni-‐goehngen.de
Jose Carvalho, Un. Minho FOSTER Project Manager jcarvalho@sdum.uminho.pt
Recommended