View
5.029
Download
87
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
LALMAN SHUKLA VS GAURI DUTT
Presente By Sarvesh Salvi – 170
Tushar Salvi - 171
ACT, 1872
INDIAN
Gauri Dutta Vs. Lalman Shukla
CASE STUDY
Allahabad High Court (1913)
There are three main Characters in this case.
Servant (Lalman Shukla)
Nephew
Gauri Dutt
One Fine Day
Nephew
Gauri Dutt
Nephew Went Missing
Gauri Dutt
Gauri Dutt Called servant
Lalman Shukla
Lalman Shukla was sent for the search with railway and other expenses.
Who so ever finds the missing nephew will be rewarded with
Rs.500.
Gauri Dutt Announced.
Suddenly after some timeLalman Shukla brought back nephew
at home.
Nephew
Gauri Dutt
Gauri DuttShe refuses to give reward
money of Rs. 500 to Lalman Shukla.
Now Question Arises
2) Is he liable to get money from Gauri Dutt or not?
1) Does it become contract?
What is contract
u/s 2 (h) CONTRACT: An agreement enforceable by law is a contract.
Offer + Acceptance = Agreement
Agreement + Enforceable by law = Contract
Essential of Offer & Acceptance
• OFFER• Existence of two parties.
• ACCEPTANCE
• Acceptance must be communicated to the Offeror.
• Acceptance must be Made within a Reasonable Time .
• Acceptance may be express or implied .
• Offer much be made to create legal obligation.
• Offer may be express or implied.
• Offer much be communicated.
Judgment
According to Indian contract Act 1872, Lalman shukla is not liable to get award money because, offer given by the Gauri dutt was not accepted by the Lalman Shukla, So Gauri Dutt bound to refuse the claim made by Lalman.
Thank You.
Recommended