View
282
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
BMS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENTYelahanka,Bangalore-64
DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
“AN OVERVIEW OF THE HIGH
EFFICIENCY VIDEO CODING (HEVC)
H.265 STANDARD”
Presented By
VARUN R[1BY11TE052]
Outline
Introduction
Literature Survey
Need for HEVC
HEVC
HEVC Block Diagram
Hardware Implementation of HEVC
Software Implementation of HEVC
Applications of HEVC
References
Introduction
Video signal
Sequence of images.
Frame rate is a measure of no. of frames in one second.
Video Compression
Practical implementation of source coding.
Video compression algorithms use lossy compression which reduces redundancy in video data.
Compression algorithms combine spatial image compression and temporal motion compensation.
Need for Video Compression Raw data is huge.
Channel capacity is limited.
It reduces bit rate.
Advantages of Video Compression
Reduces disk space.
File transferring is faster.
Video Codec
• It has a coder and a decoder.
• Used for compression or decompression of video file or streaming video data.
• Implemented using different algorithms by different companies but complies with industry standards.
• Compression technology, OS supported, sampling are the factors which differentiate between codecs.
Literature Survey
VIDEO CODECS STANDARDIZATION HISTORY[1] Gary J. Sullivan, Jens-Rainer Ohm, Woo-Jin Han, Thomas Wiegand “Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 22, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2012 Pg 1649,1650
Literature Survey Contd….
• H.261• H.262 / MPEG – 2• H.263 • H.264 / MPEG – 4 AVC• MPEG – 4• MPEG – 1• DivX• Real Video• Sorenson• x264
[1]Gary J. Sullivan, Jens-Rainer Ohm, Woo-Jin Han, Thomas Wiegand “Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 22, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2012 Pg 1649,1650[2] Jens-Rainer Ohm, J. Sullivan, Heiko Schwarz, Thiow Keng Tan, Thomas Wiegand “Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Video Coding Standards—Including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 22, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2012 Pg 1669
80%
20%
NETWORK TRAFFIC
Video Data
Need For High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) / H.265
• Digital video is driving the future of Communication and Internet.
• Internet traffic is dominated by video content, there is a need for technology which reduces bandwidth.
• Video service providers aim at cutting down cost but ensuring good video quality.
• It delivers crisper video contents and requires 50% bandwidth.• It helps to stream or download an HD Video in a very less time.• It supports 4K (4096 x 2160) and 8K(8192x4320) Ultra HD (UHD) video contents• IT pioneers like Qualcomm, Broadcom, Huawei are working on products enabled
with H.265• Strong Industrial and academic interests. Up to 1000 contributions per meeting.• Backed by most of the major tech companies around the world.
HEVC / H.265
Comparison of HEVC with H.264
HEVC Block Diagram
1.Picture Partitioning
(32x32)
(8x8)
(16x16)
2.Transform size
3.Prediction Units
Intra 2Nx2N,NxN
Inter 2Nx2N,NxN,dNxN,NxdN
4.Intra Prediction
5.Inter Prediction
Two main prediction modes• Advanced Motion Vector prediction• Merge
7 or 8-tap interpolation filter for luma:1/4 Pel
4-tap interpolation filter for chrom:1/8 Pel
6.Deblocking
• HEVC Deblocking is performed on the 8×8 grid only• Parallelizable
7. Sample Adaptive Offset
• After Deblocking (Optional)• Add offset to pixels depending on their categorization
(band, edge)• Up to 6% bitrate savings.
8. Entropy Coding
CABAC (Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding) a more sophisticated context management scheme.• Improved compression efficiency• Improved throughput speed while reducing its context
memory requirements
9. Parallel Processing
Higher Compression ratio thereby reduces file size.
50% reduction in bit rate
High performance and good stability.
High quality video
Capable of handling 3D, 4K or 8K resolutions.
Disadvantages of HEVCx265 to x264 encoding time ratio = 7:1 3.5:1
Higher CPU on playback:
x265: 15% of Quad-core i7 (CPU only)
x264: 6% of Quad-core i7 (Hardware GPU + CPU)
Concern: Battery life on mobile devices
Advantages of HEVC
Hardware Implementation of HEVC
FPGA IMPLEMENTATION OF HEVC DECODER BY HHI FRAUNHOFFER
Software Implementation of HEVC
HEVC REAL TIME 4K ENCODER
2160p60 10 bit real time encoding.Look ahead processing.Available as SDK for Windows, Linux, iOS
HEVC REAL TIME 4K DECODER
2160p60 10 bit real time decoding.Interlaced SupportPicture level parallel processing
Applications
References[1] Gary J. Sullivan, Jens-Rainer Ohm, Woo-Jin Han, Thomas Wiegand “Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 22, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2012
[2] Jens-Rainer Ohm, J. Sullivan, Heiko Schwarz, Thiow Keng Tan, Thomas Wiegand“Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Video Coding Standards—Including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 22, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2012
[3] High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Algorithms and ArchitecturesEditors: Sze, Vivienne, Budagavi, Madhukar, Sullivan, Gary J. (Eds.)
[4] Design and Implementaion of Next generation Video Coding Systems By Vivienne Sze, Madhukar Budagavi
[5] http://www.hhi.fraunhofer.de/fields-of-competence/image-processing/solutions/hevc-software-and-hardware-solutions/hevc-4k-real-time-decoder.html
[6] Official x265 developers site.
Thank You
Recommended