Teacher and Principal Evaluation School Board Study

Orting School District TPEP

Working Together as a System

Dr. Marci Shepard January 3, 2013

Teamwork

This is the case with any team. If one cog of the wheel doesn't work, the entire team grinds to a halt. We should never discount the importance of teamwork - people working together towards a common goal - in assuring our ultimate success.

The success of our students is our joint responsibility, and when they succeed, it is to our joint credit and cumulative accomplishment.

Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013

1/31/2013 3

TPEP Teachers

Principals Central Office

School Board

District

School Board

I can explain TPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role.

1/31/2013 5

1/31/2013 6

District

School Board

Evaluation System Overview

State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations

Definitions

Implementation schedule

Scoring and student growth measures

RIG and eVAL

Reflection and feedback

EVALUATION

SYSTEM OVERVIEW

• 6696

• Race to the Top/ ESEA Waiver

• 5895

• Should teacher and principal evaluations be for GROWTH or ACCOUNTABILITY?

1/31/2013 11

While there are many formative and summative reasons to measure teacher and principal effectiveness, we believe the ultimate goal of all measurement should be…

Why measure educator effectiveness?

to improve teaching and student learning.

1/31/2013 12

Before and After – A Snapshot

Before Component After

Criteria

Provisional Status

Educator evaluation Data

Binary – Sat/Unsat Tiers 2 tiers – Sat/Unsat Tiers 4 tiers-professional growth and development system

Developed over 25 years ago Criteria Developed over 25 years ago Criteria Describes effective teaching & leadership – developed by

stakeholders in 2010 legislative session

2 years (prior to ‘09-’10) Provisional Status 2 years (prior to ‘09-’10) Provisional Status 3 years

No existing requirement Educator evaluation Data

No existing requirement Educator Evaluation Data

Evaluation data must be submitted to OSPI,

beginning ‘10-’11, for all employee groups

CEL 5D

Definitions

RIG and eVAL

State Criteria

Teacher Evaluation

Principal Evaluation

1/31/2013 17

1/31/2013 18

Principal Evaluation

Centering instruction on

high expectations Demonstrating

effective teaching pracitces

Individualizing instruction

Subject matter knowledge

Fostering a safe, positive learning

environment

Use student data to modify

instruction

Communicating with parents and

shcool community

Exhibiting collaborative and collegial

practices

Teacher

Evaluation

Criteria

Creating a culture

Ensuring school safety

Planning with data

Aligning curriculum

Improving instruction

Managing resources

Engaging communities

Closing the gap

Principal

Evaluation

Criteria

TPEP Criteria Themes Themes:

Definitions

RIG and eVAL

Classroom teacher

Principal

Comprehensive evaluation

Focused evaluation

Definitions

1/31/2013 25

“Certificated Classroom Teacher” Definition

• Designed for “classroom teachers”

• Teachers who provide academically-focused instruction to students

• Districts determine best fit

1/31/2013 27

Comprehensive Evaluation for Teachers

• Assesses all 8 evaluation criteria

• All criteria contribute to the comprehensive evaluation rating

• Student growth rubrics embedded in Criterion 3, 6 and 8

• All provisional classroom teachers and any classroom teacher not on level 3 or level 4 receive comprehensive evaluation

• All classroom teachers shall receive a comprehensive summative evaluation at least once every four years

1/31/2013 28

“Principal” Definition

• Designed for certificated principals and assistant principals

• Districts determine best fit

1/31/2013 29

Comprehensive Evaluation for Principals

• Assesses all 8 evaluation criteria

• All criteria contribute to the comprehensive evaluation rating

• Student growth rubrics embedded in Criterion 3, 5 and 8

“Due to the importance of instructional leadership and assuring rater agreement among evaluators, particularly those evaluating teacher performance, school districts are encouraged to conduct comprehensive summative evaluations of principal performance on an annual basis.”

1/31/2013 31

Focused Evaluation

• Includes an assessment of one of the 8 criteria

• Student growth rubrics from one of the 3 criterion If a teacher chooses 3, 6 or 8, their accompanying student growth rubrics will

be used

If a teacher chooses criterion 1, 2, 4, 5, or 7, the accompanying student growth rubrics from criterion 3 or 6 will be used

• Approved by the teacher or principal’s evaluator

• A focused evaluation must be performed in any year that a comprehensive evaluation is not scheduled (both teachers and principals)

District

Department

Definitions

RIG and eVAL

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

State and District

1/31/2013 36

5895 Timeline

Instructional framework & TPEP info

Teacher evaluation

rubrics

TPEP Pilot

Begin implementation

2015-2016

All teachers must have

comprehensive evaluation

2013-2014 Must begin implementation

Orting School District

• 2010-2011

• Information sharing

• Instructional framework (5D)

• 2011-2012

• TPEP Team

• 4-year implementation plan

• Teacher evaluation rubrics

• 2012-2013

• RIG District/RIG Team

• TPEP Pilot/TPEP Team

• Transition plan

• Principal evaluation rubrics

• Teacher evaluation rubrics

• 2013-2014

• Implementation (2 likely models)

1/31/2013 38

Implementation Schedule

• Steering committee recommends all districts move to the new evaluation criteria for all classroom teachers and principals in 2013-2014, with some classroom teachers on the focused and some on the comprehensive.

• 5895 requires provisional or probationary teachers, and principals with fewer than 3 years of experience, unsatisfactory performance, or new to the district to be transitioned first. Nothing prevents earlier transition.

• All districts must begin implementation in 2013-2014 school year and by fully implemented by 2016.

1/31/2013 39

OSD 3-Year Transition Plan DRAFT

Definitions

RIG and eVAL

SCORING EVALUATIONS

STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES

5895 and ESEA Waiver

1/31/2013 42

Raw Score Model Determined December 1st

Preliminary Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013

1/31/2013 43

Evaluation Summative Scoring Process

1/31/2013 44

Defining Key Terms

• Student Achievement: The status of subject-matter knowledge, understandings, and skills at one point in time.

• Student Growth (Learning): The growth in subject-matter knowledge, understandings, and skill over time.

It is student growth, not student achievement, that is relevant in demonstrating impacts teacher and principals have on students.

1/31/2013 45

Student Growth Rubrics

• The TPEP steering committee organizations approved statewide rubrics for student growth to ensure consistency in implementation of the evaluation system across Washington State.

• The rubrics for student growth describe both goal-setting and outputs of student learning.

• OSPI has provided student growth rubrics for each of the three criterion

Teachers – 3, 6 and 8

Principals – 3, 5 and 8

Note: 3/5 of the student growth rubrics for teachers are goal setting.

Summative Rating and

Impact on Student Learning Matrix

Definitions

RIG and eVAL

REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS

EVAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Support and Resources

About 2/3

districts Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013

1/31/2013 56

Next Steps

1/31/2013 57

QUESTIONS?

Definitions

RIG and eVAL

District

School Board

1/31/2013 60

Think: What are implications for the school board/your role?

1/31/2013 61

1/31/2013 62

When systems align and work together, real progress is made.

Teaching, Learning,

Assessment

Business

Technology Special

Services

Supt’s Office

Teachers

Principals

School Board

Next steps?

…and feedback

Orting School District TPEP

Working Together as a System

Dr. Marci Shepard January 3, 2013

Teacher and Principal Evaluation School Board Study

Education

TEAM Teacher and Principal Evaluation Framework - NCTQ

New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System

Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project (TPEP) and World

Teacher & Principal Professional Growth and Evaluation

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015

Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot

New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation … New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System NYSED APPR TRAINING: TASK 6 “Additional Requirements” (Teachers)

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation

Teacher-Principal Evaluation Pilot

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update

Teacher and Principal Evaluation

Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of

Teacher and Principal Evaluation Training and Assessments ... · Teacher and Principal Evaluation Training ... Retraining program ... Teacher and Principal Evaluation Training and

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update

Teacher-Principal Evaluation Pilot K-20

Teacher Evaluation System UpdateTeacher Evaluation System ...c.ymcdn.com/sites/. TES... · Teacher Evaluation System UpdateTeacher Evaluation System Update ... 161 Principal responses

Washington’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System

Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation

TEAM Teacher and Principal Evaluation Framework