Capital in communities: the case of the Cipher Challenge

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Hazel Hall's invited paper presented at presented at 2003 Virtual Communities Conference, 16-17 June 2003, London. The full text of a journal article developed from this paper is accessible from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401204000283.

Citation preview

1

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Presented byHazel HallSenior LecturerSchool of ComputingNapier University, Edinburgh

h.hall@napier.ac.uk

2

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Co-authorDianne GrahamSystems AdministratorHighland Council Harbour Management Lochinver

3

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Communities of practice enhance collaborative work

– within single organisations– across networks of organisations– in non-organisational groupings

4

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Communities of practice enhance collaborative work

– within single organisations– across networks of organisations– in non-organisational groupings

and are dependent on knowledge sharing practice

5

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Incentives for knowledge sharing

6

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Incentives for knowledge sharing

– provision of rewards• hard• soft

7

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Incentives for knowledge sharing

– provision of rewards• hard• soft

– provision of infrastructure• social• technological• boundary

8

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Incentives for knowledge sharing

– provision of rewards• hard• soft

– provision of infrastructure• social• technological• boundary

Strong belief in organisational ownership of expertise

Positive attitude towards knowledge sharing promoted in the organisation

9

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Incentives for knowledge sharing

– provision of rewards• hard• soft

– provision of infrastructure• social• technological• boundary

Strong belief in organisational ownership of expertise

Positive attitude towards knowledge sharing promoted in the organisation

10

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Incentives for knowledge sharing

– provision of rewards• hard• soft

– provision of infrastructure• social• technological• boundary

Strong belief in organisational ownership of expertise

Positive attitude towards knowledge sharing promoted in the organisation

How does this apply in a “social” setting?

11

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

1997

12

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

1997 1999

13

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

1999

14

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Stage 5

109 182 6 11 88 214 74 77 153 177 109 195 76 37 188166 188 73 109 158 15 208 42 5 217 78 209 147 9 8180 169 109 22 96 169 3 29 214 215 9 198 77 112 8 30 117 124 86 96 73 177 50 161

Singh, 1999, p. 355

15

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Stage 5

109 182 6 11 88 214 74 77 153 177 109 195 76 37 188166 188 73 109 158 15 208 42 5 217 78 209 147 9 8180 169 109 22 96 169 3 29 214 215 9 198 77 112 8 30 117 124 86 96 73 177 50 161

Singh, 1999, p. 355Illiad

16

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

• Identification of Fermat’s last theorem (not Fermat’s last theorem) holding a clue.

17

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

• Identification of Fermat’s last theorem (not Fermat’s last theorem) holding a clue.

• Marginal note:

Cubem autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquodratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et generaliter nullam in infinitum ultra quadratum potestatem in duos eiusdem nominis fas est dividere. Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non careret.

18

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

• Fermat’s marginal note as key text for letter counting:

(1) cubemauteminduoscubosautquadratoquodratu

(41) minduosquadratoquadratosetgeneraliternul

(81) lamininfinitumultraquadratumpotestatemin

(121)duoseiusdemnominisfasestdividerecuiusrei

(161)demonstrationemmirabilemsanedetexihancma

(201)rginisexiguitasnoncareret

19

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

• Fermat’s marginal note as key text for letter counting:

(1) cubemauteminduoscubosautquadratoquodratu

(41) minduosquadratoquadratosetgeneraliternul

(81) lamininfinitumultraquadratumpotestatemin

(121)duoseiusdemnominisfasestdividerecuiusrei

(161)demonstrationemmirabilemsanedetexihancma

(201)rginisexiguitasnoncareret

109 182 6 11 88 214 74 77

20

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

• Fermat’s marginal note as key text for letter counting:

(1) cubemauteminduoscubosautquadratoquodratu

(41) minduosquadratoquadratosetgeneraliternul

(81) lamininfinitumultraquadratumpotestatemin

(121)duoseiusdemnominisfasestdividerecuiusrei

(161)demonstrationemmirabilemsanedetexihancma

(201)rginisexiguitasnoncareret

109 182 6 11 88 214 74 77 = plaifair

21

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

• Fermat’s marginal note as key text for letter counting:

(1) cubemauteminduoscubosautquadratoquodratu

(41) minduosquadratoquadratosetgeneraliternul

(81) lamininfinitumultraquadratumpotestatemin

(121)duoseiusdemnominisfasestdividerecuiusrei

(161)demonstrationemmirabilemsanedetexihancma

(201)rginisexiguitasnoncareret

Plaifair cipher es el proximo nivel. La palabra secreta es Illiad.

22

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Purpose of the list

23

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Monthly contributionsto the list

24

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Completion announced 11 October 2000

25

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

£10,000?

26

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Research approach

– “Content analysis”

– E-mail survey - questionnaire to sample of membership

– In-depth interviews• Simon Singh• Code breakers

27

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Demographics

– Male– Under 40– Beginners

28

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Demographics

– Male– Under 40– Beginners

29

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - knowledge capital

– Gain knowledge of code-breaking• in general• to solve a particular problem

30

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - learning

– Gain knowledge of code-breaking• in general• to solve a particular problem

– Gain information on others’ progress• benchmarking

31

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - learning

– Gain knowledge of code-breaking• in general• to solve a particular problem

– Gain information on others’ progress• benchmarking

Share knowledge with others

32

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Help requested

33

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Benchmarking

34

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Help provided

35

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - social contact

• In VCs

– Individuals seek friendship• instant access to on-going relationships with a large number

of people

36

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - social contact

• In VCs

– Individuals seek friendship• instant access to on-going relationships with a large number

of people

– Groups of enthusiasts seek sense of “belonging” • shared identities, relationships, commitments

37

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - social contact

• In VCs

– Individuals seek friendship• instant access to on-going relationships with a large number

of people

– Groups of enthusiasts seek sense of “belonging” • shared identities, relationships, commitments

In this case, companionship = not so important

38

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Low importance of social relationships

– Topic of the discussions– Clarity of the group’s purpose– Passion and interest for the topic– Demographics of membership– Prospects for interaction in the real world

39

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - social contact

• Encouragement

– (Public) one-to-one

40

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - social contact

• Encouragement

– (Public) one-to-one

– Community

41

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

One-to-one encouragement

42

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Motivation to participate - social contact

Community encouragement

I gained heart from reading all the old posts from people who had solved the various codes already. It was obviously a do-able task.

43

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Knowledge sharing and capital created

Gains Why take? Why give?

To break codes Moral obligationTo win prize

Individual Knowledge capital ReputationPersonal satisfaction

Community None Knowledge capitalSocial capital

44

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Desire to contribute

45

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Obligation to contribute

46

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Frustration with lurking free-riders

47

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Winners were lurking free-riders

48

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Knowledge sharing and capital created

Gains Why take? Why give?

To break codes Moral obligationTo win prize

Individual Knowledge capital ReputationPersonal satisfaction

Community None Knowledge capital?Social capital

49

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Lurking to learn

50

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Knowledge capital?

They exchanged a lot of comment such as “Did you know that…?” However, I do not think participants exchanged a lot of new, crucial knowledge. Very few people put forward the sort of knowledge that might jeopardise their chances of winning.

51

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Guarding against spoilers

52

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Sub-groups/cliques

53

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Knowledge creation

54

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Main conclusions of interest to business applications

– The values of community membership determine the power of incentives employed to encourage active participation.

55

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Main conclusions of interest to business applications

– The values of community membership determine the power of incentives employed to encourage active participation.

– The breadth of topic focus determines levels/type of activity and associated need for social support.

56

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Main conclusions of interest to business applications

– The values of community membership determine the power of incentives employed to encourage active participation.

– The breadth of topic focus determines levels/type of activity and associated need for social support.

– Community size matters: inclusion for individual learning, exclusion for knowledge creation.

57

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

Related work on communities

Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 36, pp. 171-227). Medford, New Jersey: Information Today.

Hall, H. (2001). Input friendly intranets: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 139-146.

Hall, H. (2001). Social exchange for knowledge exchange. Paper presented at the Managing knowledge: conversations and critiques, 10-11 April 2001, University of Leicester.

Hall, H. (in press). Borrowed theory: applying exchange theories in information science research. Library and Information Science Research, 25.

58

Capital in communities: the case of the CipherChallenge

CipherChallenge material

The bookSingh, S. (1999). The code book. London: Fourth Estate.

The solutionsAlmgren, F., Andersson, G., Granlund, T., Ivansson, L., & Ulfberg, S. (2000). How we

cracked the code book ciphers, [Online]. Available: http://answers.codebook.org/codebook_solution.pdf

The e-grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/CipherChallenge

Recommended