Analysing naplan

No Blame Analysis of Naplan

Our Data Table Share

• What have you done with your Naplan Data?

• What have you learnt from it?• Time to share

New Gisborne, Gisborne, Romsey, Kyneton SC Mt Macedon

Report Back

• As a group thing that we could take back to our schools to try

• Recommendation for others to try(Practical)

• One staff member to be data analysis to use Item analysis report – in relationship to the results anything under 50% correct was listed this list given to staff for supervision. Andy

• NSW competition – large amounts of data• On Demand data examined to find areas of

need.• Year 7 data to Schools to inform Year 6

teaching focus

• Numeracy Intervention – Exploring Mathematical Understanding Program - Kim

• Professional Reading – Booker• Teachers exploring assessment regularly• Data analysis – 10% above State average

Celebrate successes - 10% below further investigation of actual errors – find the misconceptions and share with staff

• Coding score – discuss strength and weakness for each score with teacher

• Investigate cohort growth – 0-50point growth– 52-100 – 100+

• PMI for results• Patrick Griffins -Developing Professional Teams

• Examine the language of the questions Assumptions of Prior Knowledge.

• Proformas– New Gisborne PS on the Ultranet• Collective Responsibility – PD Plan &

Professional Learning.• Be more explicit in our teaching• Helping teachers to become more reflective• You CAN photocopy students writing

Ways to Use Data to Inform Instruction

Writing– Phillip Holmes Smith – Coordinators– Trish Hyland where to next

• Transition– Primary to secondary

Phillip Holmes Smith

www.sreams.com.auUsing Naplan data as an example of to use data

to inform instruction

1.Writing criteria Report2. Marking Rubric3. Response Report

The Writing Criteria Report

Choose “Writing Criteria Report”

Click on “Preview Report” to view results

The Writing Criteria Report

The report makes little sense without understanding how the writing task is marked against the “Writing Marking

Guide”

State

School

The Writing Marking Rubric

Click here to download the Writing Marking Rubric

The Writing Marking Rubric

Text structure (0 – 4)In this school about 38% received a score of 1 but the majority 59%received 2.To improve the teachers need to move the 1s to 2 and the 2s to 3!

Our schools – a closer look

Text StructuresSkill focus: The organisation of the structural components of a persuasive text (introduction, body and conclusion) into an appropriate and effective text structure.

• What do we suggest that this teacher or teachers do to support these students?

The Student Response Report(Writing Test – by criteria)

Choose “Student Response Report”

Choose “Writing Test – by criteria”

The Student Response Report (Writing)

How can we assist teachers to think about using data like this?

• Shoulder to shoulder talk

Transition

Primary to SecondaryWho owns the data?19 months of the 24 month cycle is with

previous teachersLooking for common misconceptions so that we

can support students in achieving the best that they can

• An approach to sustaining student outcomes in the long term

• Supportive and collegiate discussions between secondary schools and feeder primary schools

• Data has to be generated by Secondary School

• Breaking year 7 data into primary school cohorts can show the strengths and areas to work on at the primary level

Item Analysis report

Choose item Analysis report

Choose class code

Reading using item analysis

What we are looking at

Reading example

Spelling

Grammar and Punctuation

Mathematics

Where to from here?

• Little steps• Drilling down on results• Strengths and weakness• Whole school ownership

Term 4 work

• Guided Reading – workshop modelling and inclass support

• Literacy block Grade 1/2 - planning modelling inclass support

• Daily 5 and Cafe Menu Prep - planning and inclass trial

• Spelling – revisit after whole school workshop

Term 4 work

• Supporting Writers Workshop with Literacy Coordinators

• Follow up afterschool workshops (To be decided)

• Reading workshop – Grade 5/6 planning and inclass support

• Friends and Books – follow up with schools/ Ultranet

• Naplan analysis and support•

Naplan Conversion to VELS

Phillip Holmes Smith Expected Growth

2011 Reading Writing Numeracy

Yr 3 -Yr5 Below Expected Growth <72 <69 <88Within Expected Growth 72-93 69-91.3 88-115.5Exceeded Expected Growth >93 >91.3 >115.5

Yr 5 - Yr 7 Below Expected Growth <44.6 <43.1 <52.2Within Expected Growth 44.6-55.8 43.1-52.9 52.2-66.9Exceeded Expected Growth >55.8 >52.9 >66.9

Yr 7 - Yr 9 Below Expected Growth <36.7 <39.5 <42.2Within Expected Growth 36.7-38.2 39.5-42.3 42.2-44Exceeded Expected Growth >38.2 >42.3 >44