View
50
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Al Goshaw (1) , Andrea Bocci (1) , Miaoyuan Liu (1) Will DiClemente (1),, Zongjin Qian (1), Joshua Loyal (1) Song-Ming Wang (2) , Suen Hou (2) , Dong Liu (2) , Zhili Weng (2) He Liang (3) , Hongye Song (3) , Ming - hui Liu (3 ), Evgeny Soldatov (4) , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
W/Z SM approval report Al Goshaw(1) , Andrea Bocci(1) , Miaoyuan Liu(1)
Will DiClemente(1),, Zongjin Qian(1), Joshua Loyal(1)
Song-Ming Wang(2) , Suen Hou(2) , Dong Liu(2), Zhili Weng(2)
He Liang(3), Hongye Song(3) , Ming-hui Liu(3),Evgeny Soldatov(4),
Stephen Gibson(5) ,Louis Helary(6), Tian Feng(7) , Zhijun Liang(8),
(1) Duke University
(2) Academia Sinica
(3) University of Science and Technology of China
(4) Moscow Engineering Physics Institute
(5) CERN
(6) LAPP-Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules
(7) Columbia University
(8) University of Oxford
22
Introduction•W+ production
TGC
• Main background:•W+jets (jet fakes as )•Z+/jets (one lepton not Id, jet mis-Id as )
• ttbar production
•W measurement can probe WW triple gauge boson coupling (TGC) vertex
• from s-channel tends to have higher Pt• If presence of anomalous TGC from new physics, could enhance W production rate, particularly at the high Pt region.
•Analysis : select events with 1 isolated lepton (e,) , 1 isolated photon, large ET
miss
ATL-COM-PHYS-2010-296 : ATLAS note on MC simulation of W production
u/t-channel s-channel
ISRFSR
3
Event SelectionW Z•W/Z GRL, MET Clean-up (only for W), nVtx>=1
•Trigger : EF_e20_medium (electron), period D~H, 1fb-1
•EF_mu18_MG or EF_mu40_MSonly_barrel(muon)
•1 Electron: Tight, pT>25GeV, E_iso<6GeV•1 Muon :
•Combined Staco, PtCone20/Pt<0.1•Pt>25 GeV, MCP quality cuts
•MET_Lochadtopo>25 GeV• MT(lepton,)>40 GeV•Z veto for e channel: |M(e, )-M_Z|>10GeV
•2 Electron:
Medium, pT>25GeV•2 Muon :
•Combined Staco, •PtCone20/Pt<0.1•Pt>25 GeV, MCP quality cuts
•Opposite charged, M(l,l)>40 GeV
Photon Selection Cuts• IsEM Tight, Pt>15 GeV, dR(e/,)>0.7• Isolation : EtCone30_Pt_ED_corr < 6 GeV
Jet selection cuts •Anki KT 4 jets , pT(EM+JES)>30GeV, ||<4.4•dR(jet ,)>0.6, dR(jet ,leptons)>0.6
4
W+jet background in Wγ analysis
Photon isolation in data is systematically higher than isolation in MC Data driven W+jet background estimation
Non-tight Control region to obtain photon isolation template for W+jet : Require photon candidates to fail at least two strip layer photon ID cuts
5
Z+jet background in Zγ analysis
Lepton isolation and photon jet background
6
Observe excess in data on lepton in lepton isolation distribution Indication of photon jet background in both electron and muon channel. The feature of photon jet background :
No real Missing ET Bad Lepton isolation , lepton is from jet fake Good photon isolation, photon is real Mostly from heavy flavor (γ+b/c jet) for muon channle
Background shape : Control region for Electron channel :
low MET region ( loose ,non-medium electron) Control region for Muon channel :
low MET region High pT Lepton track with large impact parameter (heavy flavor)
7
Control regoin definition :Systematics of Wjet (Zjet) / γjet background
Wjet
γjet
Varying Non-tight defintion:failed at least two strip cutsfailed at least one strip cutsfailed at least three strip cuts
Varying Non-isolated defintion:E_iso(γ)>7GeVE_iso(γ)>8GeVE_iso(γ)>6GeV
Nomial: Nomial:
8
2D sideband Systematics: correlations between two discriminating variables
Wjet
γjet
2D sideband assume no correlations photon shower shape and photon isolation Study such corrections for fake photons in Wjet background Monte Carlo
Define Rwjet as correlation factor, Rwjet =1 means no correlation. Rwjet in MC is consistent with 1 within 2~3 sigma Take the maximum variations of Nwjet as systematic (w/wo considering Rwjet )
2D sideband assume no correlations between MET and lepton isolation Study such corrections in γjet dominated control region in data
Define Rγjet as correlation factor, Rγjet =1 means no correlation. Study Rγjet in γjet dominated control region in data:
EF_2g20_loose trigger , at least one tight+ isolated photon At least one loose and failed medium electron.
Take the maximum variations of Nγjet as systematic (w/wo Rγjet )
9
Background estimation summary
Wγ
Zγ
10
Wγ control plot : photon pT
=0jet >=0jet Electron channel Muon channel
11
Wγ control plot : lepton pT and MET
=0jet >=0jet Electron channel Muon channel
12
Zγ control plot
13
Phase space definition
14
Photon efficiency uncertainty
15
Uncertainty on Electron isolation efficiency
Data driven isolation efficiency measurement Select Z->e+e- events using electron tight cut Only use leading electron for study Rather pure electron sample >99% purity
In time pileup : study with different Number of primary vertex
Out-of-time pileup : study with candidates with different Bunch trains positions
pT dependence
16
Uncertainty on Photon isolation efficiency
17
JET/ MET acceptance uncertainty
18
Overall uncertainty on detector effect
Electron channel
Muon channel
19
Overall uncertainty on acceptance
20
21
Parton and particle level SM prediction
Use MCFM to obtain SM NLO prediction in parton level
Correct them to particle level
Systematic uncertainty from parton to particle corrections
22
Wg Cross section measurement result ( low pT region)
=0jet >=0jet
23
Wγ Cross section measurement result ( medium pT region)
=0jet >=0jet
Electron channel Muon channel
24
Wg Cross section measurement result ( high pT region)
=0jet >=0jet
Electron channel Muon channel
25
Zg Cross section measurement result
=0jet >=0jet
Electron channel Muon channel
pT>15GeV pT>60GeV
26
SM (inclusive)SM (0jet)
Summary of fiducial cross section
27
TGC
u/t-channel s-channel
Anomalous coupling limit •W+ production
•Z+ production
• Z-Z-γ (Z-γ-γ) coupling is forbidden in SM model
• h3_γ and h4_γ are coupling parameter for Z-Z-γ
• H3_Z and h4_Z are coupling parameter for Z-γ-γ
28
Δκ=0.4 (0jet)SM (0jet)
Anomalous coupling limit in Wγ
Use highest pT bin in fiducial measurement for ATGC study
29
Bayesian limit setting
: ATGC Hypothesis
Lower limit
Upper limit
: possibility of one certainty ATGC Hypothesis given our Measurement as input
: input from fiducial measurement
30
Background estimation in high pT region
31
Systematics coupling limit in Wγ
32
Result of ATGC in Wγ
33
Systematics coupling limit in Zγ
34
Result of ATGC in Zγ
Backup
35
36
Systematics coupling limit in Wγ
37
38
39
MC Samples for Signal & Jet Faking Photon BackGround
•Wgamma : AlpgenJimmyWgammaNpX (117410-117415)
•Normalize AlpgenNp(Np0+Np1) to Sherpa_Wmunugamma(0+1jet)
•Get k-factor=1.488, apply to all Alpgen samples( Np0~Np5)
•Cross section(by summing up Np0 ~Np5) = 83.2 pb
•Zgamma : Sherpa_Zmumugamma(0+1jet) (126016)
•Use cross section from Sherpa = 14.7 pb
•Jet Faking photon : using data-driven method for normalization
•Take shape from non-tight photon control region
40
41
42
Jet multiplicity for Zg
pT>15GeV pT>60GeVpT>15GeV pT>60GeV
Recommended