View
214
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
www.clasp.org
Outreach, Screening and Online Applications Working Poor Families Project Policy AcademyWorking Poor Families Project Policy Academy
June 2011
Abigail Newcomer Abigail Newcomer Policy AnalystPolicy Analyst
www.clasp.org
Client must…• know that program exists• believe that she might be eligible• believe that benefit is worth the (perceived)
hassle of applying• know how to apply• locate and submit any needed documentation
for initial eligibility or recertification• actually submit an application (in office, or via
mail, phone or online interface)
3
www.clasp.org 5
Community based organizations
Malls
Government offices
K-12 schoolsHousing developments
Prisons
Churches
Community colleges
Community health centers
www.clasp.org
• Private funding for faith based and community organizations
• Flexible block grants that can be used to better serve low income individuals and families Community Services Block Grant Temporary Assistance for Needy Families(TANF)
• State funds for human service program administration
• Federal outreach funds
6
www.clasp.org
• Screen for multiple programs at once• Recognize that families may have needs beyond
the scope of a single program• Often only require minimal additional information
from users to screen for more programs• Harder to keep updated and accurate• Can be challenging to fund with narrowly
targeted public funds
9
www.clasp.org
• 86 online multi-benefit tools across the country
• 62 promote access to three or more programs. 19 promote access to at least half (seven or more)
• The most common programs were Medicaid (90%), SNAP (80%), and TANF (66%)
• Calculators were least likely to cover: SSI/SSDI Medicare Extra Help Federal housing programs Veteran assistance programs
12
* HHS, “Promoting Public Benefits Access Through Web-Based Tools and Outreach”
www.clasp.org
• Employment and career advancement
• Income enhancements and work supports
• Financial literacy and asset building
13
“Earn it, Keep it, Grow it”
www.clasp.org
A 2008 study found individuals in three sites were 3 to 4 times more likely to achieve major economic outcomes than those who did not receive bundled services.
15
Probability of Achieving a Major Economic Outcome
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Bon Secours CNM MET Center
With bundling
Without bundling
Percent Receiving Bundled Services
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Bon Secours CNM MET Center
* Quantitative Analysis of the Center for Working Families, Abt Associates, 2008.
www.clasp.org
• Motivated student population• Financial barriers to completion• Colleges already have many
elements in place• Offer a framework for
connections between partners
16
The Lumina Foundation’s “Big Goal” is to increase the proportion of Americans with high quality degrees and credentials by 60% by 2025
www.clasp.org 17
Yesterday’s Nontraditional Student is Today’s Traditional Student
36% Adults Aged 25 or Older
47% Independent Students
40% Enrolled in a 2 Year Public College
46% Enrolled Part-Time
36% Minority Students
40% Low Income Students
45% Students Employed Part-Time
32% Students Employed Full-Time
www.clasp.org
• Do not need to… go to a welfare office wait in line to be seen bring kids or arrange child care repeat information needed for multiple programs
• Can apply at any hour of day or night – do not need to take time off from work
• Can allow for real time telephone or online assistance
20
* This section was developed with the help of colleagues from the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities
www.clasp.org
• Data can be pre-populated into eligibility system Less possibility of data-entry and mathematical errors Fewer staff needed
• Computerized system allows for load-shifting across offices – staff in rural offices can process applications from clients in urban areas
21
www.clasp.org
Look at the online applications with your table 1.What makes the online applications work?
2.What might make them difficult to navigate?
3.How might people learn about these applications?
4.Is there an eligibility screener?
5.Is it clear how applicants’ questions are answered?
6.What outside resources could make the tool more useful?
22
www.clasp.org
• Strong outreach from community partners,• Applications and screening tools that are
compatible with a part of the state system,• Clear and simple eligibility assessments,• Real time assistance (via help line/chat function)• Opportunities to fill out application in person, • No requirement to lie, omit information or enter
information that is not mandatory.
23
www.clasp.org
• Not everyone has access to computers or is equally comfortable using them
• More difficult for some people to use People with low levels of literacy People who speak other languages Individuals with disabilities
• Instructions are not always clear, easy to understand, sensitive Especially in complicated situations: e.g. TANF child-
only cases, mixed immigration status families
24
www.clasp.org
• Assistance from call centers may not always be available Limited hours Long waits for calls to be answered
• States may in practice transfer case management responsibilities onto nonprofits Nonprofits may or may not have knowledge needed Often not paid, or not fully paid, for costs of helping
clients
25
www.clasp.org
• Violations of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
• Violations of “tri-agency guidance” – requesting citizenship and social security numbers for household members who are not applying for benefits
• Right to submit incomplete application under SNAP not provided Matters because benefits paid retroactive to date of
application
26
www.clasp.org
• Provide funding for application assistance – can leverage federal funding streams
• Expand efforts to connect potentially eligible households to work supports, including the number of access points.
• Facilitate training on use of online tools
• Develop & distribute provider modules
• Avoid duplicating outreach efforts.
30
www.clasp.org
• Encourage states to set and use performance measures on work supports, such as: Number of applications Approvals, reasons for non-approval and time to
approval Reasons for incomplete applications
• Use feedback from performance measures to improve work support policies and procedures.
31
Recommended