View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Wiinter 2019 Survey Results
Exxecutive Summary
Page 2 of 15
Reespondent Snapshot
Planning Study AreaDowntown LAWest SideN/A-Retired-StudentFreelanceNearbyCentury CityHollywoodSouth BayKoreatownPasadena-Glendale-BurbankSanta MonicaCulver CityWest HollywoodSouth LAValleyWestlake-Echo Park-Los FelizBeverly HillsNorth East LASan Gabriel Valley
49
26
22
19
18
11
10
10
9
9
8
7
7
6
6
4
3
3
1
No
Yes
308
0.35%
4.84%
28.37%
19.72%
31.14%
10.03%
5.54%
Total
84
12
5
12
6
58
21
11
62
17
2
69
46
Page 3 of 15
A walkable, retail-filled neighborhood with density centered around the new subway stations.
Mixed use mixed income transit oriented, walkable with locally based community services and easy access to other job and recreation/cultural centers.
Walkable pedestrian scaled environment that embraces transit as a feature of the neighborhood with convenient access to other areas around in LA (sans auto).
Affordable & ideally public housing near transit hubs that incorporates the needs of existing under-resourced communities.
Would love to see a walkable, vibrant place with lots of multi family housing along and near transit.
More public transit options, less congestion with cars and less parking hassles.
My vision is for the neighborhood to maintain it's current character with the existing buildings. There is a nice small village-like feel to our neighborhood that we would like to maintain. Single family homes are crucial to preserve as are low height and low density apartment buildings.
Much more affordable housing.
Dense, vibrant, diverse, transit-oriented mixed-use community.
Preserve R-1 single family homes, protect RSO and current affordable housing. Protect HPOZ's.
Retain the historical nature and quality of life in the area while using by-right zoning to build some affordable rentals and condos.
More of the four and six unit buildings that made this affordable.
To try best to preserve our great community and historic architecture, and future development should be very sensitive to that.
I envision the area remaining roughly the same with a bit more density and height on the boulevards .
Yes
No
Main Takeaways
Yes
No
No
Yes
Use the Neighborhood and Age filters to see how responses varied. Use the "Ctrl" key to select multiple options.
Page 4 of 15
We want to live in a quiet single family neighborhood where we can park our car in our neighborhood without fighting peoplewho are taking transit. That is totally unfair.The neighborhood is already pretty developed. Adding affordable housing will give low income an opportunity to live in a higherincome area.Depends on the type of development. McMansion: No; Quality, affordable housing: yes.Developments along major traffic corridors, if affordable, could do a great deal to help the housing crisis.Yes, especially if they are affordable for people at all income and wealth levels. Diverse density makes for more vibrant, dynamic,livable neighborhoodsI don't think new developments will "improve" our neighborhood and could change it for the worse if they bring more traffic,but our neighborhood needs to contribute to meeting our city-wide need for affordable housing.
7.78%
25.56%
11.11%
37.41%
7.41%
10.74%
10.81%
13.13%
22.01%
13.90%
18.53%
21.62%
21.88%
7.81%
11.72%
11.72%
28.91%
17.97%
25.00%
12.89%
12.50%
12.11%
19.92%
17.58%
10.59%
16.08%
31.37%
6.67%
12.55%
22.75%
22.87%
25.97%
12.02%
18.60%
12.40%
8.14%
6.12%
24.49%24.49%23.47%21.43% 18.15%
34.25%28.77%
11.99%6.85%
42.31%
30.07%
18.88%
2.80% 5.94%3.06% 5.78%15.31%
21.77%
54.08%
Sccale of New Development
11 [Most Desirable] 22 3 4 5 6 [Least Desirable]
308
Page 5 of 15
Addt'l affordable housing
Community faci…
Labor standards
Public open spaces
11
Additional affordable housing
Community faciliti…
Labor Standards
Public open spaces
Community facilities
Public open spaces
Labor standards
Additional affordable housing
Labor standards
Community facilities
Additional afforda…
Public open spaces
1 [Most Important]
13.24%
10.66%
12.13%
15.81%
10.66%
15.81%
21.69%
11.88%
7.28%
19.92%
21.07%
4.60%
15.33%
19.92%
27.48%
5.73%
15.65%
8.40%
20.99%
12.60%
9.16%
19.47%
8.78%
17.18%
5.34%
37.79%
8.40%
3.05%
[ p ]
7.17%
42.65%
5.73%
10.75%
14.34%
13.62%
5.73%
12.55%
10.70%
12.18%
19.93%
5.90%
17.34%
21.40%
10.74%
13.33%
16.67%
18.15%
7.04%
16.30%
17.78%
22 3 4 5 6 7 [Least Important]
Features of New Development
3
2
4
308
Page 6 of 15
27.59%
16.75%
23.65%
9.05%15.24%
27.62%
48.10%
Most Desirable
Not if it involves displacement of current residents and/or demolition of Historic and/or RSO housingDepends on whether or not the small businesses that currently occupy many of the neighborhoods in Fairfax, esp. Little Ethiopia, could afford to stay.We need to combat homelessness and climate change. We need dense housing with transit that lessens car dependency.I'm in favor of more affordable housing. We have enough condos and high-priced rental units.We fought hard for an HPOZ in our area but there has to be a way to provide affordable housing in all areas, including ours.I wish to maintain the single family home neighborhood that I made a significant investment in when I purchased my home. I do not believe thatincreasing housing units in this area will increase affordability.
43.07%
19.31%
26.24%
11.39%
20.38%
31.75% 31.75%
16.11%
11
22
33
44
Hoousing
308
LeastDesirable
Page 7 of 15
There is nowhere else to go. As a homeowner of over a decade, I couldn't afford to buy another home now. I bought what I could afford with a 30 year mortgage intending to hold onto this beauty forever. I don't want to be pushed out of my RESIDENTIAL neighborhood so that developers can get richer. I'm all for progress, but it has to work for all.
As close to another Metro Rail station as I could afford.
I would have to move quite far outside of Los Angeles, as I live in a rent controlled unit and can no longer afford market rate rents.
I'm a tenant and I honestly don't know where I would go. I've raised my kids in this community, served as a teacher in this community for 20 years, and honestly - I couldn't afford to move here. And if I got displaced, I don't know where I would move. Luckily, I have a very good relationship with my landlord, but this causes me a great deal of stress. Other tenants must be feeling very stressed and insecure.
As teachers, my partner and I would probably not be able to find affordable housing anywhere near this area.
I have no idea, and the prospect is terrifying
If I had to move I would not be able to afford to live anywhere else in LA.
I plan to stay. I'm aging in place!
I can’t afford to move out. If forced I would leave the state and I certainly don’t want to do that.
308
Affordability
Page 8 of 15
Moobility
It will depend on whether other improvements are done - our bus service needs to be more frequent to connect to the stations, our streets need to be safer so I can bike or walk home at night. If the City and Metro do absolutely nothing besides put a station in, it won't serve us because we need connections throughout the neighborhood.
I will use it every day to and from work
Not convenient to where I work or shop
Make walking and biking easier. Protected bike lanes, combined with the new subway, would entirely eliminate my car trips in the area.
Fix the gaping pot-holes that make bike-riding dangerous for both riders and drivers alike. Provide bike lanes that follow major arteries their entire length.
Basically, just implement the Mobility Plan.
DASH Bus
Scooter (i.e. Bird/Lime)
Bicycle/Bike share
Metro Bus
Taxi/Ride Share (i.e. Lyft/Uber)
Walk
Personal Automobile
21
52
82
131
186
228
256
Occasionally
Regularly
Never
No
I'm not sure now, but would cons…
Yes
I don't own a car
Yes
No
Yes
No
308
Page 9 of 15
15.93%
24.78%
38.05%
10.62% 10.62%
Yes
No
23.35%
42.13%
14.21%10.15% 10.15%
12.07%
20.69%
55.17%
6.90%5.17%
Paarking
Occasionally
Regularly
Never
No
I'm not sure now, bu…
Yes
I don't own a car
Page 10 of 15
12684125
93
1,500+ 100+38,000+
900+
58
59
59
145 6096
4084
57
308
Paarticipation
5,000+
Page 11 of 15
Page 1 of 15
Page 13 of 15
Page 14 of 15
Page 15 of 15
Recommended