WATER AND WASTEWATER BENCHMARKS IN AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AND THE PACIFIC ISLANDS A COMPARISON OF...

Preview:

Citation preview

WATER AND WASTEWATER BENCHMARKS IN AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AND THE PACIFIC

ISLANDS

A COMPARISON OF INITIATIVES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALIGNMENT

Background and Introduction

Why use benchmarks

Why use benchmarksIdentify

opportunities for improvement

Why use benchmarks

Identify best practices

Identifyopportunities for

improvement

Why use benchmarks

Identify best practices

Set internal key performance

indicators

Identifyopportunities for

improvement

Why use benchmarks

Identify best practices

Set internal key performance

indicators

Identifyopportunities for

improvement

Information for stakeholders

Comparison of Areas that are Benchmarked

NON REVENUE WATER

BILLS

METERING

RESIDENTIAL WATER CONSUMPTION

STAFF Recycled water

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Wastewater sludge

AREAS WE ALL BENCHMARK COMPLETELY DIFFERENTLYFINANCIAL PERFORMANCENETWORK PERFORMANCEQUALITY OF SERVICE

Totally different benchmarks….FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEAustralia New Zealand Pacific Islands• Net profit• Dividend pay-out• Total CAPEX• Operating cost per

property

• Revenue• Capital expenditure as a

ration of budgeted expenditure

• Operating Cost Coverage Ratio

• Debt Service Ratio

• Operating Cost Coverage Ratio

QUALITY OF SERVICEAustralia New Zealand Pacific Islands

• Call answered by an operator within 30seconds

• Fault attendance and response times

• Wastewater treatment level

• Continuity of Service• Quality of water

(chlorine residual)

Some interesting comparisons: consumption

New Zealand Median

Pacific Median Australian Median

0

50

100

150

200

250

litre

s/pe

rson

/day

DIFFERENCES: Australia reported per property

Some interesting comparisons: metering

New Zealand average

Pacific average0.00%

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%

Case Studies of International benchmarking: European Benchmarking Commission

EMPLOYEE EXCHANGEGOOD PRACTICE CASE STUDIES

Some interesting comparisons: tariffs

Median NPR charge

Median Urban Australian Charge

$0.00

$200.00

$400.00

$600.00

$800.00

$1,000.00

$1,200.00

$1,400.00

Average for pacific region consuming

72m3 $USD

$0.00

$200.00

$400.00

$600.00

$800.00

$1,000.00

$1,200.00

$1,400.00

Household tariffs for 200m3 year Household tariffs for 72m3 year

Some interesting comparisons: tariffs

Median NPR charge

Median Urban Australian Charge

$0.00

$200.00

$400.00

$600.00

$800.00

$1,000.00

$1,200.00

$1,400.00

Average for pacific region consuming

72m3 $USD

$0.00

$200.00

$400.00

$600.00

$800.00

$1,000.00

$1,200.00

$1,400.00

DIFFERENCESHousehold tariffs for 200m3 year Household tariffs for 72m3 year

200m3/year 72m3/year

Limitations of benchmarking

• Different countries collect different data• Different definitions interpretation• Measuring the wrong indicator might take us in the

wrong direction• Different system influences can lead to misleading

conclusions

Not really a comparison… Water Loss

0.0030.0060.0090.00

120.00150.00180.00210.00240.00270.00

Average Pacific No...0

306090

120150180210240270

Real Losses Non Revenue Water

Not really a comparison… Water Loss

0.0030.0060.0090.00

120.00150.00180.00210.00240.00270.00

Average Pacific No...0

306090

120150180210240270

Real Losses Non Revenue WaterDIFFERENCES

-Connection density-System pressure

-Unbilled consumption-Unauthorised consumption

Selection of fit for purpose indicatorsOBJECTIVE GOOD PRACTICE PERFORMANE INDICATOR FOR LEAKAGE

Volume per year

Litres/ service connection

M3/km mains

% of system input volume

% of water supplied

Infrastructure Leakage Index with Pressure

Set targets and track performance of an individual system

Yes, for large systems

Yes Yes No No Only if pressure management completed

Technical performance comparisons of different systems

No No No No No Yes

Case study of benchmarking using the IWA Methodology The Infrastructure Leakage Index in Malta:

FROM 20 to 2.1!*see leaksuite.com

Adoption of 5 forces model

Pressure Control

300 Zones Checked Weekly

What could we do now….

• Include Australian and New Zealand data that aligns in IBNET database

• Consider alignment of indicators when developing reports

• Share our reports with each other, with stakeholders involved in funding and operations

Over time……• Share best practice learnings• Identify twinning/training and collaborative

partnership opportunities

CONTACT:lesley.smith@waternz.org.nz

Recommended