Vector Boson Signals of Electroweak Symmetry...

Preview:

Citation preview

R. Sekhar ChivukulaMichigan State University

November 13, 2012

Vector Boson Signalsof Electroweak

Symmetry Breaking

Monday, November 12, 12

A New Boson

Monday, November 12, 12

ATLAS

CERN-PH-EP-2012-218arxiv:1207.7214

Monday, November 12, 12

CERN-PH-EP-2012-220arxiv:1207.7235

CMS

Monday, November 12, 12

Is the New Boson THE HIGGS Boson?

Symmetry Magazine, Oct 30, 2012

Monday, November 12, 12

Loss of Unitarity in

Electroweak Symmetry Breaking

Monday, November 12, 12

Sum 0

SU(2) x U(1) @ E4

Monday, November 12, 12

including (d+e)

SU(2) x U(1) @ E2 & The Higgs

Lee, Quigg, Thacker

Monday, November 12, 12

including (d+e)

SU(2) x U(1) @ E2 & The Higgs

Lee, Quigg, Thacker

gHWW

Monday, November 12, 12

Alternatives?“Higgsless” Models

Monday, November 12, 12

Expand 5-D gauge bosons in eigenmodes: e.g. for S1/Z2:

Extra-D

KK mode

4-D gauge kinetic term contains1

2

!!

n=1

"

M2

n(Aan

µ )2 ! 2MnAan

µ !µA

an

5 + (!µAan

5 )2# i.e., A

anL ! A

an5

Mn =

n

R

Flat Space:

Massive Vector Bosons from 5-D

Monday, November 12, 12

g4 =

g5!

!RMn =

n

R!UV !

1

g25

4D EFT

5D EFT

???

1/R

�UV

Energy Scales and Couplings

Monday, November 12, 12

Cancellation of bad high-energy behavior through

exchange of massive vector particles

RSC, H.J. He, D. Dicus (2002)Csaki, Grojean, Murayama, Pilo, Terning (2004)

4-D KK Mode Scattering

Monday, November 12, 12

Higgsless models are low-energy effective theories of Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking with. They include:

• massive 4-d gauge bosons arise in the context of a 5-d gauge theory with appropriate boundary conditions

• WW scattering is unitarized through exchange of KK modes (instead of scalar bosons)

• the language of Deconstruction allows a 4-d “Moose” representation of the model

Chivukula & He hep-ph/0201164Csaki, Grojean, Murayama, Pilo, Terning hep-ph/0305237

General Principles

Monday, November 12, 12

A Simple Realizaton:The Three-Site Model

Monday, November 12, 12

g0 g1f2f1

g2L

R

SU(2) ! SU(2) ! U(1) g0, g2 ! g1

Gauge boson spectrum: photon, Z, Z’, W, W’ (as in BESS)

Fermion spectrum: t, T, b, B ( is an SU(2) doublet)

and also c,C, s,S, u,U, d,D plus the leptons

pR1

!L1!L0

!R1 tR2, bR2

!

RSC, Coleppa, DiChiara, He, Kurachi, EHS, Tanabashi hep-ph/0607124

3-Site Model: Basic Structure

Monday, November 12, 12

g0 g1f2f1

g2L

RSU(2) ! SU(2) ! U(1)

g0, g2 ! g1

“Bulk Fermion” RH Boundary FermionLH Boundary Fermion

degree of delocalization

3-Site Fermion masses

each ordinary fermion mass value is tied to ordinary fermion masses are of the form mf ⇡M✏L✏fR

heavy “KK” fermion masses are ~ M

flavor structure same as in standard model

M

✏L L0⌃01 R1 + R1 L1 + L1⌃12

✓✏uR 00 ✏dR

◆ ✓uR2

dR2

◆�

✏fR

Monday, November 12, 12

S = T = W = 0

Y = M2

W (!W ! !Z)

Use WW scattering to see W’: Birkedal, Matchev, Perelstein hep-ph/0412278

General ideal delocalization condition gi(!fi )2 = gW vw

i

is realized as in 3-site model

From the W, fermion eigenvectors, one solves for

For all but top quark, !fR ! 1 so the choice

g0(!fL0

)2

g1(!fL1

)2=

v0W

v1W

�2L ⇤ (1 + �2fR)2⇤

x2

2+

�18�

�2fR

2

⇥x4 + · · ·

⌅x2 �

�g0

g1

⇥2

⇥ 4�

MW

M �W

⇥2

3-Site Ideal Delocalization

makes W’ fermiophobic and Z’ nearly so

✏2L ⇡ 2✓

M2W

M2W 0

Monday, November 12, 12

1-loop fermionic EW precision corrections too large

Allowed Region

MW’

M

10000

20000

25000

400 600 800 1000 1200 0

5000

15000

T,B

KK fermion mass (GeV)

W’ mass (GeV)

Unitarity violated

WWZ vertexvisibly altered

Chivukula et al. hep-ph/0607124

3-Site Parameter Space

�⇢ =M2 ✏4tR16 ⇡2 v2

MW 0 << MT,B

Monday, November 12, 12

But What About the New Boson?

Hong-Jian He, Ning Chen, Tomohiro Abe: Arxiv 1207.4103

Monday, November 12, 12

Linear Scalar Link Fields: ϕ1 & ϕ2

Leads to two-Higgs particles: h, H

pR1

He, Chen, Abe: arxiv 1207.4103

Linear 3-Site Model

Monday, November 12, 12

WW Unitarization

H,hγ,Z,Z’

+

Unitarize jointly by scalar and vector exchange!Leads to sum rule:

See next talk...Monday, November 12, 12

LHC Phenomenologyof Vector Bosons

RSC, EHS, H.-J. He, Y.-P. Kuang, et. al., Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 031701& arxiv:1206.6022 and PRD in press

Monday, November 12, 12

References

LHC Signatures:

W’,Z’ Production and Decay at LHC

⌫⌫

Monday, November 12, 12

Two processes with large rates and clear signatures!

W’ production at LHC

Vector Boson Fusion

Associated Production

LHC @14 TeV

Monday, November 12, 12

References

500 GeV W’ boson

Associated Production (WZZ channel)

Monday, November 12, 12

Background is 10x larger than

estimated in Birkedal, Matchev

& Perelstein (2005)

forward jet tag removes WZ background

500 GeV W’ boson

Vector Boson Fusion (WZjj channel)

Monday, November 12, 12

Fusion

Associated

Integrated Luminosity for W’ Discovery

LHC at 14 TeV

Monday, November 12, 12

W’ Discovery at 8 TeV

Associated Production

Monday, November 12, 12

arxiv:1206.6022, PRD in press

W’ Production at 8 TeV

Monday, November 12, 12

• ATLAS/CMS has discovered a new boson.

• Measure properties: is it the Higgs?

• If it isn’t, there are potential new signatures in multi-gauge boson signals.

Conclusion

Monday, November 12, 12

• C.-P. Yuan met Prof. Kuang at CCAST Workshop, Beijing in 1993.

• E. Simmons invited by Prof. Kuang to speak at ITP in Beijing in 1995.

• NSF USA-China International Program, Qing Wang and Yi Liao visited MSU, Carl Schmidt visited Tsinghua U, 1997-99.

• Hong-Jian He was a postdoc at MSU, 1997-2000.

• Chivukula, Dicus, & He on unitarity, 2001.

• Kuang et. al., LHC signature paper 2007...

MSU, Tsinghua, and Prof. Kuang

Monday, November 12, 12

生日快乐!

Monday, November 12, 12

Backup Slides

Monday, November 12, 12

Discussion Question

N. Arkani-Hamed, SavasFest 2012

?

Monday, November 12, 12

Ohl & Speckner arXiv:0809.0023

Z’ Search at LHC

Ohl & Speckner predict that the 3-site Z’ boson (at or near ideal delocalization) should be visible in 100 fb-1 of LHC data

pT � 50 GeV

| cos �| � 0.95

75 GeV mjj 85 GeV

MW 0 = 500 GeV

Monday, November 12, 12

Recommended