Using Data for ELL Success - UMKC WordPress€¦ · Using Data for ELL Success Allyson Hile,...

Using Data for ELL SuccessAllyson Hile, Director of Language ServicesStephanie Easley, ELL Assessment Specialist

DESE Data RequestStudent names and MOSIS AMAO achievement Cohort

MAP Achievement

MAP-ACCESS Correlation

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 24 3 21 5.52Proficient Advanced 35 5 30 5.31Advanced Proficient 40 5 35 5.40Advanced Basic 16 2 14 4.58Proficient Proficient 96 14 82 5.01Basic Proficient 104 20 84 5.07Proficient Basic 67 6 61 5Basic Basic 183 23 160 4.64Below Basic Basic 187 14 163 4.45Basic Below Basic 197 43 152 4.09Below Basic Below Basic 479 87 291 3.73

2015 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09

2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

What do you notice about MAP achievement versus language proficiency?

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09

2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

District Wide Trend

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

Axis

Title

AMAO 2- MET

2015

2014

2013

2012

More Trends

1st-2nd Writing 2nd-3rd Writing

Principal Data “Chats”

Using ACCESS growth reports, identify:

• Promising trends

• Concerning trends

• Next steps, highlighting� Professional development possibilities such as coaching specific

teachers/teams, whole staff professional development, department PD such as SIOP, CLIMBS, co-teaching

� How can Language Services support you?

8th-9th Writing

9th-10th 9th-10th9th-10th Writing Growth

Central Office Data “Chats”

Helps to explain the language load of the MAP/EOC

Justify:

• budget requests (additional ESL staff)

• the need for MAP and other accommodations

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09

2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

ELLevation Education Software

• Scale Score Comparison Reports

• Score History Report

• Students Needing Attention

• Future use:� Individual Education Plans� Electronic monitoring-MELLs and FLEPs� Progression monitoring-ELLs

Scale Score Comparison

ELP Score History Report

Students Needing Attention

Questions?

Thank you!