USA - Stats Presentation

Preview:

Citation preview

FIBREGLASS GFRP REBAR

FOR CONCRETE

REINFORCEMENT

citysaleservices@gmail.comT: (847)754-7662

Core-samples from Five Bridges using GFRP were

analyzed in High Corrosion Environments, in two studies 5

years apart; the samples were sent to 4 different

laboratories for evaluation, using different test methods;

the bridges were in service up to 15 years.

Joffre Bridge, Sherbrooke, QC, 14 years

Crowchild Trail Bridge, Calgary, AB, 15 years (pictured)

Hall's Harbour Wharf, Hall's Harbour, NS, 12 years

Waterloo Creek Bridge, Vancouver Island, BC, 13 years

Chatham Bridge, Chatham, ON, 15 years

INITIAL GFRP CASE STUDIES IN CANADAINTELLIGENT SENSING FOR INNOVATIVE STRUCTURES REPORT

• Rigorous testing has concluded:- 100+ Year Life Expectancy for GFRP Reinforced Structures.

No Degradation in GFRP Reinforcement

Excellent Bonding

No Debonding

No Microcracking

No Voids

No Glass Transition

No Resin Microcracking

No Glass Fibre Degradation

No Significant Delamination

No Resin Degradation

No Chemical Degradation

No Hydrolysis

CASE STUDY BRIDGE TEST RESULTS

FATIGUE RESISTANCE TEST

60 Ton Loading FixtureA. El-Ragaby , E. F. El-Salakawy and B.

Benmokrane

Steel: 20000 cycles

GFRP: 420000 cycles

Lasts 20x Longer under cyclic Loads

• Truck Traffic, Wave Action, Seismic

Non-Conductive

Non-Magnetic

Minimal Concrete Cover

Fewer Concrete Additives

No Concrete Treatments

No Protective Membranes

No Rebar Coating Repairs

Lightweight

Lower Transport Costs

Less Handling

Fast Installation

Cuts with Chop Saw or Grinding Disc in Seconds

TUF-BAR ADVANTAGES

TUF-BAR® Grid

TUF-BAR APPLICATIONS

Bridge Decks and Barrier Walls

Parking Garages and Concrete Slabs

Power Generation and MRI rooms

Structures Containing Corrosive, Conductivity or Magnetic

Challenges

Dams, Sea Walls, and Marine Applications

In 2010, Intelligent Sensing for

Innovative Structures Canada

updated guidelines for buildingwith GFRP.

In 2006, the Intelligent Structures

of Canada developed a Product

Specification Manual for GFRP

reinforcement for civil application.

GFRP BUILDING MANUALS

CSA code for “Design and

Construction of Building

Components with Fibre-

Reinforced Polymers” Updated in

2012

CSA-S806-12

CSA S6-14 Highway Bridge Design

Code updated for GFRP

Current edition CSA-S6-14

GFRP CODES

2010 CSA-S807 Code Specifications for FRP Rebar:

Mechanical Properties

Physical Properties

Durability Properties

Material Requirements:

Vinyl Ester Resin

E-type Glass or E-CR Fibreglass

USA, ACI Equivalent: ACI 440.6R (2008)

CSA-S807: MANUFACTURING

REQUIREMENTS FOR GFRP REBAR

2006 ACI 440 Guide for Structural

Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars

ACI 440.1R

2009 AASHTO Bridge Design Guide

for GFRP-Reinforced Concrete

Bridge Decks and Traffic Railings

AASHTO GFRP-1

USA GFRP DESIGN GUIDELINES

TUF-BAR is manufactured using;

Owens Corning Advantex ECR Type Glass

In Corrosive environments, Advantex® glass performance is 12

times that of a laminate made with E-glass.

Ashlands - Derakane™ epoxy vinyl ester resin

offers proven excellence in corrosion-resistant fiberglass

reinforced plastic (FRP) applications, including exceptional

durability, superior heat resistance, low maintenance and high

performance for even the most challenging environments.

TUF-BARMANUFACTURED USING NORTH AMERICAN MATERIALS

TUF-BAR - AVAILABLE SIZESBENDS AVAILABLE IN ALL SIZES

• #5 60 Gpa

• #5 40 Gpa

• #4 60 Gpa

• #4 40 Gpa

• #3 60 Gpa

• #3 40 Gpa

• #8 60 Gpa

• #8 40 Gpa

• #7 60 Gpa

• #7 40 Gpa

• #6 60 Gpa

• #6 40 Gpa

NEILS BROOK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

CAPE BRETON HIGHLANDS NATIONAL PARK NOVA SCOTIA

TUF-BAR CANADA PROJECTS

54,000 Feet of GFRP with 7,200 Feet in bent bars.

TEED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

CUMBERLAND COUNTY NOVA SCOTIA

PRECAST DECK SLAB CONSTRUCTION

Over 145,000 feet of GFRP used in total project

TUF-BAR CANADA PROJECTS

MTRs of TUF-BAR GFRP Bars of Size 5. (ASTM D7205)

Example MTR of 5-40 GPa bar

MTR – TEST REPORTS ARE GIVEN WITH EACH LOT MANUFACTUREDThe full test reports with all test results are also available upon request for each LOT

Example MTR of 5-60 GPa bar

Strength Test of TUF-BAR GFRP Bends at bend locations of Size 5. (ASTM D7205)

3rd Party Testing Completed by: Dr. Brahim Benmokrane University of Sherbrooke, Date:

March 12, 2016

Results:

Table 1: Tensile properties of straight portion of TUF-BAR GFRP bent bars size No. 5-40 GPa(Area = 199 mm²)

Specimen Ultimate Load (kN) Tensile strength (MPa) Tensile Modulus (GPa)Ultimate Strain

(%)

1 216 1088 58.3 1.86

2 237 1193 57.3 2.08

3 236 1185 57.7 2.05

4 222 1115 59.0 1.89

5 228 1144 57.2 2.00

6 227 1139 56.4 2.02

7 224 1129 58.0 1.95

8 214 1079 58.8 1.83

Average 226 1134 57.9 1.96

SD 8.2 41.1 0.86 0.09

COV (%) 3.6 3.6 1.48 4.65

BEND TEST RESULTS

Specimens Failure load (kN) Bend Strength (MPa) Strength Reduction Factor (%)

1 224.23 563.40 49.68

2 265.50 667.09 58.83

3 184.15 462.69 40.80

4 206.96 520.01 45.86

5 188.74 474.21 41.82

Average value213.92 537.48 47.40

Standard deviation32.92 82.72 7.29

C.O.V (%)15.39 15.39 15.39

Results:

Table 2 :Tensile Strength at Bend of TUF-BAR GFRP Bars #5 – 40 GPa

BEND TEST RESULTS cont.

Table 3: Tensile properties of straight portion of TUF-BAR GFRP bent bars size No. 5-60 GPa (Area = 199 mm²)

Specimen Ultimate Load (kN)Tensile Strength

(MPa)Tensile Modulus

(GPa)Ultimate Strain (%)

1 247.30 1243 67.22 1.85

2 261.70 1315 69.91 1.88

3 258.65 1300 70.10 1.85

4 251.69 1265 70.15 1.80

5 246.85 1240 68.30 1.82

6 255.71 1285 70.42 1.82

7 232.72 1169 68.59 1.70

8 260.38 1308 69.14 1.89

Average 251.88 1266 69.23 1.83

SD 9.58 48.15 1.12 0.06

COV (%) 3.80 3.80 1.62 3.20

Results: BEND TEST RESULTS cont.

Results:

Table 4 :Tensile Strength at Bend of TUF-BAR GFRP Bars #5 – 60 GPa

Specimens Failure load (kN)Tensile Strength at

Bend (MPa)

Strength Reduction Factor (%)

1 220.15 553.15 43.69

2* 216.23 543.29 42.91

3 226.73 569.67 45.00

4 274.16 688.85 54.41

5 228.25 573.50 45.30

Average value233.10 585.69 46.26

Standard deviation 23.47 58.96 4.66

C.O.V (%) 10.07 10.07 10.07

* failed due to concrete crushing

BEND TEST RESULTS cont.

TUF-BAR - USAContact: Mr. Kevin Brennan(T): (847)754-7662citysaleservices@gmail.com

DESIGN WITH TUF-BAR®

Bridge that didn’t use TUF-BAR®