Upgrade developments in Clermont-Ferrand Romeo Bonnefoy and François Vazeille Tilecal upgrade...

Preview:

Citation preview

1

Upgrade developments in Clermont-Ferrand

Romeo Bonnefoy and François VazeilleTilecal upgrade meeting (CERN, 13 June 2014)

● Handling tools● Deported HV system● Front End readout

2 next talks:● Neutron certification of active Dividers (François Vazeille)● Status report of the FATALIC4 project (Laurent Royer)

2

Handling tools

● Clermont-Ferrand tools operational

Slider at 90° Basket

Alignment on the Girder-Ring:on the free larger Ring

Modifications can be madewith respect to Barcelona services

3

● Not compatible with the Barcelona developments

▪ Patch Panel and Service tools.

▪ No bearing screw on the Slider Strength fully on the Girder Rings.

Strongly screwed

Clermont-Ferrand proposition(Several times explained)

3

▪ Poor and damaging contact of the Slider

Alignment and contact on the small Ringwhere glue and foam are located No accuracy. Damages of the foam.

Responsibilitiesmust be clarified.

● Implementation in the Building 175

HVPragu

e

HVCrate

DCS

HVbus

4Long

HV cables

4Short

HV cables

4Round

Connectors

4Electronics room

Modulearea

HV Crate

HV Bus boardsand HV cables

Deported HV SystemPerformances shown

at the last Tilecal upgrade session

Present option for the tests

5

HV output #16

PragueHV Power Supplyin Building 175

6

DCS monitoringin Building 175

7

8

●Procedure

▪ Connections

● Connect the HV Bus cards outside the Finger.● HV Tesla: Output #16 in the rear part (Ready)● Canbus: this one of the other Tesla modules (Ready).● HV crate LPC: 4 HV outputs connected to 4 HV Blue Multiconductor cables. - Channels 1-12, 13-24, 25-36, 37-48. - Several options playing with four 20 m long cables (Labels 1 to 4) and one 100 m long cable (Label 100 m). - WARNING: put the “black connector loads” in the not used HV crate outputs.

▪ Working● HV crate LPC: Switch on in the rear part (close to the Main).● HV Tesla: select channel #16 on the front part.● DCS Monitor: - Click on HV Module 4 ( Tile Slice Drawer #29). - Switch on and choose the individual HV values as usually with the DCS.

Actions in Blue and Red.

9

Front End readout

Main Board 2-3 Daughter Board

All-in-1

▪ “All-in-1 card “ - The options 2 (Clermont-Ferrand) and 3 (Argonne) have main functionalities in this very Front-End card, using a specific ASIC. - Today: Status report of the option 2 developed by Clermont-Ferrand.

▪ “Main Board 2-3” - Light version because main functions are in the “All-in-1 card”. - Today: Status report of the board suited to the two options and developed by Clermont-Fd.

● General framework

10

● “All-in-1 card”

▪ Version 1 made by Baptiste Joly. - Only one channel: FATALIC 3 (Current conveyor) TACTIC 1 (ADC) DAC (Calibration). - DAC Chicago study (Ordered by 3 bits coming from DB and 2 LVDS commands to start the injection ranges).

▪ Version 2: evolution of Version 1 suited to FATALIC4 (3 TACTIC 2 inside) - Main Board 2-3 LHC clock at 40 MHz. - FATALIC 4 2 gains (2x12bits) on 12 lines LVCMOS 1.6V @80MHz. □ Always the Medium Gain □ High or Low Gain + 2 additional bits: Gain selection, Data synchronization.

11

● “Main Board 2-3”

□ Architecture as close as possible to the Chicago developments (4 FPGA’s), but: no analog signals and no ADC’s. Besides, we take benefit from the Tilecal works with Stockholm DB.

□ Data collection of 12 “All-in-1” (Clermont-Fd) or 12 “QIE” (Argonne). 1 40-pin connector for each “All-in-1” 2 40-pin connectors for each “QIE”, with common and dedicated signals.

□ Developed by Romeo Bonnefoy.

□ Additional “Debug mode” for a readout without DB (USB 2 link at a low data flow).

□ Role of the FPGA’s - To serialize the data. - To make the digital sums (Cs calibration). - To drive control signals.

12

1 singleconnector

per channel

Similar to Chicago:emulate same ADC Chicago signals

Emulate ADC Chicago I2C signals

Same SPI controls

Sameconnector

plus asecond one

(More control signals)

13

● Status and planning

□ “All-in-1” Version 2 (With FATALIC4) - Mid-July: Final lay out, PCB routing, order of components. - End July: order of 14 PCB’s. - End August: reception of 14 PCB’s, order of cabling. - End September: reception of completed PCB’s.

□ “All-in-1” Version 1 -Today status: scheme almost completed but for the choice of the 40-pin connector. - Before end-June: Final lay out, PCB routing, order of components. - End June: order of 2 PCB’s. - Mid-July: reception of PCB’s, cabling at home.

14

□ “Main Board 2-3” -Today status: ◦ Architecture fully defined 4 FPGA ’s Cyclone IV. ◦ Allocation of FPGA pins (with Quartus): OK. ◦ Scheme almost completed ◦ In progress the choice of some components (Example: connectors). ◦ In progress the VHDL code.

- Before End June: Lay out completion and routing, order of some components.   - End June : Order of one PCB. - July: Completion of VHDL code. - Mid-July: Reception of PCB and order of cabling.   - End-August: Reception of completed PCB.

15

□ At home tests of “Main Board 2-3” and “All-in-1”   - End-August: MB + “All-in-1” V1, with USB2 Debug.  - End-September: MB + “All-in-1 ” V2, with USB2 Debug.  - October: Performances of FATALIC4 chips through the MB. - November: Complete set MB + 12 “All-in-1” + Daughter Board + KC705 (or VC707) commercial cards + PC.

□ CERN tests - December (Bldg175): MB + 12 “All-in-1” V2 + Daughter Board. - End 2014 or beginning 2015 (Bldg 175): MB + “QIE” (Argonne). - 2015 : ◦ 4 additional Main Boards. ◦ 36 additional “All-in-1” . ◦ Full tests in Bldg 175 : 4 MB + 45 “all-in-1” + 4 Daughter Boards. ◦ Ready for Test Beam.

Other information from the next talk of Laurent Royer on the

“Status report of the FATALIC4 project”

16

Back up

17

18

Recommended