Ultrasound in Diverticular Disease...Ultrasound in Diverticular Disease Stefan Schanz Evang....

Preview:

Citation preview

Ultrasound in

Diverticular Disease

Stefan SchanzEvang. Krankenhaus Kalk, Köln

Is there a role of Ultrasound in diverticular disease ?

Acute left lower quadrant pain

Criteria for an ideal imaging technique:

broad availabilty

low cost

no side effects

easy and fast carrying-out

repeatable any time

Technique and wall structures

1 mucosa2 musc. mucosae3 submucosa4 muscularis propria5 serosa

layers of the bowel wall

}

thickened bowel wall inCrohn's colitis

Small bowel colonstomach

Requirements for gastrointestinal US

small-parts US probes (5-10 MHz)

colour (power-) doppler

experienced examiner

US in diverticlar disease

longitudinal view

US in diverticulosisHollerweger et al., Ultraschall in Med 2002

number of proofed diverticula n (pts.)sonography colonoscopy

1-5 14 1 (+4)

6-10 3 10

>10 11 17 (+1)

28 33

5 false neg. sensitivity 85%

Criteria for evaluation of diverticulitis

thickening of the bowel wall – "target sign"

hypertrophy of Lamina muscularis

diverticulum – "dome sign"

inflammatory pericolic fat – "pericolitis"

pericolic abcess

US in diverticulitis

US in diverticulitis

US in diverticulitis

97%97%63Soliman et al. 2004

98%94%203Ripollés et al. 2003

97%76%247Moll et al. 2002

100%91%51Alberti et al. 2002

100%91%23*Chou et al. 2001

99%77%102Hollerweger et al. 2001

91%95%22Pisanu et al. 2000

100%95%19Estaban Hernandez et al. 1998

93%84%74Zielke et al. 1997

97%99%74Schwerk et al. 1993

98%98%52Schwerk et al. 1992

100%100%18*Wada et al. 1990

-85%54Wilson & Toi 1990

80%85%123Verbank et al. 1989

98%96%23Federmann 1989

study n senitivity specificity

1148 91% 96%*right-sided diverticulitis

US vs. CT in acute diverticulitisFarag Soliman et al. 2004- prospective study, n = 63

- US & CT exam. within 24 h after admission- results:

11/012(1)12(1)no pathology (n=11)

3/03(0)3(1)gastroenteritis (n=3)

1/11(0)0(0)appendicitis (n=1)

2/23(1)2(0)gynecologic tumor (n=2)

3/32(0)3(0)carcinoma of sigmoid (n=3)

43/2842(0)43(0)diverticulitis (n=43)

follow up/histopathologyCTUSdiagnosis

sensitivity & specificity for CT and US: 97%

limitations of US

large and complex abcess

distal sigmoid involvement

overlap between colonic cancer

and other inflammatory diseases

peridiverticular abscess

perforated carcinoma of the sigmoid

Crohn‘s disease

acute colitis

Advantages of US in diverticular disease

wide availability

diagnostic method with sufficient sens.

low cost

no iodinated contrast material

no side effects (radiation)

examiner = attending physician

Clinical ultrasound

MD

Patient

US

Diagnosis

experience & skill

clinical knowledge(history, physical exam., Lab. values etc. )

plausibilitycontrol

?

Conclusions

US as initial imaging technique in abdominal/pelvic painand suspicion of diverticulitis is highly sensitive

Reserve CT:- in patients with doubtful results in US or- discrepancy between US and clinical evolution- in large abcesses

US as a follow-up imaging technique

"You cannot depend on your eyes

when imagination is out of focus"

Mark Twain

Recommended