Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formationpeople.duke.edu/~jjd/RSNA_USbeamforming.pdf · Ultrasound...

Preview:

Citation preview

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Ultrasound Beamforming and

Image Formation

Jeremy J. Dahl

Duke University Page 1

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Overview

➠ Ultrasound Concepts

➠ Beamforming

➠ Image Formation

➠ Absorption and TGC

➠ Advanced Beamforming Techniques

➛ Synthetic Receive Aperture

➛ Parallel Beamforming

➛ Spatial Compounding

➛ Adaptive Beamforming

Duke University Page 2

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Ultrasonic Imaging

➠ Use acoustic (pressure) waves to form images

➠ Frequency range: 1-20 MHz

➠ Tomographic view: imaging plane is orthogonal to the surface

➠ Pulse-echo imaging

Duke University Page 3

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Ultrasound System

Transducer

Scan Conversion and Display

Signal Processing

Beamformer

− IQ Computation − Magnitude Calculation − Compression − Filtering − Flow Processing − Image Mode Processing

− Summation − Geometric Focal Delays − A/D Conversion − TGC

Duke University Page 4

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Coordinate System

Elevation (y)

Azimuthal (x)

Axial (z)

θ

TransducerElements

Duke University Page 5

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

➠ Ultrasound Concepts

☞ BEAMFORMING

➠ Image Formation

➠ Absorption and TGC

➠ Advanced Beamforming Techniques

➛ Synthetic Receive Aperture

➛ Parallel Beamforming

➛ Spatial Compounding

➛ Adaptive Beamforming

Duke University Page 6

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Transmit Beamforming

τ 1

τ 2

τ 3

τ 4

τ 5

System TimeDelays Scattering Medium

Duke University Page 7

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Receive Beamforming

τ 1

τ 2

τ 3

τ 4

τ 5

ScatteringMedium

Σ

AlignmentSignal

Summed RF Data(RF Line out)

DelaysSystem Time

Duke University Page 8

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

� �� �� �� � � �� �

PhasedLinear

Beams

Transducer Array

Duke University Page 9

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Duke University Page 10

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Fixed Focus Beamforming

Azimuthal Span (mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

−1 0 1

10

15

20

25

30

35−1 0 1

10

15

20

25

30

35

Azimuthal Span (mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

Duke University Page 11

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Fixed Focus Beamforming

(mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

−5 0 5

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

Dep

th (

mm

)

(mm)−5 0 5

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

Duke University Page 12

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Dynamic-Receive Beamforming

System Time Delays

Propagation Direction

Transducer

Duke University Page 13

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Dynamic-Receive Beamforming

Azimuthal Span (mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

−1 0 1

10

15

20

25

30

35−1 0 1

10

15

20

25

30

35

Azimuthal Span (mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

Duke University Page 14

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Dynamic-Receive Beamforming

(mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

−5 0 5

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

Dep

th (

mm

)

(mm)−5 0 5

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

Duke University Page 15

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Aperture Growth and Apodization

Dep

th

ApodizationWeight:

ApertureGrowth:

Time: t t t1 2 3

0

1

0

1

0

1

Unused TransducerElements

Duke University Page 16

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Aperture Growth and Apodization

Azimuthal Span (mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

−1 0 1

10

15

20

25

30

35−1 0 1

10

15

20

25

30

35

Azimuthal Span (mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

Duke University Page 17

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Aperture Growth and Apodization

(mm)

Dep

th (

mm

)

−5 0 5

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

Dep

th (

mm

)

(mm)−5 0 5

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

Duke University Page 18

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

➠ Ultrasound Concepts

➠ Beamforming

☞ IMAGE FORMATION

➠ Absorption and TGC

➠ Advanced Beamforming Techniques

➛ Synthetic Receive Aperture

➛ Parallel Beamforming

➛ Spatial Compounding

➛ Adaptive Beamforming

Duke University Page 19

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Radio-Frequency (RF) Image

Duke University Page 20

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Envelope Detection

Envelope

Signal with Carrier Frequency

Duke University Page 21

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Envelope Detection

π fsin 2 0

fπcos 2 0 +RF Line in

Q

Filter

Filter

processing filtersTo other post−

andMapping

ICompression

2 2

Duke University Page 22

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Duke University Page 23

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Compression and Gray Scale Mapping

➠ The dynamic range of the envelope detected signals is still to large to provide

useful images. Bright targets can drown out the low signals of important

structures.

➠ Compression and gray scale mapping techniques are used to reduce the

dynamic range.

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Duke University Page 24

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Duke University Page 25

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

➠ Ultrasound Concepts

➠ Beamforming

➠ Image Formation

☞ ABSORPTION AND TGC

➠ Advanced Beamforming Techniques

➛ Synthetic Receive Aperture

➛ Parallel Beamforming

➛ Spatial Compounding

➛ Adaptive Beamforming

Duke University Page 26

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Absorption

➠ Not all of the transmitted ultrasonic energy is reflected. In fact, most of the

transmitted energy is absorbed by the tissue. The typical rate of absorption

of ultrasonic energy is 0.5 decibels per centimeter per Megahertz.

➠ For example, an acoustical pulse at 5 MHz that travels 10 cm into tissue loses

25 dB of it’s signal strength (in other words, is about 1/18th of the original

amplitude).

➠ Absorption is frequency dependent: The higher the frequency, the greater

the absorption. Although resolution is better at the higher frequencies, the

penetration of the ultrasound signal is not as good as the low frequencies.

Duke University Page 27

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

5.7 MHz 8.0 MHz 10.0 MHz

Duke University Page 28

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Time-Gain Compensation (TGC)

➠ Time-gain compensation is used to counteract the effects of absorption. Gain

is applied to the signal as a function of time (or distance).

➠ Manufacturers apply pre-determined TGC to the ultrasonic signals, however

still allow the user some control of the gain with depth.

➠ Gain can be applied down to reasonable depths depending on the frequency.

At some point, however, the SNR of the signal is so low that applying any

TGC only serves to amplify noise.

Duke University Page 29

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Without TGC With TGC

Duke University Page 30

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Advanced Beamforming Techniques

➠ Synthetic Receive Aperture

➠ Parallel Beamforming

➠ Spatial Compounding

➠ Adaptive Beamforming

Duke University Page 31

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Synthetic Receive Aperture

➠ Synthetic receive aperture imaging emulates a larger transducer when a sys-

tem’s available beamforming channel count is smaller than the number of

elements in the transducer.

➠ The beamforming is considered synthetic because multiple transmits are

used to construct the beam as if it were received on the entire transducer

at once.

Duke University Page 32

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Second TransmitFirst Transmit

Transmitting

Receiving

Transmitting and Receiving

Duke University Page 33

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Parallel Receive Beamforming

➠ Parallel receive beamforming, also known as “Explososcanning,” is a method

of beamforming that forms multiple receive beams from a single transmit

event.

➠ In parallel receive beamforming, a broad transmit beam is fired, and multiple

receive beams are formed within the bounds of the transmit beam.

➠ Parallel receive beamforming is used to increase frame rate. This is most

useful when the imaging deep within tissue, or real-time 3-D imaging is de-

sired.

Duke University Page 34

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

TransmitBeam

Receive Beams

Transducer

Duke University Page 35

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Spatial Compounding

➠ All ultrasound images suffer from coherent noise, called speckle. Speckle

results from the constructive and destructive wave interference of reflections

from sub-resolution scatterers, and gives the image a grainy appearance.

➠ Speckle reduces the visible resolution by a factor of 10.

➠ Spatial compounding is a means by which the effects of speckle can be re-

duced.

Duke University Page 36

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Spatial Compounding

➠ In spatial compounding, multiple images of the same target are averaged in

order to reduce the coherent noise.

➠ Each image must contain uncorrelated speckle patterns.

➠ Many ways to obtain uncorrelated speckle patterns:

➛ Divide the transducer into small sub-apertures

➛ Change the steering angle of the beams

➛ Physically translate the transducer

➛ Change the transmit frequency

Duke University Page 37

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

pNormalp Spatial Compounding

Duke University Page 38

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Adaptive Beamforming

➠ Up to this point, we’ve assumed that the sound speed in human tissue is a

constant (1540 m/s).

➠ This is just an average of the soft tissue sound speed.

Duke University Page 39

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Adaptive Beamforming

➠ Because the sound speed can change from tissue to tissue, AND because

the thickness of these tissues vary from location to location, the sound wave

used for ultrasonic imaging can become distorted.

➠ The distortion in the sound wave is called ABERRATION in adaptive beam-

forming.

➠ In adaptive beamforming (also called adaptive imaging) we attempt to com-

pensate the beamformer for the aberration.

Duke University Page 40

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Adaptive Beamforming

➠ Some of the effects of aberration

➛ Reduced image brightness

➛ Loss in resolution

➛ Obscured targets

➛ Image artifacts

Duke University Page 41

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Control Aberrated

Duke University Page 42

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Adaptive Beamforming

➠ Many methods have been created to compensate for aberration.

➠ They generally fall into two classes, based on the model of aberration used:

➛ Near-field phase-screen models

➛ Distributed aberration models

Duke University Page 43

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

The Near-Field Phase Screen Model

Σ

τ

τ

τ

τ

τ

5

4

3

2

1

Scattering Medium

Phase ErrorSignal Misalignment −

Summed RF

Phase−ScreenNear Field

System TimeDelays

Data

Duke University Page 44

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

A Distributed Aberration Model

Σ

τ

τ

τ

τ

τ

5

4

3

2

1

Summed RFData

System TimeDelays

Mid−RangePhase−Screen

Propagation of Distorted Wavefronts

ScatteringMedium

Duke University Page 45

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Aberrated Corrected

Duke University Page 46

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Challenges in Adaptive Beamforming

➠ Requires access to the channel signals. Most manufacturers do not provide

access to these signals. In addition, the volume of data created by the chan-

nel signals is extremely large.

➠ Significant computational effort.

➠ Low frame rates - relatively few have attempted to make adaptive beamform-

ing work with real-time imaging.

Duke University Page 47

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation

Thank You

Questions?

Duke University Page 48

Recommended