UKOLN is supported by: Evidence, Impact, Metrics Social Web Services: Evidence for Their Value Brian...

UKOLN is supported by:

Evidence, Impact, Metrics Social Web Services: Evidence for Their Value

Brian Kelly

UKOLN

University of Bath

Bath, UK

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/eim-2010-12/http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/eim-2010-12/

This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat)

Twitter:#ukolneim

Acceptable Use PolicyRecording this talk, taking photographs, discussing the talk using Twitter, IM, etc. is permitted if distractions to others are minimised.

Acceptable Use PolicyRecording this talk, taking photographs, discussing the talk using Twitter, IM, etc. is permitted if distractions to others are minimised.

Blogs: Twitter:http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/ @briankellyhttp://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/evidence-impact-metrics/ @ukwebfocus

(automated)

TimetableTime Content

Beyond The Institution: Evidence of the Value of Could Services and the Social Web

13.30-13.45 Social Web Services: Profiling Early Adopters [BK]

13.45-14.05 Case Study 1: iTunes U: is it Worth it?, Jeremy Speller, UCL

14.05-14.25 Case Study 2: Media Services in the Cloud, Sarah Sherman, Bloomsbury Consortium

14.25-15.00 A Framework for Gathering and Using Metrics for Use of Social Web and Cloud Services

15.00-15.15 Coffee

15.15-15.40 Report Back

15.40-15.50 Action plans

15.50-16.00 Conclusions

2

3

Beyond The Institution

Cloud and Social Web services:• Provision of content delivery services • Popular & well-used• Free institutional effort (& tax-payers money) to do

other work• Must-use solution in today’s technical/economic

context

Or:• Selling our users’ eyeballs to advertisers• Risky – services may not be sustainable • Dangers of lock-in and deferred costs • Must avoid – need to be able to own & manage

key technical infrastructure

Intr

od

uct

ion

Today’s SessionRelevance of Cloud & Social Web services for today:

• Determined by evidence (not advocacy)• Social Web can be cost-effective:

How? How much What are savings? What are the intangible benefits? …

4

Scenarios:Headline 1: Unis waste millions on in-house social media when free services available!Headline 2: Students pay £9,000 p.a. to watch YouTube video & chat on Facebook!

Surveys of Facebook usage in UK HEIs• “In Nov 2007 76

hits for ‘university’ including Aston, Cardiff, Kent and UCLan”

• See post on “UK Universities On Facebook”

• 31 comments; discussion on ‘unauthorised’ claims

5

Intr

od

uct

ion Benchmarking: Facebook

8,000 today

Benchmarking: Facebook

6

Seven months later:• “Revisiting UK University

Pages On Facebook” post,16 June 2008

• Identified 8 most ‘popular’ UK University on Facebook

7,539

1,116

2,976

“I still can’t see any hard data that justifies time and effort spent in managing data natively inside facebook”

• Post published 4 days after news that Fb is now most popular Social Network

• Marketing potential trumps Fb concerns?

Benchmarking: Facebook “Planet Facebook Becomes Less of a Walled Garden” survey in October 2010:• Revisiting institutions from 2008 survey• Significant growth in Cardiff (13,000%),

Surrey (540%) & OU (380%)

7

“I still can’t see any hard data that justifies time and effort spent in managing data natively inside facebook”Is:

• The hard data now available• Supportive data available which needs further

analysis?

Benchmarking: iTunes U“What Are UK Universities Doing With iTunes U?”• Survey published in

Oct 2010• 16 UK colleges with

iTunes U presence • Comments on

perceived benefits (cost, audience, ease-of-use, downloads, …)

8

Discussion on openness; lock-in & costs – but not on evidence of ROI

Benchmarking: YouTube Edu

“How is the UK HE Sector Using YouTube?”• Survey published

Oct 2010• 16 institutions

with official presence

• Page provides stats on visits, nos. of videos, downloads, fans, comments, ….

9

Benchmarking: YouTube Edu

Note blog post led to discussions on best practices; other institutional & departmental channels, …

10

Other Work (1)Small-scale monitoring of use of personal tools:

• UK Web Focus blog registered on Technorati and Wikio

11

• Usage statistics for slides on Slideshare

Other Work (2)Small-scale monitoring of use of personal tools:

• Twitter stats using various service (e.g. Twitoaster)

• Bit.ly for stats on clicks from tweets

12

13

Questions

Any questions or comments?

Next two case studies:• “iTunes U: is it Worth it?”, Jeremy Speller • “Media Services in the Cloud”, Sarah Sherman

13:45-14.25

Discussion

Initial approach has been recording evidence of:• Early adopters• Usage and related statistics• Indications of purpose(s) of services• Trends (for Facebook growth)

What next:• More comprehensive surveys across

sector (who does this?, how?, why?)• Alternative / complementary approaches?• How to relate to impact and value?

14

Note: Informed by case studies

Scenario for DiscussionPVC requests evidence of value of institutional use of Cloud Services including the Social Web following tabloid headlines

You need to identify:• Ways of gathering such evidence• Ways of interpreting such evidence• Concerns regarding dangers of (mis-)use of such

evidence• Opportunities provided in aggregation of such

evidence

15 14:25-15.00

16

Questions

Any questions or comments?