Tulsa Bike Share July 21 st, 2015 Vision Presentation
Preview:
Citation preview
- Slide 1
- Tulsa Bike Share July 21 st, 2015 Vision Presentation
- Slide 2
- Bike Share Operating Experience
- Slide 3
- Advisory Committee
- Slide 4
- Movable/modular Permanently mounted Smart lock bikes
Minneapolis Nice Ride Hamiltons Social Bicycles Miamis DecoBike
Evolution of Available Technologies
- Slide 5
- Phasing Map with GO Plan draft networks
- Slide 6
- Local residents looking to fulfill trips too long to walk &
not convenient to drive/take transit for various reasons Business
District commuters needing to do lunch hour errands College
students needing a ride within or beyond campus Visitors and
tourists accessing Tulsas various destinations Likely Tulsa User
Profiles
- Slide 7
- Vision Goals New Balance Hubway in Boston Health - Improved
individual and community health thru active transportation But when
researchers factored in the health benefits derived from physical
activity, they estimated that 12.28 deaths could be avoided every
year. Governing Economic development - green jobs, improved access
to businesses and helping to brand the city In Washington, DC, more
than eight out of ten said they were more likely to visit a
business, shop or restaurant with easy access to a bike-sharing
dock. Governing
- Slide 8
- Vision Goals Quality of Life Improves the quality of life for
Tulsans last years United States Conference of Mayors concluded:
"communities that have invested in pedestrian and bicycle projects
have benefited from improved quality of life, healthier population,
greater local real-estate values, more local travel choices, and
reduced air pollution. The Economist Attracting and retaining
workforce Early adopters are young professionals Populations aged
25 34 years old represent the largest group of bike share users.
Transportation and Connectivity - Supplements the transit system
Bike share can provide an opportunity to close gaps within a
transit system and to provide the last mile connection between
peoples homes and places of work (or school) and vice versa.
- Slide 9
- Who will own, administer, and operate the system? Zotwheels,
U.C. at Irvine Denver B-Cycle What are the pros & cons of
different ownership options? Business Models
- Slide 10
- 24 stations and 216 bikes, implemented in 2 phases
Owned/operated by a nonprofit (process starting now, implementation
within 18-24 months) Phase 1 and 2 of the system is expected to
cost $3.2 - $3.8 million over five years Projected revenue is
$93,000 (year 1) to $270,000 (year 5) per year Revenues will
provide 40-50% of the operating fees, but will need to be defrayed
by $2.3 $2.9 million in gap funding over the five-year period
System Summary
- Slide 11
- Cost and Funding Options More typical split is roughly 3:1 2:1
public/private dollars
- Slide 12
- Presentations to Stakeholders Stakeholders can be
funders/supporters: Tulsa Hub, Tulsa Health Dept., ONEOK, Williams
Companies, Warren Foundation, Zarrow Foundation, Lobeck Taylor
Foundation, Tulsa City- County Library, United Way, CommunityCare,
etc. Crossover from Advisory Committee
- Slide 13
- Thank you! Jennifer Haddaway, Transportation Resource Center
Coordinator jhaddaway@incog.org