View
216
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Tularemia Outbreak at an International Airport, 2006Diseases in Nature Transmissible to ManJune 12, 2007J L Alexander, TDSHS Zoonosis Division
R Gilliland, USDA Wildlife ManagementD Duke, COA Environmental HealthM McGee, COA Animal ControlJM Richardson, COA Public HealthTA West, COA Emergency ManagementJR Pierce Jr, Amarillo Bi-City-County Health District
20 dead jackrabbits found along this 0.6 mi section of road
Identifying the zoonotic outbreak 05/16/06: An employee of the USDA Wildlife
Management observed a large number of dead jack rabbits on airport property.
05/17/06: The Regional Zoonosis Control veterinarian collected blood specimens and ticks from dead animals
05/18/06: CDC laboratory identified Francisella tularensis as the etiologic agent involved in the deaths
Public Health Response 05/18/06 - Closure of property; notification of
airport officials; suspension of mowing 05/19/06:
Notification of adjacent property owners and FBI Public Health Advisory to area physicians and
veterinarians Texas Health Alert Advisory Press release
Warning public of tularemia in rabbits near airport Not to handle rabbits Use insect repellant Signs and sxs of tularemia
Environmental Health and Animal Control Response 05/22/06
Begin applying tick/flea pesticides to grass Rabbit reduction program begins
05/23/06 – 05/30/06 Additional specimens submitted Broadened insecticide program
Tularemia positive specimens from airport property, 2006 Jackrabbit (Lepus californicus)
Coyote (Canis latrans)
Skunk (Mephitis mephitis)
Ticks (Haemaplysalis leporipalustris)
(Dermacentor variabilis)
Follow-up response 06/01/06 – PROMED post Next week - several calls from citizens about
dead rabbits; multiple media inquires 06/22/06 – second wide-area application of
tick and flea powder to airport property By 06/23/06 – 1300 rabbits eliminated;
subsequent tests of animals (including prairie dogs) all negative; intense reduction program closed
09/07/06 – repeat testing of rabbits negative 01/01/07 – maintenance program initiated
Tularemia - Affected Mammals
Sylvilagus floridanus, “Eastern Cottontail”
Lepus californicus, “Black-tailed Jackrabbit”Prairie Dogs
These animals are more likely to be affected through the terrestrial cycle of F. tularensis ssp. tularensis (Type A)
Tularemia - Affected Mammals
Beaver
Muskrat Vole
These animals tend to be affected through the water-borne cycle of F. tularensis ssp. holarctica (Type B)
Tularemia - Affected Arthropods
Ticks, mosquitoes, the deer fly and other biting arthropods serve as vectors for F. tularensis in its transmission to humans and animals.
Tularemia - Transmission to Humans
• Insect bite by tick, mosquito or deer fly.
• Skin contact with infected animal products, most notably rabbits, hares, and rodents.
• Ingestion of contaminated food or water.
• Inhalation of live bacteria by aerosolization of infected material.
Wildlife Strikes at Airports Reported wildlife strikes have more than
quadrupled from 2,066 in 1990 to 9,017 in 2005.
Over this time period, 172 people were injured, 9 died, and $233 million were lost as a result of incidents with wildlife.
Strikes increasing due to more flights, increased wildlife populations, more wildlife near airports, and more reports from pilots
Sources: FAA National Wildlife Strike Database; Mutzabaugh, Ben. “Today in the Sky.” USA Today. 28 February 2007
Wildlife Strikes at Airports
United States Total Wildlife Strikes
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005
Year
Str
ike
s
Note: 2007 data includes up to 2/28/07 Total Strikes: 88,198
Source: FAA National Wildlife Strike Database
Wildlife Strikes at Airports
Source: Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports: A Manual for Airport Personnel
Source: Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports: A Manual for Airport Personnel
Coyotes and Airports
Chino, CA -- “Coyotes on Runways: Animals Endanger Airplane Landings” In four separate instances in
April 2007, pilots reported spotting coyotes on the runways.
One pilot aborted his landing and did a go-around.
Chicago – “Coyotes Slinking Around O’Hare Cause Problems” Two pilots were waved-off from
their landings at O’Hare in February 2007.
Coyotes and Airports
In October 2005 a 19-passenger Beechcraft hit a coyote on takeoff, causing the nose gear to collapse and the plane to be declared as a total loss.
In October 1994 a small plane struck a coyote. The nose gear collapsed and the propeller hit the
runway. Resulted in major damage to the engine and
crankshaft.
Sources: Mutzabaugh, Ben. “Today in the Sky.” USA Today. 28 February 2007; Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports: A Manual for Airport Personnel
Coyotes and Airports - Potential Consequences
The presence of a coyote on the runway can be disastrous for a pilot whose natural instinct is to swerve, resulting in a wing going too low and the plane crashing or in the eruption of a fire.
An animal on a runway could be sucked into an engine or hurled through a windshield.
If the strike occurs at the critical phase of landing, a coyote could be smashed by the main gear, causing major damage and possibly changing the path of the aircraft.
Coyote Strikes at Airports
Coyote Strikes by Year
0
10
20
30
40
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Year
Str
ike
s
United States
Note: 2007 data includes up to 2/28/07 Total Strikes: 303
Source: FAA National Wildlife Strike Database
Coyote Strikes at Texas Airports
Texas Coyote Strikes
0
2
4
6
8
2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
Strik
es
Note: 2007 data includes up to 2/28/07 Total Strikes: 12
Source: FAA National Wildlife Strike Database
Texas Coyote Strikes
Dates: January 1990 – February 2007
Number of Strikes: 26
Source: FAA National Wildlife Strike Database
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 139.337 If an aircraft carrier experiences a multiple wildlife
strike or substantial damage from striking wildlife, a Wildlife Hazard Assessment is triggered.
Species-specific population management Food and prey management Vegetation, water, and building management
Wildlife Hazard Control Measures Repel Capture Kill
Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports: A Manual for Airport Personnel
Federal law does not protect terrestrial mammals, reptiles, or other wildlife taxa (e.g. deer, coyotes).
A shooting program may be used to remove specific problem animals or to kill one or more to reinforce repellent techniques.
Lethal neck snare traps can also be used on coyotes.
Source: Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports: A Manual for Airport Personnel
Rabbit & Coyote Population Dynamics A rule-based rabbit-coyote biological model predicts
that with the elimination of coyotes, the rabbit population will increase.
Source: Ledgard, Henry. “An Introduction to VSE: The Visual Software Environment.”
Rabbit & Coyote Population Dynamics Short-term removal effort of coyotes had no effect
on the population of other species, including cottontail rabbits.
Long-term removal efforts (>9 months) caused increases in jackrabbit population. A 2-year removal program in Texas resulted in a 320%
increase in jackrabbit population density. A study in Utah which used interaction models that
mimicked field observations showed that decreased coyote population densities result in increases in jackrabbit abundance.
Source: Henke, Scott. Effects of Coyote Control on Their Prey: A Review. Coyotes in the Southwest: A Compendium of Our Knowledge. San Angelo, TX. 13-14 December 1995.
Rabbit and Coyote Reduced numbers of coyotes as evidenced by fewer
scat counts resulted in increased numbers of rabbits, especially when coyote scat counts are zero or near zero.
Stapp P. Small Mammal Studies. Shortgrass Steppe Long-term Ecological Research. 2005. http://sgs.cnr.colostate.edu/
Amarillo airport zoonotic events In 2004, a natural increase in the rabbit
population began, which attracted coyotes. In 2004 a rabbit was "ingested" by a
commercial airplane engine during landing justifying the population reduction program.
A coyote and rabbit control program was initiated in May 2004
By the end of 2004, approx 15 coyotes and 301 jackrabbits had been removed
Amarillo airport zoonotic events In August 2005 the rabbit population at the
airport began to increase, this time without any natural predation.
In 2005, 513 rabbits were removed. The rabbit population continued to increase
until the tularemia die-off in May, 2006. Over 3500 rabbits have been removed since
the initiation of this program 3 years ago.
Acknowledgements
Thomas Gerald, TTUHSC Research Associate Contributors from the field
Rick Gilliland, USDA Wildlife Management Deree Duke, COA Environmental Health Mike McGee, COA Animal Control J Matthew Richardson, COA Public Health Theresa West, COA Emergency Management
Fellow Investigator Dr. James Alexander, TDSHS
Recommended