TQIP Basics for TMDs and TPMsweb2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Nathens_Orientation to Reports and...

TQIP Basics for TMDs and TPMs: Orientation to reports & drill down tools Avery Nathens, MD, PhD, FACS

Objectives • How to get the most out of your reports • When and how to drill down to get more

information • How to use TQIP to complement your PI

program • More details in “Reading between the

lines”

Report contents

• Facility characteristics • Aggregate patient/injury

characteristics • Risk adjusted analysis

• Mortality • LOS

• Contextual analysis on patient cohorts

Contextual analysis • Informative data presented by center to understand

how care is delivered for specific types of patients

TBI ICP monitoring

Tracheostomy timing Timing of death (withdrawal of care)

Elderly Timing to OR for Rx of hip fractures Timing of death (withdrawal of care)

Pelvic fractures Use of angiography

Shock (Time to hemorrhage control) (Transfusion practices)

Isolated blunt splenic injury Splenic preservation Angiography LOS – ICU, hospital

expected line

Confidence interval

O/E < 1

Better than expected

O/E > 1

Worse than expected

Caterpillar graphs Risk-adjusted outcomes

Caterpillar graphs Risk adjusted outcomes

Odd centers

Even centers

Use the data to tell a story TBI Mortality

Excess length of stay

ICP monitoring

Time to death

Are we providing futile care?

Tracheostomy practices in TBI

Disposition after Tracheostomy

Do we have a problem with end of life care?

TQIP Online • Secure site for data drill down • Patient lists for investigation of patients in TQIP

to help explain outcomes and TQIP results

TQIP participant portal www.acstqip.org

TQIP Online Patient Lists

TQIP Patient Lists • Every patient record submitted to TQIP

• Patient/injury characteristics • Ensure the data we have is what you have

• Discharge status • Alive/dead • TQIP probability of survival

• Identifies unexpected survivors or deaths • Guides your PI process

Accessing your patient lists

Click on a patient ID to see more

Patient details

Individual patient

Export data for further analysis

TBI report Patient ID Age Lived / Died Estimated probability

of death (%)

15476 17 LIVED 0.19 23645 17 LIVED 0.21 55555 21 LIVED 0.22 32112 32 LIVED 0.24 12421 21 LIVED 0.49 15734 31 LIVED 0.64 42157 43 LIVED 0.65 24125 45 LIVED 0.66 34512 51 LIVED 0.67 11221 45 LIVED 0.67 12412 46 LIVED 0.68 21453 64 LIVED 0.73 12345 45 DIED 0.8 54781 26 LIVED 0.8 63521 47 LIVED 0.81

Unexpected death

• 45 yo male, transferred in after a fall • No trauma team activation • SBP 134, HR 110, RR 18, T 37, GCSm 6 • Small subdural, small contusion and

subgaleal hematoma • Awaiting disposition • Cardiac arrest without return of cardiac

function

TBI report

Patient ID

Age Lived / Died

Probability of Death TBI

12999 78 LIVED 10.07 21125 74 LIVED 10.12 32115 83 LIVED 10.23 12451 56 LIVED 10.26 21212 17 DIED 10.8 13178 79 LIVED 11.17 11182 78 LIVED 11.21 27531 27 LIVED 11.24 23755 83 LIVED 11.33

Unexpected death • 17 yo, fell hit head, transferred in from

elsewhere • SBP 135, HR 45, T 34.5, GCSm 3 • No trauma team activation • CT ~45 min after arrival – blew pupil

• Epidural hematoma • Evacuated • Large PCA infarct postop

• Care withdrawn

Shock report Patient ID Age Lived /

Died Probability of Death

Shock 13331 34 LIVED 22.53 13214 20 LIVED 45.8 21341 28 DIED 48.57 15423 28 DIED 56.22 25252 54 LIVED 57.46 23232 55 DIED 61.85 32324 41 DIED 74.89 12129 39 LIVED 78.38 19874 27 DIED 79.61 19751 82 DIED 85.91 17922 83 DIED 91.25 18678 62 DIED 95.36 54218 62 DIED 95.6

Unexpected survivor • 39 yo male, run over by garbage truck, transported

by land with an ED SBP of 58 on a Monday morning

• Bilateral pneumo, pulmonary contusions • Sternocostal dissociation, multiple rib fractures, • Splenic & liver laceration - laparotomy, packed • Pelvic fracture, extraperitoneal packing + angio • Extraperitoneal bladder rupture • Extensive degloving abdominal wall, left groin,

lower extremity • Traumatic AKA

Unexpected survivor

• Massive transfusion protocol activated • Within a few hours: 32u RBC’s, 24 u FFP’s,

cryo, platelets • Guided by frequent labs & input from

transfusion medicine

• Why did he survive? • Transfusion medicine is a weekday service

Process evaluation • Virtually impossible to compare practices

across institutions without data • Challenging to effect change without

knowledge of where you stand • Timing of fracture fixation • ICP monitoring • Use of angiography

• Evaluate practice in relation to outcome • e.g. timing of tracheostomy & pneumonia

Summary

• Data from TQIP reports can be used as a “dashboard warning light” • There is a problem, but where??

• There is more to TQIP reports than the data in the tables and graphs • Use the data to tell a story

• TQIP online can complement your existing PI processes

Summary

• Drill downs at the patient level should complement your existing PI processes • Identify unexpected deaths

• Evaluate the other end of the bell curve – unexpected survivors • A source of positive feedback for the team • Identify factors that lead to favorable

outcomes

Summary

• Drill downs provide good overview of your patients and practices

• Practice evaluation a major component of a drill down

• Practices evolve as a result of many factors • Resources • Right people • Tradition • Patients

• Drill downs at the patient level should complement your

existing PI processes • Identify unexpected deaths

TQIP Basics for TMDs and TPMsweb2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Nathens_Orientation to Reports and...

Documents

Texas TQIP Collaborative Initiative...11 Texas TQIP Collaborative Initiative TQIP Collaborative Trauma Medical Director Job Function Review the data to define high performers and gain

14 - facs.org

Surgery is a great career - facs.org

CONSORTIUM - facs.org

Kaiser Permanente Interregional Collaborativeweb2.facs.org/download/Fuchshuber_3.pdf · Kaiser Permanente Interregional Collaborative Pascal Fuchshuber MD, ... Kaiser Permanente

Measures for Processes of Careweb2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Nance_Pediatric TQIP Program...Pediatric TQiP: Development and Roll out Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Annual

Building Collaboratives: Engaging State Health Authorityweb2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Ashley_Engaging State Health... Final.pdfEngaging State Health Authority. Dennis W. Ashley, MD.,

Role of the Trauma Medical Director - American College of ...web2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Davis_Role of the TMD Final.pdfhealthy culture and good outcomes. All data regarding outcomes

ACS TQIP Best Practices in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury

The Geriatrician in the Trauma Serviceweb2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Wong_Geriatrician in... · Geriatric Trauma Consultation Service Implementation • all patients 65 years or older

TQIP and MOC, Credentials and Licensing, and PFPweb2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Malangoni_TQIP and MOC...© American College of Surgeons 2013. All rights reserved Worldwide. TQIP and

FEATURES - facs.org

External Data Validation - web2.facs.orgweb2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Morgan_External Data Validation Final.… · • Reinforce data validation as a national standard • Identify

Mixed methods: Integration of qualitative & quantitative ...web2.facs.org/ORC2014Flashdrive/MATERIALS/... · Mixed methods: Integration of qualitative & quantitative data collection

Presented at 2015 TQIP conference expertsweb4.facs.org/TQIPFiles/2016 Ortho BPG Webinar Slides.pdf · 2016-03-21 · • A mangled extremity has an injury to three of the four major

Alicia Mangram, MD, FACS Medical Director, Trauma Services ...web2.facs.org/tqipslides2012/Mangram_Creating an Elderly Trauma … · “G60” Geriatric Trauma Service 2013 John C

NSP Sample Creation - facs.org

ACS TQIP - w3.mccg.org

Univariate Analysis: Comparing means, medians, and proportionsweb2.facs.org/ORC2014Flashdrive/MATERIALS/OBJECTIVES... · 2014-12-11 · Univariate Analysis: Comparing means, medians,

ACS TQIP GERIATRIC TRAUMA MANAGEMENT …web4.facs.org/tqipfiles/Geriatric Guide tqip.pdfexpert panel rated lists of protocols and practices to improve trauma care among elderly patients